| Literature DB >> 35010020 |
Yujin Kim1, Yoonsang Park1,2, Seulgi Han3, Wonchan Park3, Mungu Kim3, Kyunghwan Kim4, Jinmyoung Joo5, Sei Kwang Hahn3, Woosung Kwon1,2.
Abstract
The origin and classification of energy states, as well as the electronic transitions and energy transfers associated with them, have been recognized as critical factors for understanding the optical properties of carbon nanodots (CNDs). Herein, we report the synthesis of CNDs in an optimized process that allows low-temperature carbonization using ethanolamine as the major precursor and citric acid as an additive. The results obtained herein suggest that the energy states in our CNDs can be classified into four different types based on their chemical origin: carbogenic core states, surface defective states, molecular emissive states, and non-radiative trap states. Each energy state is associated with the occurrence of different types of emissions in the visible to near-infrared (NIR) range and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The potential pathways of radiative/non-radiative transitions in CNDs have been systematically studied using visible-to-NIR emission spectroscopy and fluorescence decay measurements. Furthermore, the bright photoluminescence and ROS generation of these CNDs render them suitable for in vitro imaging and photodynamic therapy applications. We believe that these new insights into the energy states of CNDs will result in significant improvements in other applications, such as photocatalysis and optoelectronics.Entities:
Keywords: bioimaging; carbon dot; near-infrared; photodynamic therapy; reactive oxygen species
Year: 2021 PMID: 35010020 PMCID: PMC8746803 DOI: 10.3390/nano12010070
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of CNDs. TEM images of (b) CND1, (c) CND2, (d) CND3, and (e) CND4. The scale bars represent 50 nm. (f,g) High-resolution TEM images of CDs. The scale bars represent 2 nm. (h) CND1–CND4 (left to right) under a 365 nm UV lamp.
Figure 2FT-IR spectra of the CNDs. The C=O (1693 cm−1) and C=C (1640 cm−1) stretch peaks are indicated by the dotted vertical lines.
Figure 3PL emission maps and spectra for excitation wavelengths of 300–600 nm. Emission maps: (a) CND1, (b) CND2, (c) CND3, and (d) CND4. Emission spectra: (e) CND1, (f) CND2, (g) CND3, and (h) CND4. Absorption (red), excitation (orange), and emission (green) spectra: (i) CND1, (j) CND2, (k) CND3, and (l) CND4. (m) Schematic illustration of the change in chemical structure with increase in the concentration of citric acid.
Figure 4(a) TCSPC signals for CNDs recorded at detection wavelength of 450 nm with pump excitation wavelength of 374 nm. (b) NIR PL emission spectra of the CNDs. (c) Schematic illustration of emission pathways and related surface structures of the CNDs.
Fluorescence lifetimes of the CNDs.
| Sample |
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CND1 | 4.05 | 58.96 | 10.45 | 29.12 | 1.18 | 11.92 | 3.65 |
| CND2 | 5.03 | 30.50 | 12.66 | 63.44 | 1.39 | 6.07 | 6.47 |
| CND3 | 4.19 | 24.54 | 12.49 | 69.27 | 0.84 | 6.18 | 5.32 |
| CND4 | 3.91 | 24.96 | 11.71 | 60.67 | 0.88 | 14.37 | 3.58 |
Brief literature review of CNDs derived from the mixture of CA and amine derivatives.
| Precursors | Reaction Condition | Size (nm) | PL Ex/Em | QY | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citric acid | 190 °C, 2 h | 12.4 ± 5.6 | 376 nm/ | 11% | Subsurface tracer | [ |
| Citric acid | 230 °C, 30 m | 19 | 375 nm/ | 50% | − | [ |
| Citric acid | 140 °C, 5 h | 2~6 | 361 nm/ | 70% | − | [ |
| Citric acid | 120 °C, 15 h | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 340 nm/ | 21.8% | − | [ |
| Citric acid | 160 °C, 4 h | 1.7 ± 0.21 | 350 nm/ | 18.8% | Hg2+ detection | [ |
| Citric acid | 90 °C, 24 h | 10.25±1.84 | 360 nm/ | 15.24% | Bioimaging and PDT | This work |
Figure 5(a) Schematic illustration of the ROS generation by CNDs. (b) Cell viability test of the CNDs in FL83B and A549 cells using the WST-1 assay. (c) In vitro confocal microscopy images of FL83B and A549 cells with CNDs. The scale bar represents 25 μm. (d) Cell viabilities of A549 cells measured by the CCK-8 assay after photodynamic treatment at different concentrations of the CNDs. The error bars are obtained from three independent experiments and represent the standard deviation.