Literature DB >> 35015110

The impact of stimulus format on task inhibition during task switching.

Stefano Sdoia1, Pierpaolo Zivi2, Fabio Ferlazzo2.   

Abstract

Switching between competing tasks is supported by active inhibition of the preceding task. The level of task stimulus processing at which interference between competing tasks must occur for inhibition to be recruited is still unclear. Here, we investigated whether inhibition is recruited by task conflict occurring at an early or late (semantic) stage of task stimulus processing by dissociating the task stimulus format from its meaning. In two experiments, participants performed three different numerical judgment tasks on numerical stimuli that could be presented as digits or number words (e.g., "6" or "six") in a cued task-switching procedure. The effects of the change of stimulus format for the inhibition of the previous task were investigated and assessed by the N-2 task repetition cost, an index of the extent to which task representations are inhibited. The N-2 task repetition cost observed in the same stimulus format condition disappeared when target stimuli on task N-1 were presented in a different format from stimuli of task N-2 and N. This occurred both when the format changed from digits to number words stimuli (Experiment 1) as well as when it changed from number words to digits stimuli (Experiment 2). Results indicated that task set inhibition is recruited very early during the stimulus processing stage. They also provided evidence that task inhibition is not tied to task preparation processes but operates as a reactive, rather than proactive mechanism of conflict resolution.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35015110     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01634-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  16 in total

1.  Executive control in set switching: residual switch cost and task-set inhibition.

Authors:  K Arbuthnott; J Frank
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2000-03

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Control and interference in task switching--a review.

Authors:  Andrea Kiesel; Marco Steinhauser; Mike Wendt; Michael Falkenstein; Kerstin Jost; Andrea M Philipp; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Anterior cingulate and posterior parietal cortices are sensitive to dissociable forms of conflict in a task-switching paradigm.

Authors:  Conor Liston; Shanna Matalon; Todd A Hare; Matthew C Davidson; B J Casey
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Andrea M Philipp; Pierre Jolicoeur; Michael Falkenstein; Iring Koch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  The neural basis of inhibition in cognitive control.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.519

7.  The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set.

Authors:  George Houghton; Rhys Pritchard; James A Grange
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition.

Authors:  Miriam Gade; Iring Koch
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2014-01-29

Review 9.  Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Edita Poljac; Hermann Müller; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching.

Authors:  James A Grange; Agnieszka W Kowalczyk; Rory O'Loughlin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.