Hosub Shin1,2, Woo Lee Choi1,2, Joo Young Lim1, Jin Hoe Huh3,4,5. 1. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 08826, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, 08826, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 08826, Seoul, South Korea. huhjh@snu.ac.kr. 4. Plant Genomics and Breeding Institute, Seoul National University, 08826, Seoul, South Korea. huhjh@snu.ac.kr. 5. Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, 08826, Seoul, South Korea. huhjh@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epigenetic modifications play important roles in diverse cellular processes such as X chromosome inactivation, cell differentiation, development and senescence. DNA methylation and histone modifications are major epigenetic modifications that regulate chromatin structure and gene expression without DNA sequence changes. Epigenetic alterations may induce phenotypic changes stable enough for mitotic or meiotic inheritance. Moreover, the reversibility of epigenetic marks makes the manipulation of chromatin and epigenetic signature an attractive strategy for therapeutic and breeding purposes. Targeted epigenetic manipulation, or epigenome editing, at the gene of interest commonly utilizes specific epigenetic modifiers fused with a targeting module of the conventional genome editing system. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize essential epigenetic components and introduce currently available epigenetic mutants and the corresponding epialleles in plants. Furthermore, advances in epigenome editing technology are discussed while proposing its potential application to plant breeding. CONCLUSIONS: Epimutations associated with useful traits may provide a valuable resource for crop development. It is important to explore epimutations in a variety of crop species while understanding the fundamental aspects of epigenetic regulation of agronomically important traits such as yield, quality, disease resistance and stress tolerance. In the end, plant breeding programs through epigenome editing may help not only to expand the use of limited genetic resources but also to alleviate consumers' concerns about genetically manipulated crops.
BACKGROUND: Epigenetic modifications play important roles in diverse cellular processes such as X chromosome inactivation, cell differentiation, development and senescence. DNA methylation and histone modifications are major epigenetic modifications that regulate chromatin structure and gene expression without DNA sequence changes. Epigenetic alterations may induce phenotypic changes stable enough for mitotic or meiotic inheritance. Moreover, the reversibility of epigenetic marks makes the manipulation of chromatin and epigenetic signature an attractive strategy for therapeutic and breeding purposes. Targeted epigenetic manipulation, or epigenome editing, at the gene of interest commonly utilizes specific epigenetic modifiers fused with a targeting module of the conventional genome editing system. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize essential epigenetic components and introduce currently available epigenetic mutants and the corresponding epialleles in plants. Furthermore, advances in epigenome editing technology are discussed while proposing its potential application to plant breeding. CONCLUSIONS: Epimutations associated with useful traits may provide a valuable resource for crop development. It is important to explore epimutations in a variety of crop species while understanding the fundamental aspects of epigenetic regulation of agronomically important traits such as yield, quality, disease resistance and stress tolerance. In the end, plant breeding programs through epigenome editing may help not only to expand the use of limited genetic resources but also to alleviate consumers' concerns about genetically manipulated crops.
Authors: Todd Blevins; Jing Wang; David Pflieger; Frédéric Pontvianne; Craig S Pikaard Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bruno Paes de Melo; Isabela Tristan Lourenço-Tessutti; Joaquin Felipe Roca Paixão; Daniel David Noriega; Maria Cristina Mattar Silva; Janice de Almeida-Engler; Elizabeth Pacheco Batista Fontes; Maria Fatima Grossi-de-Sa Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yeonhee Choi; Mary Gehring; Lianna Johnson; Mike Hannon; John J Harada; Robert B Goldberg; Steven E Jacobsen; Robert L Fischer Journal: Cell Date: 2002-07-12 Impact factor: 41.582