| Literature DB >> 35010154 |
Mouna Mekkaoui1, Hamza Assaggaf2, Ahmed Qasem2, Adel El-Shemi2, Emad M Abdallah3, El Houcine Bouidida4, Hanae Naceiri Mrabti5, Yahya Cherrah6, Katim Alaoui1.
Abstract
Wound healing consists of several continuous phases involving various cells and chemical intermediates. As a rich source of nutrition elements, honey has proved to have potential benefits in the treatment of various diseases. The present study was designed to investigate the healing effect of a honey mixture with selected essential oils on chemical and thermal wound models in rabbits. Dressing mixtures of Thymus vulgaris honey with three essential oils (Origanum vulgare, Rosmarinus officinalis, and Thymus vulgaris) were prepared and applied daily in the treatment groups. These essential oils were rich in phytochemicals and had significant antibacterial activity against four selected ATCC bacterial strains. Madecasol ointment was used as a standard control. The healing effect of the mixtures was evaluated by measuring wound surface area and comparing healing time. The results showed that the healing rate in the treatment groups was significantly higher than that of the untreated group and standard group. The best healing effect for burns was seen in the mixture of honey and Thymus vulgaris essential oil, which had wound closure rates of 85.21% and 82.14% in thermal- and chemical-induced burns, respectively, and showed the shortest healing time (14 days) in comparison to other groups. Therefore, it can be concluded that honey mixtures have significant beneficial effects on skin wound healing and, thus, they may be used as a healing agent in different types of wounds in humans after specific clinical trials.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial; essential oils; honey; in vivo; rabbits; survey; synergy; toxicity; wound healing
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010154 PMCID: PMC8750595 DOI: 10.3390/foods11010028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Study area.
Plants used for wound healing in traditional Moroccan pharmacopoeia.
| Information about the Herbalist | Ethnobotanical Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Name | Method of administration |
Questionnaire intended for beekeepers/honey used for wound healing in Morocco.
| Information about the Beekeeper | Information about Honey |
|---|---|
| Name | Most sold type(s) of honey |
Sociodemographic characteristics and experience of beekeepers.
| Characteristics | Number of Informants ( | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| <30 | 9 | 6.13 |
| 30–40 | 51 | 34.69 |
| 40–60 | 76 | 51.7 |
| >60 | 11 | 7.48 |
| Total | 147 | 100 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 126 | 85.71 |
| Female | 21 | 14.29 |
| Total | 147 | 100 |
| Education | ||
| Illiterate | 9 | 6.12 |
| Primary/Koranic school | 43 | 29.25 |
| Secondary | 71 | 48.3 |
| University | 24 | 16.33 |
| Total | 147 | 100 |
| Apiary size | ||
| <20 | 85 | 57.82 |
| 20 < A < 60 | 38 | 25.85 |
| >60 | 24 | 16.33 |
| Total | 147 | 100 |
Figure 2Honey used for wound healing.
Medicinal plants used in the treatment of wounds in Morocco as identified by the ethnopharmacological survey.
| Latin Names | Local Names | Family | Part Used | Preparation | Type of Wound | Mode of Application | No. of Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sllaha | Fabaceae | Fruit | Poultice | Burns | Externally applied | 3 | |
| Chendgura | Lamiaceae | Leaves | Decoction | Superficial wounds | Rinsing | 2 | |
| Siber/Sabbar/Sabra | Aloeaceae | Leaves | Poultice | Burns | Externally applied | 9 | |
| Bessla | Amaryllidaceae | Bulb | Poultice | Burns | Externally applied | 8 | |
| Kmoun | Apiaceae | Seed | Powder | Wounds | Externally applied | 2 | |
| Argan | Sapotaceae | Seed | Oil | Skin regeneration/Skin care | Massage | 4 | |
| Chih | Asteraceae | Leaves | Poultice | Wounds | Externally applied | 8 | |
| Tourja | Asclepiadaceae | Stem | Decoction | Wounds | Rinsing | 6 | |
| Kdram | Pinaceae | Resin | Raw | Wounds | Externally applied | 4 | |
| Lhdej | Cucurbitacae | Fruit | Poultice | Wounds | Externally applied | 2 | |
| Dghmouss | Euphorbiaceae | Stem | Powder | Wounds and abscesses | Externally applied | 7 | |
| Rremt | Amaranthaceae | Leaves | Poultice | Wounds | Externally applied | 4 | |
| Lehbalia | Boraginaceae | Leaves | Powder | Wounds | Externally applied | 1 | |
| Oum bina | Asteraceae | Stem | Latex | Skin Care/Wounds | Massage | 4 | |
| Khouzama | Lamiaceae | Leaves | Essential oil/extract | Wounds/Burns/Skin care | Externally applied | 5 | |
| Lhenna | Lythraceae | Leaves | Powder | Wounds/Burns/ | Externally applied | 7 | |
| Merewta | Lamiaceae | Leaves | Poultice | Wounds | Externally applied | 4 | |
| Ddefla | Apocynaceae | Leaves | Powder | Burns | Externally applied | 7 | |
| Zaatar/setter | Lamiaceae | Leaves | Extract | Wounds/Burns | Externally applied | 11 | |
| Tayda | Pinaceae | Bark | Poultice | Wounds | Externally applied | 5 | |
| Kharwae/Wriwra | Euphorbiaceae | Seeds | Oil | Wounds | Massage | 3 | |
| Azir | Lamiaceae | Leaves | Powder | Burns/Wounds | Externally applied | 14 | |
| Ssalmiya | Lamiaceae | Leaves | Powder | Burns/Wounds | Externally applied | 7 | |
| Khiyata | Lamiaceae | Leaves | Poultice | Wounds | Externally applied | 4 | |
| Chbartou | Asteraceae | Stem | Poultice | Wounds | Externally applied | 5 | |
| Zaiitra/Tazukknit | Lamiaceae | Leaves | E.O./Extract | Burns/Wounds | Externally applied | 7 | |
| Zaiitra, zaatar/āzukenni, tazukennit | Lamiaceae | Leaves | Extract | Wounds | Externally applied | 11 | |
| Zaiitra/āzukenni, tazukennit | Lamiaceae | Leaves | E.O./Extract | Wounds | Externally applied | 5 | |
| Laagaya | Zygophyllaceae | Stem | Powder | Wounds | Externally applied | 3 |
Physicochemical parameters of Thymus vulgaris honey.
| Sample | Moisture (%) | pH | Free Acidity (Meq kg−1) | Lactonic Acidity (Meq kg−1) | Total Acidity (Meq kg−1) | Electrical Conductivity (ms cm−1) | Sugar Content | Ash (%) | HMF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TH1 | 16.93 | 4.67 | 34.00 | 3.35 | 37.35 | 0.73 | 81.5 | 0.40 | 9.37 |
| TH2 | 17.50 | 4.11 | 33.91 | 4.04 | 37.96 | 0.86 | 77.0 | 0.25 | 11.22 |
| TH3 | 17.04 | 4.36 | 39.72 | 2.60 | 42.32 | 0.87 | 81.0 | 0.17 | 4.64 |
| Mean | 17.15 | 4.37 | 35.88 | 3.33 | 39.21 | 0.82 | 79.83 | 0.27 | 8.44 |
| SD | 0.30 | 0.26 | 3.32 | 0.72 | 2.71 | 0.083 | 2.46 | 0.12 | 3.43 |
| Range | 16.93–17.07 | 4.11–4.67 | 33.91–39.72 | 2.60–4.04 | 37.35–42.32 | 0.73–0.87 | 77–81.5 | 0.17–0.4 | 4.64–11.22 |
| Codex | ≤21% | 3.4–6.1 | ≤50 meq/kg | _ | 8.68–59.49 meq/kg | ≥0.700 (ms cm−1) | ≥60 °Brix | ≤0.6 g/kg | ≤40 mg/kg |
Antibacterial activity of the essential oils of Origanum vulgare, Thymus vulgaris, and Rosmarinus officinalis compared to chloramphenicol (30 μg/disc).
| Microorganisms | Mean Zone of Inhibition in Millimeters (Mean ± Standard Deviation) * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Chloramphenicol (30 μg) | |
| 25.1 ± 0.4 | 24.2 ± 0.3 | 17.2 ± 0.8 | 21.0 ± 0.4 | |
| 23.1 ± 0.6 | 20.3 ± 0.4 | 14.5 ± 0.6 | 12.6 ± 0.4 | |
| 30.4 ± 0.9 | 28.3 ± 1.1 | 21.8 ± 1.0 | 23.0 ± 0.6 | |
| 34.4 ± 1.2 | 30.5 ± 0.7 | 24.9 ± 0.6 | 26.7 ± 0.9 | |
* Mean of three replicates.
MIC and MBC values of Origanum vulgare, Thymus vulgaris, and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils *.
| Microorganisms |
|
|
| Chloramphenicol | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC μg/mL | MBC μg/mL | |
| 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 3.12 | 6.25 | 12.5 | 4 | 4 | |
| 3.12 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 6.25 | 12.5 | 25 | 64 | 64 | |
| 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 1.56 | 3.12 | 3.12 | 4 | 4 | |
| 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 3.12 | 2 | 2 | |
* MIC and MBC values of essential oils are interpreted in mg/mL, and the standard antibiotic is interpreted in μg/mL.
Dermal observation in rats with Origanum vulgare, Thymus vulgaris, and Rosmarinus officinalis essential oils at 0.5% and 5% concentrations.
| Rats | 1 h | 24 h | 48 h | 72 h | 5 days | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erythema 1 | Edema 2 | Erythema | Edema | Erythema | Edema | Erythema | Edema | Erythema | Edema | |
| GrII | ||||||||||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GrIII | ||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GrIV | ||||||||||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gr V | ||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GrVI | ||||||||||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gr VII | ||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 Erythema was scored as follows: no erythema = 0, very slight erythema (barely perceptible) = 1, well-defined erythema = 2, moderate to severe erythema = 3, severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth) = 4. 2 Edema formation was scored as follows: no edema = 1, very slight edema (barely perceptible) = 1, slight edema (edges of area well-defined by definite raising) = 2, moderate edema (raised approximately 1 mm) = 3, severe edema (raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond area of exposure).
Effects of Thymus vulgaris honey and mixtures on wound contraction (%).
| Rabbits | Day 1 | Day 3 | Day 5 | 1 Week | 2 Weeks | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Thermal | Chemical | Thermal | Chemical | Thermal | Chemical | Thermal | Chemical | Thermal | Chemical |
| GrI (TH) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9.87 ± 0.14 | 11.46 ± 0.21 | 20.81 ± 0.68 | 41.81 ± 1.13 | 37.43 ± 0.12 | 59.24 ± 1.76 | 58.43 ± 1.45 | 67.5 ± 0.42 |
| Gr II (TH-O) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12.65 ± 0.68 | 17.29 ± 1.14 | 31.2 ± 1.17 | 43.77 ± 0.74 | 33.49 ± 0.35 | 64.1 ± 0.66 | 76.82 ± 0.78 | 77.36 ± 1.12 |
| Gr III(TH-T) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12.97 ± 1.17 | 24.1 ± 0.45 | 28.76 ± 1.49 | 57.53 ± 1.06 | 36.72 ± 1.14 | 66.07 ± 1.12 | 85.21 ± 1.36 | 82.14 ± 0.41 |
| GrIV (TH-R) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 13.23 ± 1.13 | 27.98 ± 0.3 | 25.86 ± 0.84 | 49.84 ± 0.79 | 42.66 ± 1.71 | 68.15 ± 0.72 | 69.72 ± 0.7 | 89.65 ± 1.03 |
| GrV (Ref) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11.72 ± 0.31 | 12.56 ± 0.73 | 39.41 ± 1.13 | 32.1 ± 0.84 | 46.12 ± 0.38 | 34.93 ± 0.21 | 69.24 ± 1.19 | 78.62 ± 0.2 |
| GrVI (Control) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.44 ± 1.92 | 4.28 ± 0.49 | 7.93 ± 0.45 | 9.17 ± 1.96 | 28.03 ± 0.13 | 36.4 ± 1.58 | 48.38 ± 0.27 | 57.12 ± 0.86 |
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation for groups of six rats each.
Figure 3Wound healing effect of Thymus vulgaris honey and mixtures on thermal burns.
Figure 4Wound healing effects of Thymus vulgaris honey and mixtures on chemical burns.
Chemical composition of the studied essential oils.
| NO | TEO a | REO b | OEO c | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | % | Compound | % | Compound | % | |
| 1 | 1,3-Cyclopentadiene | 54.68 | Camphor | 35.8 | Ethanone | 57.63 |
| 2 | γ-Terpinene | 12.59 | Eucalyptol | 26.22 | Ethyl-tetramethyl-cyclopentadiene | 11.64 |
| 3 | p-Cymene | 11.11 | Caryophyllene | 14.25 | 1,3-Cyclopentadiene | 8.15 |
| 4 | Thymol | 9.23 | γ-Terpinene | 7.77 | γ-Terpinene | 8.03 |
| 5 | Phenol | 4.69 | α-Terpinene | 6.33 | Umbellulon (Bicyclol [3.1.0]Hex-2-ene) | 7.24 |
| 6 | Caryophyllene | 2.77 | Bicycloheptan-2-ol | 3.34 | Trichloromethane | 3.00 |
| 7 | 2-Carene | 1.39 | Dodecane | 1.92 | 2-Carene | 1.04 |
| 8 | Linalool | 1.38 | Terpinen-4-ol | 1.83 | Linalool | 1.01 |
| 9 | β-Myrcene | 1.26 | Humulene | 1.62 | p-Cymene | 0.68 |
| 10 | Umbellulon (Bicyclol [3.1.0] Hex-2-ene) | 0.99 | 4-Carene | 0.50 | β-Phellandrene | 0.48 |
| 11 | 1,2-Propanediol | 0.73 | Pinocarvone | 0.40 | β-Myrcene | 0.29 |
a Thymus vulgaris essential oil; b Rosmarinus officinalis essential oil; c Origanum vulgare essential oil.