Synthesis and bioactivities evaluation of oleanolic acid oxime ester derivatives as α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitors.

Different oleanolic acid (OA) oxime ester derivatives (3a-3t) were designed and synthesised to develop inhibitors against α-glucosidase and α-amylase. All the synthesised OA derivatives were evaluated against α-glucosidase and α-amylase in vitro. Among them, compound 3a showed the highest α-glucosidase inhibition with an IC50 of 0.35 µM, which was ∼1900 times stronger than that of acarbose, meanwhile compound 3f exhibited the highest α-amylase inhibitory with an IC50 of 3.80 µM that was ∼26 times higher than that of acarbose. The inhibition kinetic studies showed that the inhibitory mechanism of compounds 3a and 3f were reversible and mixed types towards α-glucosidase and α-amylase, respectively. Molecular docking studies analysed the interaction between compound and two enzymes, respectively. Furthermore, cytotoxicity evaluation assay demonstrated a high level of safety profile of compounds 3a and 3f against 3T3-L1 and HepG2 cells.HighlightsOleanolic acid oxime ester derivatives (3a-3t) were synthesised and screened against α-glucosidase and α-amylase.Compound 3a showed the highest α-glucosidase inhibitory with IC50 of 0.35 µM.Compound 3f presented the highest α-amylase inhibitory with IC50 of 3.80 µM.Kinetic studies and in silico studies analysed the binding between compounds and α-glucosidase or α-amylase.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM), characterised by chronic hyperglycaemia, has become a serious globalised problem threatening human health. It is estimated that more than 460 million people have been suffering from DM with the number of people with DM reaching more than 570 million by 2030. In the light of the causative mechanism, diabetes can be categorised into four classes as follows: type-1 diabetes (T1D), type-2 diabetes (T2D), gestational diabetes (GD) and specific types of diabetes. As the most common type of diabetes, T2D, resulting from insulin resistance and pancreatic β-cell dysfunction, takes up 90% of all diabetes cases. In addition, the excessive intake in carbohydrates can accelerate the outbreak of T2D. Carbohydrates can decompose into glucose by the synergistic action of several intestinal enzymes, including α-glucosidase and α-amylase, leading to the elevated blood glucose level in the gastrointestinal tract,. When carbohydrates are consumed, α-glucosidase hydrolyses carbohydrates to absorbable glucose and α-amylase catalyses the hydrolysis of starch to maltose and glucose. Therefore, the management of T2D can be achieved by reducing postprandial hyperglycaemia through the inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase hydrolysis. Acarbose was the effective clinical hypoglycaemic drugs targeting α-glucosidase and α-amylase. But it still had adverse gastrointestinal side effects, inspiring us to develop new inhibitors.

Oleanolic acid (OA), one of the naturally occurring pentacyclic triterpenoid compounds, was widely found in plant-derived food and medicinal herbs. OA and its derivatives possess different biological activities such as anti-inflammatory, anti-hyperglycaemic, anti-hyperlipidaemic, anti-oxidant and hepatoprotective. The research found that the introduction of oxime-ester moiety into OA can improve its anti-tumour activity, anti-inflammatory effect, the inhibition of HIV-1 protease dimerisation and the inhibitory activity of glycogen phosphorylase compared with the parent compound, and other activities, which was presumably associated with the enhancement of the hydrophilic performance. Furthermore, our group has been dedicated to the structural modification and derivation of OA skeleton at the C2, C3, C12, C13, or C28 position, simultaneously the inhibition of α-glucosidase and its mechanism have been explored in depth,.

Based on the findings above, the conjugation of OA with substituted cinnamic acid and benzoic acid through oxime linkage have been developed as our ongoing work being aimed to obtain the leading compounds in inhibiting glycosidase. In this study, oleanolic acid oxime ester derivatives 3a-3t were synthesised by acylation of oleanolic acid oxime, followed by the inhibitory activity evaluation against α-amylase and α-glucosidase.

Results and discussion

Chemistry

In order to obtain oleanolic acid oxime ester derivatives 3a–3t, the C3 position of OA scaffold was selected as modification site for the derivation according to the synthetic route concretely depicted in Scheme 1. At first, OA was oxidised to 3-Oxo-olean-12-en-28-oic acid by the freshly prepared Jones reagent, further reacting with hydroxylamine hydrochloride to produce oleanolic acid oxime 2. Then target compound 3a–3t were prepared through acylation of the oleanolic acid oxime intermediate 2 with a diversity of cinnamoyl chlorides and benzoyl chlorides. All synthetic derivatives were purified via column chromatography and their structures were identified by 1H NMR, 13 C NMR and HRMS.

Scheme 1.

Synthesis of oleanolic acid oxime ester derivatives (3a–3t). Reagents and conditions: (a) Jones reagent, acetone, 0 °C; (b) NH2OH·HCl (1.0 eq.), EtOH, NaOAc (2.0 eq.), rt, 1 h; (c) cinnamoyl chlorides and benzoyl chlorides (2.0 eq.), pyridine, DCM, 0 °C ∼ rt, overnight.

Inhibitory effect of OA derivatives against α-glucosidase

α-Glucosidase inhibition assay and SAR analysis

The α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of OA derivatives (3a–3t) was evaluated with acarbose as the standard inhibitor. As shown in Table 1, all the synthesised OA derivatives (3a–3t) had potent inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase with the IC50 values ranging from 0.35 to 3.43 µM. It was worth noting that all OA derivatives (3a–3t) showed stronger inhibitory activity than OA (IC50 = 4.09 µM) and acarbose (IC50 = 665.56 µM). Compound 3a exhibited the strongest inhibitory activity (IC50 = 0.35 µM), ∼11 times stronger than that of OA and ∼1900 times stronger than that of acarbose. The results indicated that the introduction of cinnamoyloxyimino moiety at OA-C3 position could enhance the anti-α-glucosidase activity of OA derivatives.

Table 1.

Inhibition of all the synthesised OA derivatives against α-glucosidase and α-amylase.

Compounds	R	α-Glucosidase inhibition(IC50:μM)	α-Amylase inhibition(IC50:μM)
3a		0.35 ± 0.06a	7.86 ± 1.24a
3b		0.68 ± 0.03a	15.26 ± 1.41a
3c		0.89 ± 0.07a	25.37 ± 1.17a
3d		1.45 ± 0.12a	17.47 ± 1.52a
3e		0.95 ± 0.06a	5.64 ± 1.29a
3f		1.28 ± 0.03a	3.80 ± 0.65a
3g		3.13 ± 0.13a	12.57 ± 2.37a
3h		1.36 ± 0.03a	18.29 ± 1.92a
3i		0.71 ± 0.02a	17.87 ± 1.21a
3j		0.82 ± 0.09a	70.81 ± 2.31a
3k		0.67 ± 0.04a	25.57 ± 1.66a
3l		0.99 ± 0.05a	55.30 ± 2.39a
3m		1.10 ± 0.10a	35.47 ± 2.41a
3n		1.96 ± 0.25a	70.21 ± 2.53a
3o		1.74 ± 0.14a	26.32 ± 1.61a
3p		1.81 ± 0.05a	15.93 ± 1.75a
3q		3.43 ± 0.17 a	33.61 ± 1.93a
3r		1.41 ± 0.12a	70.72 ± 1.25a
3s		1.37 ± 0.06a	18.68 ± 1.29a
3t		0.91 ± 0.04a	152.36 ± 4.24a
OA		4.09 ± 0.11b	94.10 ± 1.72b
Acarbose		665.56 ± 13.92c	100.01 ± 2.73c

Values are the mean ± SD. Mean values in the same column having different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).

For better understanding the structure activity relationships (SAR), OA derivatives were categorised into two groups, including A group (OA derivatives 3a–3j) and B group (OA derivatives 3k–3t). In A group, derivative 3a was selected as template compound, it could be seen that the introduction of functional groups (methyl, methoxy, fluorine, chlorine, bromine, trifluoromethyl, nitro, methylenedioxy and hydroxyl) at C4 position belonging to the cinnamoyl group, weakened inhibitory activity compared with the unsubstituted compounds 3a. In B group, derivative 3k was selected as template compound, and found the similar results with A group that is introduction of functional groups weakened inhibitory activity. Besides, OA derivatives in A group had a higher inhibitory activity than OA derivatives with the same substituent in B group, respectively. Thence, the incorporation of cinnamoyloxyimino moiety into the OA parent structure could improve the inhibitory activity of OA derivatives better than that of benzoyl groups.

Inhibitory kinetic analysis

To probe into the inhibition mechanism of OA derivatives (3a–3t) against α-glucosidase, compound 3a with the strongest inhibitory activity was selected as the representative compound for the enzyme inhibitory kinetic analysis. The plots of V vs. [E] with or without the presence of compound 3a (Figure 1(a)) generated straight lines which all passed through the origin, suggesting that the inhibition of compound 3a was reversible. The inhibition kinetic behaviours were investigated using the Lineweaver–Burk plots. The plots of 1/V vs. 1/[S] with or without the presence of compound 3a gave straight lines intersecting in the second quadrant, indicating compound 3a was mixed-type inhibitor (Figure 1(b)). These results revealed that compound 3a inhibited α-glucosidase by binding with free enzyme, as well as enzyme–substrate complex.

Figure 1.

Inhibition kinetics of 3a on α-glucosidase. (a) The plots of enzymatic reaction rate vs α-glucosidase concentration with or without the presence of 3a; (b) Lineweaver–Burk plots of enzymatic reaction rate versus substrate concentration with or without the presence of 3a (3a concentration: black line, 0 μM; red line, 0.25 μM; blue line, 0.45 μM; pink line, 0.5 μM).

Docking simulation for α-glucosidase

Docking simulation was performed to clarify the interactions between compound and active pocket of α-glucosidase. The most potent compound 3a was docked in the active site of α-glucosidase. As shown in Figure 2(a,b), compound 3a was well nested into the active site, and OA part located inside of the active site. The detailed interaction results between compounds 3a with active site residues were shown in Figure 2(c,d) using 3D and 2D views, respectively. The carboxylic oxygen at OA part formed a hydrogen bond with Arg439 (3.0 Å), esteryl oxygen at cinnamic acid part made a hydrogen bond with Asn241 (2.3 Å), cinnamic acid benzene ring had a π-π interaction with Trp242 (4.6 Å), and hydrophobic interaction with Phe157, Phe177, His239, Ala278, His279, Phe300, Pro309, and Arg312. The binding affinity of compound 3a regarding α-glucosidase was −3.7 kcal/mol. Furthermore, the physicochemical properties of most potent compound 3a was listed in Table 2.

Figure 2.

The molecular docking of analogue 3a with α-glucosidase (homology mode): (a) 3a in the electrostatics active pocket; (b) 3a in the active pocket; (c) 3D view of 3a with α-glucosidase; (d) 2D view of 3a with α-glucosidase.

Table 2.

The physicochemical properties of compounds 3a and 3f.

	Molecular formula	Molecular weight	Rotatable bonds	H-bond acceptoer atoms	H-bond donnor atoms	Polar surface area (Å2)	LogPo/w	Water solubility
3a	C39H53NO4	599.84	5	5	1	75.96	7.82	Poorly soluble
3f	C39H52BrNO4	678.74	5	5	1	75.96	8.49	Insoluble

Inhibitory effect of OA derivatives against α-amylase

α-Amylase inhibition assay and SAR analysis

The inhibitory activities of OA derivatives against α-amylase were also tested (Table 1). All candidate compounds had potent inhibitory activities towards α-amylase with IC50 values ranging from 3.80 to 152.36 µM. OA derivatives showed higher inhibitory activities than OA (IC50 = 94.10 µM) and acarbose (IC50 = 100.01 µM) except compound 3t. Among them, compound 3f had the strongest inhibitory activity, ∼25 times better than OA and ∼26 times better than acarbose. Hence, it was an effective way to increase the inhibitory activities of OA against α-amylase by embedding the cinnamoyloxyimino moiety into the OA motif.

For SAR analysis, it could be found that the introduction of chloro or bromo group at C4 position of benzene ring belonging to the cinnamoyl group could improve the inhibitory activity against α-amylase of OA derivatives (compounds 3e and 3f). But when substituents such as methyl, methoxyl, fluoro, trifluoromethyl, nitro, methylenedioxy or hydroxyl installed into C4 position of benzene ring, the inhibitory activity against α-amylase of OA derivatives had decreased. In addition, that the icinnamoyloxyimino substructure was merged with the OA parent structure (compounds 3a–3j) had positive effect on the improvement of anti-α-amylase activity.

Compound 3f with the strongest inhibitory activity against α-amylase was selected as the representative compound for the enzyme inhibitory kinetic analysis. As shown in Figure 3, the plots of V vs. α-amylase concentration with or without the presence of compound 3f all passed through the origin (Figure 3(a)) and the Lineweaver–Burk plots of 1/V vs. 1/[S] with or without the presence of compound 3f intersected in the second quadrant (Figure 3(b)). The results indicated compound 3f was reversible and mixed-type inhibitor.

Figure 3.

Inhibition kinetics of 3f against α-glucosidase. (a) The plots of enzymatic reaction rate vs α-glucosidase concentration with or without the presence of 3f; (b) Lineweaver–Burk plots of enzymatic reaction rate vs substrate concentration with or without the presence of 3f (3f concentration: black line, 0 μM; red line, 5 μM; blue line, 7.5 μM; pink line, 15.0 μM).

Docking simulation for α-amylase

The docking simulation results between compound 3f and α-amylase were shown in Figure 4. It was observed that OA part of compound 3f located into the active site of α-amylase and cinnamic acid part located near the edge of the active site (Figure 4(a,b)). The carboxylic oxygen at OA part formed a hydrogen bond with His305 (1.9 Å), and hydrophobic interaction with Trp59, Leu162, Val163, Leu165, Tyr151, Lys200, His201, and Ile235. The binding affinity of compound 3f regarding α-amylase was −2.1 kcal/mol. The physicochemical properties of 3f was also shown in Table 2.

Figure 4.

The molecular docking of analogue 3f and α-amylase (3BAJ): (a) 3f in the electrostatics active pocket; (b) 3f in the active pocket; (c) 3D view of 3f and α-amylase; (d) 2D view of 3f and α-amylase.

Cells cytotoxicity assay

The preliminary in vitro cells cytotoxicity of most potent compounds 3a and 3f were evaluated against 3T3-L1 and HepG2 using MTT method. Compounds 3a and 3f had non-cytotoxic to 3T3–L1 and HepG2 cells under concentration of 100 µM (Figure 5), indicating that the compounds had a high level of safety profile.

Figure 5.

Cells cytotoxicity of compounds 3a and 3f against 3T3-L1 and HepG2 cells.

Conclusion

In summary, OA oxime ester derivatives (3a–3t) were synthesised and evaluated for inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase and α-amylase. All the synthesised OA derivatives had potent inhibitory activities against α-glucosidase and α-amylase. The introduction of cinnamoyloxyimino moiety into the OA parent structure had better α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory activities than that of benzoyloxyimino moiety. Compound 3a had highest inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase with IC50 value of 0.35 µM, ∼1900 times stronger than acarbose, meanwhile compound 3f had the highest α-amylase inhibitory activity with IC50 value of 3.80 µM, ∼26 times higher than acarbose. Furthermore, the inhibition kinetic studies and docking simulation indicated the binding between compounds with protein and the low toxicity against 3T3-L1 and HepG2 cells provided the foundation for further in vivo assay. Considering all these experimental data, OA oxime ester derivatives could be developed into the leading compound in the management of T2D.

Experimental

Materials and methods

α-Glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (EC 3.2.1.20), α-amylase from hog pancreas (EC3.2.1.1), p-Nitrophenyl-α-D-galactopyranoside (p-NPG). Water-soluble starch was obtained from Shanghai Yuanye Biological Technology Co., Ltd. OA was purchased from Macklin Co., Ltd. Other chemical reagents were obtained from Titan (Shanghai) Technology Co., Ltd. 3T3-L1 cells and HepG2 cells were supplied by ATCC. 3–(4,5-Dimethythiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazoliumbromide (MTT) were supported by Sigma-Aldrich. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM), Foetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin and streptomycin were obtained from Gibco.

1H NMR and 13 C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 on 500 MHz instruments. High-resolution mass spectral analysis (HRMS) data were measured on the Apex II by means of the ESI technique.

Synthesis of OA derivatives 3a–3t

To a solution of oleanolic acid (1.0 mmol) in acetone (10 ml), freshly Jones reagent was added dropwise in an ice bath. The reaction mixture allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 4 h. Firstly, MeOH was added and then water to the reaction mixture. The organic solvent was removed under vacuum and the aqueous residue was extracted with EtOAc. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried by MgSO4 and evaporated under vacuum. Then, the crude product was purified by silica gel column chromatograph to obtain compound 1.

Subsequently, to a solution of NH2OH·HCl (1.5 mmol) in ethanol (10 ml) was added NaOAc (2.0 mmol) and the mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Compound 1 was added to the reaction mixture and the mixture was stirred for 24 h at 50 °C. After ethanol was removed under vacuum, the residue was treated with water and filtrated to afford compound 2.

Finally, freshly prepared substituted cinnamoyl chloride or benzoyl chloride (1.2 mmol) was added into the solution of compound 2 (1.0 mmol) and pyridine in DCM at 0 °C, and then, the mixture was stirred at room temperature until completion. The reaction was quenched with saturated NaHCO3 and extracted by EtOAc. The organic phase was washed with water and brine, dried by MgSO4 and removed under vacuum to obtain the residue followed by purification through silica gel column chromatograph to produce the corresponding oleanolic acid oxime ester derivatives 3a–3t.

8a (C39H53NO4). White powder; Yield 68%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.78 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (dt, J = 6.7, 3.9 Hz, 2H), 7.42 − 7.36 (m, 3H), 6.58 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.07 − 2.99 (m, 1H), 2.86 − 2.79 (m, 1H), 2.37 (ddd, J = 15.0, 12.2, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 1.97 (qd, J = 15.6, 14.7, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 1.91 − 1.82 (m, 1H), 1.82 − 1.66 (m, 3H), 1.64 − 1.55 (m, 5H), 1.51 − 1.42 (m, 2H), 1.35 (s, 2H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 1.24 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 1.22 − 1.07 (m, 9H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 7H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 183.51, 175.45, 165.31, 145.48, 143.77, 134.48, 130.46, 128.94, 128.20, 122.33, 116.35, 55.86, 47.18, 46.57, 45.81, 41.71, 41.53, 41.02, 39.33, 38.75, 37.07, 33.79, 33.07, 32.36 (d, J = 9.5 Hz), 30.69, 27.64, 27.09, 25.88, 23.53 (d, J = 13.2 Hz), 23.16, 22.91, 19.64, 18.95, 17.07, 15.16. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C39H53NO4: 600.4047; found: 600.4026.

8b (C40H55NO4). White powder; Yield 60%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.75 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 6.53 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (dt, J = 15.2, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.38 (s, 4H), 2.42 − 2.32 (m, 1H), 2.03 − 1.82 (m, 4H), 1.82 − 1.72 (m, 2H), 1.72 − 1.55 (m, 5H), 1.47 (ddt, J = 18.4, 13.5, 7.8 Hz, 2H), 1.35 (ddd, J = 13.0, 9.0, 3.2 Hz, 3H), 1.30 − 1.21 (m, 2H), 1.21 − 1.07 (m, 9H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.99 − 0.85 (m, 7H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 183.36, 175.33, 165.51, 145.50, 143.77, 140.92, 131.75, 129.67, 128.20, 122.33, 115.21, 55.86, 47.17, 46.56, 45.82, 41.72, 41.52, 41.03, 39.33, 38.75, 37.07, 33.80, 33.08, 32.37 (d, J = 9.1 Hz), 30.69, 27.64, 27.09, 25.88, 23.53 (d, J = 13.5 Hz), 23.17, 22.92, 21.53, 19.62, 18.95, 17.06, 15.16. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + K]+ calcd for C40H55NO4: 652.3763; found: 652.3740.

8c (C40H55NO5). White powder; Yield 70%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.73 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.54 − 7.47 (m, 2H), 6.94 − 6.88 (m, 2H), 6.44 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.03 (ddd, J = 15.2, 5.2, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 14.2, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (ddd, J = 15.2, 12.3, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (dd, J = 13.4, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.98 − 1.91 (m, 1H), 1.87 (ddd, J = 18.3, 6.8, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 1.82 − 1.66 (m, 3H), 1.66 − 1.54 (m, 3H), 1.51 − 1.41 (m, 2H), 1.44 − 1.31 (m, 3H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.26 (s, 2H), 1.22 (d, J = 29.2 Hz, 2H), 1.16 (s, 3H), 1.12 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 4H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 7H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 183.23, 175.21, 165.70, 161.51, 145.17, 143.77, 129.89, 127.24, 122.34, 114.35, 113.71, 113.47, 55.86, 55.43, 47.17, 46.55, 45.81, 41.72, 41.50, 41.03, 39.32, 37.07, 33.79, 33.07, 32.36 (d, J = 8.5 Hz), 30.69, 27.64, 27.08, 25.87, 23.53 (d, J = 13.0 Hz), 23.16, 19.60, 18.94, 17.06, 15.15. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C40H55NO5: 630.4153; found: 630.4124.

8d (C39H52FNO4). Light yellow powder; Yield 55%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.73 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 7.08 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 6.50 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (dt, J = 15.3, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (ddd, J = 15.0, 12.2, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.02 − 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.87 (ddd, J = 18.5, 6.7, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.74 (dtd, J = 27.9, 13.6, 4.4 Hz, 3H), 1.59 (dd, J = 15.2, 10.1 Hz, 5H), 1.47 (ddt, J = 18.0, 13.3, 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.35 (q, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H), 1.31 (s, 3H), 1.24 (dd, J = 11.7, 4.4 Hz, 1H), 1.21 − 1.07 (m, 9H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 7H), 0.79 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 183.59, 175.51, 165.10 (d, J = 25.8 Hz), 144.18, 143.79, 130.73 (d, J = 3.6 Hz), 130.09 (d, J = 8.3 Hz), 122.31, 116.19, 116.05 (d, J = 8.7 Hz), 55.85, 47.17, 46.56, 45.81, 41.71, 41.54, 41.01, 39.32, 38.74, 37.07, 33.78, 33.07, 32.36 (d, J = 10.7 Hz), 30.69, 27.64, 27.09, 25.88, 23.53 (d, J = 13.0 Hz), 23.02 (d, J = 31.5 Hz), 19.65, 18.94, 17.07, 15.16. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C39H52FNO4: 640.3773; found: 640.3751.

8e (C39H52ClNO4). Yellow powder; Yield 63%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.71 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 6.54 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.28 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (dt, J = 15.1, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (ddd, J = 15.0, 12.2, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.03 − 1.90 (m, 2H), 1.86 (ddd, J = 18.4, 6.7, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.76 (ddd, J = 14.1, 9.5, 4.6 Hz, 2H), 1.69 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 1.59 (ddd, J = 17.3, 9.0, 3.6 Hz, 5H), 1.46 (dd, J = 10.6, 6.5 Hz, 2H), 1.33 (d, J = 18.7 Hz, 6H), 1.24 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 1.14 (d, J = 17.7 Hz, 8H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 7H), 0.79 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.19, 175.57, 165.07, 143.91 (d, J = 29.5 Hz), 136.36, 132.95, 129.29 (d, J = 17.5 Hz), 122.29, 116.93, 55.84, 47.17, 46.58, 45.81, 41.62 (d, J = 17.7 Hz), 40.97, 39.32, 38.73, 37.07, 33.78, 33.08, 32.35 (d, J = 13.0 Hz), 30.69, 29.71 (d, J = 5.6 Hz), 27.64, 27.09, 25.89, 23.53 (d, J = 14.7 Hz), 23.14, 22.87, 19.65, 18.94, 17.07, 15.16. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C39H52ClNO4: 656.3477; found: 656.3451.

8f (C39H52BrNO4). White powder; Yield 42%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.70 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (dd, J = 8.7, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 7.46 − 7.39 (m, 2H), 6.56 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (dt, J = 15.1, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 14.3, 4.9 Hz, 1H), 2.37 (ddd, J = 14.8, 12.2, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.03 − 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.86 (ddd, J = 18.4, 6.5, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.81 − 1.66 (m, 3H), 1.60 (qd, J = 11.9, 10.6, 5.5 Hz, 5H), 1.47 (dd, J = 10.1, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 1.43 − 1.33 (m, 3H), 1.31 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 3H), 1.26 (d, J = 15.7 Hz, 1H), 1.24 − 1.18 (m, 1H), 1.16 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 5H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.97 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 6H), 0.80 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 182.97, 175.63, 165.06, 144.10, 143.80, 133.37, 132.19, 124.72, 122.30, 117.05, 55.84, 47.17, 46.55, 45.82, 41.73, 41.55, 41.05, 39.32, 38.74, 37.07, 33.79, 33.07, 32.39, 30.69, 27.64, 27.09, 25.87, 23.53 (d, J = 13.0 Hz), 23.15, 22.92, 19.66, 18.95, 17.05, 15.16. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C39H52BrNO4: 678.3152; found: 678.3130.

8g (C40H52F3NO4). White powder; Yield 46%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.78 (dd, J = 16.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 4H), 6.64 (dd, J = 16.0, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 5.29 (s, 1H), 3.02 (dd, J = 15.4, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.44 − 2.33 (m, 1H), 1.97 (dt, J = 18.5, 12.1 Hz, 3H), 1.91 − 1.84 (m, 1H), 1.74 (ddt, J = 31.2, 16.6, 8.3 Hz, 3H), 1.60 (dd, J = 9.9, 5.4 Hz, 5H), 1.53 − 1.41 (m, 2H), 1.33 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, 6H), 1.17 (s, 4H), 1.13 (s, 3H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.99 − 0.85 (m, 7H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 205.76, 184.26, 178.48, 175.78, 174.94, 164.65 (d, J = 20.9 Hz), 143.69 (d, J = 30.1 Hz), 137.79, 132.10 − 131.47 (m), 128.33 (d, J = 3.2 Hz), 125.91 (t, J = 3.8 Hz), 124.91, 122.74, 122.25, 118.98, 118.81, 91.03, 55.82, 55.33, 50.68, 47.17, 46.56, 45.81, 44.10, 43.97, 43.71, 42.50, 41.65 (d, J = 4.8 Hz), 41.56, 40.95, 39.31, 38.73 (d, J = 5.2 Hz), 37.50, 37.29, 37.06, 34.12, 33.78, 33.12 (d, J = 13.8 Hz), 32.53 − 32.23 (m), 31.58, 30.68, 27.63, 27.28 − 26.91 (m), 25.86 (d, J = 4.1 Hz), 23.77, 23.52 (d, J = 15.0 Hz), 23.13, 22.82 (d, J = 8.4 Hz), 20.65, 19.60 (d, J = 20.3 Hz), 18.93, 18.36, 18.09 (d, J = 13.2 Hz), 17.07, 15.70, 15.14. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + K]+ calcd for C40H52F3NO4: 706.3480; found: 706.3448.

8h (C39H52N2O6). Yellow powder; Yield 55%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.29 − 8.23 (m, 2H), 7.79 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (dd, J = 8.9, 2.7 Hz, 2H), 6.73 − 6.64 (m, 1H), 5.30 − 5.25 (m, 1H), 3.00 (dt, J = 15.1, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.39 (ddd, J = 15.3, 12.3, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.02 − 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.89 − 1.76 (m, 1H), 1.75 − 1.66 (m, 1H), 1.64 − 1.55 (m, 6H), 1.47 (dd, J = 10.5, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 1.44 − 1.29 (m, 7H), 1.26 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 2H), 1.17 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 5H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 1.01 − 0.94 (m, 1H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 6H), 0.79 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.08, 176.01, 164.35, 148.58, 143.82, 142.46, 140.53, 128.78, 124.22, 122.25, 120.76, 55.83, 47.18, 46.57, 45.82, 41.65 (d, J = 11.1 Hz), 40.98, 39.32, 38.73, 37.07, 33.78, 33.07, 32.34 (d, J = 13.2 Hz), 30.69, 29.72, 27.63, 27.12, 25.88, 23.52 (d, J = 13.8 Hz), 23.13, 22.87, 19.73, 18.95, 17.06, 15.17. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C39H52N2O6: 667.3718; found: 667.3717.

8i (C40H53NO6). White powder; Yield 45%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.68 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.09 − 7.00 (m, 2H), 6.82 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 6.01 (s, 2H), 5.28 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (dt, J = 15.1, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.7, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (ddd, J = 15.1, 12.3, 6.1 Hz, 1H), 1.97 (qd, J = 15.2, 14.4, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 1.86 (ddd, J = 18.5, 6.5, 3.8 Hz, 1H), 1.81 − 1.66 (m, 3H), 1.61 − 1.55 (m, 1H), 1.53 − 1.45 (m, 1H), 1.44 − 1.34 (m, 1H), 1.37 − 1.24 (m, 9H), 1.16 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 7H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 7H), 0.79 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 183.61, 175.29, 165.57, 149.75, 148.38, 145.22, 143.77, 128.93, 124.72, 122.33, 114.16, 108.59, 106.54, 101.62, 55.85, 47.17, 46.57, 45.81, 41.71, 41.51, 41.02, 39.32, 38.74, 37.07, 33.79, 33.08, 32.36 (d, J = 9.9 Hz), 30.69, 29.73, 27.63, 27.08, 25.88, 23.53 (d, J = 14.0 Hz), 23.03 (d, J = 31.3 Hz), 19.61, 18.94, 17.04, 15.15. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + Na]+ calcd for C40H53NO6: 666.3765; found: 666.3736.

8j (C39H53NO5). White powder; Yield 40%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.73 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 6.42 (d, J = 15.9 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 2.99 (dt, J = 15.3, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (ddd, J = 15.3, 12.1, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 2.03 − 1.82 (m, 3H), 1.73 (ddt, J = 25.4, 15.8, 8.4 Hz, 3H), 1.60 (q, J = 11.3, 9.5 Hz, 6H), 1.50 − 1.29 (m, 3H), 1.28 − 1.06 (m, 12H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 0.98 − 0.86 (m, 8H), 0.77 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.23, 175.58, 166.74, 158.90, 146.21, 143.74, 130.19, 126.56, 122.37, 116.16, 112.68, 55.62, 47.11, 46.59, 45.78, 41.67, 41.46, 40.99, 39.30, 38.59, 37.04, 33.77, 33.09, 32.34 (d, J = 23.0 Hz), 30.69, 27.63, 27.19, 25.90, 23.52 (d, J = 16.9 Hz), 22.98 (d, J = 32.1 Hz), 19.70, 18.96, 17.09, 15.18. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + K]+ calcd for C39H53NO5: 654.3555; found: 654.3525.

8k (C37H51NO4). White powder; Yield 70%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.08 − 8.03 (m, 2H), 7.58 (td, J = 7.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 5.29 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.11 − 3.03 (m, 1H), 2.83 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (ddd, J = 15.2, 12.2, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 1.97 (qd, J = 14.9, 14.2, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 1.90 − 1.82 (m, 1H), 1.75 (ddt, J = 28.0, 13.9, 4.9 Hz, 3H), 1.62 (td, J = 12.2, 10.2, 5.1 Hz, 5H), 1.54 − 1.44 (m, 2H), 1.35 (s, 6H), 1.26 − 1.20 (m, 3H), 1.13 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 5H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 7H), 0.81 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 183.76, 176.24, 164.32, 143.78, 133.04, 129.54, 128.50, 122.31, 55.82, 47.16, 46.58, 45.80, 41.67 (d, J = 10.9 Hz), 41.01, 39.33, 38.74, 37.09, 33.79, 33.07, 32.36 (d, J = 10.6 Hz), 30.69, 27.64, 27.14, 25.89, 23.53 (d, J = 13.9 Hz), 23.21, 22.89, 19.88, 18.95, 17.07, 15.16. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + K]+ calcd for C37H51NO4: 612.3450; found: 612.3423.

8l (C38H53NO4). White powder; Yield 68%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.93 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.26 (d, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (dt, J = 15.3, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.40 (s, 4H), 2.01 − 1.90 (m, 2H), 1.90 − 1.81 (m, 1H), 1.74 (tdd, J = 20.0, 18.2, 9.8, 3.9 Hz, 3H), 1.59 (td, J = 17.0, 14.9, 8.6 Hz, 5H), 1.51 − 1.40 (m, 2H), 1.34 (s, 5H), 1.24 (s, 1H), 1.18 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 5H), 1.11 (s, 4H), 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.90 (d, J = 12.3 Hz, 7H), 0.79 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.64, 176.00, 164.39, 143.76 (d, J = 5.5 Hz), 129.57, 129.22, 126.86, 122.30, 55.81, 47.15, 46.58, 45.80, 41.63 (d, J = 10.8 Hz), 40.95, 39.32, 38.71, 37.08, 33.79, 33.10, 32.36 (d, J = 14.3 Hz), 30.68, 27.63, 27.15, 25.91, 23.53 (d, J = 17.4 Hz), 23.22, 22.86, 21.75, 19.85, 18.94, 17.07, 15.14. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C38H53NO4: 588.4047; found: 588.4018.

8m (C38H53NO5). Yellow powder; Yield 44%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.07 − 7.97 (m, 2H), 6.94 (dd, J = 9.2, 2.4 Hz, 2H), 5.28 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (s, 3H), 3.11 − 3.02 (m, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.47 − 2.35 (m, 1H), 2.03 − 1.83 (m, 3H), 1.81 − 1.70 (m, 3H), 1.62 (ddd, J = 12.7, 9.6, 5.1 Hz, 5H), 1.51 − 1.30 (m, 8H), 1.25 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 2H), 1.19 − 1.10 (m, 7H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.92 (dd, J = 11.1, 5.3 Hz, 7H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 183.58, 175.85, 164.09, 163.42, 143.78, 131.58, 122.32, 121.96, 113.77, 55.82, 55.48, 47.15, 46.57, 45.80, 41.65 (d, J = 17.4 Hz), 41.02, 39.33, 38.73, 37.08, 33.79, 33.08, 32.36 (d, J = 9.5 Hz), 30.69, 27.63, 27.13, 25.88, 23.53 (d, J = 14.5 Hz), 23.22, 22.90, 19.83, 18.94, 17.07, 15.14. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C38H53NO5: 604.3997; found: 604.3997.

8n (C37H50FNO4). White powder; Yield 56%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.10 − 8.03 (m, 2H), 7.13 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.28 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.04 (ddd, J = 15.3, 5.4, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.44 (ddd, J = 15.2, 12.2, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.03 − 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.90 − 1.67 (m, 4H), 1.65 − 1.55 (m, 5H), 1.47 (qd, J = 14.1, 13.2, 7.4 Hz, 2H), 1.39 − 1.30 (m, 5H), 1.27 − 1.20 (m, 2H), 1.18 (s, 3H), 1.17 − 1.09 (m, 4H), 1.06 (s, 4H), 0.91 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 7H), 0.79 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.23, 176.31, 166.81, 164.78, 163.38, 143.80, 132.07 (d, J = 9.2 Hz), 125.89 (d, J = 3.4 Hz), 122.28, 115.71 (d, J = 22.0 Hz), 55.79, 47.15, 46.58, 45.80, 41.67 (d, J = 6.6 Hz), 40.97, 39.32, 38.71, 37.08, 33.78, 33.07, 32.35 (d, J = 13.4 Hz), 30.69, 27.63, 27.15, 25.89, 23.52 (d, J = 14.7 Hz), 23.20, 22.87, 19.90, 18.94, 17.07, 15.16. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + K]+ calcd for C37H50FNO4: 630.3355; found: 630.3326.

8o (C37H50ClNO4). White powder; Yield 65%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.01 − 7.96 (m, 2H), 7.46 − 7.40 (m, 2H), 5.28 (q, J = 3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (ddd, J = 15.3, 5.4, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (ddd, J = 15.2, 12.2, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.03 − 1.90 (m, 2H), 1.86 (ddd, J = 18.3, 6.5, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 1.82 − 1.67 (m, 3H), 1.66 − 1.54 (m, 6H), 1.53 − 1.42 (m, 2H), 1.41 − 1.30 (m, 6H), 1.29 − 1.20 (m, 2H), 1.18 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, 7H), 0.79 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.13, 176.45, 163.49, 143.80, 139.50, 130.92, 128.89, 128.12, 122.27, 55.79, 47.15, 46.58, 45.80, 41.68 (d, J = 3.8 Hz), 40.98, 39.32, 38.70, 37.08, 33.78, 33.08, 32.35 (d, J = 13.5 Hz), 30.69, 27.63, 27.15, 25.89, 23.52 (d, J = 14.8 Hz), 23.20, 22.87, 19.92, 18.94, 17.07, 15.16. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C37H50ClNO4: 608.3501; found: 608.3482.

8p (C37H50BrNO4). White powder; Yield 42%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.93 − 7.88 (m, 2H), 7.62 − 7.56 (m, 2H), 5.28 (q, J = 3.8 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (ddd, J = 15.3, 5.3, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.43 (ddd, J = 15.1, 12.1, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.03 − 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.86 (ddd, J = 18.3, 6.6, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 1.82 − 1.67 (m, 3H), 1.67 − 1.54 (m, 5H), 1.53 − 1.39 (m, 3H), 1.38 − 1.30 (m, 5H), 1.26 − 1.20 (m, 2H), 1.18 (s, 3H), 1.12 (s, 3H), 1.08 (s, 1H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 11.8 Hz, 7H), 0.79 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.26, 176.46, 163.60, 143.78, 131.86, 131.03, 128.57, 128.15, 122.26, 55.79, 47.15, 46.58, 45.80, 41.67 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 40.98 (d, J = 4.0 Hz), 39.32, 38.70, 37.08, 33.78, 33.08, 32.34 (d, J = 13.8 Hz), 30.69, 27.63, 27.14, 25.89, 23.52 (d, J = 15.2 Hz), 23.20, 22.86, 19.93, 18.94, 17.07, 15.15. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + K]+ calcd for C37H50BrNO4: 690.2555; found: 690.2524.

8q (C38H50F3NO4). White powder; Yield 43%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.16 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 5.28 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.08 − 2.99 (m, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.9, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.46 (ddd, J = 15.2, 12.1, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.03 − 1.91 (m, 2H), 1.90 − 1.75 (m, 2H), 1.75 − 1.67 (m, 1H), 1.60 (ddt, J = 18.0, 13.5, 6.8 Hz, 5H), 1.53 − 1.40 (m, 2H), 1.35 (s, 5H), 1.29 − 1.22 (m, 3H), 1.20 (s, 3H), 1.17 − 1.04 (m, 8H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 7H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.40, 176.83, 163.14, 143.80, 134.52 (d, J = 32.3 Hz), 132.99, 129.93, 126.11 − 125.38 (m), 122.25, 55.80, 47.16, 46.59, 45.80, 41.70 (d, J = 4.6 Hz), 40.96, 39.32, 38.70, 37.09, 33.78, 33.07, 32.34 (d, J = 14.6 Hz), 30.69, 27.63, 27.15, 25.89, 23.52 (d, J = 14.6 Hz), 23.19, 22.86, 19.98, 18.94, 17.07, 15.17. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C38H50F3NO4: 642.3765; found: 642.3736.

8r (C37H50N2O6). Yellow powder; Yield 57%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 8.31 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.22 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 5.28 (t, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (dt, J = 15.2, 4.7 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (ddd, J = 15.1, 12.0, 6.0 Hz, 1H), 1.97 (qd, J = 11.8, 3.3 Hz, 2H), 1.90 − 1.78 (m, 2H), 1.77 − 1.70 (m, 1H), 1.65 − 1.54 (m, 5H), 1.51 − 1.40 (m, 2H), 1.39 − 1.27 (m, 7H), 1.23 − 1.22 (m, 1H), 1.20 (s, 4H), 1.12 (s, 4H), 1.07 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 7H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 184.33, 177.14, 162.47, 150.56, 143.82, 135.19, 130.65, 123.72, 122.22, 55.78, 47.16, 46.58, 45.81, 41.73 (d, J = 10.1 Hz), 40.96, 39.32, 38.69, 37.09, 33.78, 33.07, 32.33 (d, J = 15.3 Hz), 30.69, 29.71 (d, J = 5.3 Hz), 27.63, 27.18, 25.89, 23.52 (d, J = 14.7 Hz), 23.20, 22.79 (d, J = 17.3 Hz), 20.07, 18.95, 17.05, 15.18. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C37H50N2O6: 619.3742; found: 619.3724.

8s (C38H51NO6). White powder; Yield 44%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 7.66 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 6.86 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 6.05 (s, 2H), 5.29 (t, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.04 (ddd, J = 15.3, 5.4, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (dd, J = 13.8, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 2.42 (ddd, J = 15.2, 12.2, 5.9 Hz, 1H), 2.05 − 1.92 (m, 2H), 1.90 − 1.83 (m, 1H), 1.82 − 1.73 (m, 2H), 1.72 − 1.67 (m, 1H), 1.66 − 1.56 (m, 6H), 1.53 − 1.35 (m, 3H), 1.33 (s, 3H), 1.22 − 1.16 (m, 5H), 1.13 (s, 4H), 1.06 (s, 4H), 0.91 (d, J = 12.1 Hz, 7H), 0.80 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ 182.65, 175.97, 163.70, 151.70, 147.79, 143.77, 125.33, 123.53, 122.33, 109.45, 108.15, 101.87, 55.82, 47.15, 46.54, 45.81, 41.74, 41.59, 41.08, 39.32, 38.73, 37.07, 33.79, 33.07, 32.36 (d, J = 7.6 Hz), 30.70, 29.73, 27.64, 27.14, 25.87, 23.52 (d, J = 13.0 Hz), 23.22, 22.94, 19.87, 18.96, 17.04, 15.15. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C38H51NO6: 618.3789; found: 618.3760.

8t (C37H51NO5). Yellow powder; Yield 45%. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 12.07 (s, 1H), 10.41 (s, 1H), 7.87 − 7.81 (m, 2H), 6.91 − 6.84 (m, 2H), 5.20 − 5.15 (m, 1H), 2.96 (dt, J = 15.2, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (dd, J = 14.0, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 1.96 − 1.81 (m, 2H), 1.69 (dd, J = 12.1, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 1.66 − 1.53 (m, 3H), 1.51 − 1.40 (m, 4H), 1.37 − 1.25 (m, 3H), 1.22 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 7H), 1.18 − 1.08 (m, 9H), 0.99 (s, 3H), 0.87 (s, 7H), 0.76 (s, 3H). 13 C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 179.10, 175.68, 163.52, 162.63, 144.35, 131.88, 121.86, 119.84, 116.03, 55.43, 46.91, 46.02 (d, J = 17.4 Hz), 41.90, 41.36 (d, J = 11.9 Hz), 38.51, 37.03, 33.77, 33.29, 32.49 (d, J = 11.9 Hz), 30.87, 27.67 (d, J = 5.7 Hz), 25.95, 23.83, 23.43, 23.07, 19.73, 19.03, 17.22, 15.24. HRMS (ESI-MS) m/z: [M + K]+ calcd for C37H51NO5: 628.3399; found: 628.3378.

α-Glucosidase inhibition and kinetics assay

The α-glucosidase inhibition assay of all the synthesised OA derivatives (3a–3t) was performed according to previously reported method with minor modifications. Briefly, α-glucosidase (10 µL, final concentration 0.1 U/mL, dissolved in PBS), test compound (10 µL, dissolved in DMSO), and PBS (130 µL, 0.1 M phosphate, pH 6.8) were added into a 96-well plate and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. After p-NPG (50 µL, final concentration 0.25 mM) was added, the absorbance of the mixture was measured at 405 nm at every 10 minutes using Microplate reader. DMSO working concentration in enzyme inhibition test was 5%. Acarbose was used as a positive control for α-glucosidase inhibition assay. Inhibition rate (%) = [(A1 – A0)/A0] × 100%, where A1 and A0 represent the absorbance of the blank and test compound, respectively. IC50 value of each compound were obtained from the inhibition curve. All samples were assayed at least in triplicate.

The enzyme inhibition kinetics analysis was investigated using previously reported method with minor modifications,. In brief, inhibitory effect was determined from the plots of absorbance change of OA derivatives at different concentrations with enzyme at different concentrations. The inhibition type was measured based on the Lineweaver–Burk plot of absorbance change of OA derivatives at different concentrations with p-NPG substrate at different concentrations.

α-Amylase inhibition and kinetics assay

The α-amylase inhibition of OA derivatives (3a-3t) was also assayed using previously reported method with minor modifications. Briefly, α-amylase (10 µL, final concentration 0.25 U/mL) and test compound (10 µL) were added into PBS (80 µL, 20 mM phosphate, pH 6.9) and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. After starch solution (100 µL, final concentration 0.5%) was added, the mixture was incubation at 37 °C for 10 min. Then DNS (100 µL, containing 1 M potassium sodium tartrate and 48 mM 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid) was added and the mixture was boiled for 15 min. Then, the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. The inhibition rate (%) = [(A1 – A0)/A0] × 100%, where A1 and A0 represent the absorbance of the blank and test compound, respectively. The IC50 values of all the synthesised compounds were obtained from the inhibition curve. All samples were assayed at least in triplicate.

The enzyme inhibition kinetics analysis was investigated. The operation method was similar with the assay of α-glucosidase, except the concentrations of test compound, enzyme and substrate.

Molecular docking

Molecular docking was simulated to show the binding between inhibitor with target protein using Sybyl software (Tripos, US). The crystal structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isomaltase has not been reported, then the homology mode of α-glucosidase was constructed. The sequence in FASTA format of α-glucosidase (access code P53341) was obtained from UniProt. Saccharomyces cerevisiae isomaltase (PDB ID: 3AJ7) showing 72.4% of sequence identity with α-glucosidase was selected as the template. Then, modeller 10.1 software (http://salilab.org/modeller/) was used to establish homology mode and Ramachandran plot (http://services.mbi.ucla.edu/PROCHECK/) was used to verify their quality. The most reasonable homology mode (Figure 6) was used for subsequent docking experiments. The human pancreatic α-amylase (PDB: 3BAJ) were obtained from the Protein Data Bank,. The protein was prepared following standard operating procedures and the active pocket was generated using blind or ligand mode, respectively. Compound 3a for α-glucosidase and compound 3f for α-amylase were respectively prepared with energy minimisation program. After that, the molecular docking of between inhibitor and target protein was operated in the default format. The interactions were visualised by Pymol software and Discovery studio software.

Figure 6.

Ramachandran plot results of most reasonable homology mode.

Cells cytotoxicity of the most potent compounds (3a and 3f) on 3T3–L1 and HepG2 cells were evaluated via MTT method,. 3T3–L1 or HepG2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 IU/mL streptomycin at 37 °C under 5% CO2. 3T3-L1 cells (2 × 103) or HepG2 cells (5 × 105) were plated onto 96-well plate (100 ml/well) and incubated for 24 h. After treated with compound (3a or 3f) for 24 h, the cells were added 100 ml MTT (0.5 mg/mL) and incubated for 4 h. Then 100 ml DMSO was added to dissolve the blue insoluble MTT formazan. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader. Each sample was performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

All data were presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA was performed to evaluate the difference between groups. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Click here for additional data file.