Literature DB >> 19271859

The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set.

George Houghton1, Rhys Pritchard, James A Grange.   

Abstract

Backward inhibition (BI) refers to a reaction time cost incurred when returning to a recently abandoned task compared to returning to a task not recently performed. The effect has been proposed to reflect an inhibitory mechanism that aids transition from one task to another. The question arises as to precisely what aspects of a task may be inhibited and when the process takes place. Recent work has suggested a crucial role for response-related components of the task, which occur late in the typical trial structure (cue-target-response). In contrast to this suggestion, the authors present evidence that the way in which the task is cued can also modulate BI. Specifically, they find that the less transparent the cue-target relationship, the greater the level of BI. This also demonstrates that BI can be triggered at early stages of the trial structure, specifically during task preparation and prior to response processes. The authors conclude that BI is not tied to any particular component of the task structure but arises from whatever component generates the greatest intertrial conflict. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19271859     DOI: 10.1037/a0014648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  17 in total

1.  On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition.

Authors:  James A Grange; Ion Juvina; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Cue response dissociates inhibitory processes: task identity information is related to backward inhibition but not to competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-13

3.  Cue-switch costs in task-switching: cue priming or control processes?

Authors:  James A Grange; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  The role of inhibition in task switching: a review.

Authors:  Iring Koch; Miriam Gade; Stefanie Schuch; Andrea M Philipp
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-02

5.  Task preparation and task inhibition: a comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010).

Authors:  James A Grange; George Houghton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

6.  Inhibition, interference, and conflict in task switching.

Authors:  Russell E Costa; Frances J Friedrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

7.  Cue-type manipulation dissociates two types of task set inhibition: backward inhibition and competitor rule suppression.

Authors:  Shirley Regev; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-31

8.  Same task rules, different responses: Goal neglect, stimulus-response mappings and response modalities.

Authors:  Matthew H Iveson; Yuki Tanida; Satoru Saito
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

9.  The role of working memory capacity and interference resolution mechanisms in task switching.

Authors:  Corinne Pettigrew; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N-2 list-repetition and task-repetition costs.

Authors:  Miriam Gade; Alessandra S Souza; Michel D Druey; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.