Zhifeng Wang1,2, Haisen Li3, Jingmeng Fang3, Xiaoyu Wang3, Shuhang Dai3, Wei Cao3, Yinhong Guo3, Zhe Li3, Hao Zhu4. 1. Sinoneural Cell Engineering Group Holdings Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201100, China. wangzhifeng68@hotmail.com. 2. Translational Medical Center for Stem Cell Therapy and Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. wangzhifeng68@hotmail.com. 3. Sinoneural Cell Engineering Group Holdings Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201100, China. 4. Sinoneural Cell Engineering Group Holdings Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 201100, China. zhuhao@sinoneural.com.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), one of the most common carbohydrate metabolism disorders, is characterized by chronic hyperglycemia and insulin resistance (IR), and has become an urgent global health challenge. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) originating from perinatal tissues such as umbilical cord (UC) and amniotic membrane (AM) serve as ideal candidates for the treatment of T2DM due to their great advantages in terms of abundant source, proliferation capacity, immunomodulation and plasticity for insulin-producing cell differentiation. However, the optimally perinatal MSC source to treat T2DM remains elusive. This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs derived from AM and UC (AMMSCs and UCMSCs) of the same donor in the alleviation of T2DM symptoms and explore the underlying mechanisms. Our results showed that AMMSCs and UCMSCs displayed indistinguishable immunophenotype and multi-lineage differentiation potential, but UCMSCs had a much higher expansion capacity than AMMSCs. Moreover, we uncovered that single-dose intravenous injection of either AMMSCs or UCMSCs could comparably reduce hyperglycemia and improve IR in T2DM db/db mice. Mechanistic investigations revealed that either AMMSC or UCMSC infusion could greatly improve glycolipid metabolism in the liver of db/db mice, which was evidenced by decreased liver to body weight ratio, reduced lipid accumulation, upregulated glycogen synthesis, and increased Akt phosphorylation. Taken together, these data indicate that the same donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs possessed comparable effects and shared a similar hepatoprotective mechanism on the alleviation of T2DM symptoms.
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), one of the most common carbohydrate metabolism disorders, is characterized by chronic hyperglycemia and insulin resistance (IR), and has become an urgent global health challenge. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) originating from perinatal tissues such as umbilical cord (UC) and amniotic membrane (AM) serve as ideal candidates for the treatment of T2DM due to their great advantages in terms of abundant source, proliferation capacity, immunomodulation and plasticity for insulin-producing cell differentiation. However, the optimally perinatal MSC source to treat T2DM remains elusive. This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs derived from AM and UC (AMMSCs and UCMSCs) of the same donor in the alleviation of T2DM symptoms and explore the underlying mechanisms. Our results showed that AMMSCs and UCMSCs displayed indistinguishable immunophenotype and multi-lineage differentiation potential, but UCMSCs had a much higher expansion capacity than AMMSCs. Moreover, we uncovered that single-dose intravenous injection of either AMMSCs or UCMSCs could comparably reduce hyperglycemia and improve IR in T2DM db/db mice. Mechanistic investigations revealed that either AMMSC or UCMSC infusion could greatly improve glycolipid metabolism in the liver of db/db mice, which was evidenced by decreased liver to body weight ratio, reduced lipid accumulation, upregulated glycogen synthesis, and increased Akt phosphorylation. Taken together, these data indicate that the same donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs possessed comparable effects and shared a similar hepatoprotective mechanism on the alleviation of T2DM symptoms.
Global estimates indicate that over 462 million people are currently suffering from diabetes mellitus, and this number expectedly rises to around 700 million by 2045 [1, 2]. T2DM, the most common form of diabetes, is pathologically caused by IR and pancreatic β-cell destructions, which eventually lead to the uncontrolled hyperglycemia in T2DM [2, 3]. IR is well known as the foremost pathogenesis of T2DM, and characterized by the impaired ability of peripheral tissues to response to insulin [2, 4], thereby causing the failure of glucose uptake within insulin-responsive tissues such as white adipose tissue, muscle, and liver. Among these organs, the liver functions as a vital player in the regulation of glycolipid homeostasis by directing nutrients to storage as triglycerides and glycogen [5, 6]. Besides, more than 90% of T2DM patients with obesity are described to have metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease [7], indicating a close association of T2DM with hepatic dysfunctions. Hepatic IR contributes greatly to the enhanced gluoconeogenesis and fatty acid synthesis in the hepatocytes of T2DM individuals [8], which accordingly conduces to elevated hepatic glycogen decomposition and lipid accumulation. Nowadays, many anti-diabetic drugs such as metformin, liraglutide and ipragliflozin, have been developed to alleviate T2DM through reversing peripheral IR and partially restoring β-cell mass [9]. However, these current first-line drugs are unable to cure T2DM, and their lifelong usage may evoke a high risk of severe side effects such as gastrointestinal reaction and life-threating hypoglycemia [2, 10]. Thus, it is extremely urgent to develop novel therapeutic approaches to maintain long-term normoglycemia and even cure T2DM.Due to their self-renewal, differentiation, immunosuppression and paracrine characteristics, MSCs have emerged as a very promising therapeutic modality to treat various human diseases including metabolic, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and autoimmune disorders [2, 11–16]. Intriguingly, human MSCs have been demonstrated to obviously decrease acute respiratory distress and mortality in patients with COVID-19 through improving pulmonary functions and reducing inflammatory biomarker levels [17, 18]. MSCs, existing in connective tissues of most organs, have been successfully obtained from adult tissues such as bone marrow (BM), lung and adipose, and perinatal tissues including AM, UC, and placenta [19-21]. In comparison with adult tissues-isolated MSCs, perinatal MSCs exhibit numbers of advantages, including, but not limited to, lower immunogenicity, higher proliferation capacity, greater differentiation potential, easily accessible, and abundant source [20-25]. Human UCMSCs have been shown to exert better therapeutic effects than BM-derived MSCs in patients with type 1 DM (T1DM) [1, 26]. Moreover, human UCMSC administration has been demonstrated to efficiently ameliorate systemic IR and hyperglycemia in rodent T2DM models by enhancing insulin sensitivity, suppressing inflammation, and improving glycolipid metabolism dysfunction in the liver [27-30]. Human AMMSCs are found to accelerate the skin wound healing in a T1DM mouse model [31], and the transplantation of human AMMSCs-differentiated insulin-producing cells or islet-like cell aggregates could normalize hyperglycemia in T1DM mice [32, 33]. And the application of human AM has been described to facilitate the ulcer healing in T2DM patients with chronic ulcers [34]. However, it remains unclear whether the AMMSC administration has therapeutic benefits for the treatment of T2DM.In the present study, to determine the potential benefits of AMMSCs and optimally perinatal source of MSCs in T2DM therapy, we compared the therapeutic effects of human AMMSCs and UCMSCs derived from the same donor in leptin receptor-deficient db/db mice spontaneously developing many severe humanlike T2DM symptoms. Our results showed that either AMMSC or UCMSC administration could comparably alleviate T2DM symptoms through enhancing systemic insulin sensitivity and reducing hyperglycemia. Mechanistically, the therapeutic benefits of perinatal MSCs could be attributed to the improvement of aberrant glycolipid metabolism, enhanced Akt phosphorylation, and suppressed inflammation in the liver of db/db mice. Overall, our data not only manifested the similar therapeutic effectiveness and mechanisms of the same donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs in the treatment of T2DM mice, but also provided very useful hints for the clinical application of human perinatal MSCs in treating T2DM.
Materials and Methods
Human MSC Isolation and Characterization
Human AM and UC tissues were acquired from healthy post-natal female with written informed consent. Human AMMSCs and UCMSCs were isolated and cultured according to previously described methods [35]. Primary AMMSCs and UCMSCs were expanded in MSC NutriStem® XF Medium (Biological Industries) supplemented with 5% Knockout™ Serum Replacement (Thermo Fisher Scientific).AMMSCs and UCMSCs at the fifth passage were utilized for the assessments of MSC surface markers and tri-lineage differentiation capacity. For the immunophenotypes of MSCs, the expressions of positive cell-surface markers (CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105 and CD166) and negative markers (CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45 and HLA-DR) were determined with the flow cytometer (BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer). All above antibodies were conjugated with phycoerythrin (PE) and purchased from BioLegend. Tri-lineage differentiation capacity of AMMSCs and UCMSCs was assessed with specific differentiation kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific), based on the manufacturers’ instructions. The osteocytes, adipocytes, and chondrocytes were identified by Alizarin Red S staining, Oil Red O staining, and Alcian Blue staining, respectively.
Growth Curve Analysis of MSCs
UCMSCs and AMMSCs were plated into 6-well culture plates at the density of 6 × 104 cells per well. Cell numbers in three individual wells were counted daily for continuous 5 days by the AO/PI method. Cell growth curves were then plotted.
Gene Expression Profiles of MSCs Stimulated with/without Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)
To compare the responses of AMMSCs and UCMSCs to IFN-γ, the mRNA expression levels of immunoregulatory and growth factor genes were determined using quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) method. Briefly, MSCs at the third passage were plated into 6-well culture plates (3 × 105 cells per well). After overnight growth, 10 ng/ml IFN-γ (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each well. 24 hours later, IFN-γ-stimulated MSCs were washed with ice-cold PBS for three times, and harvested through adding 1 mL TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) into each well. The qRT-PCR targets for growth factors include hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), while immunoregulatory genes involve interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-11, transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO1).
Animals and MSC Administration
All the experimental procedures on mice had been reviewed and approved by the Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee of Tongji University. Mouse care and experiments were undertaken by conforming to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Male 6-week-old C57BLKS/JNju (normal) and BKS-Leprem2Cd479/Nju (db/db) mice were obtained from GemPharmatechTM (Nanjing, China). All mice were housed in the constant temperature (20 ± 2℃) and humidity (50%) room with a 12-hour artificial light-dark cycle. All mice were fed with a standard diet, and allowed to freely acquire food and drinking water.AMMSCs or UCMSCs at the fifth passage were injected into 7-week-old db/db mice via the tail vein at a single dose of 1.5 × 106 cells/0.2 ml saline. Following this way, 0.2 ml saline was administrated intravenously into db/db and normal mice (control groups). Subsequently, the body weights and random blood glucose concentrations of MSCs- or Saline-infused mice were monitored at indicated time points.
Analyses of Metabolic Parameters
Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) and intraperitoneal insulin tolerance test (IPITT) were undertaken in MSCs- and Saline-injected mice after two weeks of treatment. For the IPGTT, mice were starved for overnight, and their tails were bled to determine the initial blood glucose concentration with a Accu-Chek Mobile glucometer (Roche). Glucose (2 g/kg bodyweight) was administrated into the mice via intraperitoneal injection, and blood glucose level was then monitored. For the IPITT, mice were firstly conducted with 6-hour starvation, then injected with 0.5-1.5 unit/kg of human insulin (Novolin 30R, Novo Nordisk), and the blood glucose concentration was measured.
Mouse Tissue Collection
For collecting mouse tissues, the mice were anesthetized after five weeks of MSC administration, and their epididymal white adipose tissue (EWAT) and liver were isolated and weighed. A portion of mouse livers was promptly cut into small pieces and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for below gene expression analyses, while the other part was fixed in formalin for below histological experiments. For western blotting assay, mice were firstly starved for 6 hours, and then administrated with human insulin (1 unit/kg bodyweight, Novolin 30R, Novo Nordisk). One hour later, mouse livers were collected and kept in the liquid nitrogen by snap-freezing for below protein purification.
qRT-PCR Assay
Total RNAs were purified from human MSCs or mouse livers with the TRIzol reagent, and subsequently reverse transcribed using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) based on its manufacturer’s instruction. qRT-PCR primers were designed via utilizing the NCBI’s Primer-BLAST tool, and then synthesized by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd (Shanghai). The GoTaq qPCR Master Mix Kit (Promega) was employed for the PCR reactions, and the relative expression values of target genes were calculated by following the 2−ΔΔCt method. The sequences of qRT-PCR primers in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Hematoxylin and Eosin Stain (H&E) and Periodic-Acid Schiff (PAS) Staining
Mouse livers were firstly processed in the formalin (Solarbio) and then embedded in the paraffin tissue blocks. 4 μm-thick sections were cut using a microtome, and transferred onto Bond-RiteTM slides. After being heated at 60℃ for 1 hour, the sections were deparaffinized in fresh xylene (three changes), and then rehydrated with descending grades of alcohol. Next, the sections were performed with either PAS (Solarbio) or H&E (Servicebio) staining, and comparatively viewed under the Olympus microscope equipped with an Olympus digital camera. Three areas having the same size were picked casually from each liver section, and their staining density was counted with the Image J software. The average value of lipid droplets within H&E staining or glycogen-positive area in PAS staining was utilized to respectively determine total lipid or glycogen content of mouse liver.
Western Blotting
Total proteins were extracted from mouse livers by using PMSF-contained RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime), and their concentration was measured employing the BCA Protein kit (Beyotime). Total proteins were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and then transferred onto the PVDF membrane. The PVDF membranes were sequentially probed with primary and secondary antibodies. Primary antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology and listed as follows: phospho-Akt (#9271s, 1:1000), Akt (#2920s, 1:1000), and GAPDH (1:5000). After being probed with the secondary antibody (Abcam, 1:5000) for 1 hour, the membranes were washed three times in TBST, and lastly detected with the Enhanced Chemiluminescent Detection Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Statistical Analyses
Quantitative results were displayed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) from at least three independent samples. The significant differences of group differences were determined by the unpaired t-test between two groups, or one-way ANOVA followed by LSD post hoc test for multiple groups. P-value (< 0.05) was thought to be statistically significant.
Results
Characterization of the Same Donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs
To determine whether these culture-expanded cells possess typical MSC characteristics, we evaluated their morphology, surface antigens and multiple differentiation capacities. Both UCMSCs and AMMSCs were attached to cell culture plates, and exhibited a spindle-shaped and fibroblast-like morphology (Fig. 1A). Consistent with typical MSC immunophenotype, more than 99.5% of UCMSCs and AMMSCs were positive for CD44, CD73, CD90, CD105 and CD166, while less than 0.25% were positive for CD14, CD19, CD34, CD45 and HLA-DR (Fig. 1B). Meanwhile, both AMMSCs and UCMSCs exhibited indistinguishable capacity to differentiate into adipocytes, chondrocytes and osteocytes in vitro (Fig. 1C). These characteristics of AMMSCs and UCMSCs were completely in conformity with the International Society of Cell Therapy (ISCT) criteria [2], demonstrating their MSC properties. Collectively, these results indicated that the same donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs have indistinguishable phenotypes and tri-lineage differentiation capacity.
Fig. 1
Biological characterization of AMMSCs and UCMSCs originating from the same donor. (A) Representative pictures of the morphology of AMMSCs and UCMSCs. The pictures were taken with a light microscope at 4× (top) and 10 × (bottom) magnification. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Representative histograms of immunophenotypic characterization of AMMSCs and UCMSCs by flow cytometry analysis. Blue areas indicate isotype control staining, and red areas represent specific marker expression. (C) Representative images of adipocytes (top), chondrocytes (middle) and osteocytes (bottom) differentiated from AMMSCs or UCMSCs. The images were captured at 40× (top), 20× (middle) and 40 × (bottom) magnification, respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Biological characterization of AMMSCs and UCMSCs originating from the same donor. (A) Representative pictures of the morphology of AMMSCs and UCMSCs. The pictures were taken with a light microscope at 4× (top) and 10 × (bottom) magnification. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Representative histograms of immunophenotypic characterization of AMMSCs and UCMSCs by flow cytometry analysis. Blue areas indicate isotype control staining, and red areas represent specific marker expression. (C) Representative images of adipocytes (top), chondrocytes (middle) and osteocytes (bottom) differentiated from AMMSCs or UCMSCs. The images were captured at 40× (top), 20× (middle) and 40 × (bottom) magnification, respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Proliferation and Gene Expression Profiles of AMMSCs and UCMSCs
Next, we tried to compare the proliferative and selected gene expression patterns between AMMSCs and UCMSCs. The growth curve showed that UCMSCs proliferated faster than the same donor-derived AMMSCs (Fig. 2A). Additionally, we assessed the expression patterns of selected growth factors and anti-inflammatory genes within AMMSCs and UCMSCs in the absence or presence of pro-inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ, which has been extensively utilized as a pre-licensing agent to improve MSC immunosuppressive activity [36-38]. Under basal condition, the mRNA expression levels of growth factors and anti-inflammatory genes were similar between AMMSCs and UCMSCs except HGF with a higher expression level in UCMSCs than AMMSCs (Fig. 2B-I). After 24-hour IFN-γ stimulation, the mRNA expression levels of IL-6 and IDO1 were dramatically increased, but IL-11 was reduced in both AMMSCs and UCMSCs (Fig. 2F-H). AMMSCs displayed much higher IGF1 level than UCMSCs in response to IFN-γ stimulation (Fig. 2C). IFN-γ treatment significantly decreased VEGF expression level in UCMSCs rather than in AMMSCs (Fig. 2E). IFN-γ stimulation could not significantly change the mRNA levels of HGF, IGF1, FGF2 and TGF-β in either AMMSCs or UCMSCs (Fig. 2B-D and I). Therefore, these data suggested that UCMSCs have faster proliferative rate than AMMSCs, but they possessed similar gene expression patterns of growth and anti-inflammatory factors except IGF1 under IFN-γ stimulation.
Fig. 2
The growth curves and gene expression patterns of AMMSCs and UCMSCs. (A) Growth curve analyses of AMMSCs and UCMSCs. (B-I) mRNA expression levels of HGF (B), IGF1 (C), FGF2 (D), VEGF (E), IL-6 (F), IL-11 (G), IDO1 (H) and TGF-β (I) in AMMSCs and UCMSCs with or without IFN-γ stimulation. The results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
The growth curves and gene expression patterns of AMMSCs and UCMSCs. (A) Growth curve analyses of AMMSCs and UCMSCs. (B-I) mRNA expression levels of HGF (B), IGF1 (C), FGF2 (D), VEGF (E), IL-6 (F), IL-11 (G), IDO1 (H) and TGF-β (I) in AMMSCs and UCMSCs with or without IFN-γ stimulation. The results are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
MSC Infusion Alleviated Hyperglycemia and IR in db/db Mice
To compare therapeutic effects of AMMSC and UCMSC infusion on T2DM, 7-week-old male db/db mice were intravenously infused with a single dose of either AMMSCs or UCMSCs. The db/db mice receiving UCMSC infusion showed markedly reduced blood glucose level at 7 days post-injection when compared to the saline control, and this hypoglycemic activity could persist for 5 weeks (Fig. 3A). Likewise, AMMSC injection led to a similar hypoglycemic effect in db/db mice (Fig. 3A). There was no difference in the body weight between saline- and MSCs-injected db/db mice (Fig. 3B). Supporting the improved hyperglycemia, either AMMSC or UCMSC administration had a great benefit on insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in db/db mice (Fig. 3C-F). Taken together, these findings suggested that the same donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs could exert comparably alleviative effects on hyperglycemia and IR in db/db mice.
Fig. 3
Metabolic phenotypes of db/db mice after AMMSC or UCMSC administration. Random blood glucose concentrations (A) and body weights (B) of different group mice were determined at indicated time points. Changes of blood glucose concentrations (C) and area under the curve (D) from the IPITT in different group mice at two weeks after MSC or saline infusion. Changes of blood glucose levels (E) and area under the curve (F) from the IPGTT in mice of different groups at two weeks after MSC or saline infusion. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM. Normal group: n = 6 mice; Saline group: n = 7 mice; UCMSCs group: n = 7 mice; AMMSCs group: n = 8 mice. AUC: area under the curve. *P or #P < 0.05, **P or
##P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. In (A) and (C), *: UCMSCs group vs. saline group; #: AMMSCs group vs. saline group.
Metabolic phenotypes of db/db mice after AMMSC or UCMSC administration. Random blood glucose concentrations (A) and body weights (B) of different group mice were determined at indicated time points. Changes of blood glucose concentrations (C) and area under the curve (D) from the IPITT in different group mice at two weeks after MSC or saline infusion. Changes of blood glucose levels (E) and area under the curve (F) from the IPGTT in mice of different groups at two weeks after MSC or saline infusion. Data are displayed as mean ± SEM. Normal group: n = 6 mice; Saline group: n = 7 mice; UCMSCs group: n = 7 mice; AMMSCs group: n = 8 mice. AUC: area under the curve. *P or #P < 0.05, **P or
##P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. In (A) and (C), *: UCMSCs group vs. saline group; #: AMMSCs group vs. saline group.
MSCs Injection Decreased Lipid Deposition and Promoted Glycogen Synthesis in the Liver of db/db Mice
Upon the pivotal roles of liver in regulating glycolipid metabolism, we then explored whether MSCs benefit liver functions in db/db mice. Both AMMSCs and UCMSCs comparably reduced the ratio of liver to body weight in db/db mice, when compared to the saline control (Fig. 4A). On the contrary, either AMMSC or UCMSC injection had no influence on the ratio of EWAT to body weight (Fig. 4B). Either AMMSC or UCMSC infusion could greatly restore the glycogen storage capacity of liver in db/db mice (Fig. 4C and D). Meanwhile, in comparison to the saline control, both AMMSCs and UCMSCs dramatically reduced the number of hepatic lipid droplets in db/db mice (Fig. 4E and F).These results implied that the infusion of the same donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs generated comparable improvement on hepatic glycolipid metabolism in db/db mice.
Fig. 4
MSC administration decreased lipid accumulation and enhanced glycogen storage in the liver of db/db mice. The ratios of liver to body weight (A) and ratios of EWAT to body weight (B) were calculated in different group mice at five weeks after MSC or saline infusion. (C) Representative pictures of PAS staining in the liver sections of different group mice. Scale bar = 200 μm. (D) Quantification of PAS-positive areas in the livers of different group mice. (E) Representative pictures of H&E staining in mouse liver sections. Scale bar = 200 μm. (F) Quantification of lipid droplet areas in the livers of different group mice. Quantitative data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 5-7 mice per group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
MSC administration decreased lipid accumulation and enhanced glycogen storage in the liver of db/db mice. The ratios of liver to body weight (A) and ratios of EWAT to body weight (B) were calculated in different group mice at five weeks after MSC or saline infusion. (C) Representative pictures of PAS staining in the liver sections of different group mice. Scale bar = 200 μm. (D) Quantification of PAS-positive areas in the livers of different group mice. (E) Representative pictures of H&E staining in mouse liver sections. Scale bar = 200 μm. (F) Quantification of lipid droplet areas in the livers of different group mice. Quantitative data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 5-7 mice per group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
MSC Infusion Enhanced Akt Phosphorylation and Improved Glycolipid Metabolic Dysfunction and Inflammation in the Liver of db/db Mice
Due to the hepatic protective effects observed in MSCs-infused db/db mice, we specifically focused on the liver to explore cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying above anti-diabetic effects of AMMSCs and UCMSCs. In further support of the improved insulin sensitivity, insulin signaling was enhanced in the liver of MSCs-infused db/db mice, as evidenced by the increased phosphorylation of Akt compared to saline-injected mice (Fig. 5A and B) (Supplementary Fig. 1). Consistent with increased hepatic glycogen storage and insulin sensitivity, hepatic mRNA expression level of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6PC), a key gluconeogenic gene, was significantly reduced in MSCs-injection db/db mice when compared to saline controls (Fig. 5C). In agreement with the dramatic reduction of hepatic lipid accumulation in MSCs-treated db/db mice (Fig. 4E and F), the mRNA expression levels of lipogenic genes fatty acid synthase (FASN) and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP-1) were reduced in the liver of MSCs-infused db/db mice when compared to saline-injected mice (Fig. 5D and E). By contrast, the mRNA level of hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), a key lipolytic gene, was significantly upregulated in MSCs-infused db/db mice (Fig. 5F).
Fig. 5
MSC administration improved Akt phosphorylation and glycolipid metabolism dysfunction and reduced inflammation in the liver. (A) Western blotting analysis of Akt and p-Akt levels in the livers of different group mice. (B) Quantification of the ratio of p-Akt to Akt protein level in mouse livers. n = 4 mice per group. (C-I) Gene expression patterns of G6PC (C), FASN (D), SREBP-1 C (E), PPAR-α (F), F4/80 (G), IFN-γ (H) and TNF-α (I) in the livers of different group mice. n = 6-7 mice per group. Quantitative data are displayed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.
MSC administration improved Akt phosphorylation and glycolipid metabolism dysfunction and reduced inflammation in the liver. (A) Western blotting analysis of Akt and p-Akt levels in the livers of different group mice. (B) Quantification of the ratio of p-Akt to Akt protein level in mouse livers. n = 4 mice per group. (C-I) Gene expression patterns of G6PC (C), FASN (D), SREBP-1 C (E), PPAR-α (F), F4/80 (G), IFN-γ (H) and TNF-α (I) in the livers of different group mice. n = 6-7 mice per group. Quantitative data are displayed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.Chronic low-grade inflammation in the liver contributes to hepatic glycolipid metabolic dysfunction and IR. Expectedly, the mRNA levels of macrophage marker gene F4/80 and pro-inflammatory genes IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were obviously increased in the liver of db/db mice, when compared to normal mice (Fig. 5G-I). MSC administration could reverse the upregulated mRNA levels of hepatic F4/80 and pro-inflammatory genes except IFN-γ in the liver of AMMSCs-injected db/db mice (Fig. 5G and H). Overall, these results suggested that both AMMSCs and UCMSCs shared similar hepatoprotective mechanisms via the enhancement of Akt phosphorylation, improvement of glycolipid metabolism, and reduction of inflammation in the liver of db/db mice.
Discussion
It is essential to identify the ideal source of MSCs for maximizing their therapeutic efficacy in human diseases such as endocrine, neurodegenerative, and autoimmune disorders. Although produced under the uniform and strict good manufacturing practice processes, MSCs are a heterogeneous population of cells from biological properties to therapeutic efficiency, highly depending on donor source, tissue origin, and cultural condition [2, 39]. Despite originating from the same foetus, AMMSCs and UCMSCs could exhibit remarkable differences at diverse aspects including differentiation potential, paracrine factors and immunomodulatory capacity [21–24, 40]. Human UCMSCs have been shown to proliferate faster than different donor-derived AMMSCs in serum-contained medium and chemically defined serum-free media [21-23]. Here, we observed that human UCMSCs did exhibit greater proliferative rate than AMMSCs isolated from the same donor. These data suggest that the higher proliferation capacity of human UCMSCs than AMMSCs may represent an intrinsic character. In line with the observed proliferative differences, we found that there is a higher HGF mRNA level in UCMSCs compared to AMMSCs. HGF, a multifunctional cytokine, is enriched in the conditioned medium of human MSCs [41, 42], and is already reported to facilitate the proliferation of human BM- and arteries-derived MSCs in a concentration-dependent manner [43, 44]. Upon the promotion of HGF on angiogenesis [41], human UCMSCs might be more suitable for the treatment of diabetes-related vascular diseases such as diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy. IFN-γ, a key cytokine involved in adaptive and innate immune responses, can raise the immunosuppressive potency of human MSCs via preconditioning strategy. IFN-γ-preconditioned UCMSCs have been reported to exert better therapeutic efficiency in rodent animal models of several inflammatory disorders such as colitis and multiple sclerosis [45, 46]. Consistent with previous observation [47], our results revealed that mRNA expression levels of IL-6 and IDO1 were significantly increased in IFN-γ-pretreated AMMSCs and UCMSCs, suggesting the reliability of IFN-γ-primed cell model applied in this study. Of note, in response to IFN-γ, the same donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs were found to display similar expression patterns of growth and anti-inflammatory factors except the IGF1 with a greater expression level in AMMSCs. Because of the protective effects of IGF1 on MSC survival and functions upon exposure to oxidative and inflammatory stresses [48, 49], it is highly possible that AMMSCs may survival better than UCMSCs in IFN-γ-enriched inflammatory environments and thus exhibit a stronger therapeutic potential in IFN-γ-dominated inflammatory diseases. To further understand the biological differences of AMMSCs and UCMSCs, more functional studies should be required to determine optimal MSC source for treating specific diseases. Besides indistinguishable differentiation potential into osteocytes, chondrocytes and adipocytes observed in this study, it would be necessary to evaluate the ability of AMMSCs and UCMSCs differentiating into other types of cells such as endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle cells, hepatocytes, and insulin-producing cells.Reduced liver inflammation contributes to the alleviation of AMMSCs and UCMSCs on T2DM symptoms in db/db mice. Chronic liver inflammation is a key contributor to the development of systemic IR and diabetic complications [28, 39]. Indeed, we observed higher mRNA levels of macrophage marker gene F4/80 and pro-inflammatory genes IFN-γ and TNF-α in the liver of db/db mice when compared to the normal control, indicating a severe degree of hepatic inflammation in db/db mice. Our data revealed that both AMMSC and UCMSC injection comparably decreased the expression level of hepatic F4/80 in db/db mice, suggesting that the number of liver macrophages in db/db mice declines after MSC application. Hepatic macrophages consist of two ontogenically distinct populations, namely circulating monocyte-derived macrophages and liver-specific macrophages (also called Kupffer cells) [50]. Because of the co-expression of F4/80 in Kupffer cells and monocyte-derived macrophages [51], further researches will be needed to investigate which subpopulation of hepatic macrophages could be affected by AMMSC and UCMSC infusion. Among T2DM-associated inflammatory factors, IFN-γ is one of most important pro-inflammatory cytokines contributing to the pathogenesis of T2DM and systemic IR [52-54]. IFN-γ, mostly generated by natural killer (NK) cells and CD4+ T cells, participates in the pathogenesis of IR and T2DM through destroying skeletal muscle homeostasis and impairing lipid metabolism and insulin signal transduction in adipose cells [54]. In this study, we found that UCMSCs rather than AMMSCs could significantly inhibit the pathological up-regulation of hepatic IFN-γ level in db/db mice, suggesting that these two kinds of MSCs may exhibit different regulatory patterns on the number of IFN-γ-generating immune cells. It will also be interesting to further explore which kind of immune cells mainly accounts for MSCs-induced IFN-γ reduction by virtue of co-culture system of UCMSCs and particular immune cells.AMMSCs and UCMSCs could comparably alleviate T2DM symptoms by largely restoring dysfunctional glycolipid metabolism in the liver of db/db mice. Liver critically affects blood glucose homeostasis via the regulation of glucose uptake, degradation, synthesis and storage [6]. Thus, liver metabolic dysfunctions including low glucose utilization and excessive fat accumulation are believed as the major contributor to hyperglycemia and systemic IR in diabetes. Hepatic IR, whose occurrence precedes systemic IR, is an important factor triggering the abnormality of hepatic glycolipid metabolism in T2DM individuals [7]. Due to IR and low glucose uptake capacity, the hepatocytes of T2DM individuals turn to employ fat metabolism for their energy and nutrient requirement through intensifying de novo lipogenesis [7, 30], consequently conducing to excess lipid accumulation in liver cells. Indeed, we found that there were significantly increased liver to body weight ratio and hepatic lipid accumulation but greatly reduced hepatic glycogen deposit in the T2DM db/db mice when compared to the normal control. However, either AMMSC or UCMSC administration could significantly reverse the dysfunction of glycolipid metabolism observed in db/db mice, thereby leading to the improvement of hyperglycemia and systemic insulin sensitivity. Mechanistically, we found that both AMMSC and UCMSC infusion reversed abnormal up-regulation of lipogenesis-correlated genes FASN and SREBP-1 in the liver of db/db mice, implying that T2DM-related hyperactivation of de novo lipogenesis is restrained. On the contrary, either AMMSC or UCMSC injection could significantly increase the mRNA level of hepatic PPAR-α that promotes fatty acid β-oxidation, suggesting that PPAR-α-involved lipid degradation may also conduce to the reduction of liver fat content in MSCs-infused db/db mice. Accordingly, AMMSCs and UCMSCs may act as very promising therapeutic agents to treat metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver diseases. Apart from the hyperactive lipogenesis, liver cells of diabetic individuals are described to compensatorily reinforce de novo glucose production via G6PC-involved gluconeogenesis [6]. Indeed, we found a greater G6PC mRNA level in the liver of db/db mice when compared to the normal mice. However, this abnormally high level of hepatic G6PC was reversed by single-dose infusion of either AMMSCs or UCMSCs, which may arise from improved hepatic IR and glucose uptake in MSCs-injected db/db mice. In favor of this speculation, our data showed that both AMMSCs and UCMSCs could increase Akt phosphorylation, a key insulin sensitivity index, in the liver of db/db mice. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms underlying the alleviation of MSC infusion on T2DM syndromes remain elusive. Growing reports showed that MSCs-derived exosomes containing numerous bioactive molecules, rather than cell-cell contact, predominantly mediate the therapeutic outcomes of MSCs in T2DM rodent models [2, 5, 55]. Human UCMSCs-released IL-6 has been manifested to mediate the alleviation of UCMSCs on hyperglycemia and IR in T2DM rats through enhancing macrophage polarization in the liver and adipose tissues [56]. Consistent with this report, the intraperitoneal application of recombinant human IL-6 obviously decreases plasma triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations, increases hepatic PPAR-α level, and reduces hepatic SREBP-1 expression in C57BL/6 mice [57]. Therefore, it is reasonable to infer that MSCs-secreted IL-6 contributes largely to the amelioration of AMMSCs and UCMSCs on T2DM symptoms and liver metabolic dysfunctions in db/db mice. However, further experiments are needed to verify this hypothesis via the injection of IL-6-knockout AMMSCs or UCMSCs in T2DM animal models.Besides tissue sources, the safety and therapeutic efficiency of MSCs is also greatly dependent on cell dosage, injection frequency, and the interval between injections [1, 39, 58], which needs extensive exploration to determine the optimal scheme for clinical application. In general, multiple injections of MSCs give rise to more effective and durable therapeutic effects in the treatment of human diseases. Thus, apart from single-dose injection of AMMSCs or UCMSCs examined in our study, it is of great importance to further assess the safety and efficacy of different dosage and/or multiple injections of AMMSCs and UCMSCs on the alleviation of T2DM syndromes. In this regard, we preliminarily tested intravenous infusion of high-dose AMMSCs or UCMSCs (5 × 106 cells/mouse), which caused high mortality of db/db mice due to acute pulmonary embolism (data not shown), implying that other sub-high dosages (e.g., 3 × 106 cells/mouse) need to be determined later. Moreover, in view of clinical application of AMMSCs and UCMSCs for T2DM treatment, it’s necessary to further investigate in vivo biodistribution, retention time, and differentiation ability toward insulin-producing cells of these human MSCs in the T2DM animal model.
Conclusions
In summary, we found that single-dose intravenous administration of the same donor-derived AMMSCs and UCMSCs have a similar ameliorating effect on severe T2DM symptoms including hyperglycemia and systemic IR in db/db mice. These comparable anti-diabetic benefits of AMMSCs and UCMSCs could be ascribed to the improved glycolipid metabolism, increased insulin sensitivity, and decreased inflammation in the liver of db/db mice (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6
Working model of perinatal MSCs in alleviating T2DM symptoms. Single-dose intravenous infusion of either AMMSCs or UCMSCs from the same donor comparably alleviates T2DM symptoms in db/db mice through improving glycolipid metabolism, enhancing insulin sensitivity, and decreasing inflammation in the liver.
Working model of perinatal MSCs in alleviating T2DM symptoms. Single-dose intravenous infusion of either AMMSCs or UCMSCs from the same donor comparably alleviates T2DM symptoms in db/db mice through improving glycolipid metabolism, enhancing insulin sensitivity, and decreasing inflammation in the liver.Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.(DOCX 976 KB)
Authors: Christina Brown; Christina McKee; Shreeya Bakshi; Keegan Walker; Eryk Hakman; Sophia Halassy; David Svinarich; Robert Dodds; Chhabi K Govind; G Rasul Chaudhry Journal: J Tissue Eng Regen Med Date: 2019-07-25 Impact factor: 3.963
Authors: J Kim; S Park; H M Kang; C W Ahn; H C Kwon; J H Song; Y J Lee; K H Lee; H Yang; S Y Baek; S H Yoo; S H Kim; H Kim Journal: Cell Transplant Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 4.064