| Literature DB >> 25369810 |
Abstract
A major issue in microbial ecology is to identify the limits of life for growth and survival, and to understand the molecular mechanisms that define these limits. Thus, interest in the biodiversity and ecology of extreme environments has grown in recent years for several reasons. Some are basic and revolve around the idea that extreme environments are believed to reflect early Earth conditions. Others are related to the biotechnological potential of extremophiles. In this regard, the study of extremely acidic environments has become increasingly important since environmental acidity is often caused by microbial activity. Highly acidic environments are relatively scarce worldwide and are generally associated with volcanic activity or mining operations. For most acidic environments, low pH facilitates metal solubility, and therefore acidic waters tend to have high concentrations of heavy metals. However, highly acidic environments are usually inhabited by acidophilic and acidotolerant eukaryotic microorganisms such as algae, amoebas, ciliates, heliozoan and rotifers, not to mention filamentous fungi and yeasts. Here, we review the general trends concerning the diversity and ecophysiology of eukaryotic acidophilic microorganims, as well as summarize our latest results on this topic in one of the largest extreme acidic rivers, Río Tinto (SW, Spain).Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 25369810 PMCID: PMC4187173 DOI: 10.3390/life3030363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Life (Basel) ISSN: 2075-1729
Physicochemical parameters at the most extreme sampling sites in Río Tinto (mean ± SD). Cond.—Conductivity (mS cm−1); Redox.—redox potential (mV). Ions in mg L−1 except Fe in g L−1.
| Location | pH | Cond | Redox | Fe | Cu | As | Cd | Zn |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iz-Iz | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 25.7 ± 2.3 | 569 ± 22 | 17 ± 4 | 12 ± 3 | 16 ± 4 | 43 ± 16 | 14 ± 3 |
| ANG | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 30.8 ± 3.4 | 471 ± 16 | 16 ± 3 | 132 ± 43 | 24 ± 3 | 30 ± 12 | 162 ± 5 |
| UMA | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 40.2 ± 8.3 | 473 ± 10 | 18 ± 7 | 85 ± 36 | 32 ± 5 | 40 ± 18 | 118 ± 4 |
| RI | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 38.9 ± 1.6 | 460 ± 30 | 22 ± 5 | 100 ± 36 | 48 ± 7 | 34 ± 11 | 94 ± 31 |
| LPC | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 3.70 ± 1.1 | 548 ± 70 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 19 ± 7 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 50 ± 10 |
Figure 1(a) General view of Río Tinto; (b) Photosynthetic biofilms formed by acidic Klebsormidium and Zygnema; (c) Photosynthetic biofilms formed by Euglena mutabilis.
Figure 2Light microscopy photographs of different eukaryotic species isolated from Río Tinto. (a) Filamentous green algae Klebsormidium sp.; (b) Diatoms; (c) Green algae Chlamydomonas spp.; (d) Heliozoa Actinophrys sp.
Photosynthetic parameters of the different biofilms (Chlorella, Euglena, Diatom and Zygnemopsis) isolated from different locations at Río Tinto (AG, ANG, 3.1, NUR, SM and LPC). Compensation light intensity (Ic) and light saturation parameter (Ik) are expressed on photon basis (μmol photons m−2 s−1). Photosynthetic efficiency (α) and photoinhibition factor (β) are expressed on Chl a basis (μmol O2 mg Chla−1 h−1) [39].
| Species | Ic | Ik | α | β |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlo_AG | 10.36 ± 3.26 | 59.65 ± 7.03 | 0.448 ± 0.13 | 0.0123 ± 0.01 |
| Chlo_ANG | 23.19 ± 3.24 | 120.34 ± 8.08 | 0.137 ± 0.02 | 0.0431 ± 0.01 |
| Eug_3.1 | 18.93 ± 0.72 | 95.41 ± 9.23 | 0.448 ± 0.09 | 0.0450 ± 0.02 |
| Eug_AG | 18.44 ± 5.34 | 49.91 ± 5.89 | 0.278 ± 0.12 | 0.0441 ± 0.00 |
| Eug_NUR | 16.84 ± 0.76 | 96.23 ± 5.32 | 0.263 ± 0.02 | 0.0247 ± 0.02 |
| Eug_SM | 17.43 ± 4.59 | 48.53 ± 5.32 | 0.558 ± 0.05 | 0.0179 ± 0.00 |
| Dia_NUR | 5.06 ± 1.72 | 47.82 ± 6.47 | 1.423 ± 0.10 | 0.0426± 0.02 |
| Zyg_LPC | 38.89 ± 22.70 | 13.22 ± 3.23 | 0.249 ± 0.03 |
Figure 32-DE preparative gels. The spots resolved by 2-DE from preparative gels were stained with (A) Cy3 cells growing under BG11/f2 artificial media at pH2. (B) Cy5 cells growing under natural metal-rich water NW/f2 at pH2.