| Literature DB >> 35010249 |
Abstract
Pasta made from durum wheat is a widely consumed worldwide and is a healthy and convenient food. In the last two decades, there has been much research effort into improving the nutritional value of pasta by inclusion of nonconventional ingredients due to the demand by health-conscious consumers for functional foods. These ingredients can affect the technological properties of the pasta, but their health impacts are not always measured rather inferred. This review provides an overview of pasta made from durum wheat where the semolina is substituted in part with a range of ingredients (barley fractions, dietary fibre sources, fish ingredients, herbs, inulin, resistant starches, legumes, vegetables and protein extracts). Impacts on pasta technological properties and in vitro measures of phytonutrient enhancement or changes to starch digestion are included. Emphasis is on the literature that provides clinical or animal trial data on the health benefits of the functional pasta.Entities:
Keywords: durum wheat; functional food; functional pasta; health benefits; pasta
Year: 2022 PMID: 35010249 PMCID: PMC8750499 DOI: 10.3390/foods11010123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Strategies to create pasta with added nutritional functionality.
| Approach | Intention | Reference |
|---|---|---|
|
| Enhance a specific component of the grain | [ |
|
conventional breeding GMOs Gene technologies—TILLING, CRISPR-Cas9 | ||
|
| Functional foods: Increase protein content and quality; increase fibre, AO, phytochemicals, etc. | [ |
|
Proteins, Fructo oligosaccharides, dietary fibre, Prebiotics, ω-3 fatty acids, minerals, vitamins Phytochemicals and probiotics Legumes (chickpeas, red lentils, yellow peas, faba beans, soy) Vegetables (pumpkin, zucchini, spinach, tomato) Herbs (oregano leaves, parsley leaves) Roots and tubers (cassava, sweet potato, beet, carrot) Others (gums, resistant starch, modified starch, β-glucan, psyllium seed husk) | ||
|
| Reduce cost of pasta by replacing some/all durum semolina with common wheat flour and other flours | [ |
|
Common wheat and durum wheat Other cereal flours and durum wheat | ||
|
| Gluten free diet, celiac diet | [ |
|
| Enhance ingredient nutritional value, remove anti-nutritional factors | |
|
Germination Fermentation Enzymic treatment Micronisation | [ | |
|
| Valorisation of cereal and noncereal by-products | |
|
Bran fractions Aleurone fractions Grape marc, fruit pomace Fish meal Whey Algae | [ | |
|
| Valorisation of underutilised grains | [ |
|
einkorn emmer wheat kamut spelt buckwheat quinoa amaranth |
Examples of pasta made with a combination of semolina and non-traditional ingredients.
| Ingredient Added | Active Ingredient | Substitution Range | Impact on Pasta | Predicted Health Benefits from Data Presented | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Barley Balance® | β-glucan | 0, 7.5, 15, 20 | Provides AO, lowers IVSD, minimal impact on pasta making quality up to 7.5% | Lower GI, cholesterol reduction, SCFA production | [ |
| Glucagel, Barley Balance® (BB) | β-glucan | 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 | BB only reduced IVSD. Some impact on pasta making quality after 4% | Lower GI, cholesterol reduction, SCFA production | [ |
| Barley β-glucan fibre fraction | β-glucan | 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 | lowers IVSD but reduced pasta making quality above 2.5% | Lower GI, cholesterol reduction, SCFA production | [ |
| Barley fractions | β-glucan | 0, 5, 20, 40 | Increased TDF, darker, acceptable sensory, lower total calories | unknown | [ |
| Barley pearling fractions | β-glucan | 50 | Higher TDF, pasta darker with good cooking qualities | unknown | [ |
| β-glucan enriched barley flour | β-glucan | 40 | Increased β-glucan to 5% in pasta; pasta quality comparable to control; higher AO and TPA; reduced IVSD | Could lower GI and enhance plasma oxidative defence | [ |
| Barley hull air classification fractions | β-glucan | 50% coarse Fr; 45% coarse Fr + 5% gluten; 95% coarse Fr + 5% gluten | Increased TDF and β-glucan; Higher AO and flavan-3-ols, TPA | Could enhance plasma oxidative defence | [ |
| Soluble fibres: BB, psyllium, GR-inulin, HPX-inulin enriched pasta and doughs | Soluble fibres | 15% individual fibre and dual combinations, 7.5% each | Pasta containing BB individually and in combination with psyllium showed an overall sensory acceptability comparable to control and in vivo glycaemic index reduction of 33–37% | Reduced pasta GI | [ |
| Oat (1,3)(1,4) β- | β-glucan | 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 | Oat β-glucan increased pasta water absorption, fat, TDF, and increased cooking loss >5%, minimal impact on appearance but sensory acceptable up to 15%. 10–15% Oat β-glucan and 5% additive of vital wheat gluten and xanthan gum yielded functional pasta containing 3.3–5.5 g β-glucans/100 g | Oat claim for lowering GI, lowering cholesterol | [ |
|
| |||||
| Guar gum, CMC | Soluble fibres | CMC: 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5 | lowers IVSD with 20% GG but impacts pasta making quality; lowers IVSD with 1.5% CMC no impact on pasta making quality | Lower GI unknown level needed | [ |
| Bran, pollard | Insoluble fibres | Bran: 0, 10, 20, 30 | Up to 10% pollard can be tolerated minimal impact pasta quality with elevated AO, TDF. Bran had negative impacts pasta at all doses but with enhanced TDF, AO with no effect on IVSD | Higher TDF bowel health and transit | [ |
| Commercial sources of pea fibre, Inulin, GG, locust bean gum, Xanthan gum, Bamboo fibre, HISol (B-glucan) | Non-starch polysaccharides, inulin | 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 | Increased cooking loss and reduced starch and protein and effects on texture varied with non-starch polysaccharides used and quantity with 5% the limit. Fresh pasta only used | Higher TDF bowel health and transit; lower GI likely, enhanced Ca absorption | [ |
| Debranning fractions (DF) and micronized debranned kernels (MK) | AO, phenolics | DF 30%; MK 100% | Higher content of phenolic compounds with minimal effects on pasta sensory properties | Higher TDF bowel health and transit | [ |
| Phenolic extract | Phenolics | Phenolic extract liquid replaces water used in pasta making | Dough was weakened, pasta was more brown and sensory scores impaired (more bitter and salty) | Poor strategy to enhance phenolics in pasta | [ |
| Long-chain inulin (HPX), short-chain inulin (GR), Glucagel, psyllium and oat material added individually and in combinations | Inulin, β-glucan, dietary fibre | 15 | Addition of DF individually and in combination increased pasta optimum cooking time, cooking loss, water absorption and a deterioration in texture and colour values compared to non-DF enriched control. Oat bran flour with another DF gave the best pasta while psyllium fibre was the worst | Higher TDF | [ |
| Wheat, rice, barley, oat brans | Insoluble fibres | 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 | Decreasing sensory acceptability and colour and increase in cooking loss with increasing dose, least impact with oat bran | unknown | [ |
| Dephytinized rice, rye, wheat, oat | Insoluble fibres | 20 | A 1.7–2.9% increase in pasta TDF. Increased TPA andF AO and Ca, P, K, Mg, Zn with significantly reduced phytic acid content | Higher TDF bowel health and transit | [ |
| Whole wheat durum pasta | Wholegrain components | Whole wheat vs. regular pasta | Whole wheat dough is weaker, pasta is reddish-brown with higher cooking loss, lower firmness in cooked product and reduced mechanical strength of dried compared to regular pasta | Potentially multiple benefits, likely lower GI | [ |
| Micronized wheat bran with CMC, XG, locus bean gum | Insoluble fibres and gums | 11.5 | Egg tagliatelle pasta with added XG > 0.8% improved textural properties and CMC >0.6% to enhance yellowness was found to produce a healthier pasta product with higher content of fibre, minerals and vitamins and suitable quality | Higher TDF and potential health benefits from this | [ |
| High fibre oat pasta | Soluble and insoluble fibre | 10, 20 | Oat fibre increased pasta TDF ~8% but increased water absorption and cooking loss, decreased brightness and firmness and impacts reduced using fine (volume mean diameter, μm 50.5) vs. medium (141) and coarse (249) oat powder | Oat claim for lowering GI, lowering cholesterol | [ |
|
| |||||
| Spirulina microalgae enriched pasta | water-soluble pigments and phycocyanin and phenolic compounds | 3 | The technological properties of pasta were affected, but overall acceptability index (85.13%) not influenced by microspheres. Microencapsulated spirulina protects the microalgae’s antioxidant potential | Benefits from AO | [ |
| Pastas with added concentrates of flesh and skin from aquaculture seabass | Source of polyunsaturated fatty acids and minerals | concentrate fish flesh powder 10, concentrate fish skin powder, 20 | Increased Ω-3 fatty acids in pastas with fish concentrates, decrease in the Ω6/Ω3 ratio that greatly exceeds current nutritional guidelines. All pastas showed a low valuation in negative attributes such as oil, or rancidity flavours. Main differences detected were colour, fishy flavour, odour, and texture (chewiness) | Possible improved cardiovascular health markers | [ |
| Salmon fish ( | Antioxidants and other carotenoids | 5, 10, 15, 20 | SFP addition to pasta increased the release of phenolic compounds and AO activity from pasta during digestion to achieve higher levels than control pasta and also reduced the in vitro starch digestibility | Lowers GI | [ |
| Pasta formulation was substituted with shrimp meat | Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids | 10, 20, 30 | shrimp meat ( | unknown | [ |
|
| |||||
| Dried amaranth leaves and amaranth seed flour pasta | Peptides derived from protein, source AO, phenolic acids, flavonoids, carotenoids | amaranth seed flour, 21.25–50.97% and dried amaranth leaves, 0–5.61%. | Pasta with amaranth seed flour and dried amaranth leaves exhibited significantly higher content of protein, crude fibre, minerals with higher AO but panellists preferred pastas with low percentage levels of amaranth seed flour | Benefits from AO anti-hypertensive, anti-oxidant, antithrombotic, anti-proliferative, and anti-inflammatory activities | [ |
| Wild edible plants, | Source of protein and lysine, soluble fibre, minerals, vitamins | 0, 10, 20 | Improved pasta dietary fibre, calcium, iron compared to the control pasta. Enriched pasta presented a greenish fibrous appearance. Sensory evaluations indicated that pasta enriched with 10% did not affect consumer acceptance | constipation, obesity (high satiety due the dietary fibre content) | [ |
|
| |||||
| Inulin enriched pasta | Inulin | 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 20 | The higher molecular weight inulin had minimal impact on pasta quality and sensory properties until 20% while lower MW inulin had more negative impacts on pasta firmness, cooking loss, and sensory acceptability. IVSD was reduced in pasta with inulin higher MW inulin up to 5% but was increased with 20% inulin. Inulin enhanced the gluten structure in pasta with higher starch crystallinity | Lower GI | [ |
| Fresh pasta with inulin (FRUTAFIT HD) | Inulin | 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 | Inulin was shown to influence the swelling index and firmness, but not the adhesiveness and elasticity of pasta products and lowered IVSD | Lower GI | [ |
|
| |||||
| Chickpea flour | phytic acid, sterols, tannins, carotenoids, as isoflavones | 5–20 | Increased protein content; sensory properties (colour, flavour and overall acceptability) improved up to 10%; >30% led to lasagne processing handling and cooking characteristics deterioration and soft mushy pasta | Higher quality protein with good balance of amino acids | [ |
| Desi chickpea ‘besan’ flour | phytic acid, sterols, tannins, carotenoids, as isoflavones | 0, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 | Up to 15% chickpea can be tolerated in spaghetti with acceptable pasta making quality | Higher lysine and protein content | [ |
| Legume pasta (mung, soya, red spit lentil, chickpea) | Soluble and insoluble fibres | 10 | No negative impact on technological quality or IVSD | Higher TDF and potential health benefits from this | [ |
| Black chickpea flour and fermented black chickpea dough pasta | phytic acid, sterols, tannins, carotenoids, as isoflavones | 5.6 (Black chickpea flour), 15 (black chickpea dough) | Fermentation enabled release of 20% of bound phenolic compounds in the dough, higher resistant starch and total free amino acids while antinutritional factors significantly decreased. Fortified pasta had higher in vitro protein digestibility (up to 38%) and higher AO levels. Fermentation reduced antinutritional elements in the black chickpea flour. Sensory acceptance while different to control described a peculiar but appreciated profile of the fortified samples, especially for the pasta including fermented black chickpea dough. | unknown | [ |
| Lentil flour and CMC | proteins, dietary fibres, oligosaccharides, starch, polyphenols, fatty acids, and antioxidants and prebiotics | 40 (lentil) | Lentil fortified spaghetti increased essential amino acids but caused a decrease in pasta quality (e.g., higher cooking loss, lower breaking energy) that was improved by adding CMC | unknown | [ |
| Mexican common bean flour | proteins, vitamins, complex carbohydrates and minerals | 0, 15, 30 | The cooking time and water absorption decreased and cooking loss increased to unacceptable levels, firmness decreased and pasta was darker as a function of the bean flour percentage. Protein increased. Increases of furosine and marginal increases in phenolic contents in pasta | Benefits from TPA | [ |
| Faba bean pasta | Essential amino acids | 0, 30, 70, 100 | Faba enriched pasta weakened the protein network that could be responsible for the increase in the in vitro protein digestion but led to high cooking loss and reduced resilience in cooked product. Very high temperature drying strengthened the protein structure of pasta, resulting in increased integrity and better resilience of pasta without altering their in vitro protein digestibility. Appreciation of legume pasta containing 80% or 100% was similar to that of commercial whole wheat pasta | unknown | [ |
| Pasta with added chickpea flour | Fibre, proteins | 20, 40 | Protein, ash, lipid, and dietary fibre and RS content increased by adding chickpea flour to the pasta. The starch hydrolysis index decreased as chickpea flour in the pasta increased, with a lower predicted glycaemic index than durum wheat-control pasta. | Lower GI | [ |
| Yellow pea pasta | alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, isoflavones, phenols, phytosterols, phytic acid, protease inhibitors, saponins, tannins | 0, 10, 20, 30 | 20% yellow pea flour had favourable sensory attributes, protein content, good texture, yellowness values, reduction in the glucose release and increased protein digestibility. Dough was weaker while product appearance similar to control | Lower GI | [ |
| Pasta with split pea and faba bean | Fibre, protein, vitamins and minerals | 35 | Increased cooking loss, lower pasta breaking energy, altered sensory properties (higher hardness and fracturability). High drying temperature improved slightly but pasta redness increased to undesirable levels with very high T drying | Higher TDF and potential health benefits from this | [ |
| Pasta with added germinated pigeon pea ( | low fat, fibre, proteins and starch, balanced of minerals | 0, 5, 8, 10 | Germination of pigeon pea reduced antinutritional components and increased vitamin B2, E and C. Good acceptability, higher protein, total available sugars, dietary fibre, micronutrients, and vitamins than pasta made from 100% semolina but impacts on pasta making quality (shorter cooking time, higher water absorption and cooking loss) | Vitamins, fibre, better protein balance | [ |
| Corn gluten meal enriched pasta | High protein source | 0, 5, 10 | Corn gluten meal increased pasta protein content, had a similar cooked weight and cooking loss but was less firm with inferior colour compared with the control. The overall flavour quality score of the spaghetti decreased | Unknown | [ |
|
| |||||
| Lupin flour to replace semolina | High protein and fibre source | 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 | Minimal impacts on pasta cooking loss and dry pasta colour and no difference in sensory acceptability up to 20% but α-galactosides and antinutritional factors like phytic acid, saponins, lectins and protease inhibitors reduce protein digestibility | unknown | [ |
| Lupin protein isolate | Proteins, AO, TDF | 0, 5, 17, 30 | Lupin protein isolate increased protein up to 129%, reduced pasta cooking time, water absorption and cooked firmness while stickiness | Reduced GI | [ |
| α-galactosides free lupin flour | High protein and fibre source | 0, 50, 80, 100 | α-galactosides free lupin flour can improve pasta nutritional value without flatulent causing oligosaccharides | unknown | [ |
|
| |||||
| Lupin protein isolate | High protein and fibre source | 0, 5, 17, 30 | Lupin protein isolate increased protein, reduced cooking time, water absorption and firmness but stickiness and cooking loss increased making dried pasta duller | unknown | [ |
| Durum bran protein concentrate | High in phytosterols, protein and EAA | 0, 1 5, 10, 20 | Pasta quality acceptable up to 10% and enriched in EAA | Benefits from better protein quality | [ |
| Whey enriched pasta | High in protein and EAA | 0, 20 | Whey addition increased protein content, and pasta water uptake with minimal impact on sensory quality | unknown | [ |
| Beef lung powder enriched pasta | High in protein and EAA, Fe | 0, 10, 15, 20 | Pasta had higher cooking loss, cooked pasta was firmer and much darker than control with reduced IVSD, higher Fe and protein content | Lowers GI | [ |
| Mustard protein isolate enriched pasta | High in protein and EAA | 0, 2.5, 5, 10 | Increased pasta protein while cooking loss, cooked weight and stickiness decreased and firmness increased while pasta is duller and more red | Unknown | [ |
| angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory activity (ACE) and AO | 0, 5, 10 | Pasta with bean had higher protein content with good sensory acceptability up to 10% with ACE and AO activity | BP regulation | [ | |
|
| |||||
| Hi Maize™ RSII and Novelose 330™ (RSIII) enriched pasta | Resistant starch | RSII: 0, 10, 20, 50 | Minimal impact on pasta quality using these ingredients up to 20% while increasing RS content of pasta, stable after cooking. Both RS reduced IVSD | Lower GI gut health benefits from RS | [ |
| Hi Maize260™, Hi Maize1043™, RSII and Fibersym70™ (RSIV) enriched pasta | Resistant starch | 0, 10, 20 | RS addition had minimal impact on pasta quality and acceptability while reducing the IVSD | Lower GI gut health benefits from RS | [ |
| Unripe banana fibre | Starch from unripe banana flour | 0, 5, 10, 15, 20 | Increased pasta RS, decreased gluten, was darker, higher cooking loss and firmness lower while sensory analysis found banana starch improved acceptability up to 15% but this analysis was limited | Unknown | [ |
| Pastas with elderberry juice Concentrate (EJC) and Hi-maize starch or apple pectin | phenolic acids, anthocyanins, flavanols, carotenoids, vitamins and minerals, soluble DF | 10 g Hi-maize starch, pectin or combination, and diluted elderberry juice concentrate (50 mL per 50 g flour) | Adding EJC to fettuccine pastas reduced the firmness, wettability and volume expansion of the fresh pastas, but Increased protein, total DF content, total antioxidant activity and total extracted TPA content | AO and TDF mostly from insoluble fibre | [ |
|
| |||||
| Stems of | Rich in soluble fibre (arabinose, galactose, rhamnose, xylose and galacturonic acid) | 0, 10, 20, 30 mL substituting the added water used to prepare pasta | Comparable quality and sensory acceptability using up to 10–20% | Blood cholesterol- and glucose-lowering capabilities | [ |
| Carrot leaf meal and Oregano leaf meal | alpha-linolenic acid, omega-3 fatty acids | 0, 5, 10 of each and combinations | Increased AO, and omega-3 fatty acid content from as little as 5% but pasta with higher cooking loss, shorter optimum cooking time, reduced weight increase but all formulations were acceptable by sensory the best being 10% oregano and carrot leaf meal | Unknown | [ |
| Soy okra soybean by-product | protein, lipid, dietary fibre isoflavones, phytosterols, coumestans, lignans, phytates, and saponins | 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 | Increasing soy okra flour reduced pasta optimum cooking time, increased cooking loss and altered taste, texture and colour tolerating only 10%. However, AO and total phenolic contents increased and predicted GI (IVSD) decreased | Lower GI, TPA presumed benefits | [ |
| Mushroom powder (white button, shiitake and porcini) | proteins, acidic polysaccharides, dietary fibre and antioxidants | 0, 5, 10, 15 | mushroom powder increased pasta cooking loss and cooked firmness The addition of shiitake mushroom powder resulted in pasta with the highest firmness and tensile strength | unknown | [ |
| Tomato peel | Antioxidants, carotenoids, DF | 0, 10, 15 | Detrimental effect on pasta such as colour, break resistance, high firmness, reduced cooking loss, inferior sensory taste and overall quality at 10% and higher. However, by adding CMC or gums could negate some of these effects on sensory. Nutritionally tomato peel enhanced b-carotene, lycopene and TDF | to scavenge reactive oxygen species and protect against degenerative diseases like cancer and cardiovascular diseases | [ |
| Onion powder | Flavonoids, Quercetin, Proteins, saponins and phenolic components | 0, 5, 10, 15 | Onion powder up to 10% does not affects sensory characteristics and provides 2.2 mg/100 g of quercetin | Unknown | [ |
Database search history showing database, search term and number of hits.
| Web of Science (2000–2021) | |||||||||
| Pasta and human health | Glycaemic index and pasta | Cardiovascular disease and durum pasta | Diabetes and durum pasta | Obesity and durum pasta | Insulin and durum pasta | Dietary fibre and durum pasta | Cholesterol and durum pasta | ||
| 27 | 19 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 53 | 4 | ||
| PubMed (2000–2021) | |||||||||
| Pasta and health | CVD and durum wheat pasta | diabetes and durum wheat pasta | obesity and durum wheat pasta | weight gain and durum wheat pasta | cancer and durum wheat pasta | insulin and durum wheat pasta | cholesterol and durum wheat pasta | dietary fibre and durum wheat pasta | dietary fibre and durum wheat pasta and health |
| 707 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 8 | 62 | 20 |
| Cochrane Registry | |||||||||
| durum pasta and obesity | durum pasta and CVD | durum pasta and weight gain | durum pasta and cancer | durum pasta and insulin | durum pasta and dietary fibre and health | durum pasta and cholesterol | |||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 | |||