Literature DB >> 34994831

Performance of the Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator in Individuals with Diabetes: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.

Arnav Agarwal1, William D Leslie2, Tuan V Nguyen3,4, Suzanne N Morin5, Lisa M Lix6, John A Eisman7,8,9.   

Abstract

Diabetes increases fracture and falls risks. We evaluated the performance of the Garvan fracture risk calculator (FRC) in individuals with versus without diabetes. Using the population-based Manitoba bone mineral density (BMD) registry, we identified individuals aged 50-95 years undergoing baseline BMD assessment from 1 September 2012, onwards with diabetes and self-reported falls in the prior 12 months. Five-year Garvan FRC predictions were generated from clinical risk factors, with and without femoral neck BMD. We identified non-traumatic osteoporotic fractures (OF) and hip fractures (HF) from population-based data to 31 March 2018. Fracture risk stratification was assessed from area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of diabetes on fractures, adjusted for Garvan FRC predictions. The study population consisted of 2618 women with and 14,064 without diabetes, and 636 and 2201 men with and without the same, respectively. The Garvan FRC provided significant OF and HF risk stratification in women with diabetes, similar to those without diabetes. Analyses of OF in men were limited by smaller numbers; no significant difference was evident by diabetes status. Cox regression showed that OF risk was 23% greater in women with diabetes adjusted for Garvan FRC including BMD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.49), suggesting it slightly underestimated risk; a non-significant increase in diabetes-related HF risk was noted (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.88-2.15). Garvan FRC shows similar fracture risk stratification in individuals with versus without diabetes, but may underestimate this risk.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; Fracture; Garvan; Osteoporosis; Risk stratification

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34994831     DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00941-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  23 in total

Review 1.  Type 2 diabetes and bone.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Mishaela R Rubin; Ann V Schwartz; John A Kanis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P Vestergaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Lora M Giangregorio; William D Leslie; Lisa M Lix; Helena Johansson; Anders Oden; Eugene McCloskey; John A Kanis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women.

Authors:  N D Nguyen; S A Frost; J R Center; J A Eisman; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Authors:  C Beaudoin; L Moore; M Gagné; L Bessette; L G Ste-Marie; J P Brown; S Jean
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Systematic review of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of fracture.

Authors:  Mohsen Janghorbani; Rob M Van Dam; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 8.  Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review.

Authors:  Katrine Hass Rubin; Teresa Friis-Holmberg; Anne Pernille Hermann; Bo Abrahamsen; Kim Brixen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Assessment of fracture risk by the FRAX algorithm in men and women with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Carnevale; Susanna Morano; Andrea Fontana; Maria Antonietta Annese; Mara Fallarino; Tiziana Filardi; Massimiliano Copetti; Fabio Pellegrini; Elisabetta Romagnoli; Cristina Eller-Vainicher; Volha V Zhukouskaya; Iacopo Chiodini; Graziella D'Amico
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.876

10.  Development of prognostic nomograms for individualizing 5-year and 10-year fracture risks.

Authors:  N D Nguyen; S A Frost; J R Center; J A Eisman; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.