Literature DB >> 35007135

In Vitro Time-Kill Studies of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia versus Escherichia coli Using Cation-Adjusted Mueller-Hinton Broth and ISO-Sensitest Broth.

Maxwell J Lasko1, Matthew L Gethers1, Jennifer L Tabor-Rennie1, David P Nicolau1,2, Joseph L Kuti1.   

Abstract

Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMZ) is considered the treatment of choice for infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, but limited pharmacodynamic data are available to support current susceptibility breakpoints or guide optimal dosing. Time-kill studies using a TMP/SMZ concentration of 4/40 μg/mL were conducted to compare 4 S. maltophilia with 4 Escherichia coli isolates having the same MICs (0.25/4.75 to 4/76 μg/mL) in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) and ISO-Sensitest broth (ISO broth). With the exception of the resistant isolates (4/76 μg/mL), which resulted in regrowth approaching the growth of the control, TMP/SMZ displayed significantly greater killing for E. coli than for S. maltophilia at each MIC. Against E. coli, the mean changes at 24 h were -4.49, -1.73, -1.59, and +1.83 log10 CFU for isolates with MICs of 0.25/4.75, 1/19, 2/39, and 4/74 μg/mL, respectively. The area under the concentration-time curve for the free, unbound fraction of the drug (fAUC)/MIC ratio required for stasis and 1-log10 and 2-log10 CFU reductions were 40.7, 59.5, and 86.3, respectively. In contrast, TMP/SMZ displayed no stasis or CFU reductions against any S. maltophilia isolate regardless of the MIC, and no pharmacodynamic thresholds were quantifiable. Observations were consistent in both CAMHB and ISO broth. These data add increasing evidence that current TMP/SMZ susceptibility breakpoints against S. maltophilia should be reassessed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gram negative; in vitro; pharmacodynamics; susceptibility breakpoint

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35007135      PMCID: PMC8923228          DOI: 10.1128/aac.02167-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.938


  30 in total

1.  In Vitro Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam Alone or in Combination with Amikacin or Colistin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Tomefa E Asempa; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Efficacy of trimethoprim in murine experimental infection with a thymidine kinase-deficient mutant of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T Tokunaga; K Oka; A Takemoto; Y Ohtsubo; N Gotoh; T Nishino
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  The contribution of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling with Monte Carlo simulation to the development of susceptibility breakpoints for Neisseria meningitidis.

Authors:  D S Burgess; C R Frei; J S Lewis Ii; K R Fiebelkorn; J H Jorgensen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Dosing regimens of cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) for melioidosis.

Authors:  Allen C Cheng; Emma S McBryde; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Wirongrong Chierakul; Premjit Amornchai; Nicholas P J Day; Nicholas J White; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in critically ill and non-critically ill AIDS patients.

Authors:  T W Chin; A Vandenbroucke; I W Fong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Monotherapy with minocycline or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hand; Hannah Davis; Ted Kim; Bryson Duhon
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Effect of minimal amounts of thymidine on activity of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole against Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  C Jones; D L Stevens; O Ojo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Generating Robust and Informative Nonclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Bacterial Infection Model Efficacy Data To Support Translation to Humans.

Authors:  Jürgen B Bulitta; William W Hope; Ann E Eakin; Tina Guina; Vincent H Tam; Arnold Louie; George L Drusano; Jennifer L Hoover
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Stenotrophomonas Bacteremia Antibiotic Susceptibility and Prognostic Determinants: Mayo Clinic 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Ahmed M Hamdi; Madiha Fida; Omar M Abu Saleh; Elena Beam
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 3.835

10.  Evaluation of Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (SXT), Minocycline, Tigecycline, Moxifloxacin, and Ceftazidime Alone and in Combinations for SXT-Susceptible and SXT-Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia by In Vitro Time-Kill Experiments.

Authors:  Chuanqi Wei; Wentao Ni; Xuejiu Cai; Jin Zhao; Junchang Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Overcoming Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Resistance for a More Rational Therapeutic Approach.

Authors:  Ravina Kullar; Eric Wenzler; Jose Alexander; Ellie J C Goldstein
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.835

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.