| Literature DB >> 35021194 |
Alon Kaplan1, Hila Zelicha1, Anat Yaskolka Meir1, Ehud Rinott1, Gal Tsaban1,2, Gidon Levakov3,4, Ofer Prager4, Moti Salti4, Yoram Yovell5, Jonathan Ofer4, Sebastian Huhn6, Frauke Beyer7, Veronica Witte7, Arno Villringer7, Nachshon Meiran3, Tamar B Emesh3, Peter Kovacs8, Martin von Bergen9, Uta Ceglarek10, Matthias Blüher11, Michael Stumvoll11, Frank B Hu12,13, Meir J Stampfer12,13, Alon Friedman4,14, Ilan Shelef1,2, Galia Avidan3,4, Iris Shai1,12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of diet on age-related brain atrophy is largely unproven.Entities:
Keywords: Green Mediterranean diet; age-related atrophy; aging; dietary intervention; hippocampal occupancy score; neurodegeneration; polyphenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35021194 PMCID: PMC9071484 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Clin Nutr ISSN: 0002-9165 Impact factor: 8.472
FIGURE 1Flowchart of Brain DIRECT PLUS (Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial Polyphenols Unprocessed Study). Green-MED diet, Mediterranean diet higher in polyphenols and lower in red/processed meat; HDG, healthy dietary guidelines; MED, Mediterranean diet.
Baseline characteristics by intervention group (for the entire population and for participants aged ≥50 y at baseline)[1]
| Entire cohort ( | ≥50 y of age ( | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entire | HDG ( | MED ( | Green-MED diet ( | Test statistic, | Entire | HDG ( | MED ( | Green-MED diet ( | Test statistic, | |
| Anthropometric parameters | ||||||||||
| Age (median) | 51.1 ± 10.6 (49.9) | 51.2 ± 10.6 | 51.5 ± 10.5 | 50.4 ± 10.9 | 0.9, 0.65 | 60.0 ± 7 (58.9) | 59.6 ± 6.0 | 59.8 ± 7.4 | 60.8 ± 7.7 | 0.4, 0.8 |
| Sex, % male of study population | 88.4 | 87.5 | 88.4 | 89.2 | 0.1, 0.93 | 88.5 | 86.3 | 87.5 | 92.5 | 0.9, 0.63 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 31.2 ± 3.9 | 31.3 ± 3.8 | 31.3 ± 3.9 | 31.1 ± 3.9 | 0.4, 0.81 | 30.9 ± 3.4 | 31.1 ± 3.2 | 31.3 ± 3.7 | 30.1 ± 3.2 | 3.1, 0.21 |
| Weight, kg | 93.6 ± 14.4 | 92.8 ± 14.8 | 94.8 ± 13.5 | 93.3 ± 15.0 | 1.9, 0.37 | 90.9 ± 12.1 | 90.4 ± 11.8 | 93.3 ± 11.7 | 88.5 ± 12.7 | 2.8, 0.25 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 109.7 ± 9.5 | 109.9 ± 10.3 | 110.1 ± 9.6 | 109.0 ± 8.7 | 1.2, 0.54 | 109.1 ± 7.6 | 109.3 ± 8.6 | 110.0 ± 6.92 | 107.8 ± 6.8 | 2.8, 0.24 |
| Systolic BP, mm Hg | 130.4 ± 14.1 | 130.3 ± 14.4 | 130.4 ± 12.3 | 130.6 ± 15.4 | 0.02, 0.98 | 134.1 ± 14.8 | 133.6 ± 14.6 | 133.5 ± 12.7 | 135.4 ± 17.6 | 0.2, 0.81 |
| Diastolic BP, mm Hg | 81.1 ± 10.3 | 80.2 ± 11.4 | 81.9 ± 8.9 | 81.4 ± 10.6 | 0.7, 0.51 | 81.4 ± 10.8 | 79.9 ± 11.9 | 82.8 ± 9.4 | 81.5 ± 10.8 | 0.9, 0.42 |
| Blood biomarkers | ||||||||||
| Glucose, mg/dL | 102.1 ± 17.3 | 102.1 ± 17.9 | 100.6 ± 13.4 | 103.5 ± 20.1 | 0.4, 0.82 | 106.1 ± 18.3 | 106.5 ± 20.1 | 104.1 ± 15.1 | 108.0 ± 19.4 | 0.6, 0.74 |
| HOMA-IR | 3.7 ± 2.3 | 4.0 ± 2.8 | 3.7 ± 1.9 | 3.6 ± 2.1 | 0.4, 0.81 | 3.7 ± 2.2 | 4.1 ± 2.7 | 3.6 ± 2.0 | 3.3 ± 1.8 | 2.1, 0.34 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 190.6 ± 33.4 | 192.6 ± 36.1 | 194.3 ± 31.7 | 184.7 ± 31.6 | 2.2, 0.11 | 190.1 ± 36.1 | 191.3 ± 41.1 | 191.0 ± 34.6 | 187.3 ± 31.6 | 0.2, 0.85 |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | 46.0 ± 11.7 | 45.6 ± 11.4 | 46.9 ± 11.0 | 45.5 ± 12.6 | 1.9, 0.39 | 48.3 ± 12.5 | 48.3 ± 12.2 | 48.8 ± 11.9 | 47.6 ± 13.8 | 0.9, 0.62 |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 125.7 ± 31.1 | 127.4 ± 32.4 | 127.2 ± 31.4 | 122.5 ± 29.5 | 0.7, 0.47 | 124.1 ± 33.6 | 125.4 ± 36.2 | 123.4 ± 33.8 | 123.3 ± 30.6 | 0.1, 0.94 |
| Triglycerides, mg/dL | 145.6 ± 64.7 | 151.4 ± 69.2 | 152.7 ± 66.3 | 132.2 ± 56.0 | 4.4, 0.11 | 141.1 ± 61.0 | 141.3 ± 62.6 | 146.9 ± 67.6 | 133.6 ± 50.2 | 0.3, 0.86 |
| | 15.7 | 18.1 | 11.7 | 17.4 | 1.7, 0.42 | 15.8 | 15.7 | 16.7 | 15.0 | 0.05, 0.98 |
| MRI-derived brain anatomical parameters | ||||||||||
| Hippocampal occupancy score | 0.86 ± 0.1 | 0.86 ± 0.1 | 0.86 ± 0.1 | 0.86 ± 0.1 | 0.3, 0.88 | 0.83 ± 0.1 | 0.84 ± 0.1 | 0.84 ± 0.1 | 0.82 ± 0.1 | 0.4, 0.82 |
| Lateral ventricle volume, cm3 | 25.3 ± 13.5 | 24.4 ± 11.8 | 24.6 ± 12.0 | 27.0 ± 16.2 | 0.7, 0.71 | 30.0 ± 15.9 | 29.3 ± 13.1 | 28.8 ± 12.9 | 32.5 ± 21.5 | 0.1, 0.97 |
| Hippocampus volume, cm3 | 8.3 ± 0.9 | 8.2 ± 0.81 | 8.4 ± 0.8 | 8.4 ± 1.0 | 0.8,0.47 | 8.0 ± 0.9 | 8.0 ± 0.7 | 8.1 ± 0.9 | 7.8 ± 0.9 | 0.8, 0.45 |
Values are mean ± SD for continuous variables and n (%) for categorical variables, unless otherwise stated. P value according to ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. A total of 284 participants had an available brain MRI scan at baseline. ApoE-ε4 was considered positive if there was 1 APOE-ε4 allele (only 1 participant had 2 alleles). BP, blood pressure; Green-MED diet, Mediterranean diet higher in polyphenols and lower in red/processed meat; HDG, healthy dietary guidelines; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; MED, Mediterranean diet.
FIGURE 2LVV and HOC across age at baseline. n = 284. Brain MRI-derived data were quantified and segmented in a fully automated manner using NeuroQuant. A change in slope was significant at age 50 y (P-nonlinear trend < 0.0001 for both, analyzed by spline regression). HOC, hippocampal occupancy score; LVV, lateral ventricle volume.
FIGURE 3Dynamics in volume of different brain structures after 18 mo of lifestyle intervention [DIRECT-PLUS (Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial Polyphenols Unprocessed Study), n = 224]. (A) Individual response of change in HOC (% of change). A decrease in HOC is represented by black lines, an increase in HOC by blue lines. Among all participants who completed the study with 2 valid MRI brain scans, 148 (66%) exhibited a decrease in HOC after 18 mo. (B) Unbiased standard MRI template brain volume for the normal population, the distance of 4 slices or 4 mm between coronal cross-sections. The color represents the relative change (%) in volume of all available brain structures across the entire cohort and in participants ≥ 50 y of age. The analysis was corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (0.05) method. (C) Changes in lateral ventricle volume (red) and hippocampal volume (blue) after 18 mo. Hippocampal atrophy and lateral ventricle expansion were significantly more prominent in older participants than in younger participants (P < 0.001 for both). The slice location is y = 96 in ab unbiased standard MRI template. (D) The relative decrease in HOC was significantly more prominent in older participants than in younger participants (cutoff = age 50 y, P < 0.001, independent-sample t tests). HOC, hippocampal occupancy score.
FIGURE 4The effect of 18-mo dietary interventions on MRI-derived brain volume structures. (A) No significant difference in change in HOC (from baseline) between groups of the entire study population. The HDG and the MED group participants had a significant decrease in HOC. In contrast, participants in the Green-MED group did not have a significant change in HOC after 18 mo of intervention. (B) Compared with the HDG group, the Green-MED group had attenuated LVV expansion across the entire study population. (C, D) Among participants ≥ 50 y of age, both the MED and Green-MED diet groups demonstrated less HOC decline and LVV expansion than the HDG group. The analysis was performed with general linear modeling. Comparisons of changes in HOC and LVV between intervention groups were analyzed using Bonferroni correction for 3 comparisons. The age-by-group interaction was significant for change in HOC (P-interaction = 0.017) and marginal for change in LVV (P-interaction = 0.07). The time-by-group interaction in change in HOC was significant among participants ≥ 50 y old (P-interaction = 0.032). *Significant change from baseline within groups. **Significant difference between groups. Green-MED diet, Mediterranean diet higher in polyphenols and lower in red/processed meat; HOC, hippocampal occupancy score; LVV, lateral ventricle volume; MED, Mediterranean diet.
Associations of 18-mo MRI-derived changes in HOC and LVV with changes in anthropometric measurements and blood biomarkers[1]
| 18-mo relative change in HOC | 18-mo relative change in LVV | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entire | Age ≥ 50 y | Entire | Age ≥ 50 y | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| ∆Weight | 0.008 | 0.904 | −0.211 | 0.027 | 0.233 | <0.001 | 0.411 | <0.001 |
| ∆BMI | 0.011 | 0.875 | −0.21 | 0.028 | 0.226 | 0.001 | 0.392 | <0.001 |
| ∆Waist circumference | 0.02 | 0.769 | −0.11 | 0.254 | 0.213 | 0.001 | 0.246 | 0.009 |
| ∆Systolic BP | −0.145 | 0.034 | −0.175 | 0.069 | 0.139 | 0.041 | 0.134 | 0.195 |
| ∆Diastolic BP | −0.142 | 0.038 | −0.171 | 0.075 | 0.232 | 0.001 | 0.182 | 0.056 |
| ∆HOMA-IR | −0.111 | 0.108 | −0.301 | 0.002 | 0.147 | 0.031 | 0.231 | 0.015 |
| ∆Triglycerides | −0.011 | 0.869 | −0.206 | 0.032 | 0.086 | 0.202 | 0.084 | 0.381 |
| ∆Cholesterol | −0.017 | 0.799 | −0.052 | 0.590 | −0.035 | 0.606 | −0.088 | 0.360 |
| ∆HDL-C | −0.037 | 0.592 | 0.015 | 0.878 | −0.087 | 0.198 | −0.116 | 0.225 |
| ∆LDL-C | −0.01 | 0.879 | 0.024 | 0.808 | −0.03 | 0.658 | −0.104 | 0.277 |
Univariate correlation matrix of 18-mo relative change in MRI HOC and LVV and 18-mo changes in selected parameters of the entire cohort and in participants who were ≥50 y of age at baseline. Brain MRI-derived data were quantified and segmented in a fully automated manner using NeuroQuant. The analysis was performed using Pearson or Spearman correlation, depending on the variable distribution. BP, blood pressure; HDL-C, HDL cholesterol; HOC, hippocampal occupancy score; LDL-C, LDL cholesterol; LVV, lateral ventricle volume.
FIGURE 5Relative change in HOC according to specific “green” dietary components (age ≥ 50 y). (A) Weekly walnut consumption: low was defined as ≤2/wk (n = 28), medium as 3–4/wk (n = 33), and high as ≥5/wk (n = 47). (B) Daily green tea consumption: low was defined as ≤1/d (n = 4), medium as 2/d (n = 6), and high as ≥3/d (n = 22). (C) Mankai consumption: low was defined as <3/wk (n = 12), medium as 4–6/wk (n = 13), and high as daily (n = 7). All analyses were performed for data from older participants of the study population (age ≥ 50 y). Mankai and green tea consumption were measured and analyzed only for the Green-MED diet (Mediterranean diet higher in polyphenols and lower in red/processed meat) group. All analyses were nonparametric. HOC, hippocampal occupancy score.