Literature DB >> 35004385

"Fixator-assisted Nailing" Technique for Closed Segmental Tibia Shaft Fracture with Extensive Soft Tissue Injury - A Case Report.

Vivek M Sodhai1, Chetan V Pradhan1, Parag K Sancheti2, Ashok K Shyam2,3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Segmental tibia fractures with extensive soft tissue injuries are rare and surgical intervention is challenging with no definitive treatment strategies. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old man presented with closed right segmental tibia and fibula fracture with extensive blistering of skin caused due to road traffic accident. Distal pulses were palpable and there were no signs of compartment syndrome and other systemic injuries. In the presence of extensive blistering, a monoplanar external fixator was applied within 24 h of injury. 3 weeks later, skin condition was conducive for internal fixation, and closed intramedullary multi-locking nailing was performed using the external fixator for reduction. Fracture healed at 15 months and patient had an excellent functional outcome with full knee range of motion at 2-years follow-up without any complications.
CONCLUSION: Fixator-assisted nailing is a simple, minimally invasive, and easily reproducible technique that is useful in reducing the fracture and preventing axial rotation of the intercalary segment minimizing the damage to the periosteal blood supply. Our case also highlights the importance of temporary external fixator in soft tissue healing and making the skin conducive for internal fixation. Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Devascularization; fixator-assisted nailing; intercalary segment; rotational displacement; segmental tibial fracture

Year:  2021        PMID: 35004385      PMCID: PMC8686490          DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i08.2382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep        ISSN: 2250-0685


Fixator-assisted nailing (FAN) is an innovative technique that is useful in conditioning of the skin, reducing the fracture and preventing rotational displacement of the intercalary segment, which can be used for closed segmental tibial shaft fractures with extensive soft tissue injury.

Introduction

Segmental fracture is defined by two fractures lines resulting in one or multiple intermediate fragments of diaphyseal bone [1]. These injuries are rare with an incidence of approximately 3–12% and result from tremendous impact injuries [2]. Common associated injuries include extensive soft tissue components leading to a higher rate of complications such as infection, non-union, and compartment syndrome [1, 3]. These complications arise due to severe soft tissue injury and periosteal stripping of the intercalary diaphyseal segment leading to the devascularization of that segment [4, 5]. Surgical treatment of these fractures is difficult and one has several options such as intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction internal fixation, and definitive external fixation. However, there is no definitive treatment strategy [4]. The treatment method favors a minimally invasive technique of internal fixation thereby reducing further soft tissue injury and devascularization of fracture fragments [6]. A review conducted by McMohan et al. reported faster healing with IMN [5]. IMN is a biomechanically more stable and closed method of treatment. However, fracture malalignment and rotational displacement of the intercalary segment during reaming is a significant problem with IMN leading to devascularisation, infection, nonunion, and malunion [7]. External fixation has its advantages of being minimally invasive which can be used in poor skin conditions. However, it has the challenges of poor patient compliance and recurrent pin tract infections [8]. We report the combined benefits of two treatment methods using the “fixator-assisted nailing” (FAN) technique for surgical fixation of segmental tibial shaft fractures. A temporizing external fixator helps improve skin condition and can also be used as a reduction aid in definitive fixation of segmental tibia fractures. The patient was informed that the case would be published and written informed consent was taken.

Case Report

A 52-year-old retired businessman was struck on his two-wheeler by a heavy vehicle and injured his right leg. He presented to our casualty 12 h later after receiving initial treatment and slab immobilization at a peripheral hospital. After a thorough clinical and radiological examination, the patient was diagnosed to have an AO 42C3 closed segmental tibia-fibula fracture of the right leg (Fig. 1) with extensive blistering of the skin. He was hemodynamically stable, distal pulses were palpable, sustained no other neurovascular or systemic injuries, and had no signs of compartment syndrome. The family gave us the prior history of hospital admission for hepatic encephalopathy which was successfully treated and currently had no symptoms, signs related to this comorbidity, or abnormal liver function tests. A thorough preoperative laboratory work-up was normal.
Figure 1

Preoperative radiograph showing AO 42C3 fracture of Right Tibia-fibula.

Preoperative radiograph showing AO 42C3 fracture of Right Tibia-fibula. Because of extensive soft tissue injury associated with segmental tibia-fibula fracture, the family was counseled about the difficulties in the treatment and anticipated complications related to this injury. The decision of an initial temporizing external fixator was taken to improve the skin condition before definitive internal fixation. The fixator was applied using the principles of length, axis, and rotation. Due to extensive soft tissue stripping, it is difficult to achieve accurate reduction without opening at the fracture site. Fixator was applied in a manner that can be used as a reduction tool during definitive internal fixation (Fig. 2 and 3). At 3 weeks, the skin condition improved and was conducive for internal fixation (Fig. 4).
Figure 2

Extensive blistering of skin suggesting soft tissue involvement.

Figure 3

Postoperative radiograph showing monoplanar external fixator application.

Figure 4

Improved skin condition with healed blisters after 3 weeks.

Extensive blistering of skin suggesting soft tissue involvement. Postoperative radiograph showing monoplanar external fixator application. Improved skin condition with healed blisters after 3 weeks. In supine position and under spinal anesthesia, the tourniquet was applied and the limb was prepared and draped. After inflating the tourniquet, the external fixator and Schanz pin holding the proximal and intercalary segment was retained and the remaining fixator was removed. A 3-mm K-wire was inserted across the posterior aspect of the proximal fragment which will act as a poller screw and allows the guide-wire to pass in the anterior quadrant and prevent fracture malalignment. In a semi-extended position, a longitudinal incision was taken for the transpatellar tendon approach. Using the fixator, the reduction was maintained and the guide-wire was passed anterior to the poller wire (Fig. 5). Fig. 6 shows the diagrammatic representation of the FAN technique. Before reaming, the fixator was loosened and Schanz pins were made unicortical to prevent damage to the reaming equipment and fixator was re-tightened. An assistant was asked to firmly hold the fixator during reaming. Multi-locking IMN was used for fixation. Once the nail was negotiated through the proximal and intercalary diaphyseal segment, the fixator was removed and the nail was passed into the distal fragment. Distal and proximal locking was done routinely. Poller wire was then removed. Satisfactory reduction and fixation were confirmed under the c-arm and shown in the postoperative radiograph (Fig. 7).
Figure 5

Fixator assisted nailing technique: Semi-extended position of the knee, surgical sheet under the ankle, the position of 3 mm poller wire, fixator holding the proximal and intercalary segment, guide-wire being passed.

Figure 6

Diagrammatic representation of “Fixator-assisted nailing”

Figure 7

Postoperative radiograph showing acceptable reduction and intramedullary nailing fixation.Preoperative radiograph showing AO 42C3 fracture of Right Tibia-fibula.

Fixator assisted nailing technique: Semi-extended position of the knee, surgical sheet under the ankle, the position of 3 mm poller wire, fixator holding the proximal and intercalary segment, guide-wire being passed. Diagrammatic representation of “Fixator-assisted nailing” Postoperative radiograph showing acceptable reduction and intramedullary nailing fixation.Preoperative radiograph showing AO 42C3 fracture of Right Tibia-fibula. In the post-operative period, the patient was started on active knee exercises and non-weight bearing walking was started on post-operative day 1. The patient was discharged after 1 week and sutures were removed at 2 weeks. The patient was followed up regularly at monthly intervals. After the radiological appearance of callus formation at 2 months, weight-bearing walking was allowed. The fracture healed successfully at 15 months. At a 2-years follow-up, the patient achieved full knee range of motion (Fig. 8) with a lower extremity functional scale of 88.75% and the radiograph showed healed tibial fractures with consolidation (Fig. 9).
Figure 8

Full knee range of motion at final follow-up.

Figure 9

At 2-years follow-up, radiograph showed healed tibial fractures with consolidation.

Full knee range of motion at final follow-up. At 2-years follow-up, radiograph showed healed tibial fractures with consolidation.

Discussion

In the past, various authors have reported the modification of standard reduction and fixation techniques for complex fractures of the tibia to overcome the intraoperative difficulties and still be able to follow the principles of minimal soft tissue damage and preserve blood supply to the bone by minimizing periosteal stripping. These modifications include a variety of options such as combining external and internal locking plates [9], clothesline technique during IMN [8], using Farabeuf clamp during undreamed nailing [10], application of large pointed reduction forceps [11], a temporary application of unicortical plates to prevent malalignment [12] and most recently FAN for difficult tibial fractures [13]. The use of internal plates can cause unnecessary extensive periosteal stripping resulting in further reduced blood supply to the diaphyseal bone. Pointed reduction forceps provide limited hold of the cortex and its difficult to control reduction and hence may be ineffective in preventing malalignment. Even though farabeuf clamp is an excellent tool to prevent distraction and rotation of the intercalary segment, there is some amount of periosteal stripping to open the fracture site. Clothesline technique utilizes two monolateral external fixators for preventing malalignment. However, it is useful in cases with proximal tibial shaft fractures. Suprapratellar nailing in the semi-extended position of the knee is also described for these fractures [14]. However, it requires special equipment to prevent cartilage injuries and thereby increases the cost of the procedure. Recently, Semenistyy et al. describe the FAN technique in detail. They utilized a biplanar external fixator for the reduction and fixation of complex tibial fractures. However, the procedure is technically demanding. Further, there is no hold in the intercalary segment to prevent its spinning while reaming. The described technique is simple, minimally invasive, and unique in certain aspects. Firstly, it utilizes the same temporizing external fixator (used for soft tissue healing and improving skin condition) in the intraoperative period. The fixator applied perpendicular to the coronal plane of the tibia and the semi-extended position of the knee counters the deforming forces of IMN that cause fracture malalignment during fixation. Second, the fixator holds the intercalary segment preventing the axial rotational, thereby minimizing injury to the remaining periosteal blood supply. To the best of our knowledge, although Semenistyy et al. [13] reported FAN in the acute phase, there is no described technique in the literature to address these two keys steps together. However, no technique is without its risks. Pin tract infection is a minor risk that can be successfully avoided by regular antiseptic pin tract dressings and antibiotics.

Conclusion

FAN is a simple, minimally invasive, and easily reproducible technique that is useful in reducing the fracture and preventing axial rotation of the intercalary segment minimizing the damage to the periosteal blood supply. FAN is a viable treatment option for closed segmental tibial shaft fractures with extensive soft tissue injury. However, further studies are required to establish the effectiveness of this technique. “FAN” is a simple, minimally invasive and easily reproducible technique that can be used in a staged manner for closed segmental tibial shaft fractures with extensive soft tissue injury. Initially, external fixator helps in conditioning the skin and soft tissue healing. During definitive internal fixation with intramedullary nail, the same external fixator helps in reducing the fracture and preventing axial rotation of the intercalary segment minimizing the damage to the periosteal blood supply. Declaration of patient consent : The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient’s parents have given their consent for patient images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient’s parents understand that his names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Conflict of interest:Nil Source of support:None
  13 in total

Review 1.  The management of segmental tibial shaft fractures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel E McMahon; Zoe E Little; Toby O Smith; Alex Trompeter; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  "Clothesline technique" for proximal tibial shaft fracture fixation using conventional intramedullary nail: a simple, useful, and inexpensive technique to prevent fracture malalignment.

Authors:  William Dias Belangero; Robinson Esteves Santos Pires; Bruno Livani; Felipe Lins Rossi; Andre Luis Lugnani de Andrade
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-23

3.  Does it really spin? Intra-medullary nailing of segmental tibial fractures--a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Mateen H Arastu; Brendan Sheehan; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci; Richard E Buckley
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Fixator-assisted nailing of tibial fractures: New surgical technique and presentation of first 30 cases.

Authors:  Anton A Semenistyy; Elena A Litvina Ea; Anna G Fedotova; Chukwuweike Gwam; Andrey N Mironov
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Using external and internal locking plates in a two-stage protocol for treatment of segmental tibial fractures.

Authors:  Ching-Hou Ma; Yuan-Kun Tu; Jih-Hsi Yeh; Shih-Chieh Yang; Chin-Hsien Wu
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-09

6.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and vascularity: preliminary results of a cadaver injection study.

Authors:  O Farouk; C Krettek; T Miclau; P Schandelmaier; P Guy; H Tscherne
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Segmental tibial fractures: an infrequent but demanding injury.

Authors:  Martin Teraa; Taco J Blokhuis; Lisa Tang; Loek P H Leenen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The difficult healing of segmental fractures of the tibial shaft.

Authors:  P M Rommens; W Coosemans; P L Broos
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  The segmental tibial fracture.

Authors:  T S Woll; P J Duwelius
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Anterior unicortical buttress plating in conjunction with an unreamed interlocking intramedullary nail for treatment of very proximal tibial diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  D E Matthews; R McGuire; A E Freeland
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.