Literature DB >> 35015359

The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses.

Falk Leichsenring1,2, Christiane Steinert1,3, Sven Rabung4, John P A Ioannidis5,6,7.   

Abstract

Mental disorders represent a worldwide public health concern. Psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies are recommended as first line treatments. However, evidence has emerged that their efficacy may be overestimated, due to a variety of shortcomings in clinical trials (e.g., publication bias, weak control conditions such as waiting list). We performed an umbrella review of recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for the main mental disorders in adults. We selected meta-analyses that formally assessed risk of bias or quality of studies, excluded weak comparators, and used effect sizes for target symptoms as primary outcome. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO and individual records of the Cochrane Library for meta-analyses published between January 2014 and March 2021 comparing psychotherapies or pharmacotherapies with placebo or treatment-as-usual (TAU), or psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies head-to-head, or the combination of psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy to either monotherapy. One hundred and two meta-analyses, encompassing 3,782 RCTs and 650,514 patients, were included, covering depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, somatoform disorders, eating disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, insomnia, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and bipolar disorder. Across disorders and treatments, the majority of effect sizes for target symptoms were small. A random effect meta-analytic evaluation of the effect sizes reported by the largest meta-analyses per disorder yielded a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.26-0.42) for psychotherapies and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.32-0.41) for pharmacotherapies compared with placebo or TAU. The SMD for head-to-head comparisons of psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies was 0.11 (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26). The SMD for the combined treatment compared with either monotherapy was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.19-0.44). Risk of bias was often high. After more than half a century of research, thousands of RCTs and millions of invested funds, the effect sizes of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders are limited, suggesting a ceiling effect for treatment research as presently conducted. A paradigm shift in research seems to be required to achieve further progress.
© 2022 World Psychiatric Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Psychotherapies; effect sizes; mental disorders; meta-analyses; meta-analytic evaluation; pharmacotherapies; randomized controlled trials

Year:  2022        PMID: 35015359      PMCID: PMC8751557          DOI: 10.1002/wps.20941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Psychiatry        ISSN: 1723-8617            Impact factor:   49.548


  161 in total

1.  A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Chinn
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  The cost of dichotomising continuous variables.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Patrick Royston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-05-06

3.  Comparative efficacy and acceptability of first-line drugs for the acute treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in adults: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hairong He; Yutao Xiang; Fengjie Gao; Ling Bai; Fan Gao; Yajuan Fan; Jun Lyu; Xiancang Ma
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Efficacy of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy for adult psychiatric disorders: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Maximilian Huhn; Magdolna Tardy; Loukia Maria Spineli; Werner Kissling; Hans Förstl; Gabriele Pitschel-Walz; Claudia Leucht; Myrto Samara; Markus Dold; John M Davis; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.596

5.  The efficacy and safety of 5 mg/d Vortioxetine compared to placebo for major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Fu; Yangmei Chen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Comparison of psychotherapies for adult depression to pill placebo control groups: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Cuijpers; E H Turner; D C Mohr; S G Hofmann; G Andersson; M Berking; J Coyne
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Response rates in patients with schizophrenia and positive symptoms receiving cognitive behavioural therapy: a systematic review and single-group meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irene Bighelli; Maximilian Huhn; Johannes Schneider-Thoma; Marc Krause; Cornelia Reitmeir; Sofia Wallis; Felicitas Schwermann; Gabi Pitschel-Walz; Corrado Barbui; Toshi A Furukawa; Stefan Leucht
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pharmacological treatments for the treatment of acute bipolar depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anees Bahji; Dylan Ermacora; Callum Stephenson; Emily R Hawken; Gustavo Vazquez
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 10.  Pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions for management of obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Petros Skapinakis; Deborah M Caldwell; William Hollingworth; Peter Bryden; Naomi A Fineberg; Paul Salkovskis; Nicky J Welton; Helen Baxter; David Kessler; Rachel Churchill; Glyn Lewis
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 27.083

View more
  5 in total

1.  Psychiatric diagnosis and treatment in the 21st century: paradigm shifts versus incremental integration.

Authors:  Dan J Stein; Steven J Shoptaw; Daniel V Vigo; Crick Lund; Pim Cuijpers; Jason Bantjes; Norman Sartorius; Mario Maj
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 79.683

2.  Effect of antidepressants on functioning and quality of life outcomes in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Teng Teng; Zhihan Zhang; Bangmin Yin; Tingting Guo; Xiaoya Wang; Jiayi Hu; Xin Ran; Qi Dai; Xinyu Zhou
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 7.989

3.  Prevention, treatment and care of substance use disorders in times of COVID-19.

Authors:  Nora D Volkow; Susan Maua; Giovanna Campello; Vladimir Poznyak; Dzmitry Krupchanka; Wataru Kashino; Anja Busse
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 79.683

4.  Mental Health in Australia: Psychological Distress Reported in Six Consecutive Cross-Sectional National Surveys From 2001 to 2018.

Authors:  Joanne Enticott; Shrinkhala Dawadi; Frances Shawyer; Brett Inder; Ellie Fossey; Helena Teede; Sebastian Rosenberg; Ingrid Ozols Am; Graham Meadows
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 5.435

5.  Frontostriatal circuitry as a target for fMRI-based neurofeedback interventions: A systematic review.

Authors:  Linda Orth; Johanna Meeh; Ruben C Gur; Irene Neuner; Pegah Sarkheil
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.473

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.