| Literature DB >> 35004880 |
Zahra Raisi-Estabragh1,2, Akshay Jaggi3, Polyxeni Gkontra3, Celeste McCracken1,4, Nay Aung1,2, Patricia B Munroe1, Stefan Neubauer4, Nicholas C Harvey5,6, Karim Lekadir3, Steffen E Petersen1,2,7,8.
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) radiomics analysis provides multiple quantifiers of ventricular shape and myocardial texture, which may be used for detailed cardiovascular phenotyping.Entities:
Keywords: cardiovascular magnetic resonance; diabetes; healthy individuals; high cholesterol; hypertension; radiomics; sex differences; smoking
Year: 2021 PMID: 35004880 PMCID: PMC8727756 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.763361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Illustrating the clustering method and approach to defining the number of radiomics feature clusters for the radiomics features. (A) Illustrates the relative change in area under the CDF (Consensus Cumulative Distribution Function) curve of the y axis with increasing number of clusters (k on x axis), with the curve levelling off at six clusters. (B) Is the correlation heatmap illustrating the six defined clusters, with the darkest purple indicating perfect positive correlation and darkest yellow perfect negative correlation. The dendrogram indicates the six clusters from hierarchical clustering. The ribbon on the right of (B) Illustrates correlation of each radiomics feature with the conventional metrics indicated on the x-axis. LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVM, left ventricular mass; RVEDV, right ventricular end-diastolic volume; RVESV, right ventricular end-systolic volume; RVSV, right ventricular stroke volume.
Summary of the six defined radiomics feature clusters including their assigned names, example features, and properties represented by the features within each cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | Volume | Size of the ventricles | 0.98 |
| Local uniformity | First-order uniformity GLSZM Large area emphasis | Size of areas with the same intensity level within myocardium | 0.67 |
| Global variance | First-order variance | Variance of myocardial intensity level distribution | 0.51 |
| Shape | Shape elongation shape sphericity | Descriptors of overall ventricular shape | 0.96 |
| Local dimness | GLDM low grey level emphasis GLSZM low grey level zone emphasis | Relative presence of areas of low signal intensity level | 0.78 |
| Global intensity | First-order mean first-order energy | Average brightness of myocardial intensity level | 0.70 |
GLCM, Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix; GLDM, Grey Level Dependence Matrix; GLSZM, Grey Level Size Zone Matrix. Consensus D1 indicates the repeatability of cluster components on repeated clustering, that is the likelihood that the same features appear in the cluster if the clustering analysis is repeated. Higher values within the shape category indicate greater sphericity and less elongated ventricular shapes. Please note, for computational reasons in Pyradiomics the “flatness” and “elongation” features are reported as inverse values, thus higher elongation and flatness values indicate less elongated more spherical shapes (and vice versa).
Baseline participant characteristics.
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total population | 32,068 | 14,902 | 27,400 |
| Men | 15,443 (48.2%) | 6,095 (40.9%) | 13,290 (48.5%) |
| Women | 16,625 (51.8%) | 8,807 (59.1%) | 14,110 (51.5%) |
| Age at imaging (years) | 63.3 ± 7.5 | 61.0 ± 7.3 | 63.4 ± 7.2 |
| Body surface area (m2) | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 1.9 ± 0.2 |
| Body mass index (Kg/m2) | 26.6 ± 4.2 | 25.6 ± 3.8 | 26.6 ± 4.2 |
| Ischaemic heart disease | 1,937 (6.0%) | 0 | 0 |
| Valvular heart disease | 582 (1.8%) | 0 | 0 |
| Non-ischaemic cardiomyopathies | 59 (0.2%) | 0 | 0 |
| Heart failure unspecified aetiology | 191 (0.6%) | 0 | 0 |
| Cardiac arrhythmia | 1,443 (4.5%) | 0 | 0 |
| Diabetes | 1,881 (5.9%) | 0 | 1,471 |
| High cholesterol | 11,161 (34.8%) | 0 | 8,848 |
| Hypertension | 10,545 (32.9%) | 0 | 8,322 |
| Smoking (current) | 1,157 (3.6%) | 0 | 1,038 |
Continuous variables are summarised as mean ± standard deviation and count variables as number of participants (percentage of total).
Relationship of sex and age with radiomics features in the healthy subset expressed as the average association within each of the six radiomics feature clusters.
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Sex (Male) | Mean beta | 0.58 | 0.76 | −0.90 | −0.28 | 0.19 | −0.24 | |
| 95% CI | 0.51, 0.66 | 0.68, 0.84 | −0.97 to−0.84 | −0.36 to −0.19 | 0.02, 0.36 | −0.33 to −0.16 | ||
| Significant features, | 41 (95%) | 45 (100%) | 37 (100%) | 34 (87%) | 14 (70%) | 43 (83%) | 214 (91%) | |
| Age | Mean beta | −0.12 | −0.05 | 0.07 | 0.02 | −0.02 | 0.02 | |
| 95% CI | −0.14 to −0.10 | −0.07 to −0.03 | 0.06, 0.09 | −0.00 to 0.05 | −0.05 to −0.00 | −0.00 to 0.05 | ||
| Significant features, | 42 (98%) | 37 (82%) | 29 (78%) | 27 (69%) | 13 (65%) | 46 (89%) | 194 (82%) | |
| Sex*age | Mean beta | −0.01 | −0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | −0.01 | |
| Lower CI | −0.015 to −0.00 | −0.08 to −0.06 | 0.01, 0.04 | 0.00, 0.03 | −0.02 to 0.03 | −0.02 to 0.00 | ||
| Significant features, | 3 (7%) | 22 (49%) | 11 (30%) | 7 (18%) | 4 (20%) | 8 (15%) | 55 (23%) | |
| Total features in cluster ( | 43 | 45 | 37 | 39 | 20 | 52 | 236 | |
Results are the mean beta coefficient and 95% CI for associations of each exposure with the features within each cluster. Beta indicates standard deviation change in radiomics feature per 1 unit/standard deviation change in the exposure. Models are mutually adjusted for age and sex, and include additional adjustment for body surface area. The interaction term is from a separate fully adjusted model. For sex, the reference level is set as “female.” “Significant features” indicates the number and percentage of features with a statistically significantly association within each cluster, based on a Bonferroni adjusted p-value. CI, confidence interval. *indicated multiplication for the interaction terms.
Figure 2Associations of sex and age with radiomics features in the healthy subset grouped into clusters. Results are from linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and body surface area. The y axis is standardised beta coefficients for associations of sex (left) and age (right) with radiomics features. Each dot represents point estimate of the association with a radiomic feature from a separate model. Black dots indicate statistically significant associations. Grey dots indicate non-significant associations. Statistical significance is based on Bonferroni adjusted p-value < 0.05. Feature associations are grouped into previously defined clusters (Figure 1; Table 1). The dark line in the box plot indicates the median beta coefficient in the cluster, the box borders indicate limits of the interquartile range.
Figure 3Mean standardised radiomics value for each feature cluster stratified by sex across all ages. Men had larger (higher size values) and more elongated (higher shape values) ventricles than women. Men had dimmer less varied signal intensities at both a global (lower global intensity, lower global variance) and local (higher local uniformity, higher local dimness) level. Alteration of radiomics features with ageing were generally consistent for men and women. There was more rapid decline in local uniformity in men with minimal age-related change in this cluster for women.
Relationship of vascular risk factors with radiomics features in the healthy subset expressed as the average association within each of the six radiomics feature clusters.
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Diabetes | Mean beta | −0.20 | 0.006 | −0.06 | −0.01 | 0.05 | −0.17 | |
| 95% CI | −0.23 to −0.17 | −0.039 to 0.05 | −0.07 to −0.04 | −0.05 to 0.04 | 0.02, 0.08 | −0.20 to −0.14 | ||
| Significant features, | 40 (93%) | 15 (33%) | 6 (16%) | 17 (44%) | 5 (25%) | 42 (81%) | 125 (53%) | |
| Diabetes*sex | Mean | −0.13 | −0.050 | 0.094 | 0.028 | −0.028 | 0.019 | |
| 95% CI | −0.15 to −0.11 | −0.08 to −0.02 | 0.08, 0.11 | −0.01 to 0.06 | −0.05 to −0.01 | −0.00 to 0.04 | ||
| Significant features, | 14 (33%) | 4 (9%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (4%) | 23 (10%) | |
| Diabetes*age | Mean | 0.01 | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | |
| 95% CI | 0.00, 0.01 | −0.01 to 0.00 | 0.00, 0.01 | −0.01 to 0.01 | 0.00, 0.01 | −0.01 to 0.01 | ||
| Significant features, | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| High cholesterol | Mean | −0.09 | −0.00 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | −0.08 | |
| 95% CI | −0.10 to 0.08 | −0.02 to 0.02 | −0.02 to −0.01 | −0.02 to 0.02 | 0.04, 0.06 | −0.09 to 0.07 | ||
| Significant features, | 40 (93%) | 15 (33%) | 3 (8%) | 19 (49%) | 12 (60%) | 37 (71%) | 126 (53%) | |
| High cholesterol*sex | Mean | −0.04 | −0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.01 | |
| 95% CI | −0.05 to −0.02 | −0.08 to −0.05 | 0.07, 0.09 | 0.00, 0.04 | −0.04 to 0.01 | −0.00 to 0.02 | ||
| Significant features, | 10 (23%) | 21 (47%) | 18 (49%) | 3 (8%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (8%) | 56 (24%) | |
| High cholesterol*age | Mean | 0.03 | −0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.02 | |
| 95% CI | 0.02, 0.03 | −0.01 to 0.00 | 0.01, 0.02 | 0.00, 0.02 | −0.01 to −0.01 | 0.02, 0.03 | ||
| Significant features, | 7 (16%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 7 (3%) | |
| Hypertension | Mean | −0.00 | 0.13 | −0.14 | −0.04 | 0.07 | −0.07 | |
| 95% CI | −0.02 to 0.01 | 0.11, 0.15 | −0.15 to −0.13 | −0.06 to −0.01 | 0.04, 0.10 | −0.09 to −0.04 | ||
| Significant features, | 23 (54%) | 40 (89%) | 37 (100%) | 18 (46%) | 15 (75%) | 43 (83%) | 176 (75%) | |
| Hypertension*sex | Mean | −0.03 | −0.03 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |
| 95% CI | −0.05 to −0.02 | −0.05 to −0.01 | 0.10, 0.13 | 0.01, 0.05 | 0.02, 0.07 | 0.01, 0.03 | ||
| Significant features, | 5 (12%) | 9 (20%) | 25 (68%) | 7 (18%) | 2 (10%) | 5 (10%) | 53 (23%) | |
| Hypertension*age | Mean | 0.02 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.02 | |
| 95% CI | 0.01, 0.02 | −0.03 to −0.02 | 0.03, 0.04 | −0.00 to 0.01 | −0.02 to −0.01 | 0.01, 0.03 | ||
| Significant features, | 1 (2%) | 2 (4%) | 7 (19%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (12%) | 16 (7%) | |
| Smoking | Mean | −0.03 | 0.06 | −0.06 | −0.04 | 0.00 | −0.06 | |
| 95% CI | −0.05 to −0.01 | 0.04, 0.08 | −0.07 to −0.05 | −0.07 to −0.01 | −0.02 to −0.03 | −0.08 to −0.03 | ||
| Significant features, | 6 (14%) | 14 (31%) | 4 (11%) | 12 (31%) | 0 (0%) | 12 (23%) | 48 (20%) | |
| Smoking*sex | Mean | −0.03 | −0.01 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | −0.02 | |
| 95% CI | −0.04 to −0.01 | −0.03 to 0.00 | 0.04, 0.06 | 0.03, 0.07 | 0.02, 0.08 | −0.04 to 0.00 | ||
| Significant features, | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Smoking*age | Mean | −0.02 | −0.00 | −0.01 | −0.01 | 0.04 | −0.01 | |
| 95% CI | −0.03 to −0.01 | −0.01 to 0.01 | −0.01 to 0.00 | −0.02 to −0.00 | 0.04, 0.05 | −0.02 to −0.01 | ||
| Significant features, | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
| Total | 43 | 45 | 37 | 39 | 20 | 52 | 236 | |
Results are the mean beta coefficient and 95% CI for associations of each exposure with the features within each cluster. Beta indicates standard deviation change in radiomics feature per 1 unit/standard deviation change in the exposure. Models are mutually adjusted for all the risk factors (diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, smoking) and include adjustment for age, sex, and body surface area. Interaction terms are from separate fully adjusted models, separately for age and sex. “Significant features” indicates the number and percentage of features with a statistically significantly association within each cluster, based on a Bonferroni adjusted p-value. CI, confidence interval. *indicated multiplication for the interaction terms.
Figure 4Associations of diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking with radiomics features grouped into clusters. Results are from linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, and body surface area, diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, and smoking. The y axis is standardised beta coefficients for associations of vascular risk factors (diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, smoking) with radiomics features. Each dot represents point estimate of association with a radiomic feature from a separate model. Black dots indicate statistically significant associations. Grey dots indicate non-significant associations. Statistical significance is based on Bonferroni adjusted p-value < 0.05. Feature associations are grouped into previously defined clusters (Figure 1; Table 1). The dark line in the box plot indicates the median beta coefficient in the cluster, the box borders indicate limits of the interquartile range.