| Literature DB >> 35002010 |
Yong Peng1, Enbin Liu1, Shanbi Peng2, Qikun Chen3, Dangjian Li1, Dianpeng Lian1.
Abstract
In late December 2019, a new type of coronavirus was discovered, which was later named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2). Since its discovery, the virus has spread globally, with 2,975,875 deaths as of 15 April 2021, and has had a huge impact on our health systems and economy. How to suppress the continued spread of new coronary pneumonia is the main task of many scientists and researchers. The introduction of artificial intelligence technology has provided a huge contribution to the suppression of the new coronavirus. This article discusses the main application of artificial intelligence technology in the suppression of coronavirus from three major aspects of identification, prediction, and development through a large amount of literature research, and puts forward the current main challenges and possible development directions. The results show that it is an effective measure to combine artificial intelligence technology with a variety of new technologies to predict and identify COVID-19 patients.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Blockchain; COVID-19; Cloud computing; Epidemic prevention and control; Internet of Things
Year: 2022 PMID: 35002010 PMCID: PMC8720541 DOI: 10.1007/s10462-021-10106-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Artif Intell Rev ISSN: 0269-2821 Impact factor: 9.588
Symptoms related to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) (Huang et al. 2020a)
| Virus name | Proportion of symptoms | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | 50–76% | 25.3–44% | Other uncommon symptoms | Very few patients | |
| SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 | Fever | Cough | Fatigue symptoms | Sputum secretion, runny nose, sore throat, chest tightness, headache, vomiting, and diarrhea | Mild fatigue, low fever, no pneumonia, or even no symptoms |
Fig. 1Number of infections and deaths in the top 10 infected countries and China (January 15, 2021)
Fig. 2How COVID-19 is spread (Tomar and Gupta 2020)
Fig. 3Overall framework of the article
Other models for predicting the spread of COVID-19
| Model or method | Achievement | References |
|---|---|---|
| Logistic growth model | Their findings demonstrate the utility of a 5-parameter logistic growth model | Chen et al. ( |
| TP-SMN-AR models | Forecasting the “confirmed” and “recovered” COVID-19 cases helps planning to control the disease and plan for the utilization of health care resources | Maleki et al. ( |
| Machine learning | The COVID-19 effects are predicted to be at a peak between the third and fourth weeks of April 2020 in India | Tiwari et al. ( |
| Four time series models | The results revealed that weather conditions largely influence the spread of coronavirus in most of the Chinese provinces | Al-Rousan and Al-Najjar ( |
| Seir model and AI approach | They found that the epidemic of China should peak by late February, showing a gradual decline by end of April | Yang et al. ( |
| GMDH algorithm | The results demonstrated that the relative humidity and maximum daily temperature had the highest impact on the confirmed cases | Pirouz et al. ( |
Fig. 4Drug development and reuse process (Xue et al. 2018)
Available drugs predicted by artificial intelligence technology
| Drug name or category | Source | References |
|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | BenevolentAI, The UK-based organization is known as a mammoth in the AI medicate revelation industry | Mak and Pichika |
| A mix of chloroquine and tocilizumab | Innoplexus, an Indo-German organization | Gordon et al. |
| Atazanavir (a medication for HIV treatment) | Deargen, a Korean organization | Scudellari |
| Niclosamide and nitazoxanide | Gero, a Singaporean organization | Cyclica |
Fig. 5Ten pre-trained network architectures used by Ardakani et al. (2020)
Some existing main frameworks and improvement methods
| Mainframe | Improved method | New model name | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| ResNet-50 | Deep Transfer Learning (DTL) | Deep Transfer Learning Based Classification Model for COVID-19 Disease | Pathak et al. ( |
| ResNet-50 | – | COVNet | Li et al. ( |
| CNN | the multi-scale spatial pyramid (MSSP) | MSCNN | Yan et al. ( |
| DenseNet-201 | SVM | – | Yu et al. ( |
| UNet/ResNet | Multi-stage combination | DeCoVNet | Wang et al. ( |
| CNN(3D) | Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) | A combination model | Han et al. ( |
| Lung Infection Segmentation Network (Inf-Net) | Semi-supervised Learning (SSL) | Semi-Supervised Inf-Net | Fan et al. ( |
Fig. 6The neural network model framework proposed by Stephen et al. (2019)
Fig. 7CT and X-ray images
Research on symptom recognition based on X-ray
| References | Model name | Dataset | All data | All COVID-19 | Train | Test | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen et al. ( | A newly constructed CNN model | COVID-19/normal | 5856 | – | 3722 | 2134 | 0.9531 | 0.9373 | – |
| Togacar et al. ( | MobileNetV2/SqueezeNet | COVID-19/pneumonia/normal | 458 | 295 | 321 | 137 | 97.04 | 99.16 | 98.83 |
| (average) | (average) | (average) | |||||||
| Tuncera et al. ( | ResExLBP | COVID-19/normal | 321 | 87 | – | – | 98.29 | 100.0 | 99.15 |
| (SVM) | (SVM) | (SVM) | |||||||
| Ucar et al. ( | COVIDiagnosis-Net | COVID-19/pneumonia/normal | 5,427 | 1393 | 1,229 | 163 | – | 99.67 | 100.00 |
| Khan et al. ( | Xception | COVID-19/pneumonia/normal | 967 | 327 | – | – | – | 97.9 | 93.17 |
| (average) | (average) | ||||||||
| Rahimzadeh et al. ( | Xception/ReNet50V2 | COVID-19/pneumonia/normal | 15,085 | 180 | 3,783 | – | 73.35/74.02 | 99.55/99.33 | 91.31/89.79 |
| (average) | (average) | (average) | |||||||
| Ozturk et al. ( | DarkCovidNet | COVID-19/pneumonia/normal | 1,127 | 127 | – | – | 95.13 | 95.3 | 98.08 |
| (average) | (average) | (average) | |||||||
| Brunese et al. ( | Improved VGG-16 model | COVID-19/pneumonia/normal | 6,523 | 250 | 2000 | 2000 | 96 | 98 | 96 |
| Mohamed et al. ( | Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) | Covid/Normal/Pneumonia_bac/Pneumonia_vir | 306 | 69 | 270 | 36 | – | – | 99.9 |
| (in the third scenario) |
Fig. 8Schematic diagram of the research route
Fig. 9Software or program development of artificial intelligence technology in the process of fighting against COVID-19
Method classification of artificial intelligence technology in the process of inhibiting COVID-19
| Research contents | Method classification |
|---|---|
| Prediction | Regression prediction (Chen et al. |
| Time series model (Maleki et al. | |
| Neural network (Chimmula and Zhang | |
| Ensemble learning algorithm (Yan et al. | |
| Symptom recognition | Neural network (Fan et al. |
| Development | Neural network (Liang et al. |
Fig. 10Radar chart of diagnostic indicators for radiologists and different networks (Ardakani et al. 2020)
Fig. 11a–h Images show representative slices corresponding to gradient-weighted class activation mapping images on the test set (Harrison et al. 2020)
Fig. 12COVID-19 Dashboard by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (Coronavirus Resource Center 2021)
Fig. 13AI system recognition results. (COVID-19: Coronavirus disease 2019; CP: Common pneumonia.) (Yan et al. 2020b)
Fig. 14A COVID-19 monitoring and control model based on the Internet of Things (Mohamed et al. 2020b)
Fig. 15Architecture for drone-based COVID-19 monitoring, control, and analytics in the smart healthcare system (Kumar et al. 2021)
| Data sources | Chief application | References |
|---|---|---|
|
| Propagation prediction | Chen et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | Dong et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | Killeen et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | Nishiura et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | Du et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | Wells et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | Anzai et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | Kucharski et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | Kraemer et al. ( |
|
| Propagation prediction | – |
|
| Propagation/Survival prediction | Liu et al. ( |
|
| Survival prediction | Xu et al. ( |
|
| Survival prediction | NazSindhu et al. ( |
|
| Survival prediction | NazSindhu et al. ( |
|
| Drug prediction | Mutlu Ece et al. ( |
|
| Measuring emotions | Kleinberg and van der V egt I, Mozes M, ( |
|
| X-ray recognition | Cohen et al. ( |
|
| Vaccine/social survey | Riham et al. ( |
|
| X-ray recognition | Togacar et al. ( |
|
| X-ray recognition | Khan et al. ( |
|
| X-ray recognition | Ozturk et al. ( |
|
| X-ray recognition | Afshar et al. ( |
|
| X-ray recognition | Wang and Wong ( |
|
| X-ray recognition | Apostolopoulos and Mpesiana ( |
|
| CT recognition | Yang et al. ( |
|
| CT and X-ray recognition | Cohen et al. ( |
|
| CT recognition | Zhao et al. ( |
|
| CT recognition | Jun et al. ( |
|
| CT recognition | – |
|
| CT recognition | – |
|
| Social media | Banda et al. ( |
|
| Social media | Chen et al. ( |
|
| Social media | Alqurashi et al. ( |
|
| Social media | Yu ( |