| Literature DB >> 28540272 |
Nasrin Takzaree1, Gholamreza Hassanzadeh2, Mohammad Reza Rouini3, Azadeh Manayi3, Abbas Hadjiakhondi3, Masoumeh Majidi Zolbin2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinicians have been searching for ways to obtain "super normal" wound healing. Honey is a traditional remedy for the treatment of infected wounds. We aimed to evaluate the wound contraction and antibacterial properties of locally produced Thyme honey on managing full-thickness wounds in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Honey; Open cutaneous wound; Rat; Wound healing
Year: 2017 PMID: 28540272 PMCID: PMC5439045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Fig. 1:Microscopic view of open cutaneous wounds: (a) control group, collagen fibers are lesser than the experimental honey twice daily group in this photomicrograph. (b) Experimental honey twice daily group, collagen fibers are more than the control group in this photomicrograph (specific staining, Masson’s trichrome *10)
Comparing the macrophages, fibroblasts, neutrophils and vessels number in the wound bed of groups in the 4th, 7th and 14th day of study
| Macrophages | 6.20 | .80 | 4.60 | .40 | 3.40 | .51 | 7.80 | .66 | 5.6 | .24 | 4.0 | .32 | 1.40 | .40 | .80 | .37 | .40 | .24 |
| Fibroblasts | 89.6 | 2.77 | 105 | 1.9 | 123 | 1.00 | 125 | 3.02 | 125 | 3.09 | 152 | 1.75 | 136 | 1.58 | 160 | 1.1 | 182 | 1.16 |
| Neutrophils | 16.2 | .66 | 14 | .71 | 12 | .71 | 10.8 | .58 | 11.4 | .75 | 12.0 | .32 | 7.80 | .37 | 5.0 | .71 | 3.0 | .71 |
| Vessels | 5.20 | .58 | 5.80 | .58 | 10.00 | 2.55 | 10.6 | .75 | 12.6 | .40 | 12.2 | 1.02 | 12.40 | 1.44 | 13.0 | 1.4 | 14.8 | .97 |
Significant differences between experimental groups and control group (P≤0.05)
Number /
Standard Deviation
Fig. 2:Microscopic view of open cutaneous wounds: (a) Control group, the number of Fibroblast are lesser than the experimental honey twice daily group in this photomicrograph. (b) Experimental honey twice-daily group, the number of Fibroblast is more than the control group in this photomicrograph. (Staining, H&E *40)
Fig. 3:a) Comparing the wound healing percentage between control and experimental groups in the different days of study. b) Comparing the wound surface between control and experimental groups in the different days of study/*Significant differences between experimental groups and control group (P≤0.05)