Domenica M Rubino1, Frank L Greenway2, Usman Khalid3, Patrick M O'Neil4, Julio Rosenstock5, Rasmus Sørrig3, Thomas A Wadden6, Alicja Wizert3, W Timothy Garvey7. 1. Washington Center for Weight Management and Research, Arlington, Virginia. 2. Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University System, Baton Rouge. 3. Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark. 4. Weight Management Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston. 5. Dallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas. 6. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. 7. Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Abstract
Importance: Phase 3 trials have not compared semaglutide and liraglutide, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues available for weight management. Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse event profiles of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg, vs once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (both with diet and physical activity), in people with overweight or obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338). Interventions: Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity. Participants unable to tolerate 2.4 mg of semaglutide could receive 1.7 mg; participants unable to tolerate 3.0 mg of liraglutide discontinued treatment and could restart the 4-week titration. Placebo groups were pooled (n = 85). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was percentage change in body weight, and confirmatory secondary end points were achievement of 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss, assessed for semaglutide vs liraglutide at week 68. Semaglutide vs liraglutide comparisons were open-label, with active treatment groups double-blinded against matched placebo groups. Comparisons of active treatments vs pooled placebo were supportive secondary end points. Results: Of 338 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 49 [13] years; 265 women [78.4%]; mean [SD] body weight, 104.5 [23.8] kg; mean [SD] body mass index, 37.5 [6.8]), 319 (94.4%) completed the trial, and 271 (80.2%) completed treatment. The mean weight change from baseline was -15.8% with semaglutide vs -6.4% with liraglutide (difference, -9.4 percentage points [95% CI, -12.0 to -6.8]; P < .001); weight change with pooled placebo was -1.9%. Participants had significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss with semaglutide vs liraglutide (70.9% of participants vs 25.6% [odds ratio, 6.3 {95% CI, 3.5 to 11.2}], 55.6% vs 12.0% [odds ratio, 7.9 {95% CI, 4.1 to 15.4}], and 38.5% vs 6.0% [odds ratio, 8.2 {95% CI, 3.5 to 19.1}], respectively; all P < .001). Proportions of participants discontinuing treatment for any reason were 13.5% with semaglutide and 27.6% with liraglutide. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by 84.1% with semaglutide and 82.7% with liraglutide. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide compared with once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, added to counseling for diet and physical activity, resulted in significantly greater weight loss at 68 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04074161.
Importance: Phase 3 trials have not compared semaglutide and liraglutide, glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues available for weight management. Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse event profiles of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg, vs once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (both with diet and physical activity), in people with overweight or obesity. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338). Interventions: Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity. Participants unable to tolerate 2.4 mg of semaglutide could receive 1.7 mg; participants unable to tolerate 3.0 mg of liraglutide discontinued treatment and could restart the 4-week titration. Placebo groups were pooled (n = 85). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was percentage change in body weight, and confirmatory secondary end points were achievement of 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss, assessed for semaglutide vs liraglutide at week 68. Semaglutide vs liraglutide comparisons were open-label, with active treatment groups double-blinded against matched placebo groups. Comparisons of active treatments vs pooled placebo were supportive secondary end points. Results: Of 338 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 49 [13] years; 265 women [78.4%]; mean [SD] body weight, 104.5 [23.8] kg; mean [SD] body mass index, 37.5 [6.8]), 319 (94.4%) completed the trial, and 271 (80.2%) completed treatment. The mean weight change from baseline was -15.8% with semaglutide vs -6.4% with liraglutide (difference, -9.4 percentage points [95% CI, -12.0 to -6.8]; P < .001); weight change with pooled placebo was -1.9%. Participants had significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss with semaglutide vs liraglutide (70.9% of participants vs 25.6% [odds ratio, 6.3 {95% CI, 3.5 to 11.2}], 55.6% vs 12.0% [odds ratio, 7.9 {95% CI, 4.1 to 15.4}], and 38.5% vs 6.0% [odds ratio, 8.2 {95% CI, 3.5 to 19.1}], respectively; all P < .001). Proportions of participants discontinuing treatment for any reason were 13.5% with semaglutide and 27.6% with liraglutide. Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by 84.1% with semaglutide and 82.7% with liraglutide. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide compared with once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, added to counseling for diet and physical activity, resulted in significantly greater weight loss at 68 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04074161.
Authors: Ariana M Chao; Thomas A Wadden; Olivia A Walsh; Kathryn A Gruber; Naji Alamuddin; Robert I Berkowitz; Jena S Tronieri Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Melanie Davies; Louise Færch; Ole K Jeppesen; Arash Pakseresht; Sue D Pedersen; Leigh Perreault; Julio Rosenstock; Iichiro Shimomura; Adie Viljoen; Thomas A Wadden; Ildiko Lingvay Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: W Timothy Garvey; Jeffrey I Mechanick; Elise M Brett; Alan J Garber; Daniel L Hurley; Ania M Jastreboff; Karl Nadolsky; Rachel Pessah-Pollack; Raymond Plodkowski Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Xavier Pi-Sunyer; Arne Astrup; Ken Fujioka; Frank Greenway; Alfredo Halpern; Michel Krempf; David C W Lau; Carel W le Roux; Rafael Violante Ortiz; Christine Bjørn Jensen; John P H Wilding Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Patrick M O'Neil; Vanita R Aroda; Arne Astrup; Robert Kushner; David C W Lau; Thomas A Wadden; Jason Brett; Ana-Paula Cancino; John P H Wilding Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: A Blackman; G D Foster; G Zammit; R Rosenberg; L Aronne; T Wadden; B Claudius; C B Jensen; E Mignot Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: John P Kirwan; Anita P Courcoulas; David E Cummings; Allison B Goldfine; Sangeeta R Kashyap; Donald C Simonson; David E Arterburn; William F Gourash; Ashley H Vernon; John M Jakicic; Mary Elizabeth Patti; Kathy Wolski; Philip R Schauer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 17.152
Authors: Thomas S J Crabtree; Karen Adamson; Hazel Reid; Dennis Barnes; Siva Sivappriyan; Alex Bickerton; Ian W Gallen; Benjamin C T Field; Iskandar Idris; Robert E J Ryder Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 6.408