| Literature DB >> 35006394 |
Sabrina Marcazzan1,2,3,4, Marcos J Braz Carvalho1, Matthias Konrad5, Julia Strangmann1,6, Anna Tenditnaya2,3, Theresa Baumeister1, Roland M Schmid1, Hans-Jürgen Wester5, Vasilis Ntziachristos2,3, Dimitris Gorpas2,3, Timothy C Wang7, Margret Schottelius5,8, Michael Quante9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging has been emerging as a promising strategy to overcome the high number of early esophageal adenocarcinomas missed by white light endoscopy and random biopsy collection. We performed a preclinical assessment of fluorescence imaging and endoscopy using a novel CXCR4-targeted fluorescent peptide ligand in the L2-IL1B mouse model of Barrett's esophagus.Entities:
Keywords: Animal models; Barrett’s esophagus; CXCR4; Dysplasia; Endoscopy; Esophageal cancer; Fluorescence imaging; Molecular imaging; Peptide
Year: 2022 PMID: 35006394 PMCID: PMC8748556 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00875-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res ISSN: 2191-219X Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1Structure (left) and Sulfo-Cy5 signal assessment (right) of the CXCR4-targeted fluorescent ligand MK007. For the assessment of fluorescence signal before mouse endoscopy, Sulfo-Cy5 MK007 1 mM was diluted in 0.9% NaCl to obtain a final concentration of 400 nmol/mL and measurement was performed using a 670 nm laser diode and a highly sensitive CCD camera. NaCl alone showed no fluorescence signal
Fig. 2Ex vivo wide-field imaging shows accumulation of CXCR4-targeted MK007 in dysplastic lesions of IL1B mice. A Representative ex vivo fluorescence imaging of three IL1B mice injected with MK007 (left) and one non-injected 12-month-old IL1B mouse (right, upper row), which had a dysplasia score of 3. The different dysplasia score (1–3) is reported. The quantification of ex vivo Sulfo-Cy5 signal by CTCF in mouse stomach and organs 4 h post-injection showed peptide accumulation also in liver, kidney, and spleen (right, middle row). Target-to-background ratio (TBR) of injected mice was 2.45 ± 0.24 compared with negative control (1.26). TBR was calculated as reported in Methods. Data in both graphs are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 5). B Representative confocal images of areas from squamocolumnar junction (SCJ), squamous, and glandular epithelium of the IL1B mouse with dysplasia score 2 in 2A showed less or no Sulfo-Cy5 signal in non-dysplastic areas than dysplastic areas (arrows). Sulfo-Cy5 signal was detected by using Cy5.5 red channel. Additionally, most CXCR4 + cells were detected in the SCJ and squamous epithelium (Squamous Ep.) of IL1B mice, compared with the normal glandular epithelium (Glandular Ep.). Scale bars represent 50 μm
Fig. 3Co-localization of CXCR4 and Sulfo-Cy5 signal in lesions at the squamocolumnar junction of IL1B mice. A Representative confocal images of stomach of injected IL1B mice of different grade of dysplasia and of one negative control (12 months old). Orange/yellow fluorescence indicated the co-localization of MK007 signal with CXCR4 Ab (white arrows) next to dysplastic areas at the SCJ. In some CXCR4 + cells, no MK007 uptake was observed (red arrows). The staining for CXCR4 was performed with anti-CXCR4 Ab conjugated with PE as described in the Methods section. Sulfo-Cy5 signal was detected by using Cy5.5 red channel. Scale bars represent 50 μm. B Quantification of CXCR4 expression and Sulfo-Cy5 signal in SCJ, squamous epithelium (Sq Ep) and glandular epithelium (Stomach): in the SCJ, the mean CXCR4 and Sulfo-Cy5 signal were 580.6 ± 105.2 and 465.8 ± 89.19, respectively. A much lower CXCR4 expression (211.9 ± 15.74) and Sulfo-Cy5 signal (272.8 ± 54.99) were detected in the glandular epithelium. One mouse presented a high CXCR4 expression in the inflamed squamous epithelium but without an increase of Sulfo-Cy5 signal. Data are represented as single plotted values and mean ± SEM (n = 5). C No Sulfo-Cy5 signal (mean positive area < 100 pixels) was detected in negative controls (n = 2). Signal quantification was expressed by calculating the mean positive area in pixels per each mouse and data are represented as single plotted values and mean ± SEM
Fig. 4Dysplastic lesions of IL1B mice detected by fluorescence endoscopy and MK007. A Representative endoscopy images of two MK007-injected IL1B mice (60 nmol; 4 h p.i.), 14 and 12 months old (left) and two negative controls, 17 and 12 months old (right). Two endoscopy frames per each mouse are showed: visible dysplastic lesions in the color channel (red arrows) corresponded with the presence of Sulfo-Cy5 signal (red line). No Sulfo-Cy5 signal was detected in negative controls, despite visible lesions were found in both mice (black arrows). Fluorescence images are showed in grey scale. C Endoscopy images (left) and ex vivo wide-field imaging (right, up) of the third injected mouse, 14 months old. The ex vivo imaging of the other two injected mice is showed in Fig. 2A. Sulfo-Cy5 signal observed by endoscopy is indicated by the red line. A high Sulfo-Cy5 signal in the SCJ (blue line) was further confirmed by ex vivo imaging of the whole stomach. Quantification of Sulfo-Cy5 signal from all lesions in injected mice showed a significantly higher TBR than lesions in negative controls. Two to five dysplastic lesions were evaluated per each mouse. The signal quantification was performed as described in the Methods section. Data are represented as the TBR of each evaluated lesion and mean value ± SEM. **P < 0.01 by unpaired two-tailed T test
Fig. 5Histopathological confirmation of dysplastic lesions in IL1B mice. A Representative H&E images of all three MK007-injected IL1B mice and evaluated by endoscopy: the dysplastic lesions were located at the junction between the squamous epithelium and columnar epithelium. At a higher magnification, the lesions displayed a dysplasia score of 3 out of 4 (orange arrows) in all the three mice. Metaplasia and infiltration of inflammatory cells such as lymphocytes were also present. B Representative H&E images of the two negative control IL1B mice used for endoscopy: both negative control mice presented metaplastic or dysplastic lesions (arrows) at the junction between the squamous and the columnar epithelium but only one mouse (negative control 2) had dysplasia (score 3). The other mouse (negative control 1) had no dysplasia (score 0). Scale bars represent 50 μm (20 x) and 25 μm (40 x)