| Literature DB >> 35010203 |
Naifeng Xu1, Qiaojuan Zhu1, Jiangxiong Zhu1, Jingze Jia1, Xinlin Wei2, Yuanfeng Wang1.
Abstract
Recently, concerns about heavy metal cadmium ion (Cd2+) residue in asparagus have been frequently reported, and there is an urgent need to develop an effective, sensitive, and rapid detection method for Cd2+. In this study, we innovatively combined molecular microbiology to carry out the comparative screening of Cd2+ chelators in a green, efficient, and specific way. The knock-out putative copper-transporter gene (pca1Δ) yeast strain with high sensitivity to Cd2+ was first used to screen the Cd2+ chelator, and the optimum chelator 1-(4-Isothiocyanatobenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N,N,N'-tetraacetic acid (ITCBE) was obtained. Additionally, a rapid latex microsphere immunochromatographic assay (LMIA) was developed, based on the obtained monoclonal antibody (mAb) with high specificity and high affinity (affinity constant Ka = 1.83 × 1010 L/mol), to detect Cd2+ in asparagus. The 50% inhibitive concentration (IC50) of test strip was measured to be 0.2 ng/mL, and the limit of detection (IC10) for qualitative (LOD, for visual observation) and quantitative detection (LOQ, for data simulation) of the test strip was 2 ng/mL and 0.054 ng/mL, respectively. In all, the developed mAb-based LMIA shows a great potential for monitoring Cd2+ in asparagus, even in vegetable samples.Entities:
Keywords: asparagus; cadmium ion; immunochromatography; latex microspheres; monoclonal antibody
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010203 PMCID: PMC8750861 DOI: 10.3390/foods11010078
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1The growth of WT and pca1Δ yeast strains incubated with various chelators plus distinct concentrations of Cd2+. (A) Different concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 15 μM); (B) Different concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 5, and 10 μM) plus 5-Br-PADAP (0, 10, and 20 μM); (C) Different concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 5, 10, and 20 μM) plus 2-MBT (0, 10, 20, and 40 μM); (D) Different concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 5, 10, and 20 μM) plus NAC (0, 10, 20, and 40 μM); (E) Different concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 5, 10, 20, and 25 μM) plus CADION (0, 10, 20, 40, and 50 μM); (F) Different concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 5, 10, 20, and 25 μM) plus dimercaptosuccinic acid (0, 10, 20, 40, and 50 μM); (G) Different concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 5, 10, 20, and 25 μM) plus CaNa2-EDTA (0, 10, 20, 40, and 50 μM); (H) Different concentrations of Cd2+ plus EDTA (0, 10, 20, 40, and 50 μM); (I) Different concentrations of Cd2+ (0, 5, 10, 20, and 25 μM) plus ITCBE (0, 10, 20, 40, and 50 μM).
Figure 2Complete antigens for Cd2+ were identified by ultraviolet spectrophotometry. (A) The immune antigens against Cd2+ based on BSA and method 1; (B) The immune antigens against Cd2+ based on BSA and method 2; (C) The immune antigens against Cd2+ based on KLH and method 1; (D) The immune antigens against Cd2+ based on KLH and method 2; (E) Coating antigens for Cd2+.
Figure 3Complete antigens for Cd2+ were identified by SDS-PAGE. (A) The immune antigens against Cd2+ based on BSA; (B) Coating antigens for Cd2+ based on OVA.
Figure 4Identification of positive hybridoma cells. (A) Standard curve of antiserum obtained after final immunization against immunogen Cd-ITCBE-BSA30 in BALB/c mice. (B) Identification of antibody isotype secreted by different cell lines; (C) Analysis of the purity of antibodies secreted by different cell lines.
Figure 5Affinity constants of mAbs secreted by 4 cell lines. (A) 3C9; (B) 4A9; (C) 4H2; (D) 7D3. Different colors represent different concentrations of coated antigen.
Figure 6Standard curves of different mAbs for Cd2+ detection by ic-ELISA. (A) 3C9; (B) 4A9; (C) 4H2; (D) 7D3.
Comparison of detection characteristics of monoclonal antibodies secreted by four cell lines.
| Cell Strain | IC50 (ng/mL) | LOD (ng/mL) | Linear Range (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3C9 | 1.59 | 0.13 | 0.28–9.00 |
| 4A9 | 4.34 | 0.04 | 0.22–84.16 |
| 4H2 | 2.05 | 0.02 | 0.10–40.48 |
| 7D3 | 3.56 | 0.10 | 0.37–34.62 |
Cross-reaction rate of four mAbs for EDTA-metal ions.
| mAb Number | 3C9 | 4A9 | 4H2 | 7D3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDTA-Meta Ions | IC50, ng/mL | CR% | IC50, ng/mL | CR% | IC50, ng/mL | CR% | IC50, ng/mL | CR% |
| EDTA-Cd | 1.61 ± 0.01 | 100 | 4.32 ± 0.03 | 100 | 2.01 ± 0.02 | 100 | 3.62 ± 0.03 | 100 |
| EDTA-Hg | >10 | <16% | >50 | <8% | >50 | <4% | >10 | <36% |
| EDTA-Pb | >500 | <0.3% | >500 | <0.8% | >500 | <0.4% | >500 | <0.7% |
| EDTA-As | >500 | <0.3% | >500 | <0.8% | >500 | <0.4% | >500 | <0.7% |
| EDTA-Cu | >500 | <0.3% | >500 | <0.8% | >500 | <0.4% | >500 | <0.7% |
| EDTA-Fe | >500 | <0.3% | >500 | <0.8% | >500 | <0.4% | >500 | <0.7% |
| EDTA-Ni | >500 | <0.3% | >500 | <0.8% | >500 | <0.4% | >500 | <0.7% |
| EDTA-Cr | >500 | <0.3% | >500 | <0.8% | >500 | <0.4% | >500 | <0.7% |
Figure 7Schematic diagram of the preparation of immunochromatographic microsphere test strips for the Cd2+ detection. (A) Probe preparation; (B) Operation of test strip; (C) Judgment of the result displayed by the test strip.
Figure 8Characterization of immunochromatographic test strips based on the mAb for cadmium ion, concentration unit, ng/mL. (A) Sensitivity of test strips; (B) Standard curve of test strip sensitivity; (C) Specificity of test strips; (D) Influence of sample matrix effect on test strip (‘×’ represent dilution multiple); (E) Measurement of actual samples.
Comparison with the reported Cd2+ immunoassays.
| Methods | Linear Detection Range (ng/mL) | IC50 (ng/mL) | Detection Limit (ng/mL) | Detection Time | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vLOD | LOQ | |||||
| ic-ELISA | - | 45.6 | - | 1.953 | >2 h | [ |
| ic-ELISA | 0.1–1000 | - | - | 0.1 | >2 h | [ |
| ic-ELISA | 0.2–40 | 2.59 | - | 0.08 | >3 h | [ |
| Silver-enhanced ICA strip | 0.5–5 | - | 5 | 0.35 | >30 min | [ |
| Competitive ICA strip | 0.25–8 | - | - | 0.18 | 1 h | [ |
| Fuorescent immunoassay strip | 3.8–48.9 | - | - | 1.93 | 12 min | [ |
| LMIA strip | 0.08–0.48 | 0.20 | 2.00 | 0.05 | 3–5 min | this work |