Ajeet Kumar Kaushik1, Jaspreet Singh Dhau2, Hardik Gohel3, Yogendra Kumar Mishra4, Babak Kateb5, Nam-Young Kim6, Dharendra Yogi Goswami7. 1. NanoBioTech Laboratory, Department of Natural Sciences, Division of Sciences, Art, & Mathematics, Florida Polytechnic University, Lakeland, Florida 33805, United States. 2. Molecule Inc., Tampa, Florida 33612, United States. 3. Applied AI Research Lab, University of Houston Victoria, Victoria, Texas 77901, United State. 4. Mads Clausen Institute, NanoSYD, University of Southern Denmark, Alsion 2, 6400 Sønderborg, Denmark. 5. National Center for NanoBioElectronics, Brain Mapping Foundation, Brain Technology and Innovation Park, Society for Brain Mapping and Therapeutics, Pacific Palisades, California 90272, United States. 6. RFIC Bio Center, Department of Electronics Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, South Korea. 7. Clean Energy Research Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States.
Abstract
To manage the COVID-19 pandemic, development of rapid, selective, sensitive diagnostic systems for early stage β-coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) virus protein detection is emerging as a necessary response to generate the bioinformatics needed for efficient smart diagnostics, optimization of therapy, and investigation of therapies of higher efficacy. The urgent need for such diagnostic systems is recommended by experts in order to achieve the mass and targeted SARS-CoV-2 detection required to manage the COVID-19 pandemic through the understanding of infection progression and timely therapy decisions. To achieve these tasks, there is a scope for developing smart sensors to rapidly and selectively detect SARS-CoV-2 protein at the picomolar level. COVID-19 infection, due to human-to-human transmission, demands diagnostics at the point-of-care (POC) without the need of experienced labor and sophisticated laboratories. Keeping the above-mentioned considerations, we propose to explore the compartmentalization approach by designing and developing nanoenabled miniaturized electrochemical biosensors to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus at the site of the epidemic as the best way to manage the pandemic. Such COVID-19 diagnostics approach based on a POC sensing technology can be interfaced with the Internet of things and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques (such as machine learning and deep learning for diagnostics) for investigating useful informatics via data storage, sharing, and analytics. Keeping COVID-19 management related challenges and aspects under consideration, our work in this review presents a collective approach involving electrochemical SARS-CoV-2 biosensing supported by AI to generate the bioinformatics needed for early stage COVID-19 diagnosis, correlation of viral load with pathogenesis, understanding of pandemic progression, therapy optimization, POC diagnostics, and diseases management in a personalized manner.
To manage the COVID-19 pandemic, development of rapid, selective, sensitive diagnostic systems for early stage β-coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) virus protein detection is emerging as a necessary response to generate the bioinformatics needed for efficient smart diagnostics, optimization of therapy, and investigation of therapies of higher efficacy. The urgent need for such diagnostic systems is recommended by experts in order to achieve the mass and targeted SARS-CoV-2 detection required to manage the COVID-19 pandemic through the understanding of infection progression and timely therapy decisions. To achieve these tasks, there is a scope for developing smart sensors to rapidly and selectively detect SARS-CoV-2 protein at the picomolar level. COVID-19 infection, due to human-to-human transmission, demands diagnostics at the point-of-care (POC) without the need of experienced labor and sophisticated laboratories. Keeping the above-mentioned considerations, we propose to explore the compartmentalization approach by designing and developing nanoenabled miniaturized electrochemical biosensors to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus at the site of the epidemic as the best way to manage the pandemic. Such COVID-19 diagnostics approach based on a POC sensing technology can be interfaced with the Internet of things and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques (such as machine learning and deep learning for diagnostics) for investigating useful informatics via data storage, sharing, and analytics. Keeping COVID-19 management related challenges and aspects under consideration, our work in this review presents a collective approach involving electrochemical SARS-CoV-2 biosensing supported by AI to generate the bioinformatics needed for early stage COVID-19 diagnosis, correlation of viral load with pathogenesis, understanding of pandemic progression, therapy optimization, POC diagnostics, and diseases management in a personalized manner.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19 pandemic; Internet of things; artificial intelligence; diseases management; infectious diseases; point-of-care; smart diagnostics; smart sensing
Since the first case was reported by Chinese physicians in late 2019, the
β-coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2) has
resulted in a life-threatening respiratory infectious disease
(COVID-19)[1−4]
which is continuously affecting socio-economic aspects along with national
financial policies.[5,6] Medical health experts and the medical
administration of Wuhan municipal health committee observed unexpected
pneumonia emerging by unknown causes and unknown ways for dealing and
handling it.[3,4] The number of affected patients started growing
rapidly, and the actual reason was unknown to prescribe a suitable therapy.
The early investigation ruled out seasonal flu, and medical officials
started making efforts to figure out the actual reason.[7]
Several investigations confirmed that these respiratory syndrome related
symptoms are emerging drastically due to the coronavirus
infection.[8,9] This virus has crown-like spikes on their surface
(Figure A,B) and is
categorized in seven groups as (1) 229E (α coronavirus), (2) NL 63
(α coronavirus), (3) OC43 (β human coronavirus), (4) HKU1
(β human coronavirus), (5) MERS-CoV (β human coronavirus that
causes the middle east respiratory syndrome, or MERS), (6) SARS-CoV-1
(β human coronavirus that causes the severe acute respiratory
syndrome, or SARS), and (7) novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), a new strain,
confirmed by the World Health Organization (WHO), which caused the COVID-19
pandemic. People generally get infected with α and β
coronavirus, but in certain circumstances that can evolve into a new strain
leading to new disease patterns. SARS-CoV-2 is an example of this such
evolution.
Figure 1
(A) Microscopic image of SARS-CoV-2 [Courtesy: National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, U.S. National Institutes of
Health (NIAID-NIH)], (B) color enhanced transmission electron
microscopic image of SARS-CoV-2 virus isolated from a patient
[Courtesy; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIAID-NIH)], and
(C) illustration of aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2 virus protein.
Reprinted with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2020 Author Sui Huang.
(A) Microscopic image of SARS-CoV-2 [Courtesy: National Institute
of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, U.S. National Institutes of
Health (NIAID-NIH)], (B) color enhanced transmission electron
microscopic image of SARS-CoV-2 virus isolated from a patient
[Courtesy; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIAID-NIH)], and
(C) illustration of aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2 virus protein.
Reprinted with permission from ref (10). Copyright 2020 Author Sui Huang.In the unprecedented present situation and considering the severity of a
rapidly increasing respiratory disorder associated with the SARS-CoV-2
virus, efforts were made to release advisories and guidelines mainly based
on self-protection or protecting each other (Figure C) to avoid human-to-human (H2H) transmission
through the use of an appropriate mask-based effort for social and
profession involvements.[10−13]
The association of SARS-CoV-2 virus spreading through aerosolization and
droplet methods has been proven, and using a very simple mask, made of
simple cloth (cotton, silk, and so on) or of disposal surgical purpose, can
reduce infection risk significantly.[14−16] Besides, having a careful practice
of sanitization and social/physical distance is also among the top
recommendations of experts.[17] The COVID-19 disease became
an epidemic as a declared international health emergency in a short period
of time because of its immediate adverse effect on the respiratory system,
especially in the immune-compromised population.[8]
SARS-CoV-2 virus, which easily transmits H2H,[18] via
contact and aerosol droplets, has a novel strain more active site (S1
protein) to bind with host cells’ receptors, i.e.,
angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2).[19] COVID-19
infection was declared as a pandemic by WHO[20] because it
has affected more than 30.0 million people in 227 countries and
approximately 30% of cases belong to the United States of America (USA).
Since then, efforts are being made to investigate virus structure profiling,
virus life cycle, infection pathways, functional sites useful for
therapeutics discovery, and pathogenesis.[9]Due to several unanswered encounters such as asymptomatic carriers (silent
carriers),[21] unknown virus strain categories, and
unpredicted virus mutation,[22] the investigation of
therapeutics and diagnostics to manage COVID-19 have emerged as very
challenging.[23] Keeping these aspects in view, this
report explores the potential of a timely investigation of affordable,
sensitive, and selective detection and diagnostics of SARS-CoV-2 virus
infection.[24] In a combination of artificial
intelligence (AI), such a SARS-CoV-2 sensor can be managed to perform
personalized COVID-19 diagnostics in desired conditions and locations.
Before describing COVID-19 diagnostics aspects, trends in the fundamentals
of SARS-CoV-2, recommended advisories, and nanoenabled strategies to manage
COVID-19 are also discussed briefly.[6]
Toward Exploring SARS-CoV-2 to Understand COVID-19
After preliminary advisories, efforts were being made to understand the
SARS-CoV-2 categories, mutations, strains, and structure. Such
bioinformatics is very useful to explore pathogenesis, mechanism on
infection progression, and identification of functional sites and to design
therapeutics. In this direction, the phylogenetic network of SARS-CoV-2
genome was analyzed by Forster et al. and they claimed the existence of
three variants (types A, B, and C, as illustrated in Figure
), differentiated on the basis of amino
acid changes.[25] In this research, 160 complete human
SARS-CoV-2 genomes were analyzed, and outcomes confirmed that type B is
significant in East Asia, and both types A and C are associated with
COVID-19 in Europe and the USA. The outcomes of this research are useful to
understand the evaluation and mutation of SARS-CoV-2 in humans.[25]
Figure 2
Phylogenetic expression of SARS-CoV-2 virus analyzed using 160
genomes. Reprinted with permission from ref (25). Copyright 2020 The
Authors under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0,
published by PNAS.
Phylogenetic expression of SARS-CoV-2 virus analyzed using 160
genomes. Reprinted with permission from ref (25). Copyright 2020 The
Authors under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0,
published by PNAS.In order to develop an effective vaccine, diagnostics, and therapeutics
antibodies, Wrapp et al. have investigated cryo-EM structures of the CoV
spike (S) glycoprotein.[26] The authors utilized 3.5 Å
resolution cryo-EM to investigate SARS-CoV-2 S trimer in the perfusion
conformation (Figure A). The
outcomes of this research based on biophysical and structural evidence
suggested that SARS-CoV-2 S form binds with ACE2 with higher affinity in
comparison to SARS-CoV-2 S form. These claims were validated using available
monoclonal antibodies specific to SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain (RBD)
proteins. This newly investigated SARS-CoV-2 S structure will be useful to
develop medical countermeasures (MCMs) to fight against the COVID-19
epidemic.[26] Further, Yan et al. explored the
cryo-EM high-resolution structure of full-length human ACE2. In this
research, docking was performed in the presence of a neutral amino acid
transporter with or without the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 S protein. The outcome of
this research confirms that RBD is recognized by the extracellular peptidase
domain of ACE2 through polar residues. This investigation is useful to
explore the molecular basis for coronavirus recognition and
infection.[27] These findings were useful to
introduce a computational approach for exploring the function site of the
virus. Han and Kral explored a computational approach to investigate
possible ACE2-based peptide inhibitor (Figure B).[28] These inhibitors
were suggested as a potential therapeutic to manage COVID-19
diseases.[28]
Figure 3
(A) Cryo-EM structure of SARS-CoV-2 S in the perfusion
conformation. Presentation of SARS-CoV-2 primary structure
showing color domains that were excluded from ectodomain
contract or unable to visualize. (B) Computational-based
approach for the designing of ACE2-based peptide selective as
SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors Reprinted with permission from ref (28). Copyright 2020
American Chemical Society.
(A) Cryo-EM structure of SARS-CoV-2 S in the perfusion
conformation. Presentation of SARS-CoV-2 primary structure
showing color domains that were excluded from ectodomain
contract or unable to visualize. (B) Computational-based
approach for the designing of ACE2-based peptide selective as
SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors Reprinted with permission from ref (28). Copyright 2020
American Chemical Society.To develop effective and efficient COVID-19 therapeutics, it becomes very
essential to have the best understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 entry pathway,
virus lifecycle, and therapeutic site to be targeted.[29]
The SARS-CoV-2 has enveloped virions (virus particles) that measure
approximately 120 nm in diameter.[8] It has been
investigated that both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 are very much similar on a
structural level, sharing 77.5% of their amino acid sequence,[30] with reference to coronavirus genomic profiling. For
transmission and infection, SARS-CoV 2 spike (S) protein binds with ACE2
enzyme and TMPRSS2 protein of the host cell in humans, as described by
Hoffmann et al. as illustrated in Figure A.[31] This recent investigation suggests
that the S protein of SARS-CoV 2 can be a key target site to develop
monoclonal antibodies and therapies. Targeting/blocking SARS-CoV 2 S
protein-ACE2 enzyme/or both TMPRSS2 proteomes interaction can also be useful
to inhibit virus progression and when developing vaccines and drugs.[30]
Figure 4
(A) Illustration of SARS-CoV-2 virus binding with ACE2 and TMPRSS2
receptor justifying virus entry in human and
further presentation of coronavirus life cycle
confirmed using nanopore-based high-resolution gene mapping of
SARS-CoV-2. Reprinted with permission from ref (31), Copyright 2020
American Chemical Society. (B) Treatment strategies investigated
by WHO based on clinical trials to explore possible steps
(numbered) in the coronavirus replication cycle. Reprinted with
permission from ref (36).
Copyright 2020 American Association for the Advancement of
Science.
(A) Illustration of SARS-CoV-2 virus binding with ACE2 and TMPRSS2
receptor justifying virus entry in human and
further presentation of coronavirus life cycle
confirmed using nanopore-based high-resolution gene mapping of
SARS-CoV-2. Reprinted with permission from ref (31), Copyright 2020
American Chemical Society. (B) Treatment strategies investigated
by WHO based on clinical trials to explore possible steps
(numbered) in the coronavirus replication cycle. Reprinted with
permission from ref (36).
Copyright 2020 American Association for the Advancement of
Science.Further, efforts were made to explore the life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 to define
the cell-uptake mechanism and process of viral replication, as shown in
Figure A,[31] on the basis of the investigation of Kim et al.[32] The
research explained the mechanism of the SARS-CoV-2 life cycle involving the
following steps: (1) S1 protein SARS-CoV-2, a single-stranded RNA-enveloped
virus, binds with host cell receptors and then after the envelope of the
virus peeled off integrates with genomic RNA present in the cytoplasm. (2)
In this process, ORF1a and ORF1b of genomic RNA translated into pp1a and
pp1ab proteins, respectively. (3) Protease takes place, wherein pp1a and
ppa1b proteins make nonstructural proteins, such that a total of 16 forms
formed a (+) strand genomic RNA template based replication/transcription
complex, i.e., RNA polymerase (RdRp). (4) these (+) strand genomics served
as genomes of the new virus particle wherein subgenomic RNAs translated into
structural protein units (S, envelope, membrane, and nucleocapsid protein)
of a viral particle. (5) These protein units merge with an endoplasmic
reticulum to form a nucleoprotein complex via combination of nucleocapsid
protein with (+) strand genomic RNA. (6) Finally nucleoprotein complexes
merge together to form complete virus particle in the endoplasmic
reticulum-Golgi apparatus region, which further expelled to the
extracellular region of vesicle. This nanopore-based high-resolution gene
mapping research of SARS-CoV-2 involved a functional investigation of the
unknown transcripts and RNA modifications.[32] The outcomes
of this research successfully explored gene and associated mechanisms of
viral gene fusion. Such informatics which explained the life cycle and
pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 were needed to design and develop diagnostics
and therapeutics to combat against the COVID-12 pandemic.[32]Exploring the SARS-CoV-2 virus structure, virus entry mechanism, and genomic
profile become essential for designing new therapeutics and optimizing a
therapy based on the available drugs.[4,33] The schematic of
SARS-CoV-2 potential drug targeting concerning the viral life cycle is
illustrated in Figure B,
well-explained by Sanders et al.[34] and supported
scientific evidence.[35,36] It was well-understood that developing an
appropriate therapy for managing COVID-19 would be a time-consuming
procedure, so WHO and other agencies recommended the exploration of
available antiviral drugs such as remdesivir (for Ebola), chloroquine (or
its derivative as hydroxychloroquine, developed for malaria), and a
combination of anti-HIV drugs (lopinavir and ritonavir) in combination with
interferon β (an immune system messenger and useful for virus
crippling). None of these drugs emerged as a potential therapeutic solution
but were acceptable up to an extent. Every in-practice drug has side effects
as well, and the studies later confirmed that ingestion emerged more
dangerous than SARS-CoV-2-related effects. Adverse effect of anti-COVID-19
drugs on the lungs, heart, and eyes have been reported. In addition, the
following three alternative therapies—(1) corticosteroids (decreases
host inflammatory response but causes lung injury and ARD), (2)
immunomodulatory or anticytokine (monoclonal antibody-based approach to
knock down SARS-CoV-2 and to boost up immune systems), and (3)
immunoglobulin therapy (convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulins
collected from recovered patient found useful to clear virus)—were
also recommended as potential alternatives.[34] These
approaches have shown good results at initial stages; however, experts
suggested extensive and elaborate studies to optimize therapeutic agents of
purity in scaling up a facility to promote them for COVID-19 management.Along with exploring effective drug and alternative therapies based on
investigated SARS-CoV-2 genomic profiling, parallel efforts are also
developing vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 to manage
COVID-19.[33,37] Keeping this in view, the development of around 90
vaccines using various approaches is under process and some of them are in
line for FDA approval. Around seven groups have started exploring the
efficacy of vaccine formulation into human volunteers or animals to explore
safety, efficacy, and selectivity.State-of-the-art vaccines developed against SARS-CoV-2, categories of vaccines,
therapeutics mechanisms, and aspects to promote them for COVID-19 management
are summarized by Callaway[35] and Amanat along with
Krammer.[38] The outcomes of studies conducted by
Callaway,[35] based on the finding of Le et
al.,[33] proposed an array of vaccines (Figure ) and confirmed eight
investigated ways associated with vaccines to provide immunity to
SARS-CoV-2. It suggested having vaccines as a therapy due to long-term
effects which certainly will reduce morbidity and mortality if SARS-CoV-2
integrates with the human genome to stay permanently in the
system.[33,38]
Figure 5
Roadmap of vaccine development against SARS-CoV-2: Array of
vaccines proposed on the basis of WHO–COVID-19 vaccines
landscape.
Roadmap of vaccine development against SARS-CoV-2: Array of
vaccines proposed on the basis of WHO–COVID-19 vaccines
landscape.
Trends in COVID-19 Pandemic Management
Managing COVID-19 is not only a respiratory-related challenge but the severity
of SARS-CoV-2-associated infection is emerging in a different scenario that
affects organ functions, including injury, which leads to damage and failure
as well. Studies have demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 can attack anything in
the body and cause devastating consequences including death.[39] To suggest appropriate diagnostics, therapy, and
monitoring, presently efforts are being made to understand how the virus
kills, i.e., the ferocious rampage through the body (from the brain to toe)?
When inhaled via nose or throat, SARS-CoV-2 interacts with receptor ACE2, an
enzyme known to regulate blood pressure. Once it enters in cells, SARS-CoV-2
hijacks functional machinery to replicate and expedite viral infection. As
virus is replicating, the symptoms such as fever, dry cough, sore throat,
loss of smell, and head/body ache appear within a week. This is a situation
where the immune system needs to attack back to eradicate SARS-CoV-2;
otherwise, the virus can move down to the lungs, where it can turn deadly as
the lungs’ respiratory tree, rich in ACE2 receptors, which keep
feeding SARS-CoV-2. Over time, SARS-CoV-2 keeps replicating by consuming the
blood oxygen, even though battling with immune cells, and causes
respiratory-related syndromes. As COVID-19 infection progresses, the oxygen
concentration in blood keeps decreasing and the patient develops a condition
of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), a condition where breathing
becomes very difficult.[39]Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 has shown various adverse effects regarding various organs
as follows: (1) lung (a cross-section of the lung showed that immune cells
crowded in an inflamed alveolus, or air sac, whose walls break down from the
SARS-CoV-2 attack and diminishing oxygen uptake (Figure
A(a,b)), (2) health and blood vessels
SARS-CoV-2 enters those cells lining blood vessels through binding with ACE2
receptors and as a result, viral infection promoted blood clots, heart
attacks, and cardiac inflammation), (3) brain (SARS-CoV-2 can transmigrate
to the brain through the nasal route and COVID-19 infected patients
exhibited strokes, seizures, confusion, and brain inflammation; therefore,
efforts are being made to establish a correlation between SARS-CoV-2 level
and brain tissues function, injury, and damage (Figure
A(c)); (4) eyes (COVID-19 patients have
exhibited conjunctivitis; (5) nose (COVID-19 infected patients lose their
sense of smell because SARS-CoV-2 can move up through the nasal route to
damage cells); 6) liver (almost 50% of COVID-19 patients have shown serious
liver problems due to combating against SARS-CoV-2 and ingestion of drugs in
excessive doses; (7) kidney (a very common and serious issue among COVID-19
patients which may cause death; SARS-CoV-2 virus attacks kidneys directly
and results in kidney failure due to a whole-body event with plummeting
blood pressure); (8) intestines (biopsy of COVID-19 patients suggested that
SARS-CoV-2 infects the lower gastrointestinal tract, as it is rich in ACE2
receptors, to cause diarrhea).[39]
Figure 6
(A) Lung and brain damage from SARS-CoV-2 [SARS-CoV-2 caused
extensive damage (yellow, as predicted 3D modeling using a
computerized tomography scans) on the lungs of a 59-year-old man
who died due to diseases severity (a) and MRI images analysis of
a 58-year-old woman with COVID-19 showed encephalitis which
causes brain tissue damage (b)]. Reprinted with permission from
ref (39). Copyright 2020
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (B) CRISPR
Cas9-based gene-edited strategy proposed to recognize and
eradicate mutated genome. This approach can be useful for
selective detection and diagnostics of COVID-19. Reprinted with
permission from ref (45).
Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
(A) Lung and brain damage from SARS-CoV-2 [SARS-CoV-2 caused
extensive damage (yellow, as predicted 3D modeling using a
computerized tomography scans) on the lungs of a 59-year-old man
who died due to diseases severity (a) and MRI images analysis of
a 58-year-old woman with COVID-19 showed encephalitis which
causes brain tissue damage (b)]. Reprinted with permission from
ref (39). Copyright 2020
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (B) CRISPR
Cas9-based gene-edited strategy proposed to recognize and
eradicate mutated genome. This approach can be useful for
selective detection and diagnostics of COVID-19. Reprinted with
permission from ref (45).
Copyright 2020 Elsevier.On the basis of the above outcomes, experts suggested that the lungs are ground
zero for SARS-CoV-2 but COVID-19 affects organ systems from the brain to
blood vessels.[39] Thus, managing COVID-19 needs a lot of
testing (decided based on patient symptoms), careful symptoms analysis
(because SARS-CoV-2 is affecting several organs at the same time), and
optimization of therapy-based available therapeutics options. Developing
COVID-19 specific therapy is now a futuristic approach, but exploring
biotechnology and nanotechnology to manage SARS-CoV infection becomes the
focus, as briefly discussed in this section.In the clinical setup, there are several molecular bioassay based diagnostics
tools, mainly PCR and ELISA, to detect MERS and SARS virus protein.[40] Considering the possibilities of the SARS-CoV-2 virus
spreading via travel, thermal-based screening is in practice at airports.
Thus, very efficient thermal cameras have been installed at public places
and are also recommended as a very rough and preliminary qualitative
screening method. However, as of now, there is no available diagnostics tool
for COVID-19 diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 detection at a specified and public
place. Considering pandemic management aspects in view, presently efforts
are being made to achieve the followings tasks: (1) developing novel
therapeutics of desired efficacy, (2) exploring new strategies to recognize
and eradicate the virus, (3) exploring nanoscience and nanotechnology to
design and develop protective units such as nanoenabled masks, and (4)
miniaturized diagnostics tools to manage targeted and mass detection,
contact tracing, and big data analytics to introduce AI for optimization and
selection of management-related parameters.[41]International health agencies including WHO and the Center for Disease Control
(CDC) have requested experts of universities, research institutes,
electronics and biomedical companies, and the pharma sector to accelerate
efforts to investigate new biomarkers to early stage COVID-19 diagnostics.
However, molecular bioassays, mainly RT-PCR, are in present practice for
SARS-CoV-2 detection at the initial stage and imaging technology, mainly
CT-scan for conformation of COVID-19 infection. Recently WHO and CDC have
issued guidelines to collect biological samples of COVID-19 infected
patients for diagnostics application and patient protocols, especially with
the symptoms of other diseases such as pneumonia, asthma, tuberculosis, and
heart, etc. These approved safety and precaution guidelines are globally
accepted for both patients and helping health workers.[42,43] As a result,
the patient got better testing along with an appropriate follow-up. Besides,
these guidelines will minimize the possibilities of COVID-19 spreading among
health workers who are front line warriors and need a very safe working
environment.To manage an infectious disease-related pandemic that involves millions of
people, who may be in big cities, towns, and urban areas, there exists a
cost-effective need for therapeutics of higher efficacy and protective
component, rapid, and sensitive diagnostics systems. Such efficient
diagnostics tools are also suggested to perform at the site of the location,
which requires special attention and focus. Shen et al. have summarized the
prospects of nucleic acids-based prototypes and possible strategies for
COVID-19 diagnostics.[44] The authors suggested paying
attention for developing a real-time (RT), loop-mediated isothermal
amplification (LAMPS)–vertical flow (VF)- and CRISPR-associated
enzyme Cas 13/12-based platform, namely, specific high-sensitivity enzymatic
reporter unlocking (SHERLOCK),[45] to detect RNA and
DNA[44] (Figure B).[45]Parallelly, several efforts are also being made to explore the mechanism of
virus pathogenesis which required accelerated efforts to design and develop
biomarker and selective recognition of SARS-CoV-2 virus protein. Such
biomarkers can be used to develop analytical for selective and rapid
detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus protein. The continuous monitoring of COVID-19
emerged as essential because the RT-PCR test was surprisingly positive for
three out of four patients who recovered from COVID-19.[46]
The scope of developing analytical tools, such as an efficient biosensor,
and related possible strategies is discussed in the next section.Besides molecular biology, sincere efforts are also being made to explore
functional nanomaterials, micro-/nanoelectronics, numerical simulations, and
algorithms to predict or optimize strategies for COVIS-19 management. One
such approach is to explore nanomaterials for trapping and eradication of
SARS-CoV-2 virus via using masks,[16] fabricated
specifically with N95 requirements and a very normal version for everyday
use. Making an efficient mask to avoid or minimize H2H transmission is
presently the focus at fundamental and translational aspects.[48] However, the selection of a fabric which can trap the
virus is crucial due to a lack of fundamental knowledge. Thus, assessment of
filtration efficiencies of suitable fabrics such as cotton or cloth, the
choice of nanomaterials-embedded membranes is essential if the targeted
application concerns SARS-CoV-2 aerosolized at varying 10 nm to 10 μm
particulates sizes. Konda et al.[47] fabricated an
efficient three layers mask alone or in a combination of cotton, silk,
chiffon, and flannel fabrics to trap a particulate of <300 nm (efficiency
varies from 5 to 85%) to >300 μm (efficiency varies from 5 to 90%)
(Figure A). The outcomes of
this research suggested that an optimized combination of layers can exhibit
filtration efficiency of 80–90% due to mechanical and
electrostatic-assisted filtration. Herein selected materials are
biocompatible, easily available, and of tunable membrane size via managing
thread size.[47] Thus, required scaling up is possible as
per requirement and desired filtration efficiency. However, the use of three
layers may cause some sensation of suffocation which needs to be optimized
before recommending for managing respiratory-related diseases such as
COVID-19. In this direction, various masks made of cloth (cotton, wool,
synthetic, synthetic blend, and synthetic/cotton blend) were developed to
evaluate their efficiency to filter nanoscale aerosol (50–825 nm).
Such cloths masks (Figure B) have
successfully slowed down the spread of SARS-CoV-2 virus considering the case
of virus transmission through the aerosol process.[11] The
results of this study suggest that the charge on the cloth material does not
affect the filtration efficiency. However, the quality of yarn, i.e.,
fabrication process, yarn count, and so on, affects the filtration
efficiency. Thus, significant research is still required to investigate
efficient masks which can trap the SARS-CoV-2 virus protein without causing
any notable breathing problems.
Figure 7
(A) Designing of a nanoenabled mask to avoid the SARS-CoV-2
spreading via aerosolization. Reprinted with permission from ref
(47). Copyright
2020 American Chemical Society. (B) Illustration of cloth-based
mask to trap the SARS-CoV-2 virus protein. Reprinted from ref
(11). Copyright
2020 American Chemical Society.
(A) Designing of a nanoenabled mask to avoid the SARS-CoV-2
spreading via aerosolization. Reprinted with permission from ref
(47). Copyright
2020 American Chemical Society. (B) Illustration of cloth-based
mask to trap the SARS-CoV-2 virus protein. Reprinted from ref
(11). Copyright
2020 American Chemical Society.Eradication of SARS-CoV-2 virus on the surfaces via a trapping and killing
approach also suggested exploration Having this as a focus, Van Doremalen et
al. evaluated the stability of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1, isolated from
various strains, in aerosols of various particle sizes onto plastic,
cardboard, stainless steel, and copper surfaces via assessing decay
rates.[49] In a humanized environment SARS-CoV-2
aerosol (size < 5 μm) were incubated in a 50% tissue culture
infectious dose. The results of this research confirmed that SARS-CoV-2
exhibit stability 3 SARS-CoV-1 but showed noticeable high viral loads in the
upper respiratory tract. This means that a person may be an infection
shelter for SARS-CoV-2 and can transmit this after being
asymptomatic.[21] In addition, after 72 h incubation
the SARS-CoV-2 was found to be less viable on Cu surface (no viability after
4 h) and more stable on plastic and stainless steel (no viability after 24
h). This is the first research to confirm the aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2,
viability on various substrates, and possibilities of H2H transmission via
nosocomial spread.[49]Another approach to managing the COVID-19 epidemic is to eradicate this virus
from the air because this virus can stick to tiny air particulates and has
the possibility to be inhaled. A recent study reported that SARS-CoV-2 virus
spread from hospitals and was transmitted through the air and close contact.
Experts suggested that close contact can be avoided via careful acts but the
cleaning of air at huge places such as hospitals is a remaining challenge.
To manage this serious issue, efforts have suggested the design and
development of centralized air purifiers which can recognize and eradicate
virus particulates. One such approach could be air purifiers as developed by
Molecule Inc., where cleaning of air in big facilities works on nanoenabled
photosensitized degradation of air pollutants. On the basis of a
well-demonstrated and proven mechanism, the photodegradation of bacteria in
the presence of TiO2 nanoparticle.[50] An
approach of nanosystem-assisted photodegradation of a living micro-organizm
is illustrated in Figure A.
Nanosystems of TiO2 have been engineered as a potential candidate
for various photocatalytic applications. On photostimulation,
nano-TiO2 generates photocouple electrons which produce
enough energy required to attack the weak sites of microorganism cells,
enough to degrade them as a function of exposure time. Presently, sincere
efforts are being made to investigate novel cost-effective and scalable
TiO2 nanosystems, via doping or generating functionality,
to enhance photocatalytic efficiency with reference to a targeted field of
applications.[50] These smart TiO2
nanosystem can serve as a suitable coating material to eradicate biowarfare
agents, weather they are indoor or outdoor. A similar working principle is
demonstrated by Molecule Inc., with a claim that SARS-CoV-2 can be removed,
degraded, or eradicate from indoor air. In addition, several other
functional nanosystems have been investigated and are in the process of
development for eradicating microorganisms on applying an optimized
stimulation.[51−53]
Figure 8
(A) Presentation of a nanoassisted photosensitive degradation of
bacteria, a possible approach that can be scaled-up to remove
virus particles from the air. (B) Development of cellular
nanocage, wrapped by polymeric nanoparticle, for inhibiting
SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. Reprinted from ref (54). Copyright 2020
American Chemical Society.
(A) Presentation of a nanoassisted photosensitive degradation of
bacteria, a possible approach that can be scaled-up to remove
virus particles from the air. (B) Development of cellular
nanocage, wrapped by polymeric nanoparticle, for inhibiting
SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. Reprinted from ref (54). Copyright 2020
American Chemical Society.Along with eradicating SARS-CoV-2 virus protein, another approach is to inhibit
the entry of this virus via using an appropriate inhibitor, protein
receptor, or receptor-/inhibitor-like nanosystems.[54] Such
a nanosystem, namely, cellular nanosponges, has recently been fabricated
using human microphages to inhibit the cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2 virus
(Figure B). The result of a
systematic study demonstrated the cellular nanosponges are agnostic to viral
mutation and over time neutralize the SARS-CoV-2 protein to inhibit viral
entry though the host cell. Besides inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 virus entry, the
beneficial role of cellular nanosponges to treat inflammatory diseases were
also claimed in this research.The above-discussed advancements are very motivating to direct present and
future research to investigate technologies needed to manage the COVID-19
pandemic. Significant efforts have been made to explore nanoscience
technology in all of the possible directions to investigate novel approaches
for recognizing and eradicating SARS-CoV-2 virus
protein.[31,54−56] Among them, investigating
sensitive, selective, and affordable analytical COVID-19 tools to detect
SARS-CoV-2 are in demand to perform targeted and mass COVID-19
diagnostics.[41,57] The aspects and advancements in the
field of developing sensing strategies to detected SARS-CoV-2 are discussed
in the next section.
Urgency of Early Stage COVID-19 Diagnostics
The COVID-19 pandemic is getting more serious due to the new continuously
varying strain of SARS-CoV-2. Recent studies confirmed that SARS-CoV-2 virus
infection is not only affecting the respiratory system but damaging major
organs, mainly the lungs, brain, heart, kidney, and gut, along with
effecting pregnancy,[58] child growth,[59,60] and the
neurological system.[61,62] COVID-19 is transmitting mainly through H2H and
aerosol and well-supported via traveling and social gathering. Thus,
qualitative and quantitative detecting of SARS-CoV-2 becomes essential with
the focus on mass and targeted testing.[41] Such a
manageable COVID-19 diagnosis will help health experts to know how
SARS-CoV-2 is progressing and varying under several conditions, for
example—under the influence of weather, prescribed drugs (such as
chloroquine, hydroxyquinol, and so on), and other diseases (such as
tuberculosis, asthma, and heart problems, etc.) and in the setting of drug
abuse and alcohol consumption. Keeping the above discussion in
consideration, novel biomarkers for selective detection,[29] SARS-CoV-2 virus recognizing agents,[63] and
miniaturized biomolecular assays can be factors for efficient diagnostics of
the COVID-19 pandemic.[64]When such multiparameters dependent COVID-19 diagnostics are present, timely,
well-managed, and well-planned strategies to collect personalized
bioinformatics for performing artificial intelligence to optimize therapy
will be required. On the other hand, selective detection of SARS-CoV-2 is
also required to establish a correlation between disease progression with
the SARS-CoV-2 virus level for exploring pathogenesis. The main objective
for this kind of bioinformatics collection and analysis using
state-of-the-art technology is required for evaluating the efficacy of the
developing drug against SARS-CoV-2 virus in order to investigate therapies
that recognize, eradicate, and progress inhibition via blocking active
sites.It has been suggested that sometimes therapy does not exhibit efficacy due to a
sudden increment in viral load. Taking this into consideration, real-time
monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 virus level variation is recommended. In addition,
it has also been observed that sometimes virus infection varies at a very
low level which is undetectable using conventional diagnostics systems.
Thus, to optimize therapy and estimating SARS-CoV-2 level variation, the
development of an efficient sensor that can detect SARS-CoV-2 at a very low
level is also one of the requirements while designing an analytical
diagnostics system to manage the COVID-19 pandemic. Such analytical systems
are urgently required to produce bioinformatics while keeping various
categories such as gender, age, race, and georegion in mind. Such
informatics can be used to implement AI-supported deep learning, machine
learning, and the Internet of things/medical things (IoT and/or IoMT) in
order to understand the pattern of the disease. Intelligent SARS-CoV-2
detection for early stage COVID-2 diagnostics is of high significance to
explore patterning associated with genomic and strain variability as well.
The best knowledge of the SARS-CoV-2 concentration correlation with
population-based variabilities will certainly be useful to better understand
this disease and optimize therapeutics in a personalized manner. The trends
in COVID-19 diagnostics using state-of-the-art sensing technology are
discussed in the next section.
State-of-the-Art COVID-19 Diagnostics Strategies
According to WHO, RT-PCR is the only available method for COVID-19 diagnostics.
Once the patient is screened out as COVID-19 positive regardless of the
presence of a conventional respiratory pathogen, WHO and Chinese medical
authorities are suggesting performing another test to monitor disease
progression.[29] The RT-PCR is an effective
procedure, but the requirement of a well-equipped laboratory and expert
operator limits its application to manage the epidemic.[29]
In several cases, health experts recommended a combinational approach, for
example, RT-PCR in combination with CT-Scan/MRI to evaluate SARS-CoV-2
presence in human systems. Such approaches were useful to differentiate
COVID-19 from pneumonia and dengue viral fever.[24]
However, the executions of these recommended approaches are not possible in
the case of pandemic management. Some of the approaches adopted to diagnose
COVID-19 are discussed in this section.At the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, it was very difficult to diagnose
coronavirus-related respiratory infection due to its close similarity with
pneumonia and other symptoms such as fever (98%), cough (76%), and myalgia
or fatigue (44%). Due to the severity of the increasing effect, more precise
techniques were introduced to investigate the reasoning. Chest radiographs
were recorded (at days 3 and 8, from the onset of symptoms) of patients and
showed bilateral lung consolidation due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.[65] To explore SARS-CoV-2 detection, the long-term CT-scan
studies were recommended for COVID-19 epidemic understanding.[65] Chung et al. recorded the chest CT scans of 21 COVID-19
infected patients to evaluate the common and variable factors.[66] This analysis is required for the radiologist to
identify early detection of SARS-CoV-2 for COVID-19 diagnostics. The finding
of this study suggest that 57% of patients showed ground-glass opacities,
33% showed opacities with rounded morphology, 33% showed a peripheral
distribution of disease, 29% exhibited consolidation with ground-glass
opacities, and 19% showed noticeable crazy-paving pattern.[66] Li and Xia conducted a study based on chest CT scans to
evaluate the effectiveness of the chest CT-scan approach for COVID-19
diagnosis (51 patients), in comparison to 2 patients affected by
adenovirus.[67] The outcomes of this research suggest
that CT scans exhibit more selectivity (missed diagnostics around 3.9%) and
can successfully be adopted for rapid COVID-19 diagnostics and management.
However, this approach is qualitative as it does not identify virus types
and categories.[67] Thus, exploring other options which can
perform rapid quantitative detection are also suggested to explore for
COVID-19 diagnostic.Besides the accomplishments of a CT scan, parallel efforts were also made to
explore non-invasive bioassays for selective quantitative detection of
SARS-CoV-2 virus protein. In this direction, the optimization is relevant
and a biosample is crucial, and with the help of RT-PCR, saliva emerged as a
real sample of choice to perform diagnostics. To et al. researched ways to
detect SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR in the self-collected saliva of 12
patients.[68] The outcomes of this research confirmed
that SARS-CoV-2 infected epithelial cells in the salivary gland, although
further studies were recommended to evaluate the role of saliva secretion
pathways and viral load. Overall, saliva-based testing would be preferable
to manage COVID-19 because it can be collected easily in enough quantity,
without risk of nosocomial transmission to perform the desired
testing.[68] Ai et al. explored a combinational
approach to analyze RT-PCR assay and chest CT imaging of 1014 COVID-19
positive cases in China.[69] The findings of this research
concerning RT-PCR show that CT imaging exhibited sensitivity of 97%
(580/601). Several other findings are showing RT-PCR negative but chest CT
scans positive (n = 308 patients). As an outcome, 48% of
patients were reconsidered to re-examine and 33% of patients were probable
cases as evaluated through a comprehensive evaluation. Chest CT scanning
exhibited higher sensitivity than initial RT-PCR for COVID-19, diagnostics
performed with swab samples, but it is a time-consuming procedure and
requires expertise and an equipped laboratory and therefore is limited in
its ability to manage a pandemic. However, this technique is very useful in
high risks in COVID-19 areas.[69]
FDA Approved Miniaturized COVID-19 Diagnostics System
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA and other international
health agencies understood the urgent need for developing the COVID-19
diagnostic system and revised their approval policies to expedite the
development and clinical applications. The Becton, Dickinson, and Co. and a
global leading biomedical technology company (BioGX Inc.) developed a
molecular COVID-19 diagnostic system (with results within 3 h) that received
FDA and Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to manage the pandemic. This BioGX
molecular diagnostics system, a kind of real-time PCR detection method,
targets viral RNA sequences (present in SARS-CoV-2) for selective
diagnostics of COVID-19. Such a miniaturized system has the potential for
hospital use as it is fully automated and can process 24 samples at the same
time.[70] A POC system developed by Cepheid’s
GeneXpert received FDA and EUA approval for COVID-19 diagnostics. This
device has a cartridge-based design which contains all the necessary reagent
to perform rapid detection of SRAS-oV-2 within 45 min. This company is
working closely according to the norms of the FDA to improve performance,
validation, and translation for clinical and hospital use.[71]Healgen Scientific developed a COVID-19 diagnostics kit based on the COVID-19
IgG/IgM working principle and is getting FDA and EUA approval to detect the
DNA of SARS-CoV-2 present in the bloodstream in 15 min. This diagnostics kit
is selective and in practical use in China, Singapore, and Taiwan. This
testing is serological and confirms the presence of antibodies (developed by
SARS-CoV-2 virus) in the patient’s blood. However, its global
clinical application will take a significantly long time due to a multistep
testing procedure with the need for some big caveats. Although this device
is performing well, its emergency use has been approved by FDA and the
device performance outcomes are under FDA assessment criteria.[72] FDA approved a POC diagnostics system developed by
Abbot, a healthcare technology producer, which produces the Abbott ID NOW
COVID-19 test. This lab-in-a-box is portable and detects the virus RNA of
COVID-19 infected patients in 5 min without using the sophisticated
laboratory to perform COVID-19 testing. However, this POC system is not
commercially available yet and the company is exploring translational and
marketing aspects to promote this technology for clinical
application.[73]Recently, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) also approved a
confirmatory diagnostic system for COVID-19 diagnostics via detecting the N
Gene of SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcriptase loop-mediated amplification
of viral nucleic acid (RT-LAMP) within 2 h.[74] This
RT-LAMP kit, developed by the Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical
Sciences and Technology and supported by the Department of Science and
Technology (DST), Government of India, is specific to two regions of the
gene present in the SARS-CoV-2 virus structure. Such two-sites-based
detection introduced selectivity in diagnostics, especially when SARS-CoV-2
is showing mutation and train variation. The Chitra Gene LAMP-N gene-based
COVID-19 kit is affordable, enables rapid diagnostics (detection time as 10
min and RNA extraction along with testing within 2 h), and performs
confirmative testing without a screening test cost. This system was tested
on 30 samples in a batch at the same time, and the observed results were
acceptable.[74] The Indian government is making
efforts for scaling up and promotion of this kit for clinical
application.Despite the significant outcomes mentioned above, FDA approved COVID-19
diagnostics systems are not capable enough to manage a pandemic due to a lot
of variabilities in virus structure, disease systems, and the need for big
bioinformatics to understand and manage the disease. Thus, health experts
suggested mass and targeted sensing of SARS-CoV-2 at a site of interest.
Such diagnostics can be achieved using nanotechnology and a
smart-technology-assisted approach, which are discussed in the next
section.
Nanoenabled Biosensing for Managing Coronavirus Infection Diseases
Nanoenabled Detection of SARS and MARS
Since 2002, the coronavirus has stricken mankind several times and caused
loss of lives and added economic burden to individuals and
governments. To manage the coronavirus epidemic, the design and
development of a smart sensor were recommended. These sensors appeared
as one of the potential solutions to provide cost-effective and rapid
diagnostics of SARS and MERS infection. Over time systematic efforts
were made to make such sensors more effective via introducing
miniaturization and nanotechnology. The introduction of nanotechnology
enables sensing of SARS and MERS at a very low level. In addition,
miniaturization makes these sensors suitable for on-site diagnostics
application.[75]A microcantilever array technology-based sensor was fabricated by Velanki
and Ji to detect SARS-CoV-1. This system detected feline coronavirus
(FIP) type I virus using a very specific feline coronavirus (FIP) type
I antiviral antiserum.[76] In this sensing approach,
a type I virus-positive sample was injected into the fluid cell
holding a microcantilever. The target analyte produced microcantilever
bends due to the recognition of the virus by the antiserum available
on the microcantilever surface. To confirm sensing, a few samples
which do not contain a virus were also used as a negative control. As
a result, no microcantilever bends were obtained in this situation.
This sensor exhibited a detection limit as 0.1 μg/mL, and the
detection time was observed as <1 h. This sensor exhibited the
potential to be used as an analytical tool for detecting SARS but
needs more study related to the translational approach for clinical
application.[76]Zuo et al. utilized horse polyclonal antibody to fabricate a
piezoelectric immunosensor to detect SARS-CoV-1 in sputum in the gas
phase.[77] In this research, antibodies
selective to SARS-CoV-1 was immobilized onto a PZ crystal surface. The
target analyte of SARS-CoV-1 was atomized into an aerosol by an
ultrasonator. In this process, the antibody on the crystal absorbed
SARS antigen specifically which changed the mass of the crystal and
eventually led a frequency shift. Such a developed piezoelectric
sensor detected SARS with a linear range that varies from 0.6 to 4
μg/mL. This was reproducible 100 times without losing sensing
ability and stable for 60 days at 4–6 °C, and detection
time > 2 min. Despite the remarkable performance, the authors
suggested focusing more on stability and precision before promoting it
for clinical application.To improve the sensing performance, the role of nanoscience and
nanotechnology was emerging as one of the best solutions to manage
COVID-19 via selective detection of the virus protein. Keeping these
aspects in mind, various electroactive smart nanostructures were
investigated to fabricate a biosensor.[78] Ishikawa
et al. fabricated a nanowire-based label-free electrochemical sensing
of the N-virus protein of SARS Virus N-Protein using an antibody mimic
protein (AMP) approach (Figure A).[78] In this research,
In2O3 nanowire was utilized as an antibody
immobilizing platform to design nano-biosensors. The AMP (Fibronectin,
Fn) was used for selective detection of nucleocapsid (N) protein of
SARS at nM concentration. The authors recommend testing this developed
sensor using real samples and biological complex systems involving
antibodies, antigen, protein, ligand, and oligonucleotides, etc. Over
time, it was also reported that developing fluorescent and
colorimetric assays could be one such approach to detect DNA and RNA
for point-of-care applications. Teengam et al. developed a paper-based
colorimetric assay for detecting DNA associated with MERS-CoV,
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), and human
papillomavirus (HPV), as illustrated in Figure B.[79] In this
research, the authors used a positively charged pyrrolidinyl peptide
nucleic acid (acpcPNA) due to attachment with the C-terminal of lycin
as a probe and silver (Ag) nanoparticle and as a calorimetric sensing
reagent. The variation in Ag nanoparticle dispersion in the
presence/absence of target DNA led to the color change. Such
fabricated paper-based colorimetric DNA sensors exhibited selectivity
against a single-base mismatch, two-base mismatch, and
noncomplementary target DNA. This sensor exhibited a low detection of
limit as 1.53, 1.27, and 1.03 nM concerning MERS-CoV, MTB, and HPV,
respectively. The author claimed this developed system as one of the
potential alternates of available state-of-the-art technology due to
low cost and multiplex detection, but said this sensor would be more
effective if multiplex detection were optimized to detect viruses of
the same category as Ebola, Zika, and other coronaviruses, etc.[79]
Figure 9
(A) Label-free sensing of SARS using
In2O3 nanowire-based
biosensor. The variation in electric response was observed
as a function SARS virus level. The sensing principle was
based on AMPs and BSA was used to block nonspecific
binding Reprinted from ref (78). Copyright 2009 American Chemical
Society. (B) Illustration paper-based multiplex sensing
chip fabrication process using acpcPNA-induced AgNP
aggregation in the presence 201 of DNA complementary and
DNA noncomplementary. Reprinted with permission from ref
(79).
Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.
(A) Label-free sensing of SARS using
In2O3 nanowire-based
biosensor. The variation in electric response was observed
as a function SARS virus level. The sensing principle was
based on AMPs and BSA was used to block nonspecific
binding Reprinted from ref (78). Copyright 2009 American Chemical
Society. (B) Illustration paper-based multiplex sensing
chip fabrication process using acpcPNA-induced AgNP
aggregation in the presence 201 of DNA complementary and
DNA noncomplementary. Reprinted with permission from ref
(79).
Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society.A 2D nanosheet of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) was utilized to
develop a fluorescent biosensor to the detection of the infectious
bronchitis virus (IBV).[80] The IBV is an avian
coronavirus that is known to affect the performance of egg-laying and
meat-type birds causing substantial economic loss in the poultry
industry. A MoS2 nanostructure based fluorescent
immunosensor was fabricated using a selective antibody for IBV
detection (Figure A). This
flexible optical sensor, fabricated on the low-cost
cotton-thread-based microfluidic manifold, performed on the bases of
fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between the nanosystem
and fluorescence dye during the formation of Ab–antigen
immune–complex formation. The authors optimized operational
conditions of IBV sensing, and the sensor exhibited a sensitivity as
4.6 × 102 EID50/mL, with the detection range varying
from 102 to 106 EID50/mL. Further, this sensor
was tested using a real sample of chicken serum which proves its
application in the field of poultry farming. However, this sensor was
not designed to detect coronavirus considering the application for
diseases and diagnostics in humans.
Figure 10
Schematic presentation immunosensor fabrication and cotton
thread microfluidic. On integration, this sensor detected
IBV selectively at 4.6 × 102 EID50/mL.
Adapted with permission from ref (80). Copyright 2018
The Authors under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0,
published by IEEE.
Schematic presentation immunosensor fabrication and cotton
thread microfluidic. On integration, this sensor detected
IBV selectively at 4.6 × 102 EID50/mL.
Adapted with permission from ref (80). Copyright 2018
The Authors under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0,
published by IEEE.
Nanoenabled Biosensor for SARS-CoV-2 Detection
It has been demonstrated that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has mutated and shown
numerous strains under categories regarding country, region, race, and
age, etc. Thus, exploring aspects of nanobiotechnology to investigate
miniaturized diagnostics systems of selective SARS-CoV-2 detection is
a key component to manage COVID-19. In this direction, Broughton et
al. designed a lateral flow assay using the CRISPR–Cas12 gene
to detect SARS-CoV-2 virus protein selectively within 40 min.[81] This miniaturized bioassay detected known
SARS-CoV-2 protein concentrations (1–5 fM) and further
validated using respiratory RNA extracts swabs of 36 COVID-19 infected
and 42 other virus-infected patients. The CRISPR-based test exhibited
sensing at a low level (10 copies/μL input) faster SARS-CoV-2
detection than FDA approved real-time RT–PCR assay with 95%
selectivity (regarding E and N genes) and 100% negative with reference
to non-COVID-19 infected patients. CRISPR-based design of the Cas-12
gene provides selectivity and portability seems useful for POC
applications.[81] However, with significant
efforts toward device packaging, the introduction of the microfluidic
unit for automated sampling and testing based a greater recommended
number of patient investigators of this research promoted a
CRISPER-Cas-12-based approach for COVID-19 diagnostics for clinical
application.Well-supported by outcomes with nanotechnology-assisted SARS and MERS
sensing, efforts are seriously being made to develop efficient and
effective nanoenabled optical and electrical SARS-CoV-2 biosensors. In
this direction, Qui et al. developed a dual-functional plasmonic
SARS-CoV-2 gene sensor which functions on the basis of combined
features of plasmonic photothermal (PPT) effect and localized surface
plasmon resonance (LSPR) based transduction (Figure
A).[82] Such a
combinational sensing approach was useful to achieve selectivity which
is desired for diagnostics of COVID-19 at clinical application. In
this research, the 2D nanostructure of gold (Au), utilized as a
plasmonic platform, functionalized with a complementary DNA to detect
a specific sequence of SARS-CoV-2 based on the concept of gene
hybridization. During sensing, the thermoplasmonic heat generated by
Au, on illumination at an optimized frequency facilitates an in situ
hybridization required for accurate discrimination between gene
sequences. This sensor exhibited a very low detection limit as 0.22 pM
and selective SARS-CoV-2 detection even in the multigene
mixture.[82] Such systems are new and need
supportive studies and validations before suggesting their application
as potential COVID-19 diagnostics tools.
Figure 11
(A) Plasmo-photothermal-based biosensor for selected viral
sequences for SARS-CoV-2 detection. (B) 2D nanoisland of
Au serving as an immobilizing platform to formulate a
thiol-cDNA ligand. (C) Real-time monitoring of AuNI
response on adding 0.1 nmol of cDNA and ability to
demonstrate discrimination between two related and almost
similar sequences. Reprinted with permission from ref
(82).
Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.
(A) Plasmo-photothermal-based biosensor for selected viral
sequences for SARS-CoV-2 detection. (B) 2D nanoisland of
Au serving as an immobilizing platform to formulate a
thiol-cDNA ligand. (C) Real-time monitoring of AuNI
response on adding 0.1 nmol of cDNA and ability to
demonstrate discrimination between two related and almost
similar sequences. Reprinted with permission from ref
(82).
Copyright 2020 American Chemical Society.A lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) fabricated using a lanthanide-doped
polystyrene nanosystem based rapid (10 min) and sensitive bioassay was
developed by Chen et al. to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG for COVID-19
diagnostics in human serum (Figure ).[83] A nitrocellulose membrane was
utilized for IgG A capturing through recombinant nucleocapsid
phosphoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 and self-assembled nanosystem labeled
with mouse antihuman IgG antibody worked as a fluorescent readout. To
promote clinical application, this sensor was validated using real
samples (1:1000 dilution) of COVID-19 infected 12 patients. The
sensing performance of this sensor was also tested involving 51 normal
samples. The testing performance of this device was validated using
RT-PCR, and outcomes of both techniques were in a good match. This
COVID-19 diagnostic platform meets the clinical challenges and can be
part of COVID-2 infection disease management due to selectivity, cost
effectiveness, and portability.[83] However, its
testing using a greater number of COVID-19 infected patients is also
recommended. Seo et al. developed a field-effect-transistor
(FET)-based biosensor for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 protein in
nasopharyngeal swab specimens of COVID-19 infected patients (Figure ).[84] In this research, graphene sheen was fabricated as
gate materials to design a FET and a specific monoclonal antibody
against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was utilized for selective
diagnostics of COVID-19. Such a FET-based electrical SARS-CoV-2 sensor
exhibited a detection limit as 1 fg/mL in the presence of
phosphate-buffered saline (100 fg/mL) and ion transport mediator.
Moreover, this sensor exhibited a limit of detection of 1.6 × 101
pfu/mL using a known concentration of virus protein and 2.42 ×
102 copies/mL in the case of clinical samples. As one
of the major advantages, COVID-19 diagnostics using this system will
not require any pretreatment and labeling.[84]
However, validation of this sensor based on a great number of COVID-19
infected patients is recommended prior to adopting this at a clinical
facility.
Figure 12
Representations of LTR flow-based bioassay for selective
detection of SARS-CoV-2 detection (A, B). For testing 58
serum samples (51 normal and 7 infected) bioassays
utilized and developed successfully differentiating the
samples (C). Reprinted from ref (83). Copyright 2020
American Chemical Society.
Figure 13
Schematic presentation of FET-based SARS-CoV-2 biosensor,
wherein graphene was utilized as gate material (A).
Specific monoclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody selected for
sensing ranging from 1 fg/mL to 10 pg/mL (B). Reprinted
with permission from ref (84). Copyright 2020 American Chemical
Society.
Representations of LTR flow-based bioassay for selective
detection of SARS-CoV-2 detection (A, B). For testing 58
serum samples (51 normal and 7 infected) bioassays
utilized and developed successfully differentiating the
samples (C). Reprinted from ref (83). Copyright 2020
American Chemical Society.Schematic presentation of FET-based SARS-CoV-2 biosensor,
wherein graphene was utilized as gate material (A).
Specific monoclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody selected for
sensing ranging from 1 fg/mL to 10 pg/mL (B). Reprinted
with permission from ref (84). Copyright 2020 American Chemical
Society.The nanoenabled miniaturized biosensor mentioned above had shown
significant contribution in the field of developing smart and desired
diagnostics of COVID-19 via sensitive and selective detection of
SARS-CoV-2. These developments also expressed the approach of POC
application with high significance. So far available biosensors are
multicomponent systems which make optimization and validation of a
developed system very challenging. Thus, it has been recommended by
biomedical engineers that a diagnostics biosensor should be the least
component unit for effective and interfering with less sensing. Among
various types of sensors, electrochemical sensors are emerging as a
diagnostics tool of choice.[75,85−87] These systems can perform sensing at POC as
well.[87] Due to advancements in smart
materials science microfluidic systems, electrochemical biosensors can
detect a target analyte at picomolar levels to manage an infectious
disease caused by the epidemic.[88]With these aspects being kept in mind and on the basis of our expertise
in developing an electrochemical zika virus
sensor,[88,89] we purposed the development
of nanoenabled biosensors which can detect SARS-CoV-2 at the picomolar
level even at POC application (Figure ). To develop an electrochemical
SARS-CoV-2 biosensor, it is recommended to adopt and optimize an
immunosensing approach. The ongoing efforts to develop a biomarker to
optimize pathogenesis and recognition of SARS-CoV-2 protein also
required the development of monoclonal antibodies for selective
performance. Such developed antibodies can be useful to develop an
electrochemical immunosensor for selective detection of SARS-CoV-2 in
the real samples. Considering scaled-up production, it also
recommended investigating a disposable immunosensing chip which is
cost effective and does not require sophisticated equipment for
storage. To make such a sensor more efficient, nanoparticles modified
substrate or interdigitated electrodes are also recommended to amplify
signals to achieve low detection limits and a wide sensing range. Such
a SARS-CoV-2 sensing chip can be integrated with a miniaturized
potentiostat interfaced with a smartphone to perform on-site COVID-19
diagnostics. The smartphone-based sensing will be very much useful for
performing diagnostics at the site of infection, i.e., POC
application. This approach is also very useful for rapid data
analysis, safe data storage, and remote data sharing with health
experts. The Internet of things (IoT) will expedite diagnostics and
therapy optimization. Introduction of IoT will manage the generation
and securing of bioinformatics that will need AI to analyze the
several optimized relationships between SARS-CoV-2 protein level with
individual pathogenesis. These outcomes will certainly be useful for
exploring the best therapy as per the patient genomic profile.
Figure 14
Schematic presentation of electrochemical SARS-CoV-2
immunosensing in the physiological range. Such sensitive
smart SARS-CoV-2 sensing platforms can be interfaced with
microelectronic and AI-supported IoT for rapid and
selective COVID-19 diagnostics required for pandemic
management, having personalized and intelligent health
care as the focus.
Schematic presentation of electrochemical SARS-CoV-2
immunosensing in the physiological range. Such sensitive
smart SARS-CoV-2 sensing platforms can be interfaced with
microelectronic and AI-supported IoT for rapid and
selective COVID-19 diagnostics required for pandemic
management, having personalized and intelligent health
care as the focus.
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Approaches for COVID-19 Pandemic
Management
It has been suggested by experts that if there is a vast bioinformatics
collection related to the COVID-19 pandemic and its rapid analysis, then it
is crucial to investigate AI for intelligent healthcare. There are some
AI-based systems designed and developed to predict which Covid-19 patients
will become critically ill, even as many are struggling to validate the
tool’s effectiveness on those with the new disease. The effects of
SARS-CoV-2 are associated with socioregional aspects such as country,
region, race, gender, and age, etc. Smart technology is required which can
perform in all of these aspects to optimize diagnostics, therapeutics
agents, and optimization of prediction. To manage the COVID-19 pandemic,
AI-supported deep learning, machine learning algorithms, and IoT approaches
have emerged collectively to combat against SARS-CoV-2. Taiwan is using this
technology at the front line to explore big data analysis, new technologies,
and proactive testing, as reported by Wang et al.[90] The
outcomes of this research were useful to recognize pandemic zones,
optimization of resources, and understanding of emergency and timely
diagnosis decisions. Such smart use of technology was sensitive population
oriented and helped the government for making necessary decisions to decide
the plan of action and policies. Taiwan set up an example to manage the
COVID pandemic with a combinational approach, using both the
smartphone-based technologies and the support of people. Some of the recent
developments in AI-based COVID-19 pandemic are discussed below.Song et al. reported that IoT-based combinational approaches to involve
sensors, sharing informatics, AI, and dynamic networking devices was very
useful to health workers to evaluate COVID-19 full spectrum perception,
reliable transmission, and intelligent processing.[91]
These IoMT devices have demonstrated several advantages as follows: (i)
rapid leaning and certifying a high-quality guideline application; (ii)
systematic and desired management of suspected patients; (iii) management of
a sensitive population who may need medical consultations to improve success
rates; and (iv) control over aspects. Prior to recommending them for medical
application, several recommendations are suggested to resolve the following
tasks as follows: (i) improved and adoptable interoperability (this is
required to establish good communication between numerous open standards and
products of different manufacturers); (ii) ensuring no leakage; and (iii)
enhancement in the istribution network, specially sensors-based services
which are urgently required for remote health workers. Presently, sincere
efforts are being made to resolve these challenges for developing advanced
IoMT systems which can be useful to improve current telemedicine. These
devices are can be coupled with smartphones and programmed concerning a
targeted disease, and yes COVID-19 pandemic can be one example.
COVID-19-related IoM seems a smart platform designed to achieve easy to
prevent/diagnose/treat diseases/communicate with experienced doctors.[91] Keeping easy and real-time operation in view, IoM
technology can be a part of the medical center cloud system for COVID-19
management.Experts suggested that anti-COVID-19 therapy development will certainly take
time; thus monitoring of this pandemic has made using AI-assisted smart
technology essential. To understand disease spreading patterns, the
smartphone is emerging as one of the best technology platforms to collect
bioinformatics, which is also required for diagnostics and diagnosis points
of view. This seems an executable approach, especially in the case of a
lockdown, because most of the population carry a smartphone. For example,
Allam and Jones presented the concept of Smart City Network which is useful
to monitor the COVID-19 pandemic in the case of a lockdown. This AI-assisted
contact tracing-based approach is useful to share national policies, educate
people, standardize national protocols, and share health data, leading to
better global understanding and management of COVID-19.[92]
As the COVID-19 outbreak emerged as a serious pandemic, besides exploring
specific diagnostics and therapeutics, health experts suggested social
distancing, staying at home, and being quarantined in suspected cases, to
cut the human-to-human transmission. Keeping this in view, Dandekar explored
machine learning to quantify the effect of quarantine control in COVID-19
infectious spread.[93] In this research, a neural network
augmented model was developed to interpret and extrapolate public health
data available at Wuhan, China; Italy; South Korea; and the USA. The
outcomes of the data analysis were compared with the parameters associated
with quarantine and isolation measures, i.e., the reproduction number
Rt of the virus. The outcomes of this
research suggested that countries that executed rapid interventions and
strict public health measures such as testing and reporting for quarantine
and isolation were able to significantly control the virus spreading.Bai et al. proposed a COVID-19 intelligent diagnosis and treatment assistant
program (nCapp) based on IoT-assisted intelligent diagnostics along with
treatments to manage COVID-19.[94] This team explored
automated analysis based on real-time communication to manage data,
questionnaires, analysis, and diagnosis-related bioinformatics. The outcomes
of this programming were useful for knowing whether someone suspected to
have infection did or for concerns that a COIVD-19 infected patient has a
mild, moderate, severe, or critical pneumonia scenario. The nCapp enables
real-time database update and predicting the appropriate diagnosis model of
best accuracy (Figure A). Such
systems are useful for front-line health workers for rapid diagnostics and
long-term follow-up needed for better understanding of disease progression,
to evaluate the effects of therapy and physicians and to examine the
postinfection effects.[94] Besides, smartphone-assisted
implementation of nCapp can be useful to avoid COVID-19 spreading via
blocking human-to-human transmission. In this way, we can block disease
transmission, avoid physician infection, and epidemic prevention and control
as soon as possible. Srinivasa Rao developed machine learning-based
algorithms, for a person under investigation (PUI), for quicker
identifications of COVID-19.[95] This approach is
smartphone based and involves a web-based survey based on basic information
such as travel history. The outcome of this approach can successfully reduce
the diseases spreading in sensitive populations. Thousands of data points
collected using this method can be processed through AI for the early stage
screening and identification of COVID-19 infected patients (Figure B). The outcomes of this
approach, recommended during quarantine, are useful to predict all kinds of
risks factor, for example, no/minimal/moderate/high risk associated with
COVID-19 pandemic.[95]
Figure 15
Various AI-supported approaches investigated for COVID-19
management. (A) Illustration of nCapp, a cloud-based terminal,
supported diagnostics, tracing, and treatment, etc., needed for
COVID-19 management. (B) Presentation of a conceptual framework
developed for various data collection and COVID-19
identification considering geographical region-based approach
including city, county, town, village, or households (a);
respondents- and nonrespondents-based cloud-assisted survey (b);
and probable identification of COVID-19 infection people
regarding respondents and nonrespondents-based survey outcomes
(c). Reprinted with permission from ref (95). Copyright 2020 The
Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America under Creative
Commons License 4.0.
Various AI-supported approaches investigated for COVID-19
management. (A) Illustration of nCapp, a cloud-based terminal,
supported diagnostics, tracing, and treatment, etc., needed for
COVID-19 management. (B) Presentation of a conceptual framework
developed for various data collection and COVID-19
identification considering geographical region-based approach
including city, county, town, village, or households (a);
respondents- and nonrespondents-based cloud-assisted survey (b);
and probable identification of COVID-19 infection people
regarding respondents and nonrespondents-based survey outcomes
(c). Reprinted with permission from ref (95). Copyright 2020 The
Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America under Creative
Commons License 4.0.It is confirmed that available anti-COVID-19 drugs have limited therapeutic
properties and exhibit some adverse effects to lung and heart. In the
present scenario, these drugs are in practice and have raised the demand of
smart technology for the design and development of effective and efficient
drugs which target only SARS-CoV-2 specifically with side effect. In this
direction, a deep-learning-based approach was investigated by Zhang et al.
for screening available drugs for effective treatment of COVID-19.[96] In this model (DFCNN), RNA sequences were collected from
the GISAID database to explore related 3D protein sequences modeling using
homology modeling. The DFCNN explores possible protein–ligand
interactions of high accuracy to perform drug screening without using
docking or molecular dynamics. This protease-based modeling successfully
identified 4 chemical compound databases and confirmed that peptides-based
drugs exhibited good stability, the desired bioavailability, and negligible
immune responses.[96]In this unprecedented situation, sincere efforts are being made to explore drug
repurposing, an effective drug discovery approach using existing drugs. This
approach is very cost effective and recommended to optimize timely therapy.
In this direction, Zhou et al. developed a network-based approach to
identify an optimized drug combination to combat against the COVID-19
pandemic.[97] This approach developed a
pharmacology-based network medicine which quantifies the interplay between
human coronavirus/SARS-CoV-2-host molecular interactions interactome and
possible drug targeting sites in a protein–protein interaction
network (Figure ).[97] In this research, detailed phylogenetic-based analyses
of 15 human coronavirus genomes confirmed that COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 exhibit a
major nucleotide sequence with reference to SARS-CoV-2 as 79.7%. Using this
model, 16 potential anti-COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 repurposable drugs were
recommended which were further validated using enrichment analyses based on
drug–gene signatures and virus-induced transcriptomics. Besides,
three potential drug combinations as follows, (i) sirolimus plus
dactinomycin, (ii) mercaptopurine plus melatonin, and (iii) toremifene plus
emodin, were identified using complementary exposure pattern.[97] The outcomes of this research project were suitable for
the rapid identification of a therapeutic drug/or drugs needed for perfect
targeting of COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2.
Figure 16
Network-based methodology based on a protein–protein network
involving (A) HCoV-associated host protein collected from
literature and pooled to generate a pan-HCoV protein subnetwork,
(B) screening of potential repurposable candidates via analyzing
network proximity between targeted drugs and proteins associated
with HCoV, (C, D) validation of network-based predictions using
gene set enrichment analysis, (E) network-based prediction of
optimized drug combination using complementary exposure pattern,
and (F) hypothesis illustration of the network-based methodology
to explore PPI based on human interactome. Reprinted with
permission from ref (97).
Copyright 2020 The Authors via Creative Commons License 4.0,
published by Springer Nature.
Network-based methodology based on a protein–protein network
involving (A) HCoV-associated host protein collected from
literature and pooled to generate a pan-HCoV protein subnetwork,
(B) screening of potential repurposable candidates via analyzing
network proximity between targeted drugs and proteins associated
with HCoV, (C, D) validation of network-based predictions using
gene set enrichment analysis, (E) network-based prediction of
optimized drug combination using complementary exposure pattern,
and (F) hypothesis illustration of the network-based methodology
to explore PPI based on human interactome. Reprinted with
permission from ref (97).
Copyright 2020 The Authors via Creative Commons License 4.0,
published by Springer Nature.The current healthcare industry is rapidly adopting IoT- and AI-based new
technology for intelligent healthcare management. As illustrated in Figure , technological
integration of IoT, Edge, and machine learning, a branch of AI, can
demonstrate predictive capabilities, the deployment of a predictive model on
the cloud or edge. This system tries to avoid or mitigate the impact of
unexpected changes happening on the IoT device and observes the anomalies,
using machine learning, occurring on the device. In addition, this system is
capable of identifying anomalies at the IoT Edge instead of the IoT Cloud
and will notify one about the necessary action. This is to reduce or avoid
communication latency to the cloud so that critical decisions can be
implemented right away at the edge by deploying AI models. Efforts are
sincerely made to explore these devises for COVID-19 management via
predicting diseases’ patterns, assessing therapy, spatial impact,
personalized assessment, and easy connection with health centers, optimizing
timely therapy, and many others.
Figure 17
Deployment of the machine learning model on IoT Edge Gateway.
Deployment of the machine learning model on IoT Edge Gateway.
Viewpoint
Health agencies and experts have confirmed that adverse effects, mainly loss of
lives, related to the COVID-19 pandemic maybe got worse than
yesterday.[29] This is because of the new SARS-CoV-2
strain and unavailability of therapy along with lacking effective
diagnostics tool.[6] The COVID-19 respiratory diseases are
spreading faster than the productive efforts made by health agencies and
governments.[1] This virus spread via H2H and
traveling, also another factor of the rapid spreading of viruses from big
cities to a small village. This situation makes COVID-19 pandemic management
very difficult because small villages do not have well-equipped laboratories
for timely diagnostics.[57,83,98−100]
These challenges have raised the demand for investigating novel nanoenabled
sensing approaches for rapid and selective SARS-CoV-2 detection at the site
of infection.[101] Scientists of various expertise are
requested to work together to design and develop a miniaturized sensing
system which can perform POC diagnostics. These systems should be cost
effective, selective, and able to detect SARS-CoV-2 at the picomolar level.
The low-level detection of SARS-CoV-2 is also required to understand the
COVID-19 progression while a patient is under prescribed therapy.It is also known that smartphone-based operation made operation and application
of a biosensor more in accord with a patient’s requirements. Such a
user-friendly approach made multiple times testing very easy in a
day.[89,102,103] In this approach, more
data, such as bioinformatics, can be collected which can be managed using
IoT technology for better understanding and analysis of COVID-19 progression
and control. Besides, AI including deep learning and machine learning
approaches is required to investigate the algorithm for big data
analysis.[87] The outcomes of such analysis are
required to explore the correlation between the SARS-CoV-2 level and patient
pathogenesis. This correlation will be useful to design and develop new
therapeutics according to race, location, gender, and age. Besides,
IoT-AI-assisted bioinformatics analysis is required to optimize the best
appropriate biomarkers for developing novel and smart COVID-19 diagnostics
tools.[1] On having the best combination of sensing
prototype, device engineering, IoT, and AI, such a COVID-19 diagnostics
system will be capable of early stage diagnostics, disease progression under
therapy, and epidemic management according to patient profile (Figure ).
Figure 18
Systematic planning and execution of steps suggested by developing
a nanosensor for early stage COVID-2 diagnostics.
Systematic planning and execution of steps suggested by developing
a nanosensor for early stage COVID-2 diagnostics.However, optimization of the operation parameter, integrating a sensing chip
with micro-/nanoelectronics, and interfacing of the sensing platform with a
smartphone, optimizing sensing system performance at POC applications,
data-related aspects (collection, sharing, storage, and safety), big data
analytics, correlation of SARC-CoV-2 levels with pathogenesis, therapy
optimization, and timely therapy decisions are the very challenging aspects
to consider in developing a smart sensing platform for COVID-19 pandemic
management. However, AI-assisted predictions related to COVID-19 pandemic
have been found to be inaccurate or nonreliable due to too much outlier data
and noisy social media, big data hubris, and algorithmic dynamics. This is
the reason experts avoid AI-based modeling and prefer established
epidemiological models, namely, SIR models standing for the population
sensitive to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Developing such as smart sensing system
is a multidisciplinary approach and requires public–private
involvement. Stepwise planning and execution of every aspect, as illustrated
in Figure , associated with
developing a SARS-CoV-19 sensor is crucial for the timely development of
COVID-19 diagnostics for clinical and POC applications.
Conclusions
This review summarizes the seriousness, demand, and high significance of
developing a nanoenabled electrochemical biosensor for COVID-19 diagnostics
at POC application. Overall, the smart sensor for SARS-CoV-2 virus protein
detection, as discussed carefully and critically in this report, is a
required technology for managing the COVID-19 pandemic and analyzing
consequences via collecting and analyzing bioinformatics to investigate
therapeutics, even in a personalized manner. Having multimodel approaches
for consideration, AI-supported nanoenabled biosensing strategies assisted
by IoT designed and developed for application can successfully be adopted
for expedite diagnostics and bioinformatics-based big data analysis needed
for timely decisions. With such intelligent healthcare approaches being
recommended by health experts on an urgent basis, therefore significant
efforts, supported by public–private cooperation, are required to
promote advanced research in the direction of developing a nanoenabled
electrochemical SARS-CoV-2 sensing system optimized using AI and IoT to
perform at POC intelligent COVID-19 management in a personalized manner.
Authors: Daniel Wrapp; Nianshuang Wang; Kizzmekia S Corbett; Jory A Goldsmith; Ching-Lin Hsieh; Olubukola Abiona; Barney S Graham; Jason S McLellan Journal: Science Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Markus Hoffmann; Hannah Kleine-Weber; Simon Schroeder; Nadine Krüger; Tanja Herrler; Sandra Erichsen; Tobias S Schiergens; Georg Herrler; Nai-Huei Wu; Andreas Nitsche; Marcel A Müller; Christian Drosten; Stefan Pöhlmann Journal: Cell Date: 2020-03-05 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Sammy A Perdomo; Viviana Ortega; Andres Jaramillo-Botero; Nelson Mancilla; Jose Hernando Mosquera-DeLaCruz; Drochss Pettry Valencia; Mauricio Quimbaya; Juan David Contreras; Gabriel Esteban Velez; Oscar A Loaiza; Adriana Gomez; Jhonattan de la Roche Journal: IEEE Trans Instrum Meas Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Cícero C Pola; Sonal V Rangnekar; Robert Sheets; Beata M Szydlowska; Julia R Downing; Kshama W Parate; Shay G Wallace; Daphne Tsai; Mark C Hersam; Carmen L Gomes; Jonathan C Claussen Journal: 2d Mater Date: 2022-06-10 Impact factor: 6.861
Authors: E Alperay Tarim; Betul Karakuzu; Cemre Oksuz; Oyku Sarigil; Melike Kizilkaya; Mahmoud Khatib A A Al-Ruweidi; Huseyin Cagatay Yalcin; Engin Ozcivici; H Cumhur Tekin Journal: Emergent Mater Date: 2021-03-25