Literature DB >> 33667417

Semaglutide 2·4 mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Melanie Davies1, Louise Færch2, Ole K Jeppesen2, Arash Pakseresht2, Sue D Pedersen3, Leigh Perreault4, Julio Rosenstock5, Iichiro Shimomura6, Adie Viljoen7, Thomas A Wadden8, Ildiko Lingvay9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of the GLP-1 analogue once a week subcutaneous semaglutide 2·4 mg versus semaglutide 1·0 mg (the dose approved for diabetes treatment) and placebo for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: This double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3, superiority study enrolled adults with a body-mass index of at least 27 kg/m2 and glycated haemoglobin 7-10% (53-86 mmol/mol) who had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at least 180 days before screening. Patients were recruited from 149 outpatient clinics in 12 countries across Europe, North America, South America, the Middle East, South Africa, and Asia. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) via an interactive web-response system and stratified by background glucose-lowering medication and glycated haemoglobin, to subcutaneous injection of semaglutide 2·4 mg, or semaglutide 1·0 mg, or visually matching placebo, once a week for 68 weeks, plus a lifestyle intervention. Patients, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. Coprimary endpoints were percentage change in bodyweight and achievement of weight reduction of at least 5% at 68 weeks for semaglutide 2·4 mg versus placebo, assessed by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03552757 and is closed to new participants.
FINDINGS: From June 4 to Nov 14, 2018, 1595 patients were screened, of whom 1210 were randomly assigned to semaglutide 2·4 mg (n=404), semaglutide 1·0 mg (n=403), or placebo (n=403) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Estimated change in mean bodyweight from baseline to week 68 was -9·6% (SE 0·4) with semaglutide 2·4 mg vs -3·4% (0·4) with placebo. Estimated treatment difference for semaglutide 2·4 mg versus placebo was -6·2 percentage points (95% CI -7·3 to -5·2; p<0·0001). At week 68, more patients on semaglutide 2·4 mg than on placebo achieved weight reductions of at least 5% (267 [68·8%] of 388 vs 107 [28·5%] of 376; odds ratio 4·88, 95% CI 3·58 to 6·64; p<0·0001). Adverse events were more frequent with semaglutide 2·4 mg (in 353 [87·6%] of 403 patients) and 1·0 mg (329 [81·8%] of 402) than with placebo (309 [76·9%] of 402). Gastrointestinal adverse events, which were mostly mild to moderate, were reported in 256 (63·5%) of 403 patients with semaglutide 2·4 mg, 231 (57·5%) of 402 with semaglutide 1·0 mg, and 138 (34·3%) of 402 with placebo.
INTERPRETATION: In adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes, semaglutide 2·4 mg once a week achieved a superior and clinically meaningful decrease in bodyweight compared with placebo. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33667417     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00213-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  58 in total

1.  Is it Time to Expand Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use for Weight Loss in Patients Without Diabetes?

Authors:  Wendy H Updike; Olivia Pane; Rachel Franks; Faizah Saber; Farah Abdeen; Derek D Balazy; Nicholas W Carris
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Semaglutide and Diabetic Retinopathy Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Feiyu Wang; Yinjun Mao; Hang Wang; Yiwei Liu; Pinfang Huang
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Semaglutide for weight loss.

Authors:  Mo Ojeniran; Betty Dube; Allison Paige; Joey Ton; Adrienne J Lindblad
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  A novel approach to treating opioid use disorders: Dual agonists of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors and neuropeptide Y2 receptors.

Authors:  Riley Merkel; Amanda Moreno; Yafang Zhang; Rachel Herman; Jennifer Ben Nathan; Sana Zeb; Suditi Rahematpura; Kamryn Stecyk; Brandon T Milliken; Matthew R Hayes; Robert P Doyle; Heath D Schmidt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Once-Weekly Semaglutide for Weight Management: A Clinical Review.

Authors:  Abby Fornes; Jamie Huff; Roger Iain Pritchard; Miranda Godfrey
Journal:  J Pharm Technol       Date:  2022-05-13

6.  Progress in Pharmacotherapy for Obesity.

Authors:  Susan Z Yanovski; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Lessons from bariatric surgery: Can increased GLP-1 enhance vascular repair during cardiometabolic-based chronic disease?

Authors:  Ehab Bakbak; Daniella C Terenzi; Justin Z Trac; Hwee Teoh; Adrian Quan; Stephen A Glazer; Ori D Rotstein; Mohammed Al-Omran; Subodh Verma; David A Hess
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 8.  Obesity in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Links, Risks and Management Challenges.

Authors:  Nuria Vilarrasa; Patricia San Jose; Miguel Ángel Rubio; Albert Lecube
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 9.  Hypothalamic GPCR Signaling Pathways in Cardiometabolic Control.

Authors:  Yue Deng; Guorui Deng; Justin L Grobe; Huxing Cui
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 10.  Clinical Perspectives on the Use of Subcutaneous and Oral Formulations of Semaglutide.

Authors:  Baptist Gallwitz; Francesco Giorgino
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.