| Literature DB >> 35003029 |
Zhen Wang1,2,3, Manoj Kumar Solanki4, Zhuo-Xin Yu3, Muhammad Anas3, Deng-Feng Dong3, Yong-Xiu Xing3, Mukesh Kumar Malviya2, Fei Pang1, Yang-Rui Li2,3.
Abstract
To understand the beneficial interaction of sugarcane rhizosphere actinobacteria in promoting plant growth and managing plant diseases, this study investigated the potential role of sugarcane rhizospheric actinobacteria in promoting plant growth and antagonizing plant pathogens. We isolated 58 actinobacteria from the sugarcane rhizosphere, conducted plant growth-promoting (PGP) characteristics research, and tested the pathogenic fungi in vitro. Results showed that BTU6 (Streptomyces griseorubiginosus), the most representative strain, regulates plant defense enzyme activity and significantly enhances sugarcane smut resistance by regulating stress resistance-related enzyme (substances (POD, PAL, PPO, TP) in sugarcane) activity in sugarcane. The genomic evaluation indicated that BTU6 has the ability to biosynthesize chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, and various secondary metabolites and plays an essential role in the growth of sugarcane plants under biotic stress. Potential mechanisms of the strain in improving the disease resistance of sugarcane plants and its potential in biodegrading exogenous chemicals were also revealed. This study showed the importance of sugarcane rhizosphere actinobacteria in microbial ecology and plant growth promotion.Entities:
Keywords: actinobacteria; biocontrol; genome; smut; sugarcane
Year: 2021 PMID: 35003029 PMCID: PMC8740303 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.797889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Comparison of defensive enzyme activities, active substances and susceptibility rates of plant disease resistance in different treatments in greenhouse experiments.
| Treatment | POD (U⋅g–1) | PPO (U⋅g–1) | PAL (U⋅g–1) | TP (mg g–1) | Lignin (mg g–1) | Infection rate (%) | Fresh weight (g) | Plant height (m) | ||
| Shoot | Root | |||||||||
| T1 | 90.1c | 78.2c | 26.9c | 3.3c | 153a | 5.6c | 154.9b | 12.2b | 0.62a | |
| T2 | 105.9b | 101.4b | 57.4b | 5.1b | 161.5a | 45.6b | 174.4a | 22.7a | 0.67a | |
| T3 | 138.6a | 131.6a | 67.4a | 7.3a | 157.9a | 78.9a | 182.1a | 18.6a | 0.63a | |
| SE | 7.41 | 8.14 | 6.13 | 0.58 | 4.32 | 10.67 | 4.23 | 1.69 | 0.01 | |
| LSD | 5.57 | 7.19 | 1.79 | 0.22 | 11.70 | 3.51 | 3.49 | 2.0 | 0.02 | |
| CV (%) | 6.6 | 7.8 | 12.1 | 11.0 | 2.7 | 24.6 | 2.9 | 9.4 | 1.8 | |
T1 (no inoculation-only water), T2 (inoculation of smut pathogen only), T3 (inoculation of smut pathogen and actinomycetes BTU6 as biocontrol agent). Different small letters as superscript represent significant difference at 95% confidence intervals based on DMRT test.
Identification and PGP characteristics of actinobacteria.
| Isolates | Type strain match (% similarity) | No. of nucleotides | Accession number | PGP traits | ||||
| Siderophore | P-solibilization | N-free medium growth | ||||||
| TU2 | 1,416 |
| – | 0.28g | + | – | + | |
| TU3 | 1,429 |
| – | – | + | – | – | |
| TU4 | 1,442 |
| 21.89m | 0.06k | – | – | – | |
| TU5 | 1,426 |
| – | 0.26g | – | – | – | |
| TU6 | 1,424 |
| 27.55kl | – | – | – | – | |
| TU7 | 1,424 |
| – | – | – | – | – | |
| TU8 | 1,426 |
| 25.83l | – | – | – | – | |
| TU10 | 1,426 |
| – | – | – | + | + | |
| TU11 | 1,427 |
| 49.05h | – | – | + | – | |
| TU12 | 1,426 |
| 43.75i | – | – | – | – | |
| TU13 | 1,422 |
| 75.55c | 0.51f | + | – | – | |
| TU14 | 1,423 |
| – | – | – | – | – | |
| TU15 | 1,430 |
| 48.01h | 0.01k | – | – | – | |
| TU16 | 1,429 |
| 58.67de | 0.55f | – | – | – | |
| TU17 | 1,427 |
| – | – | – | – | – | |
| TU19 | 1,431 |
| – | – | – | – | + | |
| TU20 | 1,414 |
| 36.02j | – | – | + | – | |
| TU21 | 1,408 |
| 29.05kl | – | – | – | – | |
| TU22 | 1,425 |
| – | – | – | – | + | |
| TU23 | 1,424 |
| – | – | – | – | + | |
| TU32 | 1,427 |
| – | – | + | – | – | |
| TU33 | 1,424 |
| 40.71i | 0.52f | – | – | – | |
| BTU1 | 1,423 |
| 56.52ef | 0.24g | + | + | – | |
| BTU2 | 1,425 |
| 60.96d | 0.07jk | – | + | – | |
| BTU3 | 1,423 |
| – | – | – | – | + | |
| BTU4 | 1,423 |
| 43.25i | – | – | – | – | |
| BTU5 | 1,426 |
| – | – | – | – | + | |
| BTU6 | 1,428 |
| 50.87gh | 0.08ijk | + | – | + | |
| BTU8 | 1,428 |
| 84.85 | – | + | + | – | |
| BTU9 | 1,423 |
| 88.65 | 1.47d | – | – | – | |
| BTU10 | 1,426 |
| 56.99def | 0.15hij | – | – | – | |
| BTU11 | 1,426 |
| 79.45 | 0.16hi | – | – | – | |
| BTU12 | 1,428 |
| 54.30fg | 0.07jk | – | – | + | |
| BTU13 | 1,424 |
| + | – | – | + | – | |
| BTU14 | 1,427 |
| – | 0.26g | – | + | – | |
| BTU16 | 1,421 |
| 59.89de | 1.56c | – | – | – | |
| BTU17 | 1,426 |
| 87.47 | 0.08h–k | – | – | – | |
| BTU18 | 1,425 |
| 51.16gh | 0.08ijk | + | – | + | |
| BTU19 | 1,424 |
| – | 0.76e | – | – | + | |
| BTU20 | 1,424 |
| 56.52ef | 0.16h | – | + | + | |
| BTU21 | 1,429 |
| – | 0.30g | – | – | – | |
| BTU22 | 1,425 |
| – | – | – | – | – | |
| GEN1 | 1,422 |
| – | – | – | – | – | |
| GEN2 | 1,423 |
| 20.36m | – | – | – | – | |
| GEN5 | 1,420 |
| 28.76kl | – | – | – | + | |
| GEN7 | 1,404 |
| 21.89m | – | – | – | – | |
| GEN8 | 1,417 |
| 35.20j | – | – | – | – | |
| GEN15 | 1,419 |
| – | – | – | – | + | |
| WZS021 | 1,484 |
| 30.50k | 3.03 | + | – | + | |
| WZS023 | 1,427 |
| 26.22l | – | + | + | – | |
| WZS027 | 1,403 |
| – | – | + | – | – | |
| WZS028 | 1,425 |
| – | – | – | + | – | |
| WZS030 | 1,429 |
| – | – | – | – | – | |
| WZS031 | 1,424 |
| – | – | + | – | – | |
| WZS035 | 1,368 |
| 21.32m | – | – | – | – | |
| WZS050 | 1,430 |
| – | – | – | + | – | |
| WZS051 | 1,428 |
| – | 2.05 | + | – | – | |
| WZS221 | 1,424 |
| 29.87kl | – | – | – | + | |
+, positive; –, negative.
FIGURE 1The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the 16S rDNA sequence of sugarcane rhizosphere actinomycetes and similar type strains through the neighbor-joining method.
FIGURE 2In vitro antagonism of actinobacteria and phytopathogenic fungi (A), and screening of synthetic genes for secondary metabolites of actinobacteria (B). (A) Growth definitely retarded with zone of inhibition (1) near the colony, (2) of ≥ 10 mm, and (3) of ≥ 15 mm. (0) Represents no inhibition. (B) (0) Negative; (1) positive.
FIGURE 3Streptomyces griseorubiginosus BTU6 colonizes the root surface (B) and hair area (C) of sugarcane and forms a mycelial cluster. (A) Represents a control sugarcane plant without BTU6 inoculation. Scale bar = 20 μm.
FIGURE 4Genome overview map of Streptomyces griseorubiginosus BTU6. Circles from the outside to the inside represent the genome size, COG function classification, repetitive sequence, RNA classification, GC content, and GC-s.
FIGURE 5Comparison of 17 Streptomyces biosynthetic gene clusters and genome size, with similarity ≥ 20%.