Literature DB >> 35016614

ChromoMap: an R package for interactive visualization of multi-omics data and annotation of chromosomes.

Lakshay Anand1, Carlos M Rodriguez Lopez2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent advancements in high-throughput sequencing have resulted in the availability of annotated genomes, as well as of multi-omics data for many living organisms. This has increased the need for graphic tools that allow the concurrent visualization of genomes and feature-associated multi-omics data on single publication-ready plots.
RESULTS: We present chromoMap, an R package, developed for the construction of interactive visualizations of chromosomes/chromosomal regions, mapping of any chromosomal feature with known coordinates (i.e., protein coding genes, transposable elements, non-coding RNAs, microsatellites, etc.), and chromosomal regional characteristics (i.e. genomic feature density, gene expression, DNA methylation, chromatin modifications, etc.) of organisms with a genome assembly. ChromoMap can also integrate multi-omics data (genomics, transcriptomics and epigenomics) in relation to their occurrence across chromosomes. ChromoMap takes tab-delimited files (BED like) or alternatively R objects to specify the genomic co-ordinates of the chromosomes and elements to annotate. Rendered chromosomes are composed of continuous windows of a given range, which, on hover, display detailed information about the elements annotated within that range. By adjusting parameters of a single function, users can generate a variety of plots that can either be saved as static image or as HTML documents.
CONCLUSIONS: ChromoMap's flexibility allows for concurrent visualization of genomic data in each strand of a given chromosome, or of more than one homologous chromosome; allowing the comparison of multi-omic data between genotypes (e.g. species, varieties, etc.) or between homologous chromosomes of phased diploid/polyploid genomes. chromoMap is an extensive tool that can be potentially used in various bioinformatics analysis pipelines for genomic visualization of multi-omics data.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genome visualization; Multi-omics data visualization; R package

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35016614      PMCID: PMC8753883          DOI: 10.1186/s12859-021-04556-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


Background

Recent dramatic decrease in Next Generation Sequencing costs, and its application to the analysis of multiple levels of biological information (genomics, transcriptomics, epigenomics), has rapidly increased the number of multi-omics datasets available in public repositories. This has sifted the interest of researchers towards the annotation and comparison of such information at a genome or chromosome level. Besides identifying structural differences, comparison of genomic annotations can help understanding how variability within and between species affect phenotypes. Currently, genomes are viewed using interactive web-based genome browser applications like JBrowse [1]. There is a paucity of non-web based independent tools capable of generating publication-ready interactive visualization of annotated genomes. This is more evident with the recent advent of diploid phased genomes of highly heterozygous samples [2]. The R [3] package chromoMap, is capable of annotating multiple genomic features, for the generation of interactive graphics. This allows the visualization in a single plot of chromosomes or chromosome sections of any living organism. The large genome size of certain species presents practical graphical challenges of displaying whole chromosomes within the available canvas space suitable for publications. ChromoMap, renders chromosomes as a continuous composition of windows, to surmount this restriction. Each window, consisting of a specific genomic range determined algorithmically based on chromosome length, displays information about the annotation in that region as a tooltip, allowing for plot interactivity.

Implementation

chromoMap is built using two languages, R and JavaScript. The R code, written using a procedural approach (as opposed to an object-oriented paradigm), handles the data input and data pre-processing part. The graphics rendering is entirely handled by the JavaScript part, constructed using vanilla JavaScript and D3 JavaScript library (version 4.0). The package was designed and tested using R version 4.0 and is compatible to run with R version 4.0 (or later) on multiple OS (Windows/macOS/Linux). R was chosen due its open-source nature as well as due to its general preference within the bioinformatics community. Annotated chromosomes are constructed by providing genomic co-ordinates, and optional secondary data, as either tab-delimited BED files or directly through R objects. A single R function is used for constructing a variety of different plots by changing its arguments values. For example, Fig. 1 was generated using the code below.
Fig. 1

Example of chromoMap plot constructed using various features of chromoMap including polyploidy (used as multi-track), feature-associated data visualization (scatter and bar plots), chromosome heatmaps, data filters (color-coded scatter and bars). Differential gene expression in a cohort of patients positive for COVID19 and healthy individuals (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus id: GSE162835) [12]. Each track contains information for chromosome 1 (For a complete interactive plot containing all 23 chromosomes see Additional file 1). Each track from top to bottom describes: (1) number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (FDR < 0.05) (bars over the chromosome depictions) per genomic window (green boxes within the chromosome). Windows containing ≥ 5 DEGs are shown in yellow. (2) DEGs (FDR < 0.05) between healthy individuals and patients positive for COVID19 visualized as a scatterplot above the chromosome depiction (genes with logFC ≥ 2 or logFC ≤ −2 are highlighted in orange). Dots above the grey dashed line represent upregulated genes in COVID19 positive patients. Heatmap within chromosome depictions indicates the average LogFC value per window. (3–4) Normalized expression of differentially expressed genes (scatterplot) and of each genomic window containing DEG (green scale heatmap) in (3) patients with severe/critical outcomes and (4) asymptomatic/mild outcome patients. (5) logFC of DEGs between healthy individuals and patients positive for COVID19 visualized as scatter plot color-coded based on the metabolic pathway each DEG belongs to

Example of chromoMap plot constructed using various features of chromoMap including polyploidy (used as multi-track), feature-associated data visualization (scatter and bar plots), chromosome heatmaps, data filters (color-coded scatter and bars). Differential gene expression in a cohort of patients positive for COVID19 and healthy individuals (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus id: GSE162835) [12]. Each track contains information for chromosome 1 (For a complete interactive plot containing all 23 chromosomes see Additional file 1). Each track from top to bottom describes: (1) number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (FDR < 0.05) (bars over the chromosome depictions) per genomic window (green boxes within the chromosome). Windows containing ≥ 5 DEGs are shown in yellow. (2) DEGs (FDR < 0.05) between healthy individuals and patients positive for COVID19 visualized as a scatterplot above the chromosome depiction (genes with logFC ≥ 2 or logFC ≤ −2 are highlighted in orange). Dots above the grey dashed line represent upregulated genes in COVID19 positive patients. Heatmap within chromosome depictions indicates the average LogFC value per window. (3–4) Normalized expression of differentially expressed genes (scatterplot) and of each genomic window containing DEG (green scale heatmap) in (3) patients with severe/critical outcomes and (4) asymptomatic/mild outcome patients. (5) logFC of DEGs between healthy individuals and patients positive for COVID19 visualized as scatter plot color-coded based on the metabolic pathway each DEG belongs to As shown in the example code above, the user inputs to the function fall into two categories: (1) the BED files or R objects, which specify the genomic coordinates of the chromosomes/chromosomal regions as well as the genomic coordinates for the studied genomic features, (genes, SNPs etc.), along with their associated data (e.g. gene expression values), and (2) the various ‘option’ arguments that are used to specify the graphic-properties of the plot, used for instance to turn a feature ON/OFF etc. Errors caused by the first type, such as user-provided files with incorrect structure or files created in an unsupported format, is handled in the implementation such that the program will first validate the file and will terminate the program with message on the console if the input file was incorrect. In addition to the detection of unsupported file format and/or structure, we implemented an out-of-bound annotations (i.e., annotation coordinates outside the boundary of the target chromosome or genomic feature) detection step. First, out-of-bound annotations are identified by the program and removed from the analysis. Then, the plot is rendered with the remaining annotations, together with an error message, displayed on the console to alert the user of the presence of such errors in their input files. The errors caused by the second type of inputs (e.g. the use of options not available for a given plot type, or failure to specify an option), are also handled in the implementation in a similar way (i.e., checking and exiting the program if encounter errors). The generated plot, as viewed in RStudio’s viewer pane, offers users the possibility to zoom into a locus allowing them to explore their annotations of interest. Users can export the plot either as a static image [4-10], or as a stand-alone HTML file (see example in https://pouya-dini.github.io/equine-gene-db/#tab2) that contains an interactive plot that can be included in webpage accessible formats (e.g. Shiny Apps), as additional files in publications (See example Additional files 1 and 2), or embedded in RMarkdown documents.

Features and applications

Point and segment-annotations

ChromoMap provides the choice of two annotation algorithms, point-annotation and segment-annotation, differing in how annotations are visualized on the plot. Point-annotation ignores the element’s size, annotating it on a single base. Segment-annotation uses the element’s size to delimit its location. This can be advantageous when visualizing and annotating chromosomal regions or structural elements (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Example of chromoMap plot generated using the segment-annotation feature. 28 Splice variants of the human ABCD4 (ATP binding cassette subfamily D member 4) gene visualized using the segment-annotation feature. Exons are highlighted in red and introns in green. Feature coordinates were extracted from Ensembl BioMart [13]

Example of chromoMap plot generated using the segment-annotation feature. 28 Splice variants of the human ABCD4 (ATP binding cassette subfamily D member 4) gene visualized using the segment-annotation feature. Exons are highlighted in red and introns in green. Feature coordinates were extracted from Ensembl BioMart [13]

Group annotations

Visualizing annotations might require depicting annotations of groups of elements as opposed to individual ones. Groups can be color-coded for effective visualizations (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Example of chromoMap plot constructed using group annotations. Genomic location of 5 ortholog genes in the rice and maize genomes. Gene coordinates were extracted from Ensembl BioMart [13]

Example of chromoMap plot constructed using group annotations. Genomic location of 5 ortholog genes in the rice and maize genomes. Gene coordinates were extracted from Ensembl BioMart [13]

Hyperlinks and labelling

Allow the user viewing information embedded in tooltips associated to genomic features and to be redirected to preexisting webpages containing detailed information about such features. Additionally, users can use the ‘labelling’ option to display labels on static visualizations.

Feature-associated data visualization

Feature-associated numeric data, such as gene expression, methylation status, copy number variants, feature density values, etc., can either be summarized as scatter/bar plots (Fig. 4a) or visualized as heatmaps (Fig. 4b). As each window represents a specific range of base pairs, multiple elements can be annotated within its range. ChromoMap uses aggregated data values (sum, average, min, max or count) for each window encompassing more than one element. Individual data values, for each element, can also be viewed in tooltips. Additionally, there is an ‘epi-tag’ feature that allows condition-based marking of loci. More advanced features include creating multidimensional scatter plots (Fig. 1-track 5) or applying mathematical filters on scatter/bar plots as depicted on Fig. 3 by Chidzanga et al. [11].
Fig. 4

Feature-associated data visualization using chromoMap. A Visualization of genomic and epigenomic information for chromosomes 4 and 5 in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Vertical bars show the number of protein coding genes per genomic window (windows with ≥ 50 genes shown in yellow), and differential methylation (-Log10 (FDR)) of ms-GBS markers between plants grown under control conditions and under salt stress (75 mM NaCl) (Green: Hypermethylated markers under salt stress. Red: Hypomethylated markers under salt stress) European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) (Study Accession Number: PRJEB27251) [14]. B gene expression differences between healthy and breast cancer patients (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus id: GSE59055) [15]. Solid black chromosomes depict difference in gene expression (logFC) between the healthy and cancer diagnose cohorts, while empty chromosomes depict the mean normalized expression for individuals within the control (Green) diseased (Red) cohorts

Feature-associated data visualization using chromoMap. A Visualization of genomic and epigenomic information for chromosomes 4 and 5 in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Vertical bars show the number of protein coding genes per genomic window (windows with ≥ 50 genes shown in yellow), and differential methylation (-Log10 (FDR)) of ms-GBS markers between plants grown under control conditions and under salt stress (75 mM NaCl) (Green: Hypermethylated markers under salt stress. Red: Hypomethylated markers under salt stress) European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) (Study Accession Number: PRJEB27251) [14]. B gene expression differences between healthy and breast cancer patients (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus id: GSE59055) [15]. Solid black chromosomes depict difference in gene expression (logFC) between the healthy and cancer diagnose cohorts, while empty chromosomes depict the mean normalized expression for individuals within the control (Green) diseased (Red) cohorts

Polyploidy (multitrack)

This feature allows rendering each chromosome set independently irrespectively of the species’ ploidy. This allows plotting chromosome sets that differ in size and number. This feature also allows the visualization of chromosome sets of different species for comparative genomic studies; or the visualization of highly heterozygous diploid genomes and homologous chromosomes pairs in phased diploid/polyploid genome assemblies (Fig. 1). This feature allows the visualization of biologically important variability that would be lost in a consensus sequence assembly.

chromLinks

The linkage/correlation between any two annotated features can be visualized either as directed or undirected edges or as thick chord-like connectors. Moreover, data associated to these links can be visualized as color-coded links along with respective legends (Fig. 5). This feature can have several applications like for visualizing the homolog genes or to visualize co-expressed genes.
Fig. 5

Example plot generated using chromLinks: Normalized expression of the top 50 highly expressed orthologous genes in mouse (Mus musculus) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) during pluripotent cell determination (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus id: GSE42081) [16]. Orthologous gene pairs are connected with colored links. Each orthologous pair is indicated by a different link color. For an interactive version of this plot see Additional file 2

Example plot generated using chromLinks: Normalized expression of the top 50 highly expressed orthologous genes in mouse (Mus musculus) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) during pluripotent cell determination (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus id: GSE42081) [16]. Orthologous gene pairs are connected with colored links. Each orthologous pair is indicated by a different link color. For an interactive version of this plot see Additional file 2

Conclusion

ChromoMap is an efficient and user-friendly tool to visualise genomic elements, as well as its associated data (such as multi-omics data), in relation to their regional occurrence across chromosomes for any living organism with an available genome assembly. ChromoMap’s flexible plots permits the comparison of data uniquely associated to each strand of a given chromosome, and of homologous chromosome independently of their size. ChromoMap will allow the individual visualization of multi-omics data in all homologous chromosomes of phased diploid/polyploid genomes.

Availability and requirements

ChromoMap is available under the GPL-3 Open Source license from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=chromoMap. A vignette is included for comprehensive description of its features. ChromoMap is also available as a containerized web application, referred as chromoMap App, that provides a GUI that will allow researchers to utilize all the above-mentioned features in an R-independent manner. The app can be run locally on the user’s computer. chromoMap App is available as a Docker Image at Docker Hub (https://hub.docker.com/r/lakshay57/chromomap-app). The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding references. Project name: chromoMap. Project home page: https://lakshay-anand.github.io/chromoMap/index.html. Operating system(s): Platform independent. Programming language: R, JavaScript. Other requirements: None. License: GPL3. Any restrictions to use by non-academics: license needed. Additional file 1. Example of chromoMap interactive plot constructed using various features of chromoMap including polyploidy (used as multi-track), feature-associated data visualization (scatter and bar plots), chromosome heatmaps, data filters (color-coded scatter and bars). Differential gene expression in a cohort of patients positive for COVID19 and healthy individuals (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus id: GSE162835) [12]. Each set of five tracks labeled with the same chromosome ID (e.g. 1-22, X & Y) contains the following information: From top to bottom: (1) number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (FDR < 0.05) (bars over the chromosome depictions) per genomic window (green boxes within the chromosome). Windows containing ≥ 5 DEGs are shown in yellow. (2) DEGs (FDR < 0.05) between healthy individuals and patients positive for COVID19 visualized as a scatterplot above the chromosome depiction (genes with logFC ≥ 2 or logFC ≤ −2 are highlighted in orange). Dots above the grey dashed line represent upregulated genes in COVID19 positive patients. Heatmap within chromosome depictions indicates the average LogFC value per window. (3–4) Normalized expression of differentially expressed genes (scatterplot) and of each genomic window containing DEG (green scale heatmap) in (3) patients with severe/critical outcomes and (4) asymptomatic/mild outcome patients. (5) logFC of DEGs between healthy individuals and patients positive for COVID19 visualized as scatter plot color-coded based on the metabolic pathway each DEG belongs to. Additional file 2. Example of interactive plot generated using chromLinks: Normalized expression of the top 50 highly expressed orthologous genes in mouse (Mus musculus) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) during pluripotent cell determination (NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus id: GSE42081) [16]. Orthologous gene pairs are connected with colored links. Each orthologous pair is indicated by a different link color.
  12 in total

1.  3D mapping and accelerated super-resolution imaging of the human genome using in situ sequencing.

Authors:  Huy Q Nguyen; Shyamtanu Chattoraj; David Castillo; Son C Nguyen; Guy Nir; Antonios Lioutas; Elliot A Hershberg; Nuno M C Martins; Paul L Reginato; Mohammed Hannan; Brian J Beliveau; George M Church; Evan R Daugharthy; Marc A Marti-Renom; C-Ting Wu
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Resistance Gene Analogs in the Brassicaceae: Identification, Characterization, Distribution, and Evolution.

Authors:  Soodeh Tirnaz; Philipp E Bayer; Fabian Inturrisi; Fangning Zhang; Hua Yang; Aria Dolatabadian; Ting X Neik; Anita Severn-Ellis; Dhwani A Patel; Muhammad I Ibrahim; Aneeta Pradhan; David Edwards; Jacqueline Batley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Development of an Australian Bread Wheat Nested Association Mapping Population, a New Genetic Diversity Resource for Breeding under Dry and Hot Climates.

Authors:  Charity Chidzanga; Delphine Fleury; Ute Baumann; Dan Mullan; Sayuri Watanabe; Priyanka Kalambettu; Robert Pontre; James Edwards; Kerrie Forrest; Debbie Wong; Peter Langridge; Ken Chalmers; Melissa Garcia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Single individual structural variant detection uncovers widespread hemizygosity in molluscs.

Authors:  Andrew D Calcino; Nathan J Kenny; Marco Gerdol
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Ensembl 2020.

Authors:  Andrew D Yates; Premanand Achuthan; Wasiu Akanni; James Allen; Jamie Allen; Jorge Alvarez-Jarreta; M Ridwan Amode; Irina M Armean; Andrey G Azov; Ruth Bennett; Jyothish Bhai; Konstantinos Billis; Sanjay Boddu; José Carlos Marugán; Carla Cummins; Claire Davidson; Kamalkumar Dodiya; Reham Fatima; Astrid Gall; Carlos Garcia Giron; Laurent Gil; Tiago Grego; Leanne Haggerty; Erin Haskell; Thibaut Hourlier; Osagie G Izuogu; Sophie H Janacek; Thomas Juettemann; Mike Kay; Ilias Lavidas; Tuan Le; Diana Lemos; Jose Gonzalez Martinez; Thomas Maurel; Mark McDowall; Aoife McMahon; Shamika Mohanan; Benjamin Moore; Michael Nuhn; Denye N Oheh; Anne Parker; Andrew Parton; Mateus Patricio; Manoj Pandian Sakthivel; Ahamed Imran Abdul Salam; Bianca M Schmitt; Helen Schuilenburg; Dan Sheppard; Mira Sycheva; Marek Szuba; Kieron Taylor; Anja Thormann; Glen Threadgold; Alessandro Vullo; Brandon Walts; Andrea Winterbottom; Amonida Zadissa; Marc Chakiachvili; Bethany Flint; Adam Frankish; Sarah E Hunt; Garth IIsley; Myrto Kostadima; Nick Langridge; Jane E Loveland; Fergal J Martin; Joannella Morales; Jonathan M Mudge; Matthieu Muffato; Emily Perry; Magali Ruffier; Stephen J Trevanion; Fiona Cunningham; Kevin L Howe; Daniel R Zerbino; Paul Flicek
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Host transcriptomic profiling of COVID-19 patients with mild, moderate, and severe clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ruchi Jain; Sathishkumar Ramaswamy; Divinlal Harilal; Mohammed Uddin; Tom Loney; Norbert Nowotny; Hanan Alsuwaidi; Rupa Varghese; Zulfa Deesi; Abdulmajeed Alkhajeh; Hamda Khansaheb; Alawi Alsheikh-Ali; Ahmad Abou Tayoun
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 7.271

7.  An exploration of assembly strategies and quality metrics on the accuracy of the rewarewa (Knightia excelsa) genome.

Authors:  Ann M McCartney; Elena Hilario; Seung-Sub Choi; Joseph Guhlin; Jessica M Prebble; Gary Houliston; Thomas R Buckley; David Chagné
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Cross-species genome wide expression analysis during pluripotent cell determination in mouse and rat preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Elisa A Casanova; Michal J Okoniewski; Paolo Cinelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis.

Authors:  Robert Buels; Eric Yao; Colin M Diesh; Richard D Hayes; Monica Munoz-Torres; Gregg Helt; David M Goodstein; Christine G Elsik; Suzanna E Lewis; Lincoln Stein; Ian H Holmes
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  How Single Molecule Real-Time Sequencing and Haplotype Phasing Have Enabled Reference-Grade Diploid Genome Assembly of Wine Grapes.

Authors:  Andrea Minio; Jerry Lin; Brandon S Gaut; Dario Cantu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  12 in total

1.  Nuclear-embedded mitochondrial DNA sequences in 66,083 human genomes.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Katherine R Schon; Greg Elgar; Andrea Orioli; Melanie Tanguy; Adam Giess; Marc Tischkowitz; Mark J Caulfield; Patrick F Chinnery
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 69.504

2.  R2R3-MYBs in Durum Wheat: Genome-Wide Identification, Poaceae-Specific Clusters, Expression, and Regulatory Dynamics Under Abiotic Stresses.

Authors:  Emanuela Blanco; Pasquale Luca Curci; Andrea Manconi; Adele Sarli; Diana Lucia Zuluaga; Gabriella Sonnante
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Introgression of the Triticum timopheevii Genome Into Wheat Detected by Chromosome-Specific Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR Markers.

Authors:  Julie King; Surbhi Grewal; Manel Othmeni; Benedict Coombes; Cai-Yun Yang; Nicola Walter; Stephen Ashling; Duncan Scholefield; Jack Walker; Stella Hubbart-Edwards; Anthony Hall; Ian Phillip King
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Identification of novel PHD-finger genes in pepper by genomic re-annotation and comparative analyses.

Authors:  Ji-Yoon Guk; Min-Jeong Jang; Seungill Kim
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.260

5.  Genome-Wide Selection Signatures and Human-Mediated Introgression Events in Bos taurus indicus-influenced Composite Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Seyed Milad Vahedi; Siavash Salek Ardestani; Kian Pahlevan Afshari; Seyed Mohammad Ghoreishifar; Sima Moghaddaszadeh-Ahrabi; Mohammad Hossein Banabazi; Luiz Fernando Brito
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Genome-Wide Identification, Characterization, and Comparative Analysis of NLR Resistance Genes in Coffea spp.

Authors:  Mariana de Lima Santos; Mário Lúcio Vilela de Resende; Gabriel Sérgio Costa Alves; Jose Carlos Huguet-Tapia; Márcio Fernando Ribeiro de Júnior Resende; Jeremy Todd Brawner
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Whole-Genome Profile of Greek Patients with Teratozοοspermia: Identification of Candidate Variants and Genes.

Authors:  Maria-Anna Kyrgiafini; Themistoklis Giannoulis; Alexia Chatziparasidou; Nikolaos Christoforidis; Zissis Mamuris
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.141

8.  Robust, versatile DNA FISH probes for chromosome-specific repeats in Caenorhabditis elegans and Pristionchus pacificus.

Authors:  Renzo S Adilardi; Abby F Dernburg
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.542

9.  Double-strand break toxicity is chromatin context independent.

Authors:  Anoek Friskes; Lisa Koob; Lenno Krenning; Tesa M Severson; Emma S Koeleman; Xabier Vergara; Michael Schubert; Jeroen van den Berg; Bastiaan Evers; Anna G Manjón; Stacey Joosten; Yongsoo Kim; Wilbert Zwart; René H Medema
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 19.160

10.  Testing the accuracy of 3D automatic landmarking via genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Yoland Savriama; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.542

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.