Literature DB >> 34999844

A population study of clinical trial accrual for women and minorities in neuro-oncology following the NIH Revitalization Act.

Sheantel J Reihl1, Nirav Patil2,3,4, Ramin A Morshed1, Mulki Mehari1, Alexander Aabedi1, Ugonma N Chukwueke5, Alyx B Porter6, Valy Fontil7,8, Gino Cioffi9,2, Kristin Waite9,2, Carol Kruchko2, Quinn Ostrom2,10,11,12, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan2,13, Shawn L Hervey-Jumper1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The NIH Revitalization Act, implemented 29 years ago, set to improve the representation of women and minorities in clinical trials. In this study, we investigate progress made in all phase therapeutic clinical trials for neuroepithelial CNS tumors stratified by demographic-specific age-adjusted disease incidence and mortality. Additionally, we identify workforce characteristics associated with clinical trials meeting established accrual benchmarks.
METHODS: Registry study of published clinical trials for World Health Organization defined neuroepithelial CNS tumors between January 2000 and December 2019. Study participants were obtained from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Population-based data originated from the CBTRUS for incidence analyses. SEER-18 Incidence-Based Mortality data was used for mortality analysis. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact, and χ 2 tests were used for data analysis.
RESULTS: Among 662 published clinical trials representing 49 907 participants, 62.5% of participants were men and 37.5% women (P < .0001) representing a mortality specific over-accrual for men (P = .001). Whites, Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics represented 91.7%, 1.5%, 2.6%, and 1.7% of trial participants. Compared with mortality, Blacks (47% of expected mortality, P = .008), Hispanics (17% of expected mortality, P < .001) and Asians (33% of expected mortality, P < .001) were underrepresented compared with Whites (114% of expected mortality, P < .001). Clinical trials meeting accrual benchmarks for race included minority authorship.
CONCLUSIONS: Following the Revitalization Act, minorities and women remain underrepresented in therapeutic clinical trials for neuroepithelial tumors, relative to disease incidence and mortality. Study accrual has improved with time. This study provides a framework for clinical trial accrual efforts and offers guidance regarding workforce considerations associated with enrollment of underserved patients.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial accrual; clinical trials; disparities; glioma

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34999844      PMCID: PMC9340618          DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuro Oncol        ISSN: 1522-8517            Impact factor:   13.029


  13 in total

Review 1.  Why ethnic minority groups are under-represented in clinical trials: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mahvash Hussain-Gambles; Karl Atkin; Brenda Leese
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2004-09

Review 2.  Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jean G Ford; Mollie W Howerton; Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Shari Bolen; M Chris Gibbons; Jon Tilburt; Charles Baffi; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Renee F Wilson; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Barriers to accrual and enrollment in brain tumor trials.

Authors:  Eudocia Q Lee; Ugonma N Chukwueke; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; John F de Groot; Jose Pablo Leone; Terri S Armstrong; Susan M Chang; David Arons; Kathy Oliver; Kay Verble; Al Musella; Nicole Willmarth; Brian M Alexander; Amanda Bates; Lisa Doherty; Evanthia Galanis; Sarah Gaffey; Thomas Halkin; Bret E Friday; Maryam Fouladi; Nancy U Lin; David Macdonald; Minesh P Mehta; Marta Penas-Prado; Michael A Vogelbaum; Solmaz Sahebjam; David Sandak; Martin van den Bent; Michael Weller; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Inclusion of women and minorities in clinical trials and the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993--the perspective of NIH clinical trialists.

Authors:  L S Freedman; R Simon; M A Foulkes; L Friedman; N L Geller; D J Gordon; R Mowery
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1995-10

5.  Efficient interval estimation for age-adjusted cancer rates.

Authors:  Ram C Tiwari; Limin X Clegg; Zhaohui Zou
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Gender representation in trials.

Authors:  C L Meinert; A K Gilpin; A Unalp; C Dawson
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-10

7.  Clinical trial participation and outcome for patients with glioblastoma: multivariate analysis from a comprehensive dataset.

Authors:  Kathryn M Field; Katharine J Drummond; Merve Yilmaz; Mark Tacey; Daniel Compston; Peter Gibbs; Mark A Rosenthal
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 8.  Twenty years post-NIH Revitalization Act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Moon S Chen; Primo N Lara; Julie H T Dang; Debora A Paterniti; Karen Kelly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Racial/ethnic disparities in treatment pattern and time to treatment for adults with glioblastoma in the US.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Halle L Krebs; Nirav Patil; Gino Cioffi; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 10.  Applying a Conceptual Framework to Maximize the Participation of Diverse Populations in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  A Napoles; E Cook; T Ginossar; K D Knight; M E Ford
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.767

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting access to postoperative treatment after glioblastoma resection: an analysis of neighborhood-level disadvantage using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI).

Authors:  Krissia M Rivera Perla; Oliver Y Tang; Shayla N M Durfey; Tito Vivas-Buitrago; Wendy J Sherman; Ian Parney; Joon H Uhm; Alyx B Porter; Heinrich Elinzano; Steven A Toms; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Sexual dimorphism of the immune system predicts clinical outcomes in glioblastoma immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack M Shireman; Simon Ammanuel; Jens C Eickhoff; Mahua Dey
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Improving survival in neuro-oncology is a struggle; we cannot allow ourselves to also struggle with issues of diversity.

Authors:  Annick Desjardins
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 13.029

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.