| Literature DB >> 35000176 |
Fangjhy Li1, Tsangyao Chang2, Mei-Chih Wang3, Jun Zhou4.
Abstract
In this paper, we use (Yilanci et al. 2020) Fourier autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model to study the correlation between health expenditures, CO2 emissions, and GDP fluctuations in BRICS countries from 2000 to 2019. The Fourier ARDL model has the function of bootstrap repeated simulation calculations, so that small samples can also achieve the advantages of finer inspection results. In this paper, we find that in the long term, Brazil and China are countries that both have cointegration relationships in health expenditure, CO2 emissions, and economic growth. With CO2 emissions as the dependent variable and health expenditure and economic growth as independent variables, in the short term, there is a negative causal relationship between India's CO2 emissions and health expenditure; other countries only show the relationship between CO2 emissions, health expenditure, or economic growth one-way relationship. This paper also has some policy suggestions on health expenditures and CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries at the end.Entities:
Keywords: BRICS countries; CO2 emissions; Economic growth; Fourier ARDL; Health expenditures
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35000176 PMCID: PMC8742688 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17900-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 5.190
Fig. 1Distribution of global CO2 emissions in 2020
Fig. 2The average life expectancy of the BRICS countries in 2018
Description of statistics
| Economies | Brazil | China | India | South Africa | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | CO2 | Health | GDP | CO2 | Health | GDP | CO2 | Health | GDP | CO2 | Health | GDP |
| Mean | 2.5801 | 2.7568 | 3.8384 | 3.8274 | 2.1462 | 3.5093 | 3.8274 | 2.1462 | 3.5093 | 2.6109 | 2.5757 | 3.7173 |
| Maxi | 2.7029 | 3.0109 | 4.1220 | 3.9655 | 2.6443 | 3.9425 | 3.9655 | 2.6442 | 3.9424 | 2.6521 | 2.7762 | 3.9034 |
| Mini | 2.4803 | 2.3911 | 3.4516 | 3.5266 | 1.6269 | 2.9820 | 3.5266 | 1.6268 | 2.9819 | 2.5284 | 2.2279 | 3.3983 |
| Sd. Dev | 0.0782 | 0.2330 | 0.2360 | 0.1542 | 0.3673 | 0.3452 | 0.1542 | 0.3672 | 0.3452 | 0.0410 | 0.1640 | 0.1502 |
| Skew | 0.2183 | − 0.4722 | − 0.4437 | − 0.8647 | − 0.0391 | − 0.2036 | − 0.8647 | − 0.0390 | − 0.2035 | − 0.9490 | − 0.7664 | − 1.0043 |
| Kurt | 1.5111 | 1.5997 | 1.6803 | 2.3111 | 1.4766 | 1.5194 | 2.3111 | 1.4765 | 1.5194 | 2.5437 | 2.5333 | 2.8912 |
| J-B | 1.8056 | 2.1395 | 1.8970 | 2.5992 | 1.7452 | 1.7684 | 2.5992 | 1.7452 | 1.7684 | 2.8579 | 1.9257 | 3.0348 |
***, **, and * indicate the null hypothesis is rejected at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels
Unit root tests
| Country | Level | First difference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADF | PP | KPSS | ADF | PP | KPSS | ||
| Brazil | CO2 | − 0.8169 | − 0.8169 | 0.5170** | − 3.6976** | − 3.6982 | 0.1229 |
| Health | − 4.7396*** | − 0.8245 | 0.4747** | − 2.2098 | − 2.5433 | 0.1622 | |
| GDP | − 3.7380** | − 0.9982 | 0.4500* | − 2.6009 | − 2.5650 | 0.1689 | |
| China | CO2 | − 3.9374*** | − 3.3594** | 0.5165** | − 1.1463 | − 1.3744 | 0.4743** |
| Health | − 1.2941 | − 0.4197 | 0.5508** | − 2.3987 | − 2.4306 | 0.1698 | |
| GDP | − 1.5235 | − 1.1595 | 0.5481** | − 1.8313 | − 1.8397 | 0.2554 | |
| India | CO2 | − 3.9374*** | − 3.3594** | 0.5165** | − 1.1463 | − 1.3744 | 0.4743** |
| Health | − 1.2941 | − 0.4197 | 0.5508** | − 2.3987 | − 2.4306 | 0.1698 | |
| GDP | − 1.5235 | − 1.1595 | 0.5481** | − 1.8313 | − 1.8397 | 0.2554 | |
| South Africa | CO2 | − 1.9808 | − 2.2580 | 0.4260* | − 3.5901** | − 3.5685** | 0.3577* |
| Health | − 1.2802 | − 1.2590 | 0.4655** | − 2.9929* | − 2.9632* | 0.1411 | |
| GDP | − 1.5844 | − 1.5841 | 0.4012* | − 2.7001* | − 2.7507* | 0.2583 | |
Cointegration analysis (2 variables)
| Country | Dependent variable| | frequency | AIC | Result | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | CO2 | Health | 1.5 | − 6.31 | 19.62*** | 12.78 | 7.099 | − 4.635 | − 3.163 | 4.607 | 2.995 | No cointegration |
| Health | CO2 | 1.4 | − 3.96 | 4.352** | 3.393 | 0.733 | − 2.024 | 0.190 | 1.101 | − 0.261 | No cointegration | |
| China | CO2 | Health | 2.5 | − 6.10 | 0.465 | 3.315 | 1.567 | − 1.866 | − 0.484 | 1.098 | 0.484 | No cointegration |
| Health | CO2 | 0.5 | − 5.16 | 33.33*** | 4.541 | 1.235 | − 2.348 | − 1.300 | 0.783 | 1.119 | No cointegration | |
| India | CO2 | Health | 2.5 | − 6.10 | 1.183 | 3.167 | 1.567 | − 1.915 | − 0.484 | 1.030 | 0.484 | No cointegration |
| Health | CO2 | 2.5 | − 6.10 | 5.893** | 3.002 | 1.567 | − 1.614 | − 0.484 | 1.095 | 0.484 | No cointegration | |
| South Africa | CO2 | Health | 3.4 | − 5.59 | 0.087 | 5.286 | 2.752 | − 2.850 | − 0.650 | 2.385 | 0.038 | No cointegration |
| Health | CO2 | 2.6 | − 3.59 | 1.7791 | 7.063 | 6.547 | − 3.238 | − 3.263 | 2.072 | 2.682 | No cointegration |
***, **, and * indicate the null hypothesis is rejected at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels.
Granger causality analysis based on Fourier ARDL model
| Country | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | n.a | 4.173*** (0.002)(-) | |
| 0.175 (0.864)(-) | n.a | ||
| China | n.a | 0.885 (0.398)( +) | |
| 16.890* (0.000)(-) | n.a | ||
| India | n.a | 5.765*** (0.000)(-) | |
| 8.873*** (0.000)(-) | n.a | ||
| South Africa | n.a | 1.343 (0.210)(-) | |
| 1.2405 (0.201)( +) | n.a | ||
Values in bold refer to the case of cointegration and the causality test involved both lagged level and lagged differenced variables. Those values not in bold refer to the case of no-cointegration where the causality test involved only lagged differences
Fig. 3Granger causality analysis based on Fourier ARDL model (2 variables)
Cointegration analysis (3 variables)
| Country | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | CO2 | Health, GDP | 1.5 | − 6.20 | 7.81** | 6.568 | 2.860 | − 3.384 | − 2.451 | 7.277 | 3.862 | No cointegration |
| Health | CO2 GDP | 1.9 | − 6.58 | 96.*** | 5.444 | 0.389 | − 1.633 | − 0.014 | 5.236 | 0.563 | No cointegration | |
| China | CO2 | Health, GDP | 0.4 | − 7.06 | 13.*** | 6.488 | 9.122 | − 3.521 | − 4.997 | 7.639 | 9.250 | |
| Health | CO2 GDP | 0.5 | − 6.09 | 9.7*** | 7.635 | 6.583 | − 4.074 | − 4.149 | 9.883 | 7.467 | No cointegration | |
| India | CO2 | Health, GDP | 0.4 | − 7.06 | 0.1872 | 7.183 | 9.122 | − 3.467 | − 4.997 | 8.383 | 9.250 | |
| Health |CO2 GDP | 0.5 | − 6.91 | 7.27** | 8.053 | 6.583 | − 4.274 | − 4.149 | 10.656 | 7.467 | No cointegration | |
| South Africa | CO2 | Health, GDP | 2.8 | − 6.34 | 1.632 | 6.057 | 1.688 | − 3.267 | − 1.994 | 7.701 | 2.531 | No cointegration |
| Health | CO2 GDP | 1 | − 6.54 | 3.844* | 12.03 | 4.943 | − 4.7092 | − 0.349 | 14.791 | 4.703 | No cointegration |
***, **, and * indicate the null hypothesis is rejected at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels
The results of long-term estimation analysis based on Fourier ARDL model
| Country | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| China | n.a | n.a | |
| 3.133** (0.019)( +) | n.a | ||
| 3.830*** (0.002)(-) | n.a | ||
| India | n.a | n.a | |
| -0.865 (0.432)(-) | n.a | ||
| 0.0493 (0.932)( +) | n.a | ||
***, ** and * indicate the null hypothesis is rejected at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels
Granger causality analysis based on Fourier ARDL model (3 variables)
| Country | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brazil | n.a | 44.779** (0.00) (-) | |
| 1.728 (0.309)(-) | n.a | ||
| 2.613** (0.102)( +) | 22.6184** (0.000)( +) | ||
| China | n.a | 0.501 (0.600)( +) | |
| 0.493 (0.432)(-) | n.a | ||
| 1.133 (0.932)( +) | 0.908 (0.309)(-) | ||
| India | n.a | 0.557 (0.203)( +) | |
| 3.650*** (0.008)( +) | n.a | ||
| 3.069** (0.012)(-) | 0.898 (0.507)(-) | ||
| South Africa | n.a | -0.036 (0.965)(-) | |
| 0.076 (0.932)(-) | n.a | ||
| 0.495 (0.691)( +) | 1.997* (0.088)( +) | ||
Values in bold refer to the case of cointegration and the causality test involved both lagged level and lagged differenced variables. Those values not in bold refer to the case of no-cointegration where the causality test involved only lagged level
Fig. 4Granger causality analysis based on Fourier ARDL model (3 variables)