Literature DB >> 17370100

Development of a nomogram for individualizing hip fracture risk in men and women.

N D Nguyen1, S A Frost, J R Center, J A Eisman, T V Nguyen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Until now there has been no published prognostic tool available for predicting of hip fracture to primary care settings. We have developed a nomogram for predicting the absolute risk of hip fracture for any individual by using clinical factors, including age, prior fracture and fall, in addition to BMD that was based on a 15-year follow-up cohort study.
INTRODUCTION: Bone mineral density or clinical risk factors alone are useful but limited tools for the identification of individuals with high-risk of hip fracture. It is hypothesized that the combination of clinical risk factors and BMD can improve the accuracy of fracture prediction. This study was aimed at developing a nomogram which combines these factors for predicting 5-year and 10-year risk of hip fracture for an individual.
METHODS: The study, designed as a epidemiologic, community-based prospective study, included 1,208 women and 740 men aged 60+ years with median duration of follow-up of 13 years (inter-quartile range, IQR: 6-14) for both women and men, yielding 10,523 and 7,586 person-years of observation, respectively. Main outcome measures were incidence of hip fractures and risk factors were femoral neck bone mineral density (FNBMD), prior fracture, history of fall, postural sway and quadriceps strength. Femoral neck BMD was measured by DXA (GE-LUNAR Corp, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). Cox's proportional hazards model was used to estimate the risk of fracture for individuals, and a nomogram was constructed for predicting hip fracture risk.
RESULTS: Between 1989 and 2004, 127 individuals (96 women) sustained a hip fracture. Advancing age, low femoral neck BMD, prior fracture and history of falls were independent predictors of hip fracture. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.85 for both sexes. A nomogram was constructed for predicting hip fracture risk for an individual. Among those aged 75 or older with BMD T-scores < or = -2.5, the risk of hip fracture in men was comparable to or higher than in women; however, in younger age groups, the risk was higher in women than in men.
CONCLUSION: The combination of BMD and non-invasive clinical risk factors in a nomogram could be useful for identifying high-risk individuals for intervention to reduce the risk of hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17370100     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0362-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  31 in total

1.  Postural stability and associated physiological factors in a population of aged persons.

Authors:  S R Lord; R D Clark; I W Webster
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-05

Review 2.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Postoperative nomogram for 12-year sarcoma-specific death.

Authors:  Michael W Kattan; Denis H Y Leung; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: their ROCs and implied models.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Form of empirical ROCs in discrimination and diagnostic tasks: implications for theory and measurement of performance.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 6.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Femoral neck bone loss predicts fracture risk independent of baseline BMD.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Identification of high-risk individuals for hip fracture: a 14-year prospective study.

Authors:  Nguyen D Nguyen; Chatlert Pongchaiyakul; Jacqueline R Center; John A Eisman; Tuan V Nguyen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Symptomatic fracture incidence in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study (DOES).

Authors:  G Jones; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; C Gilbert; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  74 in total

Review 1.  Relevance of vitamin D in muscle health.

Authors:  Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Secondary fracture prevention.

Authors:  Robert A Adler
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Comments on Sandhu et al.: prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX(TM) algorithm and Garvan nomogram.

Authors:  W Pluskiewicz; B Drozdzowska
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Fracture Risk Assessment in Long-term Care (FRAiL): Development and Validation of a Prediction Model.

Authors:  Sarah D Berry; Andrew R Zullo; Yoojin Lee; Vincent Mor; Kevin W McConeghy; Geetanjoli Banerjee; Ralph B D'Agostino; Lori Daiello; David Dosa; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  FRAX: a coming of age.

Authors:  W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Genetics and the individualized prediction of fracture.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 7.  Genetic profiling and individualized assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 43.330

8.  Fracture prediction from self-reported falls in routine clinical practice: a registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S N Morin; L M Lix; P Martineau; M Bryanton; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; N C Harvey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Bone mineral density at the hip in Norwegian women and men--prevalence of osteoporosis depends on chosen references: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  Nina Emaus; Tone K Omsland; Luai Awad Ahmed; Guri Grimnes; Monica Sneve; Gro K Berntsen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond.

Authors:  Joop P W van den Bergh; Tineke A C M van Geel; Willem F Lems; Piet P Geusens
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.