| Literature DB >> 35017565 |
Katarina Persson1,2, Ulrika Petersson2, Charlotte Johansson1,3, Isak Demirel1,2, Robert Kruse4,5.
Abstract
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) may undergo a cyclic cascade of morphological alterations that are believed to enhance the potential of UPEC to evade host responses and re-infect host cell. However, knowledge on the pathogenic potential and host activation properties of UPEC during the morphological switch is limited. Microarray analysis was performed on mRNA isolated from human bladder epithelial cells (HBEP) after exposure to three different morphological states of UPEC (normal coliform, filamentous form and reverted form). Cells stimulated with filamentous bacteria showed the lowest number of significant gene alterations, although the number of enriched gene ontology classes was high suggesting diverse effects on many different classes of host genes. The normal coliform was in general superior in stimulating transcriptional activity in HBEP cells compared to the filamentous and reverted form. Top-scored gene entities activated by all three morphological states included IL17C, TNFAIP6, TNF, IL20, CXCL2, CXCL3, IL6 and CXCL8. The number of significantly changed canonical pathways was lower in HBEP cells stimulated with the reverted form (32 pathways), than in cells stimulated with the coliform (83 pathways) or filamentous bacteria (138 pathways). A host cell invasion assay showed that filamentous bacteria were unable to invade bladder cells, and that the number of intracellular bacteria was markedly lower in cells infected with the reverted form compared to the coliform. In conclusion, the morphological state of UPEC has major impact on the host bladder response both when evaluating the number and the identity of altered host genes and pathways.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35017565 PMCID: PMC8752619 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04396-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Summary of the experimental protocol and a visual demonstration of the three different morphological states of ESBL019. ESBL019 Coliform was grown for 3 h in cell culture medium (CCM) without ceftibuten, ESBL019 Filamentous was grown for 3 h in the presence of ceftibuten and ESBL019 Reverted was grown in the presence of ceftibuten for 3 h and then without ceftibuten for 1 h to allow its reversion. The bacteria were thereafter added to HBEP cells, in 6-well plates, in the presence or absence of ceftibuten as indicated. The lower panel demonstrates the different morphological states of ESBL019 carrying an eGFP-plasmid (enhanced green fluorescence protein, kindly provided by Professor Philip Poole at University of Oxford, UK). Scale bar: 50 µm.
Differentially expressed gene entities with a ≥ 2 fold change.
| Coliform | Shared gene entities (R1 + R2) | Filamentous | Shared gene entities (R2 + R3) | Reverted | Shared gene entities (R2 + R4) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up-regulated | 737 | 305 | 374 | 138 | 634 | 342 |
| Down-regulated | 597 | 36 | 55 | 27 | 620 | 310 |
| Total | 1334 | 341 | 429 | 165 | 1254 | 652 |
Figure 2Venn diagram of differentially expresses gene entities in HBEP cells stimulated by different morphological states of ESBL019 compared to unstimulated controls. Shown in blue; HBEP cells stimulated by the Coliform, in yellow; HBEP cells stimulated by Filamentous bacteria and pink; HBEP cells stimulated by Reverted bacteria. Up and down regulated entities are designated U and D respectively (n = 4 in each group). Overlapping regions represent entities that are present in Coliform and Filamentous (R1 + R2), Filamentous and Reverted (R2 + R3) or Coliform and Reverted (R2 + R4).
A comparative analysis of shared gene entities altered in HBEP cells after stimulation with all three morphologies (Coliform, Filamentous, Reverted).
| Gene symbol | Coliform vs C | Filamentous vs C | Reverted vs C | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL17C | 2406 | 1371 | 11.5 | Homo sapiens interleukin 17C |
| TNFAIP6 | 1231 | 398 | 7.3 | Homo sapiens tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 6 |
| TNF | 1162 | 49.7 | 68.8 | Homo sapiens tumor necrosis factor |
| IL20 | 442 | 75.4 | 19.5 | Homo sapiens interleukin 20 |
| CXCL2 | 393 | 22.1 | 61.2 | Homo sapiens chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2 |
| CXCL3 | 339 | 13.6 | 19.9 | Homo sapiens chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 3 |
| IL6 | 275 | 23.8 | 16.1 | Homo sapiens interleukin 6 |
| CXCL8 | 274 | 49.0 | 24.7 | Homo sapiens chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 8 |
| ICAM1 | 252 | 334 | 3.9 | Homo sapiens intercellular adhesion molecule 1 |
| CXCL1 | 222 | 66.3 | 13.4 | Homo sapiens chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 |
| ZNF485 | − 3.8 | − 2.2 | − 2.8 | Homo sapiens zinc finger protein 485 |
| DFFB | − 4.1 | − 2.0 | − 2.8 | Homo sapiens DNA fragmentation factor, 40 kDa, beta polypeptide (caspase-activated DNase), transcript variant 1 |
| ID3 | − 4.6 | − 3.2 | − 2.5 | Homo sapiens inhibitor of DNA binding 3, dominant negative helix-loop-helix protein |
| ZNF214 | − 4.6 | − 2.7 | − 3.2 | Homo sapiens zinc finger protein 214 |
| ZNF239 | − 4.7 | − 2.6 | − 2.2 | Homo sapiens zinc finger protein 239, transcript variant 1 |
| IRX5 | − 5.1 | − 3.2 | − 2.1 | Homo sapiens iroquois homeobox 5, transcript variant 1 |
| CBX2 | − 5.3 | − 2.5 | − 5.6 | Homo sapiens chromobox homolog 2, transcript variant 1 |
| RAB3A | − 6.9 | − 2.6 | − 4.2 | Homo sapiens RAB3A, member RAS oncogene family |
| SOX2 | − 9.2 | − 3.3 | − 3.0 | Homo sapiens SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 2 |
| ZFP37 | − 14.3 | − 3.1 | − 5.0 | Homo sapiens ZFP37 zinc finger protein, transcript variant 3 |
Data are expressed as fold change compared to unstimulated control cells (C). The top 10 up-regulated and down-regulated genes are shown.
Figure 3A comparative analysis of (A) shared upstream regulators altered in HBEP cells after stimulation with all three morphologies (Coliform, Filamentous, Reverted) compared to unstimulated control cells, (B) upstream regulators for gene entities that were uniquely altered in HBEP cells after stimulation with only one of the three morphologies (only Coliform, only Filamentous, only Reverted) compared to unstimulated control cells. The top 30 upstream regulators are shown, and data are presented as activation z-score and − log B-H corrected p-value.
Figure 4Pathway analysis showing upstream regulators associated with gene expression of (A) NLRP3 and (B) CXCL8. Red regulators are upregulated compared to unstimulated control cells while blue are downregulated. Red/orange lines indicate that the regulator leads to a predicted activation of gene expression while yellow lines indicate disagreement between the state of the upstream regulator and the predicted function. Grey lines indicate that no activation pattern can be predicted.
Figure 5A comparative analysis of canonical pathways showing enrichment of altered gene entities in functional pathways in HBEP cells stimulated with Coliform, Filamentous and Reverted bacteria compared to unstimulated control cells. The top 30 activated pathways are shown, and data are presented as activation z-score and − log B-H corrected p-value.
Figure 6The human bladder epithelial cell line HBLAK was infected in 24-well plates with Coliform, Filamentous and Reverted bacteria followed by evaluation of bacterial invasion. Bacterial invasion was assessed and quantified as the number of intracellular bacteria (CFU)/well. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of four independent experiments. Statistical significance *p < 0.05.