| Literature DB >> 35012151 |
Mengxia Wang1, Xiaran Miao2,3, Hui Li1, Chunhai Chen1.
Abstract
Cellulose nanofibers (CNF), representing the nano-structured cellulose, have attained an extensive research attention due to their sustainability, biodegradability, nanoscale dimensions, large surface area, unique optical and mechanical performance, etc. Different lengths of CNF can lead to different extents of entanglements or network-like structures through van der Waals forces. In this study, a series of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) composite films, reinforced with CNF of different lengths, were fabricated via conventional solvent casting technique. CNF were extracted from jute fibers by tuning the dosage of sodium hypochlorite during the TEMPO-mediated oxidation. The mechanical properties and thermal behavior were observed to be significantly improved, while the optical transparency decreased slightly (Tr. > 75%). Interestingly, the PVA/CNF20 nanocomposite films exhibited higher tensile strength of 34.22 MPa at 2 wt% filler loading than the PVA/CNF10 (32.55 MPa) while displayed higher elastic modulus of 482.75 MPa than the PVA/CNF20 films (405.80 MPa). Overall, the findings reported in this study provide a novel, simple and inexpensive approach for preparing the high-performance polymer nanocomposites with tunable mechanical properties, reinforced with an abundant and renewable material.Entities:
Keywords: TEMPO-mediated oxidized cellulose nanofibrils; morphology and dimension; polyvinyl alcohol; reinforcement
Year: 2021 PMID: 35012151 PMCID: PMC8747125 DOI: 10.3390/polym14010128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1The schematic representation of the synthesis of the PVA/CNF nanocomposite films.
Figure 2The TEM images: (a) CNF20; (b) CNF10; (c) CNF5; (d) Optical images of the films; (e) FTIR spectrum of CNF/PVA; (f) 1D-WAXS of CNF/PVA; (g) Zeta potential distribution of CNF/PVA; (h) Stress-strain curves of CNF/PVA.
Figure 3The conductivity titration curves (a–c), TGA curves (d), and DTG curves (e) of CNFs with different dimensions.
TGA data of CNFs with different morphology.
| Samples | Tonset/°C | Tmax1/°C | Tmax2/°C | Char Yield/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNF20 | 206.93 | 256.08 | 313.85 | 25.90 |
| CNF10 | 220.73 | 257.29 | 321.44 | 25.89 |
| CNF5 | 225.21 | 259.36 | 327.99 | 28.06 |
Figure 4FTIR: (a) CNF20 and PVA films; (b) PVA/CNF composites with different additions of CNFs with different lengths; UV-vis spectrum of PVA/CNF composites: (c)PVA/CNF20;(d) PVA/CNF10; (e) PVA/CNF5; Mechanical properties of PVA/CNF composites: (f) Young’s Modulus; (g) Elongation at break; (h) Tensile strength.
The tensile properties of pure PVA and PVA/CNF nanocomposites.
| Film | CNF Content (%) | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Elongation at Break (%) | Young’s Modulus (MPa) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVA | 0 | 31.65 ± 0.85 | 550.61 ± 11.06 | 91.00 ± 21.64 |
| PVA/CNF20 | 0.5 | 34.84 ± 0.44 | 535.26 ± 10.71 | 197.73 ± 22.03 |
| 1.0 | 34.02 ± 0.71 | 507.12 ± 11.65 | 227.41 ± 30.59 | |
| 1.5 | 34.46 ± 0.80 | 447.24 ± 15.49 | 239.29 ± 17.22 | |
| 2.0 | 34.22 ± 0.66 | 385.04 ± 10.73 | 405.80 ± 20.34 | |
| PVA/CNF10 | 0.5 | 36.21 ± 0.62 | 458.49 ± 13.85 | 234.98 ± 24.25 |
| 1.0 | 34.21 ± 0.33 | 430.71 ± 20.47 | 266.22 ± 30.66 | |
| 1.5 | 33.48 ± 0.43 | 352.42 ± 8.58 | 378.88 ± 25.25 | |
| 2.0 | 32.55 ± 0.56 | 324.52 ± 6.78 | 482.75 ± 21.95 | |
| PVA/CNF5 | 0.5 | 29.97 ± 0.72 | 529.64 ± 11.06 | 114.48 ± 24.21 |
| 1.0 | 30.64 ± 0.85 | 437.54 ± 11.75 | 141.27 ± 16.57 | |
| 1.5 | 29.75 ± 0.48 | 390.89 ± 17.21 | 145.77 ± 14.87 | |
| 2.0 | 22.71 ± 0.82 | 284.42 ± 12.48 | 196.83 ± 23.33 |
Figure 5The TGA curves of (a–c) PVA/CNF20; (d–f) PVA/CNF10 and (g–i) PVA/CNF5 composites at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1.
The TGA data of neat PVA and PVA/CNF composites as a function of the CNF content.
| Film | CNF Content (%) | T−5%/°C | T25%/°C |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVA | 0 | 263.07 | 367.21 |
| PVA/CNF20 | 0.5 | 265.97 | 368.63 |
| 1.0 | 264.95 | 391.12 | |
| 1.5 | 262.94 | 376.18 | |
| 2.0 | 258.38 | 376.81 | |
| PVA/CNF10 | 0.5 | 264.51 | 388.55 |
| 1.0 | 262.27 | 368.36 | |
| 1.5 | 263.84 | 361.96 | |
| 2.0 | 262.21 | 367.24 | |
| PVA/CNF5 | 0.5 | 258.25 | 358.17 |
| 1.0 | 265.17 | 361.43 | |
| 1.5 | 262.56 | 357.07 | |
| 2.0 | 260.15 | 342.87 |
Figure 6The DMA thermograms of neat PVA and PVA/CNF nanocomposites as a function of temperature: (a) PVA/CNF20; (b) PVA/CNF10; (c) PVA/CNF5.
The DMA data of PVA and PVA/CNF composites as a function of the CNF content.
| Samples | PVA | 20–0.5 | 20–1.0 | 20–1.5 | 20–2.0 | 10–0.5 | 10–1.0 | 10–1.5 | 10–2.0 | 5–0.5 | 5–1.0 | 5–1.5 | 5–2.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tg/°C | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 83 | 82 | 85 | 84 |
| ΔE’ at Tg | 1096 | 1225 | 1289 | 1681 | 1333 | 1156 | 1376 | 1173 | 1142 | 1263 | 1453 | 1030 | 1370 |
The results of this work compared with other researches.
| Samples | CNF Morphology | σ/MPa | ε/% | Ε/MPa | Tr./% | Td/°C | References | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D/nm | L/nm | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | After | Before | ||
| PVA/MFC | 365 | - | 48 1 | 41 | - | - | 1600 1 | 1200 | - | - | 2651 | 252 | [ |
| EVA/CNF | 5–10 | - | 3.64 2 | 3.32 | 688 2 | 750 | 6.92 2 | 5.36 | 77 2 | 78 | - | 320–380 | [ |
| PVA/CNF-Ⅰ | 10–15 | 1120 | 44.30 3 | 39.08 | 89.2 3 | 320.5 | 1473.86 3 | 96.09 | 53 3 | 90 | 294.9 4 | 272.5 | [ |
| PVA/CNF-Ⅱ | 250 | 44.59 3 | 39.08 | 313 3 | 320.5 | 276.2 3 | 96.09 | 86 3 | 287.4 4 | 272.5 | |||
| PVA/CNF20 | 5–10 | 200–1000 | 34.22 5 | 31.65 | 385.04 5 | 550.61 | 405.80 5 | 91 | 83.51 5 | 90.84 | 258.38 5 | 263.07 | This work |
| PVA/CNF10 | 10–15 | 1000–3000 | 32.55 5 | 324.52 5 | 482.75 5 | 80.51 5 | 262.21 5 | ||||||
| PVA/CNF5 | 20–50 | >3000 | 22.71 5 | 284.42 5 | 196.83 5 | 77.55 5 | 260.15 5 | ||||||
Abbreviations: σ = Tensile Strength; ε = Elongation at break; E = Young’s Modulus; Tr. = Transparency; Td = Thermal degradation temperature; D = Diameter; L = Length. 1 CNF content was 3%; 2 CNF content was 1%; 3 CNF content was 10%; 4 CNF content was 5%; 5 CNF content was 2%.