| Literature DB >> 35013298 |
Jia-Lei Yan1, Rakesh Maiti1, Shi-Chao Ren1, Weiyi Tian2, Tingting Li3, Jun Xu1,4, Bivas Mondal1, Zhichao Jin3, Yonggui Robin Chi5,6.
Abstract
Axially chiral styrenes bearing a chiral axis between a sterically non-congested acyclic alkene and an aryl ring are difficult to prepare due to low rotational barrier of the axis. Disclosed here is an N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC) catalytic asymmetric solution to this problem. Our reaction involves ynals, sulfinic acids, and phenols as the substrates with an NHC as the catalyst. Key steps involve selective 1,4-addition of sulfinic anion to acetylenic acylazolium intermediate and sequential E-selective protonation to set up the chiral axis. Our reaction affords axially chiral styrenes bearing a chiral axis as the product with up to > 99:1 e.r., > 20:1 E/Z selectivity, and excellent yields. The sulfone and carboxylic ester moieties in our styrene products are common moieties in bioactive molecules and asymmetric catalysis.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35013298 PMCID: PMC8748895 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27771-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Challenges and strategies to access axially chiral styrenes bearing acyclic alkenes.
a Challenges in the synthesis of axially chiral styrenes bearing acyclic alkenes. b Previous methods for accessing axially chiral styrenes bearing acyclic alkenes. c Our Strategy: carbene-catalyzed chemo- and enantio-selective addition.
Optimization of the reaction conditionsa.
| Entry | NHC | ROH | Product (yield)b | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22:78 | >20:1 | |||
| 2 | 78:22 | >20:1 | |||
| 3 | – | – | |||
| 4 | 85:15 | >20:1 | |||
| 5 | 87:13 | >20:1 | |||
| 6 | 91:9 | >20:1 | |||
| 7 | cyclohexanol | – | – | ||
| 8 | phenol | 86:14 | 20:1 | ||
| 9 | 2-methylphenol | 83:17 | >20:1 | ||
| 10 | 2,6-dimethylphenol | 84:16 | >20:1 | ||
| 11 | 4-methoxyphenol | >99:1 | 15:1 | ||
| 12 | 2-methoxyphenol | >99:1 | 20:1 | ||
| 13f | 2-methoxyphenol | >99:1 | >20:1 | ||
aReaction conditions: 1a (0.05 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol), NHC precatalyst (20 mol%), NaOAc (0.15 mmol), DQ (0.1 mmol), ROH (0.055 mmol), Et2O (1 mL), and 4 Å MS (100 mg); for entries 1–5, rt,12 h; for entries 6–12, 0 °C, 36 h.
bIsolated yield unless otherwise noted.
cNMR yield with 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as an internal standard.
de.r. = the ratio of enantiomers, determined via HPLC on a chiral stationary phase.
eE/Z = the ratio of E and Z isomers, determined via 1H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
E (5 mol%), −20 °C, 6 d. 4 Å MS = 4 Å molecular sieves.
Fig. 2Scope of the reaction.
a Variations of sulfinic acids. b Variations of ynals. Standard reaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), E (5 mol%), NaOAc (0.3 mmol), DQ (0.2 mmol), 2-methoxyphenol (0.11 mmol), Et2O (2 mL), 4 Å MS (150 mg), −20 °C, 6 d. E (20 mol%) was used at −40 °C for 7 d. The reaction was performed at −20 °C for 9 d. E (20 mol%) was used.
Fig. 3The rotational barriers (△G‡) and half-lives (t1/2rac) of 9a, 9n–9o.
The ΔG‡ values were obtained via racemization experiment. The ΔG‡cal. value was obtained via DFT calculation. The half-lives (t1/2rac) were determined via analysis of experimental data.
Fig. 4Versatile chemical transformations of the axially chiral products.
a Synthetic transformations of the axially chiral product (9a) based on ester group. b Synthetic transformations of 11b and 9x.