| Literature DB >> 35010636 |
Ana Teresa Luís1,2, Francisco Córdoba3, Catarina Antunes1, Raul Loayza-Muro4, José Antonio Grande2,5, Bruna Silva1, Jesus Diaz-Curiel6, Eduardo Ferreira da Silva1.
Abstract
Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) results from sulfide oxidation, which incorporates hydrogen ions, sulfate, and metals/metalloids into the aquatic environment, allowing fixation, bioaccumulation and biomagnification of pollutants in the aquatic food chain. Acidic leachates from waste rock dams from pyritic and (to a lesser extent) coal mining are the main foci of Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) production. When AMD is incorporated into rivers, notable changes in water hydro-geochemistry and biota are observed. There is a high interest in the biodiversity of this type of extreme environments for several reasons. Studies indicate that extreme acid environments may reflect early Earth conditions, and are thus, suitable for astrobiological experiments as acidophilic microorganisms survive on the sulfates and iron oxides in AMD-contaminated waters/sediments, an analogous environment to Mars; other reasons are related to the biotechnological potential of extremophiles. In addition, AMD is responsible for decreasing the diversity and abundance of different taxa, as well as for selecting the most well-adapted species to these toxic conditions. Acidophilic and acidotolerant eukaryotic microorganisms are mostly composed by algae (diatoms and unicellular and filamentous algae), protozoa, fungi and fungi-like protists, and unsegmented pseudocoelomata animals such as Rotifera and micro-macroinvertebrates. In this work, a literature review summarizing the most recent studies on eukaryotic organisms and micro-organisms in Acid Mine Drainage-affected environments is elaborated.Entities:
Keywords: AMD (Acid Mine Drainage); Euglena; Rotifera; extremophilic organism; fungi; green algae; metal mining; micro-macroinvertebrates; protozoa
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010636 PMCID: PMC8751164 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1(A) Pinnularia acidophila, (B) Pinnularia acoricola, (C) Pinnularia aljustrelica, (D) Pinnularia subcapitata and (E) Eunotia exigua.
Diatom species with pH and metal concentrations (mg/L), pH tolerance range and optimum pH.
| Species Name | pH Tolerance Range | Optimum pH | Metal Concentrations |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 2.0–5.0 | 2.0–3.0 | Fe 1300 to 6000 |
|
| 2.0–4.5 | 2.0–2.2 | |
|
| 2.0–6.0 | 2.0–3.0 | |
|
| 2.0–7.0 | 3.0 | |
|
| 2.0–6.8 | 2.0–2.2 | |
|
| 3.0–5.0 | 3.0 | Similar metal concentrations as above, but species valves are morphologically affected by metals (teratologies) |
|
| 4.5–7.5 | 4.8 | Fe 1100 |
Figure 2(A) Unicellular algae (Chlamydomonas acidophila), (B) Filamentous algae (Klebsormidium sp.), (C) Euglena mutabilis, (D) Protozoo Heliozoa, (E) Protozoo Ciliata, (F) Amoeba, (G) Rotífer.
Figure 3(A) Scytalidium thermophilum, (B) Possible Acremonium sp., (C) Scytalidium acidophilum, (D) Lecythophora hoffmannii. Photos from [89]. Photos adapted from ref. [89].
Figure 4Microphotographs of individuals from family Chironomidae: (A) Cricotopus sp., (B) subfamily Orthocladinae.