Literature DB >> 24694557

Semiextended intramedullary nailing of the tibia using a suprapatellar approach: radiographic results and clinical outcomes at a minimum of 12 months follow-up.

Roy W Sanders1, Thomas G DiPasquale, Charles J Jordan, John A Arrington, H Claude Sagi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic results associated with the use of a percutaneous suprapatellar (SP) portal and accompanying instrumentation for tibial intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion using a semiextended approach.
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, nonconsecutive study.
SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2007 to January 2011, 56 fractures (55 patients) underwent intramedullary nailing of a tibia fracture with a semiextended approach through a SP portal. Radiographic and clinical follow-up examinations were performed at a minimum of 1 year after the index procedure. Measurements included bone healing, tibial alignment, knee range of motion, pain drawings, pain scoring (visual analogue scale), functional outcome (Lysholm and SF-36 scoring), evaluation of prenail and postnail insertion arthroscopic images of the patella-femoral (PF) joint (subgroup of study patients), and 1-year follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (STIR and T2 gradient echo) of the knee to evaluate the PF joint cartilage. MRI scans were reviewed by an independent bone radiologist, whereas arthroscopic images were evaluated by an independent sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (37 fractures) were available for follow-up at a minimum of 1 year (range: 12-49 months) after the index procedure. All but 2 fractures healed after the index procedure (94.6%). There was 1 radiographic malunion (2.7%). The mean Lysholm knee score was 82.14. Mean SF-36 physical and mental scores were 40.8 and 46.0, respectively. Mean arc of knee motion was 124.4 degrees for the affected extremity compared with 127.2 degrees for the contralateral knee. One patient (2.7%) complained of mild pain at the scar, but no patient complained of anterior knee pain either at the PF joint or at the anterior proximal tibia. In 13 of 15 patients undergoing an arthroscopic assessment of the PF joint, prenail and postnail insertion, no cartilage changes, or pressure points were seen either at the patella or at the trochlea groove. Two patients had grade II chondromalacia of the trochlea immediately after the procedure, but these did not correspond with either MRI scans or clinical findings at 1 year. When the remainder of the 1-year MRI scans were reviewed, 1 knee (2.7%) in a patient that did not have an arthroscopic examination was found to have grade II chondromalacia in the PF joint, but this did not correlate with the clinical examination, which was normal.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first paper to critically document clinical and radiographic results using the percutaneous SP portal with the semiextended approach for IMN of the tibia. Our 1 year results indicate that the procedure resulted in excellent tibial alignment, union, and knee range of motion, with rare sequelae in the PF joint based on immediate arthroscopy and 1-year MRI scans and clinical examinations. Even more interesting was the absence of anterior tibial pain often found when a tibial nail is inserted in a standard fashion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24694557     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  18 in total

Review 1.  Intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures in the semi-extended position using a suprapatellar portal technique.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effects of morphological changes in the patellar tendon on the development of anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures: A retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Erman Ceyhan; Fatih İnci; İbrahim Alper Yavuz; Utku Gürhan; Ahmet Özgür Yıldırım; Özdamar Fuad Öken
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.511

3.  The outcome comparison of the suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Qi Sun; XiaoYang Nie; JinPeng Gong; JieZhou Wu; RenLong Li; Wei Ge; Ming Cai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Character, Incidence, and Predictors of Knee Pain and Activity After Infrapatellar Intramedullary Nailing of an Isolated Tibia Fracture.

Authors:  William Obremskey; Julie Agel; Kristin Archer; Philip To; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  A Review of Proximal Tibia Entry Points for Intramedullary Nailing and Validation of The Lateral Parapatellar Approach as Extra-articular.

Authors:  Akshar H Patel; J Heath Wilder; Olivia C Lee; Austin J Ross; Krishna C Vemulapalli; Paul B Gladden; Murphy P Martin; William F Sherman
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-01-30

Review 6.  Safe surgical technique: intramedullary nail fixation of tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle; Guilherme Boni
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2015-12-12

7.  Application of the Chinese Aircraft-shaped Sleeve system in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures using a suprapatellar approach for tibial intramedullary nailing: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ke Lu; Ting-Ting Zhou; Yi-Jun Gao; Hong-Zhen Wang; Zhi-Qiang Wu; Yuan Wang; Dong-Gui Zheng; Qi-Rong Dong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 8.  Anterior knee pain and functional outcome following different surgical techniques for tibial nailing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mandala S Leliveld; Michael H J Verhofstad; Eduard Van Bodegraven; Jules Van Haaren; Esther M M Van Lieshout
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Difference in Pain, Complication Rates, and Clinical Outcomes After Suprapatellar Versus Infrapatellar Nailing for Tibia Fractures? A Systematic Review of 1447 Patients.

Authors:  Nils Jan Bleeker; Inge H F Reininga; Bryan J M van de Wall; Laurent A M Hendrickx; Frank J P Beeres; Kaj Ten Duis; Job N Doornberg; Ruurd L Jaarsma; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; Frank F A IJpma
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Locked META intramedullary nailing fixation for tibial fractures via a suprapatellar approach.

Authors:  Beigang Fu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.