Literature DB >> 32323974

Rapid and Sensitive Detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, Using Lanthanide-Doped Nanoparticles-Based Lateral Flow Immunoassay.

Zhenhua Chen1, Zhigao Zhang1, Xiangming Zhai1, Yongyin Li2, Li Lin1, Hui Zhao3, Lun Bian1, Peng Li1, Lei Yu4, Yingsong Wu1, Guanfeng Lin5.   

Abstract

The outbreak of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been a challenge for hospital laboratories because of the huge number of samples that must be tested for the presence of the causative pathogen, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Simple and rapid immunodiagnostic methods are urgently needed to identify positive cases. Here we report the development of a rapid and sensitive lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) that uses lanthanide-doped polysterene nanoparticles (LNPs) to detect anti-SARV-CoV-2 IgG in human serum. A recombinant nucleocapsid phosphoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 was dispensed onto a nitrocellulose membrane to capture specific IgG. Mouse anti-human IgG antibody was labeled with self-assembled LNPs that served as a fluorescent reporter. A 100-μL aliquot of serum samples (1:1000 dilution) was used for this assay and the whole detection process took 10 min. The results of the validation experiment met the requirements for clinical diagnostic reagents. A value of 0.0666 was defined as the cutoff value by assaying 51 normal samples. We tested 7 samples that were positive by reverse-transcription (RT-)PCR and 12 that were negative but clinically suspicious for the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG. One of the negative samples was determined to be SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive, while the results for the other samples were consistent with those obtained by RT-PCR. Thus, this assay can achieve rapid and sensitive detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in human serum and allow positive identification in suspicious cases; it can also be useful for monitoring the progression COVID-19 and evaluating patients' response to treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32323974      PMCID: PMC7202245          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


In early December 2019, the cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pneumonia were identified in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China.[1] Since then, the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak has rapidly spread throughout the country and around the world.[2] Despite emergency measures, the current situation is grim. According to the COVID-19 report published by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, over 70 000 cases of COVID-19 have been diagnosed in China. As our knowledge of the clinical features of COVID-19 and route of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 has grown, it has been determined that the virus has an incubation period that may be as long as 24 days, along with a high basic reproductive number (R0 = 3.77).[3,4] Early diagnosis and treatment are critical for controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. A rapid and accurate laboratory method for the diagnosis of COVID-19 is desired,[5] but the huge number of samples and complex situations in hospitals pose major challenges.[6] Establishing standards for specimen collection and nucleic acid extraction as well as the proper testing environment, and correctly interpreting test results are the major problems faced by hospital laboratories, especially those in rural areas, where resources are inadequate. Many factors could contribute to false negative results by reverse transcription (RT-)PCR, and the positive rate of the first RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 was just 70%.[7] Chest computed tomography (CT) is being used as a confirmatory diagnostic method for samples with high clinical suspicion that were found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.[8] A simple and rapid immunodiagnostic method for COVID-19 would be a useful adjunct or more practical alternative to chest CT. Immunodiagnostic methods such as lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) have the advantages of being convenient and rapid. However, traditional colloidal gold-based LFIAs do not have optimal performance or quantification capability. In recent years, many fluorescence-based LFIAs have been developed for quantitative or semiquantitative detection,[9−12] but conventional fluorescent dyes are not the ideal reporter because they are prone to photobleaching and have poor stability or quantum yield. Lanthanide-doped polysterene nanoparticles (LNPs) can overcome these problem while maintaining the advantages of simple and rapid detection.[13,14] COVID-19 diagnosis based on the detection of anti-SARS-CoV IgG in serum has been reported.[15,16] Monitoring changes in serum SARS-CoV IgG concentration can also be useful for evaluating response to treatment and prognosis.[17] High-throughput sequencing has revealed a high degree of similarity between SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV, the causative pathogen in the 2003 SARS outbreak.[18] Based on this finding, quantitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG for the diagnosis of COVID-19 is entirely feasible. Given the absence of a specific medicine, convalescent serum and plasmapheresis may be used to treat COVID-19, as in the case of SARS.[19] In this study, we report the development of a LFIA that uses a recombinant nucleocapsid phosphoprotein and self-prepared LNPs to detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in human serum.

Experiment

Reagents, Samples, and Instrumentation

Tris(1,3-diphenyl-1,3-propanedionato)(1,10-phenanthroline)europium(III) (Eu(DPP)3Phen), styrene (St), acrylic acid (AA), 2,2′-azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN), and cetyltrimethylammonium (CTMA) were purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. (Tokyo, Japan). 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES), surfactant (including polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and TritonX-100), carboxyl activating agents (including 1-ethyl-3-(3-(dimethylamino)propyl) carbodimide hydrochloride (EDC) and N-hydroxy-sulfosuccinimide (sulfo-NHS)), and Proclin-300 were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Functional block polymer, Tetronic 1307 (surfactant S9), was obtained from BASF Corp. (Florham Park, NJ, USA). Rabbit IgG and goat anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Rockland Immunochemicals (Limerick, PA, USA). Mouse anti-human IgG was obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Nitrocellulose (NC) membranes, glass fiber conjugate pads, and cellulosic absorbent pads were purchased from Millipore (Hong Kong, China). Cellulosic sample pads were from Jieyi Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was obtained from Roche Diagnostics (Hong Kong, China). Other chemicals used in this study were of analytic grade and used without further treatment. Ultrapure water, obtained using a Milli-Q Advantage A10 purification system (Millipore), was used in all experiments. The following buffer solutions were used: coating buffer (0.3% trehalose [w/v] and 0.1% NaN3 [w/v] in 100 mM citrate-buffered saline [CBS], pH 8.5); sample pad treatment buffer (100 mM Na2B4O7·10H2O, 1% PVP [w/v], 0.2% casein-Na [w/v], 1% TritonX-100 [v/v], and 0.1% NaN3 [w/v]); conjugate pad treatment buffer (0.5% poly(vinyl alcohol) [PVA] [w/v], 0.5% BSA [w/v], and 1% TritonX-100 [v/v] in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4); activating buffer (50 mM MES, pH 5.1); binding buffer (10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0); washing buffer (0.2% Tween-20 [v/v], 0.9% NaCl [w/v], and 0.05% Proclin-300 [v/v] in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8); storage buffer (1% BSA [w/v], 5% trehalose [w/v], 20% sucrose [w/v],and 0.05% Proclin-300 [v/v] in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 9.0); and assay buffer (7.5% BSA [w/v], 0.3% TritonX-100 [v/v], and 0.1% surfactant S9 [w/v] in 10 mM PBS, pH 7.4). All solutions in this study were freshly prepared before use. Serum samples were obtained from Guangzhou Eighth People’s Hospital and Nanfang Hospital and stored at −20 °C until use. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Science and Technology Department of Southern Medical University (Guangzhou, China).

Expression of Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Phosphoprotein

The RNA genome of SARS-CoV-2 was kindly provided by DAAN Gene Co. (Guangzhou, China). Reverse transcription was performed to generate cDNA using PrimeScript II first Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan; Catalog No. 6210A). The full-length nucleocapsid phosphoprotein gene was amplified from the cDNA by PCR using the following primers: 5′-ATG TCT GAT AAT GGA CCC CAA AAT C-3′ (forward) and 5′-TTA GGC CTG AGT TGA GTC AGC −3′ (reverse), which were designed based on sequences in GenBank (MN908947.3). PCR products were sequenced and cloned into the pMD-19T backbone vector; the resultant pMD-19T-N plasmid was fused with the linear pET-32a vector (Not I), using a Seamless Cloning and Assembly Kit (Beijing Zoman Biotechnology, Beijing, China; Catalog No. ZC231), from which the nucleocapsid phosphoprotein gene was amplified using the primers 5′-AG CTC CGT CGA CAA GCT TGC ATG TCT GAT AAT GGA CCC CAA AAT-3′ (forward) and 5′-TG GTG GTG GTG GTG CTC GAG TGC GGC CGC GGC CTG AGT TGA GTC AGC ACT-3′ (reverse). The target protein was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 competent cells by induction with isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside, with the induction time optimized to ensure maximal expression. Positive serum samples were used to confirm the antigenicity of the purified recombinant protein by Western blotting.

Preparation of LNPs

The LNPs were synthesized by miniemulsion polymerization. Briefly, 200 mg of Eu(DPP)3Phen and 20 mg of AIBN were dissolved in 2 g of St in a glass vial; and 60 mg of CTMA and 100 mg of AA were dissolved in 15 mL of deionized water. The aqueous and monomer solutions were mixed with a magnetic stirrer for 10 min and miniemulsions were prepared with an ultrasonicator for 20 min in an ice bath. Nitrogen gas was bubbled for 2 h at room temperature to remove oxygen from the mixture, and the emulsion was then stirred at room temperature for 20 h. The product was ultrasonically washed 4 times with water and centrifuged. The resultant LNPs were dispersed in water (5% w/v) and stored as stock at 4 °C.

Functionalizing LNPs with Protein Molecules

LNPs were functionalized with mouse anti-human IgG antibody (M-HIgG) and rabbit IgG (RIgG) as previously described,[20] with some modifications. A two-step procedure was used to prevent aggregating between LNPs via cross-linking of antibody molecules. Briefly, 20 μL of EDC (1% EDC [w/v] in activating buffer) and 180 μL of sulfo-NHS (1% sulfo-NHS [w/v] in activating buffer) solutions were mixed and added to 2 mg of LNPs resuspended in 0.8 mL of activating buffer. The mixture was incubated for 30 min with gentle stirring at room temperature. To remove unreacted components, the LNPs was washed three times by centrifugation at 18000g for 10 min with binding buffer after NHS-ester was formed. The pellet was ultrasonically resuspended in 0.95 mL of binding buffer. The antibodies were purified and diluted in binding buffer at a concentration of 1 mg/mL; 50 μL of as-prepared antibody solution (M-HIgG or RIgG) was added into the activated LNPs suspension. A 4-h incubation with gentle rotation was applied, then 1.5 μL of ethanolamine was added and the admixture was further incubated for 10 min. In order to purify the functionalized LNPs, the washing process was repeated three times before adding blocking buffer (2% BSA in 25 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4). The functionalized LNPs were ultrasonically resuspended in blocking buffer, and a 30-min incubation with gentle mixing was employed to block any remaining unreacted hydrophobic sites on the surface of LNPs and to form a thin hydration layer to prevent aggregation. The antibody-enameled LNPs were cleansed three times with washing buffer and were resuspended in storage buffer.

Fabrication of LFIA Strips

LFIA strips were prepared as described in our previous work.[21] The sample pad was immersed in a sample pad treatment buffer for 1 h and dried at 37 °C for 24 h. The conjugate pad was saturated with a conjugate pad treatment buffer at room temperature for 1.5 h and also dried at 37 °C for 24 h. M-HIgG@LNPs and RIgG@LNPs were diluted in storage buffer (0.125 and 0.05 mg/mL, respectively) and combined; the mixture was dispensed onto the conjugate pad at 1 μL/cm using a Biolet Quanti dispenser (BioDot, Shanghai, China), and dried at 37 °C before being stored in a dry cabinet at room temperature until use. Recombinant nucleocapsid phosphoprotein and goat anti-rabbit IgG were diluted with coating buffer at concentration of 2 mg/mL, then dispensed onto an NC membrane (Millipore; Catalog No. HF13502XSS) at 1 and 0.8 μL/cm, respectively, as test and control lines. The membrane was dried at 37 °C for 4 h. The NC membrane, absorbent pad, conjugate pad and sample pad were sequentially laminated together onto a backing card, as shown in Figure . Strips with 4 mm wide were cut and placed into disposable plastic housings for later use. The assembled test strips were stored in a moisture-proof cabinet.
Figure 1

Design and fabrication of the developed assay. (A) Lateral flow test strip. (B) Assay.

Design and fabrication of the developed assay. (A) Lateral flow test strip. (B) Assay.

Analytical Procedure and Statistical Analysis

As shown in Figure , serum samples were diluted with assay buffer (1:1000), and 100 μL of diluted sample was added to the sample well of a LFIA strip. As the liquid migrated from the sample pad toward the absorbent pad, functionalized LNPs were captured at the test and control lines. After a 10-min incubation, the strip was loaded into the portable fluorescence reader for detection of fluorescence at excitation and emission wavelengths of 365 and 615 nm, respectively, with the delay time set at 20 μs. Excitation of the fixed LNPs produced a bright fluorescent zone on the membrane. The results are denoted as the fluorescence peak area of the test line (At) and control line (Ac). The At/Ac ratio (R) was calculated to determine the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG concentration in the serum.

Results and Discussion

Characterization of LNPs and Functionalized LNP Probe

Most biochemical assays are performed in solution. In aqueous environments, the emission of lanthanide chelates is strongly suppressed due to energy loss through the nonradiative activation of the 5D0 state to the O–H vibration of water molecules.[22] Thus, it is preferable to encapsulate lanthanide chelates in water-dispersible spheres. The maximal fluorescence emission peak of LNPs was obtained at ∼615 nm; the peak was narrow and symmetric (Figure a). Dynamic light scattering analysis was performed for physical characterization of LNPs before and after functionalization. The change in the size and surface zeta potential of LNPs (Figures b and 2c) indicated that the M-HIgG and RIgG antibodies were successfully conjugated.
Figure 2

Physical properties of LNPs and functionalized LNP probe: (A) absorption and emission spectra, (B) size distribution of naked and conjugated LNPs, and (C) zeta potential distribution.

Physical properties of LNPs and functionalized LNP probe: (A) absorption and emission spectra, (B) size distribution of naked and conjugated LNPs, and (C) zeta potential distribution.

Optimization

Immunoreaction time significantly influences fluorescence signals. In this assay, a positive sample was measured to establish the optimal assay time. The At/Ac ratio (R) was measured every 2 min over a period of 0–16 min from the start of incubation. R increased rapidly over the first 4 min and reached a plateau at 10 min (see Figure ). Based on this result, the total assay time was determined as 10 min.
Figure 3

Optimization of immunoreaction time.

Optimization of immunoreaction time.

Reproducibility

The reproducibility of our assay was evaluated based on intra-assay and inter-assay variations. Four samples were measured five times a day for five consecutive days, and the coefficient of variation (CV) values were calculated. The intra-assay and inter-assay CVs were 7.71%–9.69% and 11.51%–14.63%, respectively (see Table ). Since the CVs were all <15%, we concluded that our assay is reproducible.
Table 1

Reproducibility Test of the Developed Assay

 Intra-assay
Inter-assay
samplemean, Rstandard deviation, SDcoefficient of variation, CV (%)mean, Rstandard deviation, SDcoefficient of variation, CV (%)
A0.0290.00289.660.0340.004814.12
B0.0390.00379.490.0530.006111.51
C0.2560.02088.130.2310.033814.63
D0.3900.03017.720.4680.068014.53

Clinical Sample Tests

In order to define the appropriate cutoff value for our assay, we tested 51 normal serum samples and 7 samples that were determined to be positive by RT-PCR. The cutoff value of R (the mean of normal samples plus 3 times the standard deviation) was calculated as 0.0666. All 7 samples that were positive by RT-PCR had an R value of >0.0666 (Figure ), indicating that the developed assay can detect anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in positive samples.
Figure 4

Test results for 58 serum samples, including 51 normal and 7 positive samples. [Symbol legend: (*) P < 0.05, (****) P < 0.0001 (one-way analysis of variance and Fisher’s least significant difference test).]

Test results for 58 serum samples, including 51 normal and 7 positive samples. [Symbol legend: (*) P < 0.05, (****) P < 0.0001 (one-way analysis of variance and Fisher’s least significant difference test).] To confirm the diagnostic accuracy of our assay, we used it to test 7 samples that were positive by RT-PCR and 12 that were negative but clinically suspect. The χ2 test showed that the P-value of the McNemar test was 1.0, and the value obtained with the kappa test was 0.890 (P < 0.001) (see Table ). Thus, there was no statistically significant difference between the results obtained with our developed assay versus those obtained by RT-PCR.
Table 2

χ2 Test for Diagnostic Results of the Developed Assay and RT-PCR

 RT-PCR Test
 
 positivenegativetotal
developed LFIA   
positive718
negative01111
total71219
One of the 12 clinically suspicious samples that were negative by RT-PCR was found to be SARS-CoV-2 IgG positive with our assay. Unlike other suspected cases, this case did not only have the fever and came with high clinical suspicion. The negative result of RT-PCR test raised clinical concerns about the management of this case. Base on our IgG test result, the RT-PCR test result was more likely to be a false negative. At present, prevention of cross-infection is very essential in outbreak control; timely isolation and treatment should be adopted for this case.

Conclusion

The present study describes a simple and rapid LNP-based immunoassay for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG in human serum. Because there is presently no official anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG standard available, the assay cannot be improved from semiquantitative to accurate quantification. However, the results of the validation experiment meet the requirements for clinical diagnostic reagents. Our assay can be used to monitor the progression of COVID-19, as well as responses to treatment. We expect this assay to be highly useful for helping to contain the COVID-19 outbreak by allowing timely diagnosis through early detection of SARS-CoV-2.
  114 in total

1.  Handheld Thermo-Photonic Device for Rapid, Low-Cost, and On-Site Detection and Quantification of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody.

Authors:  Damber Thapa; Nakisa Samadi; Nima Tabatabaei
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.301

2.  Application of Nanoscale Materials and Nanotechnology Against Viral Infection: A Special Focus on Coronaviruses.

Authors:  Prathap Somu; Sonali Mohanty; Srishti Chakraborty; Subhankar Paul
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Evaluation of eleven immunochromatographic assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection: investigating the dengue cross-reaction.

Authors:  Beatriz Araujo Oliveira; Lea Campos de Oliveira; Franciane Mendes de Oliveira; Geovana Maria Pereira; Regina Maia de Souza; Erika Regina Manuli; Fabricio Klerynton Marchini; Evelyn Patrícia Sanchez Espinoza; Marcelo Park; Leandro Taniguchi; Pedro Vitale Mendes; Lucas Augusto Moyses Franco; Ana Catharina Nastri; Maura Salaroli de Oliveira; José Mauro Vieira Junior; Esper Georges Kallas; Anna Sara Levin; Ester Cerdeira Sabino; Silvia Figueiredo Costa
Journal:  Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 2.169

4.  Development of a rapid and sensitive quantum dot nanobead-based double-antigen sandwich lateral flow immunoassay and its clinical performance for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 total antibodies.

Authors:  Yaofeng Zhou; Yuan Chen; Wenjuan Liu; Hao Fang; Xiangmin Li; Li Hou; Yuanjie Liu; Weihua Lai; Xiaolin Huang; Yonghua Xiong
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 7.460

Review 5.  COVID-19 Diagnostic Strategies Part II: Protein-Based Technologies.

Authors:  Tina Shaffaf; Ebrahim Ghafar-Zadeh
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-28

6.  Electrochemical immunosensor platform based on gold-clusters, cysteamine and glutaraldehyde modified electrode for diagnosing COVID-19.

Authors:  Lokman Liv
Journal:  Microchem J       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.821

Review 7.  Advances of nanomaterials-based strategies for fighting against COVID-19.

Authors:  Chunxi Zeng; Xucheng Hou; Margaret Bohmer; Yizhou Dong
Journal:  View (Beijing)       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 8.  State of the art of colloidal particles and unique interfaces-based SARS-CoV-2 detection methods and COVID-19 diagnosis.

Authors:  Ebru Saatçi; Satheesh Natarajan
Journal:  Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.448

9.  Simultaneous detection of the spike and nucleocapsid proteins from SARS-CoV-2 based on ultrasensitive single molecule assays.

Authors:  Qiyong Cai; Jingjing Mu; Yang Lei; Jia Ge; Aaron Albert Aryee; Xiaoge Zhang; Zhaohui Li
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Nanoparticle Transfer Biosensors for the Non-Invasive Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Trapped in Surgical Face Masks.

Authors:  Andreu Vaquer; Alejandra Alba-Patiño; Cristina Adrover-Jaume; Steven M Russell; María Aranda; Marcio Borges; Joana Mena; Alberto Del Castillo; Antonia Socias; Luisa Martín; María Magdalena Arellano; Miguel Agudo; Marta Gonzalez-Freire; Manuela Besalduch; Antonio Clemente; Enrique Barón; Roberto de la Rica
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 7.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.