Literature DB >> 19678942

Xenograft models of head and neck cancers.

Daisuke Sano1, Jeffrey N Myers.   

Abstract

Head and neck cancers are among the most prevalent tumors in the world. Despite advances in the treatment of head and neck tumors, the survival of patients with these cancers has not markedly improved over the past several decades because of our inability to control and our poor understanding of the regional and distant spread of this disease. One of the factors contributing to our poor understanding may be the lack of reliable animal models of head and neck cancer metastasis. The earliest xenograft models in which human tumor cells were grown in immunosuppressed mice involved subcutaneous implantation of human head and neck cancer cell lines. Subcutaneous xenograft models have been popular because they are easy to establish, easy to manage, and lend themselves to ready quantitation of the tumor burden. More recently, orthotopic xenograft models, in which the tumor cells are implanted in the tumor site of origin, have been used with greater frequency in animal studies of head and neck cancers. Orthotopic xenograft models are advantageous for their ability to mimic local tumor growth and recapitulate the pathways of metastasis seen in human head and neck cancers. In addition, recent innovations in cell labeling techniques and small-animal imaging have enabled investigators to monitor the metastatic process and quantitate the growth and spread of orthopically implanted tumors. This review summarizes the progress in the development of murine xenograft models of head and neck cancers. We then discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each type of xenograft model. We also discuss the potential for these models to help elucidate the mechanisms of regional and distant metastasis, which could improve our ability to treat head and neck cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19678942      PMCID: PMC2737672          DOI: 10.1186/1758-3284-1-32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck Oncol        ISSN: 1758-3284


  42 in total

Review 1.  The implications of angiogenesis for the biology and therapy of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  I J Fidler; L M Ellis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-10-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Cancer invasion and micrometastasis visualized in live tissue by green fluorescent protein expression.

Authors:  T Chishima; Y Miyagi; X Wang; H Yamaoka; H Shimada; A R Moossa; R M Hoffman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Development of a new in vivo model for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  A Dinesman; B Haughey; G A Gates; T Aufdemorte; D D Von Hoff
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Metastasis of human tumors in athymic nude mice.

Authors:  F E Sharkey; J Fogh
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1979-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The potential of the nude mouse xenograft model for the study of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  B J Braakhuis; G Sneeuwloper; G B Snow
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1984

6.  An in vivo model for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  S R Baker
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  An orthotopic floor-of-mouth cancer model allows quantification of tumor invasion.

Authors:  C Simon; A J Nemechek; D Boyd; B W O'Malley; H Goepfert; C M Flaitz; M J Hicks
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Development of a new invasion and metastasis model of human oral squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  S Kawashiri; S Kumagai; K Kojima; H Harada; E Yamamoto
Journal:  Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol       Date:  1995-07

Review 9.  The response to chemotherapy of a variety of human tumour xenografts.

Authors:  G G Steel; V D Courtenay; M J Peckham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  43 in total

1.  Human tumor xenografts: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Richard A Morgan
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 11.454

2.  Evolutionary Action Score of TP53 Identifies High-Risk Mutations Associated with Decreased Survival and Increased Distant Metastases in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  David M Neskey; Abdullah A Osman; Thomas J Ow; Panagiotis Katsonis; Thomas McDonald; Stephanie C Hicks; Teng-Kuei Hsu; Curtis R Pickering; Alexandra Ward; Ameeta Patel; John S Yordy; Heath D Skinner; Uma Giri; Daisuke Sano; Michael D Story; Beth M Beadle; Adel K El-Naggar; Merrill S Kies; William N William; Carlos Caulin; Mitchell Frederick; Marek Kimmel; Jeffrey N Myers; Olivier Lichtarge
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Temporal characterization of lymphatic metastasis in an orthotopic mouse model of oral cancer.

Authors:  Peter Szaniszlo; Susan M Fennewald; Suimin Qiu; Carla Kantara; Tuya Shilagard; Gracie Vargas; Vicente A Resto
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Cancer stem cells: mediators of tumorigenesis and metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Steven B Chinn; Owen A Darr; John H Owen; Emily Bellile; Jonathan B McHugh; Matthew E Spector; Silvana M Papagerakis; Douglas B Chepeha; Carol R Bradford; Thomas E Carey; Mark E P Prince
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Orthotopic non-metastatic and metastatic oral cancer mouse models.

Authors:  Manish V Bais; Maria Kukuruzinska; Philip C Trackman
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 5.337

6.  CD271 Confers an Invasive and Metastatic Phenotype of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma through the Upregulation of Slug.

Authors:  Man Ki Chung; Young Ho Jung; Joon Kyoo Lee; Soo Youn Cho; Oihana Murillo-Sauca; Ravindra Uppaluri; June Ho Shin; John B Sunwoo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Hypoxia-induced autophagic response is associated with aggressive phenotype and elevated incidence of metastasis in orthotopic immunocompetent murine models of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC).

Authors:  Nadarajah Vigneswaran; Jean Wu; Anren Song; Ananth Annapragada; Wolfgang Zacharias
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.362

8.  Future directions and treatment strategies for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Trisha M Wise-Draper; David J Draper; J Silvio Gutkind; Alfredo A Molinolo; Kathryn A Wikenheiser-Brokamp; Susanne I Wells
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 7.012

9.  Integrative genomic characterization of oral squamous cell carcinoma identifies frequent somatic drivers.

Authors:  Curtis R Pickering; Jiexin Zhang; Suk Young Yoo; Linnea Bengtsson; Shhyam Moorthy; David M Neskey; Mei Zhao; Marcus V Ortega Alves; Kyle Chang; Jennifer Drummond; Elsa Cortez; Tong-Xin Xie; Di Zhang; Woonbok Chung; Jean-Pierre J Issa; Patrick A Zweidler-McKay; Xifeng Wu; Adel K El-Naggar; John N Weinstein; Jing Wang; Donna M Muzny; Richard A Gibbs; David A Wheeler; Jeffrey N Myers; Mitchell J Frederick
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  Tumor-targeted chemotherapy with the nanopolymer-based drug NC-6004 for oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kazuhira Endo; Takayoshi Ueno; Satoru Kondo; Naohiro Wakisaka; Shigeyuki Murono; Makoto Ito; Kazunori Kataoka; Yasuki Kato; Tomokazu Yoshizaki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.