| Literature DB >> 35010728 |
Mohammad H Rahbar1,2,3, Maureen Samms-Vaughan4, Yuansong Zhao2,5, Sepideh Saroukhani1,2, Sheikh F Zaman1,2, Jan Bressler1,6, Manouchehr Hessabi2, Megan L Grove1,6, Sydonnie Shakspeare-Pellington4, Katherine A Loveland7.
Abstract
Arsenic (As) is a metalloid that has been classified as a xenobiotic with toxic effects on human beings, especially on children. Since the soil in Jamaica contains As, dietary intake is considered the main source of As exposure in Jamaicans. In addition, glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes, including GSTT1, GSTP1, and GSTM1, play an important role in the metabolism of xenobiotics including As in humans. Using data from 375 typically developing children (2-8 years) in Jamaica, we investigated the environmental and sociodemographic factors, as well as their possible interactions with the children's genotype for GST genes in relation to having a detectable level of blood As concentration (i.e., >1.3 μg/L). Using multivariable logistic regression, we have identified environmental factors significantly associated with blood As concentrations that include a child's age, parental education levels, and the consumption of saltwater fish, cabbage, broad beans, and avocado (all p < 0.01). Based on the multivariable analysis including gene x environment interactions, we found that among children with the Ile/Ile genotype for GSTP1 Ile105Val, children who consumed avocado had higher odds of having a detectable blood As concentration compared to children who did not eat avocado.Entities:
Keywords: Jamaica; blood arsenic concentrations; children; food consumption; glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes; interaction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35010728 PMCID: PMC8745014 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Demographic and socioeconomic characteristics of children and their parents (n = 375).
| Variables | Categories | |
|---|---|---|
| Child’s sex | Male | 307 (81.9) |
| Female | 68 (18.1) | |
| Child’s age (months) | Age < 72 | 281 (74.9) |
| Age ≥ 72 | 94 (25.1) | |
| Child’s race | Afro-Caribbean | 365 (97.3) |
| Parish of child’s birth | Kingston parish | 232 (61.9) |
| Other parishes a | 143 (38.1) | |
| Maternal age (at child’s birth) b | Age < 35 | 326 (88.4) |
| Age ≥ 35 | 43 (11.6) | |
| Parental education level c | Both up to high school d | 199 (54.5) |
| At least one beyond high school e | 166 (45.5) | |
| Socioeconomic status (SES) | High SES (own a car) | 151 (40.3) |
|
| DD i | 92 (25.8) |
| I/I or I/D j | 264 (74.2) | |
|
| DD i | 89 (24.9) |
| I/I or I/D j | 268 (75.1) | |
|
| Ile/Ile | 96 (26.7) |
| Ile/Val | 182 (50.7) | |
| Val/Val | 81 (22.6) |
a Include Portland, Trelawny, Westmoreland, Clarendon, St. Andrew, St. Mary, St. James, St. Elizabeth, St. Catherine, St. Thomas, St. Ann, Hanover, or Manchester. b Maternal age was missing for six mothers. c Parental education level was missing for ten parents. d Up to high school education means attended primary/jr. secondary, and secondary/high/technical schools. e Beyond high school education means attended a vocational, tertiary college, or university. f GSTT1 was missing for 19 children. g GSTM1 was missing for 18 children. h GSTP1 was missing for 16 children. i DD indicates the null alleles for GSTT1 and GSTM1. j I/I or I/D indicate the homozygote (I/I) or a heterozygote (I/D) for GSTT1 and GSTM1.
Associations of environmental factors and children’s genotypes for GST genes with blood As concentrations based on univariable logistic regression models (n = 375).
| Exposure Variables | Categories | ≥LoD | <LoD | OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child’s gender | Male | 183 (82.8) | 124 (80.5) | 1.17 (0.69, 1.98) | 0.57 | |
| Child’s age (months) | Age ≥ 72 | 70 (31.7) | 24 (15.6) | 2.51 (1.49, 4.22) | <0.01 | |
| Child’s race | Afro-Caribbean | 216 (97.7) | 149 (96.8) | 1.45 (0.41, 5.10) | 0.56 | |
| Place of child’s birth | Kingston parish | 144 (65.2) | 88 (57.1) | 1.40 (0.92, 2.14) | 0.12 | |
| Maternal age (at child’s birth) b | Age ≥ 35 | 25 (11.6) | 18 (11.7) | 0.99 (0.52, 1.89) | 0.98 | |
| Parental education level c | At least one beyond high school d | 80 (37.0) | 86 (57.7) | 0.43 (0.28, 0.66) | <0.01 | |
| Socioeconomic status (SES) | High SES (own a car) | 79 (35.8) | 72 (46.8) | 0.63 (0.42, 0.96) | 0.03 | |
|
| DD g | 48 (23.2) | 44 (29.5) | 0.72 (0.45, 1.16) | 0.18 | |
| I/I or I/D h | 159 (76.8) | 105 (70.5) | REF | |||
|
| DD g | 51 (24.6) | 38 (25.3) | 0.96 (0.59,1.56) | 0.88 | |
| I/I or I/D h | 156 (75.4) | 112 (74.7) | REF | |||
|
| Ile/Ile | 54 (25.8) | 42 (28.0) | REF | ||
| Ile/Val | 106 (50.7) | 76 (50.7) | 1.08 (0.66, 1.79) | 0.75 | ||
| Val/Val | 49 (23.5) | 32 (21.3) | 1.19 (0.65, 2.17) | 0.57 | ||
| Living near a high | 80 (36.2) | 65 (42.2) | 0.78 (0.51, 1.18) | 0.24 | ||
| Pica (habitually put items in mouth) | Mud j | 19 (8.7) | 4 (2.6) | 3.56 (1.19, 10.69) | 0.02 | |
| Source of drinking | Piped water | 208 (94.6) | 150 (97.4) | 0.46 (0.15, 1.46) | 0.19 | |
| Source of cooking | Piped water | 210 (95.4) | 152 (98.7) | 0.28 (0.06, 1.28) | 0.10 | |
| Seafood consumption | Saltwater fish | 139 (76.5) | 91 (59.1) | 2.25 (1.44, 3.52) | <0.01 | |
| Freshwater fish (Pond fish, Tilapia) | 81 (36.6) | 39 (25.3) | 1.71 (1.08, 2.69) | 0.02 | ||
| Sardine, mackerel (Canned fish) | 194 (87.8) | 122 (79.2) | 1.89 (1.08, 3.30) | 0.03 | ||
| Tuna (Canned fish) | 87 (39.4) | 48 (31.2) | 1.43 (0.93, 2.22) | 0.10 | ||
| Salt fish (Pickled mackerel) | 181 (81.9) | 114 (74.0) | 1.59 (0.97, 2.61) | 0.07 | ||
| Shellfish (Lobster, Crab) | 29 (13.1) | 19 (12.3) | 1.07 (0.58, 1.99) | 0.82 | ||
| Shrimp | 42 (19.0) | 24 (15.6) | 1.27 (0.73, 2.20) | 0.39 | ||
| Organ/meat | Liver | 152 (68.8) | 80 (52.0) | 2.04 (1.33, 3.12) | <0.01 | |
| Grain and starches | White rice or rice and peas | 216 (97.7) | 152 (98.7) | 0.57 (0.11, 2.97) | 0.50 | |
| Fried dumpling (Festival dumpling) | 188 (85.1) | 116 (75.3) | 1.87 (1.11, 3.14) | 0.02 | ||
| Boiled dumpling | 194 (87.8) | 143 (92.9) | 0.55 (0.27, 1.15) | 0.11 | ||
| White bread | 139 (62.9) | 109 (70.8) | 0.70 (0.45, 1.09) | 0.11 | ||
| Whole wheat bread | 147 (66.5) | 92 (59.7) | 1.34 (0.87, 2.05) | 0.18 | ||
| Cakes/Buns | 195 (88.2) | 124 (80.5) | 1.82 (1.03, 3.21) | 0.04 | ||
| Porridge (cornmeal, oatmeal) | 201 (90.9) | 142 (92.2) | 0.85 (0.40, 1.79) | 0.67 | ||
| Cold breakfast cereal | 177 (80.1) | 124 (80.5) | 0.46 (0.58, 1.63) | 0.92 | ||
| Pasta, macaroni, noodles | 184 (83.3) | 141 (91.6) | 0.46 (0.24, 0.90) | 0.02 | ||
| Beans | Peas, beans, nuts | Red peas, gungo peas | 191 (86.4) | 108 (70.1) | 2.71 (1.62, 4.55) | <0.01 |
| Broad beans | 158 (71.5) | 66 (42.9) | 3.34 (2.17, 5.15) | <0.01 | ||
| Peanuts, cashews | 179 (81.0) | 115 (74.7) | 1.45 (0.88, 2.37) | 0.14 | ||
| Fruits and vegetables | Root | Yam, sweet potato, dasheen, coco | 146 (66.1) | 113 (73.4) | 0.71 (0.45, 1.11) | 0.13 |
| Carrot, pumpkin | 195 (88.2) | 130 (84.4) | 1.39 (0.76, 2.52) | 0.29 | ||
| Leafy | Lettuce | 153 (69.2) | 81 (52.6) | 2.03 (1.32, 3.11) | <0.01 | |
| Callaloo, broccoli, or | 195 (88.2) | 112 (72.7) | 2.81 (1.64, 4.83) | <0.01 | ||
| Cabbage | 125 (56.6) | 108 (70.1) | 0.56 (0.36, 0.86) | <0.01 | ||
| Legumes | String beans | 120 (54.3) | 42 (27.3) | 3.17 (2.04, 4.93) | <0.01 | |
| Fruit | Tomatoes | 180 (81.4) | 100 (64.9) | 2.37 (1.48, 3.81) | <0.01 | |
| Ackee | 149 (67.4) | 110 (71.4) | 0.83 (0.53, 1.30) | 0.41 | ||
| Avocado | 158 (71.5) | 71 (46.1) | 2.93 (1.91, 4.51) | <0.01 | ||
| Green banana | 148 (67.0) | 117 (76.0) | 0.64 (0.40, 1.02) | 0.06 | ||
| Fried plantain | 190 (86.0) | 128 (83.1) | 1.25 (0.71, 2.20) | 0.45 | ||
OR: Odds ratio. a p-values are based on the Wald’s test in the univariable logistic regression models. b Maternal age was missing for six mothers. c Parental education level was missing for ten parents. d Beyond high school education means attended a vocational, tertiary college, or university. e GSTT1 was missing for 14 children with blood As concentrations above LoD and 5 children with blood As concentrations below LoD. f GSTM1 was missing for 14 children with blood As concentrations above LoD and 4 children with blood As concentrations below LoD. g DD indicates the null alleles for GSTT1 and GSTM1. h I/I or I/D indicate the homozygote (I/I) or a heterozygote (I/D) for GSTT1 and GSTM1. i GSTP1 was missing for 12 children with blood As concentrations above LoD and 4 children with blood As concentrations below LoD. j Pica-mud was missing for two children with blood As concentrations above LoD. k Source of drinking water was missing for one child with blood As concentrations above LoD. l Source of cooking water was missing for one child with blood As concentrations above LoD.
Associations between children’s exposure to environmental factors and a binary detectable level of blood As concentrations by children’s genotypes for GST genes based on the multivariable logistic regression models that include the interaction between GST genes and the main environmental exposure (n = 375).
| Environmental Factor | Category Compared | Referent Category | Gene | Models | Genotypes | OR (95%CI) | Overall Interaction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child’s gender | Male | Female | Recessive | DD e | 3.75 (1.18, 11.94) | 0.03 | 0.02 | |
| I/I or I/D f | 0.75 (0.39, 1.44) | 0.39 | ||||||
| Co-dominant | Ile/Ile | 0.46 (0.13, 1.60) | 0.22 | 0.07 | ||||
| Ile/Val | 1.18 (0.58, 2.40) | 0.64 | ||||||
| Val/Val | 4.29 (1.02, 18.07) | 0.047 | ||||||
| Dominant | Ile/Ile | 0.46 (0.13, 1.60) | 0.22 | 0.09 | ||||
| Val/Val or Ile/Val | 1.56 (0.84, 2.91) | 0.16 | ||||||
| Recessive | Val/Val | 4.29 (1.02, 18.07) | 0.047 | 0.052 | ||||
| Ile/Ile or Ile/Val | 0.92 (0.50, 1.68) | 0.78 | ||||||
| Parish of child’s birth | Kingston | Other g | Recessive | DD e | 0.74 (0.32, 1.71) | 0.49 | 0.06 | |
| I/I or I/D f | 1.91 (1.15, 3.17) | 0.01 | ||||||
| Co-dominant | Ile/Ile | 0.71 (0.29, 1.73) | 0.45 | 0.01 | ||||
| Ile/Val | 2.76 (1.50, 5.08) | <0.01 | ||||||
| Val/Val | 0.74 (1.83, 0.43) | 0.51 | ||||||
| Dominant | Ile/Ile | 0.71 (0.29, 1.73) | 0.45 | 0.07 | ||||
| Val/Val or Ile/Val | 1.83 (1.11, 3.02) | 0.02 | ||||||
| Recessive | Val/Val | 0.74 (0.30, 1.83) | 0.51 | 0.1 | ||||
| Ile/Ile or Ile/Val | 1.75 (1.07, 2.86) | 0.03 | ||||||
| Parental education level i | Group 1 j | Group 2 k | Co-dominant | Ile/Ile | 1.07 (0.47, 2.41) | 0.88 | 0.057 | |
| Ile/Val | 3.04 (1.64, 5.65) | <0.01 | ||||||
| Val/Val | 4.38 (1.61, 11.92) | <0.01 | ||||||
| Dominant | Ile/Ile | 1.07 (0.47, 2.41) | 0.88 | 0.02 | ||||
| Val/Val or Ile/Val | 3.31 (1.96, 5.57) | <0.01 | ||||||
| Recessive | Val/Val | 4.38 (1.61, 11.92) | <0.01 | 0.19 | ||||
| Ile/Ile or Ile/Val | 2.09 (1.28, 3.42) | <0.01 | ||||||
| Consumption of ackee | Yes | No | Co-dominant | Ile/Ile | 1.78 (0.76, 4.15) | 0.18 | 0.09 | |
| Ile/Val | 0.66 (0.34, 1.28) | 0.22 | ||||||
| Val/Val | 0.48 (0.17, 1.34) | 0.16 | ||||||
| Dominant | Ile/Ile | 1.78 (0.76, 4.15) | 0.18 | 0.03 | ||||
| Val/Val or Ile/Val | 0.6 (0.34, 1.04) | 0.07 | ||||||
| Recessive | Val/Val | 0.48 (0.17, 1.34) | 0.16 | 0.23 | ||||
| Ile/Ile or Ile/Val | 0.96 (0.58, 1.62) | 0.89 | ||||||
| Consumption of avocado | Yes | No | Co-dominant | Ile/Ile | 7.04 (2.85, 17.37) | <0.01 | 0.09 | |
| Ile/Val | 2.12 (1.15, 3.88) | 0.01 | ||||||
| Val/Val | 2.72 (1.05, 7.05) | 0.04 | ||||||
| Dominant | Ile/Ile | 7.04 (2.85, 17.37) | <0.01 | 0.03 | ||||
| Val/Val or Ile/Val | 2.28 (1.37, 3.81) | <0.01 | ||||||
| Recessive | Val/Val | 2.72 (1.05, 7.05) | 0.04 | 0.79 | ||||
| Ile/Ile or Ile/Val | 3.16 (1.92, 5.20) | <0.01 |
a p-values are based on the Wald’s test in multivariable logistic regression models. b overall interaction p-values based on the type 3 effect test in multivariable logistic regression models. c GSTM1 was missing for 14 children with blood As concentrations above LoD and 4 children with blood As concentrations below LoD. d GSTT1 was missing for 14 children with blood As concentrations above LoD and 5 children with blood As concentrations below LoD. e DD indicates the null alleles for GSTT1 and GSTM1. f I/I or I/D indicate the homozygote (I/I) or a heterozygote (I/D) for GSTT1 and GSTM1. g Include Portland, Trelawny, Westmoreland, Clarendon, St. Andrew, St. Mary, St. James, St. Elizabeth, St. Catherine, St. Thomas, St. Ann, Hanover, or Manchester. h GSTP1 was missing for 12 children with blood As concentrations above LoD and 4 children with blood As concentrations below LoD. i Parental education level: five missing for children with blood As concentrations above LoD, and five missing for children with blood As concentrations below LoD. j Up to high school education means attended primary/jr. secondary, and secondary/high/technical schools. k Beyond high school education means attended a vocational, tertiary college, or university.
Adjusted associations between children’s exposure to environmental factors and a binary detectable level of blood As concentrations by children’s genotypes for GST genes based on multivariable logistic regression models that include the interaction between GST genes and the main environmental exposure (n = 375).
| Models | Environmental Factor | Categories Compared | Gene | Genotypes | OR | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additive multivariable model | Child’s age (months) | Age ≥ 72 vs. | 2.27 | <0.01 | |||
| Parental education level b | Group 1 c vs. | 1.82 | 0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of saltwater fish | Yes vs. no | 1.99 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of cabbage | Yes vs. no | 0.47 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of beans | Yes vs. no | 2.72 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of avocado | Yes vs. no | 2.18 | <0.01 | ||||
| Interactive multivariable model | Co-dominant | Child’s age (months) | Age ≥ 72 vs. | 2.41 | <0.01 | ||
| Parental education level b | Group 1 c vs. | 2.01 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of saltwater fish | Yes vs. No | 1.96 | 0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of cabbage | Yes vs. No | 0.47 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of beans | Yes vs. No | 2.89 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of avocado e | Yes vs. No | Ile/Ile | 7.44 | <0.01 | |||
| Ile/Val | 1.17 | 0.66 | |||||
| Val/Val | 1.87 | 0.27 | |||||
| Dominant | Child’s age (months) | Age ≥ 72 vs. | 2.37 | <0.01 | |||
| Parental education level b | Group 1 c vs. | 2.01 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of saltwater fish | Yes vs. no | 1.93 | 0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of cabbage | Yes vs. no | 0.48 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of beans | Yes vs. no | 2.92 | <0.01 | ||||
| Consumption of avocado g | Yes vs. no | Ile/Ile | 7.43 | <0.01 | |||
| Val/Val or Ile/Val | 1.33 | 0.35 | |||||
a p-values are based on the Wald’s test in the multivariable logistic regression models. b Parental education level: five missing for children with blood As concentrations above LoD, and five missing for children with blood As concentrations below LoD. c Up to high school education means attended primary/jr. secondary, and secondary/high/technical schools. d Beyond high school education means attended a vocational, tertiary college, or university. e Overall interaction p-values based on the type 3 effect test is 0.01. f GSTP1 was missing for 12 children with blood As concentrations above LoD and 4 children with blood As concentrations below LoD. g Overall interaction p-value based on the type 3 effect test is 0.004.