| Literature DB >> 35011859 |
Horia Bumbea1,2, Ana Maria Vladareanu1,2, Ion Dumitru1, Viola Maria Popov3, Cristina Ciufu1,2, Anca Nicolescu1, Minodora Onisai1,2, Cristina Marinescu1,2, Diana Cisleanu1,2, Irina Voican1, Sinziana Sarghi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), extensive bleeding is one of the most frequent causes of death. Impaired activation and aggregation processes were identified in previous studies on platelet behaviour associated with this disease. This study's aim was to examine platelet function in correlation with other haemorrhage risk factors (fever, sepsis, recent bleeding, uraemia, leucocytosis, haematocrit value, treatment). DESIGN AND METHODS: The analysis of platelet surface proteins (Glycoprotein Ib-IX (CD42b, CD42a), Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa (CD41, CD61), p-selectin (CD62P), granulophysin (CD63)) was conducted by flowcytometry from samples of whole blood in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in different stages of diagnosis and therapy (n = 22) in comparison with healthy human controls (n = 10). RESULTS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Our results show a significant decrease in fluorescence level associated with platelet activation markers (CD63 (14.11% vs. 40.78 % p < 0.05); CD62P (15.26% vs. 28.23% p < 0.05)); adhesion markers (CD42b (69.08% vs. 84.41% p < 0.05)) and aggregation markers (CD61 (83.79% vs. 98.62% p < 0.001)) in patients compared to controls. The levels of CD41 (80.62% vs. 86.31%, p = 0.290) and CD42a (77.98% vs. 94.15%, p = 0.99) demonstrate no significant differences in the two groups.Entities:
Keywords: acute myeloid leukaemia; flow cytometry; platelet activation; platelet adhesion
Year: 2021 PMID: 35011859 PMCID: PMC8745388 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11010118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Figure 1Dot-plot acquisition histograms representing expression of CD61 and CD41 on platelets in AML patients study group.
Characteristics of patients with AML and controls.
| AML (N = 22) | C (N = 10) | |
|---|---|---|
| Females/males | 13/9 | 6/4 |
| Age in years | 48 (28–83) | 24 (10–38) |
| Intake of NSAID | none | none |
| Intake of anticoagulants | 1 | none |
| Treatment with beta-lactam antibiotics | 10 (45%) | none |
| Chemotherapy | 2 | none |
| Corticotherapy | 10 | none |
| Received haemostatic iv treatment b | 13 | none |
| Received blood products a day before (erythrocyte concentrate/thrombocyte concentrate) | 7 (2/5) | none |
| Platelet count × 109/L a | 50 (2–782) | 256 (143–400) |
| Haematocrit (%) a | 24 (17–38) | 34 (32–42) |
| Leucocytes × 109/L a | 3 (0.5–33.7) | 5200 (4300–7000) |
| Peripheral blasts (%) | 0–72% | none |
| Cutaneus haemorrhagic syndrome | 13 | none |
| Infection (localized or generalized) | 11 | none |
NSAID, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs; a Data are presented as medians, with ranges in parentheses; b Haemostatic treatment: etamsylatum and carbazochromi salicylas.
Platelets’ antigens distribution in AML patients and controls.
| Markers/Cases | Median (25–75%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| C | AML | ||
| % of CD62p positive | 28.23 (18.7–30.12) | 15.26 (7.51–26.88) | 0.038 |
| % of CD63 positive | 40.78 (31.92–43.35) | 14.11 (6.23–30.10) | 0.001 |
| % of CD42a positive | 94.15 (78.2–97.8) | 77.98 (60.14–94.92) | 0.099 |
| % of CD42b positive | 79.45 (76.42–96.27) | 72.96 (45.63–91.3) | 0.047 |
| % of CD61 positive | 98.67 (98.16–98.88) | 94.08 (74.45–96.78) | <0.01 |
| % of CD41 positive | 86.31 (73.53–94.21) | 80.62 (55.51–92.14) | 0.29 |
C, controls; AML, acute myeloid leukaemia. * p value represents the statistical significance of platelets expressing positive fluorescence analysis, in patients with acute leukaemia and control.
Figure 2Expression of platelet activation markers in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients and controls (C).
Statistical correlations in AML group.
| Correlation Pairs | Spearman’s Rho * | |
|---|---|---|
| CD62p-CD63 | 0.695 | 0.000 |
| CD63-Ht | 0.598 | 0.003 |
| CD 63-Blasts | 0.447 | 0.037 |
| CD42a-CD41 | 0.783 | 0.000 |
| CD42b-CD42a | 0.823 | 0.000 |
| CD42b-CD61 | 0.570 | 0.007 |
| CD42b-CD41 | 0.761 | 0.000 |
| CD61-CD42a | 0.758 | 0.000 |
| CD61-CD42b | 0.570 | 0.007 |
| CD61-CD41 | 0.684 | 0.000 |
| CD41-CD42a | 0.783 | 0.000 |
| CD41-CD42b | 0.761 | 0.000 |
| To-Ht | 0.559 | 0.007 |
*: Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). To = temperature of patients (higher or normal). Ht = haematocrit.
Figure 3Graphical correlation in AML patients. Each box illustrates the statistic results presented in Table 3. There are represented correlations between temperature and haematocrit (Ht)—non-linear inverted correlation; CD63 and blasts—no correlation; CD41 and CD61—direct correlation; CD42a and CD42b—direct correlation; CD42a and CD41—direct correlation; CD42b and CD42a—direct correlation; CD42b and CD41—direct correlation; CD42b and CD61—direct correlation; Ht and CD61—inverted correlation.
Platelets’ antigens distribution in AML patients with or without bleeding.
| Markers | Cases and the Presence of Hemorrhage | Median | |
|---|---|---|---|
| % of CD62p positive | AML NO | 16.46 (7.38–47.32) | 0.038 |
| % of CD63 positive | AML NO | 16.78 (5.12–45.76) | 0.001 |
| % of CD42a positive | AML NO | 76.59 (1.44–95.81) | 0.099 |
| % of CD42b positive | AML NO | 76.35 (12.94–95.31) | 0.047 |
| % of CD61 positive | AML NO | 87.51 (40.35–98.10) | <0.01 |
| % of CD41 positive | AML NO | 73.19 (21.42–93.06) | 0.029 |
Figure 4The flow cytometric analysis of our 22 AML patients and 10 controls revealed the following platelet characteristics. Patients without bleeding (arm No) or with bleedings (arm Yes) are represented in the boxplots with the level of expression for platelets markers CD61, CD41, CD42a, CD42b, CD62p and CD63.