| Literature DB >> 34997893 |
Liqiong Jiang1, Jianying Zhou2, Li Zhang3, Yufeng Du4, Mingming Jiang4, Liqian Xie5, Zhenni Ma5, Fengling Chen6.
Abstract
Inflammation is considered an important mechanism in the development of diabetes mellitus (DM) and persists for a long time before the occurrence of diabetic nephropathy (DN). Many studies have demonstrated that a decrease in the endothelial glycocalyx (EG) is negatively correlated with proteinuria. To elucidate whether EG damage induced by inflammasomes in DM patients leads to the occurrence of microalbuminuria (MA) and accelerates the progression of DN, this study screened 300 diagnosed DM patients. Finally, 70 type 2 diabetes patients were invited to participate in this study and were divided into two groups: the T2DM group (patients with normal MA and without diabetic retinopathy, n = 35) and the T2DN group (patients with increased MA and diabetic retinopathy, n = 35). Circulating heparin sulphate (HS, EG biomarkers) and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β, inflammasome biomarkers) of the patients were measured by ELISA. Laboratory data were measured using routine laboratory methods. Patients in the T2DN group had increased serum HS, increased IL-1β, increased CRP, decreased haemoglobin, and increased neutrophils compared to patients in the T2DM group (all P < 0.05). Increased HS and decreased haemoglobin were independently associated with T2DN patients. ROC curves showed that the AUC of HS for the prediction of T2DN was 0.67 (P < 0.05). The combination of HS and haemoglobin yielded a significant increasement in the AUC (0.75, P < 0.001) with optimal sensitivity (71.2%) and specificity (79%). Furthermore, serum IL-1β was positively correlated with HS and was an independent associated factor of HS in the T2DN group. The relationship between HS and IL-1β was not significant in the T2DM group. Our findings surgessed the inflammasome may be associated with and promote damage to the EG during the disease course of DN that manifests as increased MA.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic nephropathy; Endothelial glycocalyx; Inflammasome; Interleukin 1β; Microalbuminuria; heparin sulphate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34997893 PMCID: PMC8821487 DOI: 10.1007/s10719-021-10035-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glycoconj J ISSN: 0282-0080 Impact factor: 2.916
Fig. 1Flow chart of the prospective, observational cohort. UACR, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio
Characteristics of subjects and comparison of demographic and laboratory data of diabetic patients between the T2DN group and the T2DM group by univariate analyses
| Healthy controls (n = 16) | T2DM patients (n = 35) | T2DN patients (n = 35) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 61 ± 9 | 62 ± 12 | 65 ± 13 |
| Gender (female) | 52% | 57% | 42% |
| HS (ng/ml) | 1.54 ± 0.60 | 1.41 ± 0.92 | 2.17 ± 1.44 a,b |
| IL-1β (pg/ml) | 16.06 ± 6.70 | 21.35 ± 11.26 a | 27.85 ± 14.62 a,b |
| UARC (mg/g) | 4.2(0.08,8.7) | 8.1(5.1,11.1) a | 58.5(35.9,125.6) a,b |
| Albumin (g/L) | 45.40 ± 2.09 | 42.92 ± 3.16 | 41.52 ± 5.57 |
| FGB (mmol/L) | 5.32 ± 0.35 | 8.63 ± 3.36 | 8.48 ± 3.26 |
| Urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | 5.48 ± 1.49 | 5.33 ± 1.22 | 6.30 ± 2.52 a,b |
| Creatinine (umol/L) | 69.71 ± 14.12 | 58.69 ± 12.32 | 69.71 ± 34.32 |
| Uric acid (umol/L) | 360.71 ± 90.16 | 322.57 ± 85.92 | 324.93 ± 90.18 |
| Carbon dioxide (mmol/L) | 26.47 ± 1.14 | 26.25 ± 3.06 | 26.19 ± 2.92 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.35(0.92,2.54) | 1.43(1.10,2.08) | 1.30(0.93,1.95) |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.99(4.50,5.71) | 4.34(3.58,4.99) | 4.32(3.66,5.07) |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 1.27 ± 0.19 | 1.10 ± 0.28 | 1.09 ± 0.28 |
| LDL (mmol/L) | 3.20 ± 0.77 | 2.46 ± 1.01 | 2.66 ± 0.78 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.07(0.43,2.83) | 0.81(0.45,3.15) | 2.03(0.90,6.53) a,b |
| HbAlc (%) | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 9.2 ± 2.5 | 9.8 ± 2.9 |
| HGB (g/L) | 148 ± 7 | 141 ± 15 | 128 ± 19 a,b |
| Platelet (× 109/L) | 215 ± 38 | 204 ± 51 | 224 ± 70 |
| Leukocyte (× 109/L) | 6.1 ± 1.2 | 5.9 ± 1.3 | 6.4 ± 2.1 |
| Neutrophil (× 109/L) | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 3.4 ± 1.0 | 4.1 ± 1.9 a,b |
| N% | 57 ± 9 | 56 ± 9 | 63 ± 10 a,b |
HS heparin sulphate, UARC urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio, FGB fasting blood glucose, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, CRP c-reaction protein, HbAlc glycosylated haemoglobin, HGB haemoglobin, N% neutrophilic granulocyte percentage
a P < 0.05 vs. Healthy controls
b P < 0.05 vs. T2DM
Fig. 2Comparison of serum IL-1β among the T2DM group, the T2DN group and the controls
Fig. 3Comparison of serum HS among the T2DM group, the T2DN group and the controls
Logistic regression analyses for identifying factors independently associated with T2DN patients
| Variable | Exp (B value) | P value | EXP (B value) 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
| HS | 0.582 | 0.047* | 0.342 | 0.992 |
| CRP | 0.977 | 0.561 | 0.904 | 1.056 |
| HGB | 1.051 | 0.029* | 1.005 | 1.099 |
| IL-1β | 0.973 | 0.326 | 0.922 | 1.027 |
| FGB | 0.997 | 0.981 | 0.793 | 1.254 |
| N% | 0.942 | 0.096 | 0.878 | 1.011 |
HS heparin sulphate, FGB fasting blood glucose, CRP c-reaction protein, HGB haemoglobin, N% neutrophilic granulocyte percentage, CI confidence interval
* P < 0.05
Fig. 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for T2DN with each potential predictor. Blue line: HS concentration; orange line: HGB concentration; green line: HS concentration + HGB concentration. Abbreviations: HS, heparin sulphate; HGB, haemoglobin; AUC, area under the ROC curve
Bivariate correlation analyses for the correlation of serum HS and serum IL-1β with other variables in T2DM patients and T2DN patients
| T2DM | T2DN | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| heparan sulfate | IL-1β | heparan sulfate | IL-1β | ||||||||
| P value | P value | P value | P value | ||||||||
| Age | -0.14 | 0.43 | -0.31 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.53 | 0.27 | 0.12 | |||
| HS | / | / | 0.19 | 0.29 | / | / | 0.60 | 0.00* | |||
| IL-1β | 0.19 | 0.29 | / | / | 0.60 | 0.00* | / | / | |||
| eGFR | 0.00 | 0.99 | 0.11 | 0.52 | 0.11 | 0.52 | -0.15 | 0.40 | |||
| Albumin | 0.37 | 0.03* | 0.26 | 0.14 | -0.11 | 0.53 | -0.19 | 0.28 | |||
| FBG | 0.06 | 0.75 | 0.33 | 0.06 | 0.42 | 0.01* | 0.13 | 0.48 | |||
| Urea nitrogen | -0.05 | 0.80 | -0.20 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 0.81 | 0.29 | 0.09 | |||
| Creatinine | -0.07 | 0.69 | -0.05 | 0.80 | -0.05 | 0.79 | 0.15 | 0.39 | |||
| Uric acid | -0.08 | 0.64 | -0.03 | 0.87 | -0.17 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 0.89 | |||
| Carbon dioxide | -0.09 | 0.62 | 0.06 | 0.74 | 0.04 | 0.83 | -0.12 | 0.51 | |||
| Triglyceride | 0.22 | 0.21 | -0.06 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 1.00 | -0.09 | 0.61 | |||
| Total cholesterol | 0.17 | 0.34 | -0.02 | 0.91 | -0.01 | 0.94 | -0.19 | 0.28 | |||
| HDL | 0.09 | 0.60 | -0.03 | 0.88 | 0.02 | 0.94 | -0.16 | 0.38 | |||
| LDL | -0.26 | 0.13 | -0.02 | 0.93 | -0.11 | 0.54 | -0.15 | 0.41 | |||
| CRP | -0.03 | 0.85 | 0.16 | 0.38 | 0.05 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.99 | |||
| HbAlc | -0.06 | 0.75 | 0.23 | 0.18 | 0.43 | 0.02* | 0.31 | 0.09 | |||
| HGB | 0.08 | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.30 | -0.21 | 0.24 | -0.25 | 0.16 | |||
| Platelet | 0.04 | 0.83 | -0.05 | 0.78 | 0.09 | 0.61 | -0.35 | 0.05 | |||
| Leukocyte | -0.21 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.62 | -0.05 | 0.77 | -0.02 | 0.91 | |||
| Neutrophil | -0.19 | 0.28 | -0.01 | 0.95 | -0.06 | 0.74 | -0.05 | 0.77 | |||
| N% | -0.06 | 0.74 | -0.10 | 0.58 | -0.06 | 0.76 | -0.10 | 0.57 | |||
HS heparin sulphate, FGB fasting blood glucose HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, CRP c-reaction protein, HbAlc glycosylated haemoglobin, HGB haemoglobin, N% neutrophilic granulocyte percentage
*P < 0.05
Fig. 5Correlation of serum HS with IL-1β, FBG and HbA1c in T2DN patients. Serum HS was significantly positively correlated with serum IL-1β, FBG and HbA1c in T2DN patients
Multivariate linear regression analyses for the establishment of factors independently associated with HS in T2DN patients adjusted by HbA1c
| Variable | B value | P value | B value 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lower limit | upper limit | ||||
| IL-1β | 0.053 | 0.000* | 0.029 | 0.077 | |
| FGB | 0.168 | 0.008* | 0.047 | 0.289 | |
FGB fasting blood glucose, HbA1c glycosylated haemoglobin, CI confidence interval
*P < 0.05