PURPOSE: Little is known about how patients' socioeconomic status (SES) influences physicians' clinical management decisions, although this information may have important implications for understanding inequities in health care quality. We investigated physician perspectives on how patients' SES influences care. METHODS: The study consisted of in-depth semistructured interviews with primary care physicians in Connecticut. Investigators coded interviews line by line and refined the coding structure and interview guide based on successive interviews. Recurrent themes emerged through iterative analysis of codes and tagged quotations. RESULTS: We interviewed 18 physicians from varied practice settings, 6 female, 9 from minority racial backgrounds, and 3 of Hispanic ethnicity. Four themes emerged from our interviews: (1) physicians held conflicting views about the effect of patient SES on clinical management, (2) physicians believed that changes in clinical management based on the patient's SES were made in the patient's interest, (3) physicians varied in the degree to which they thought changes in clinical management influenced patient outcomes, and (4) physicians faced personal and financial strains when caring for patients of low SES. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians indicated that patient SES did affect their clinical management decisions. As a result, physicians commonly undertook changes to their management plan in an effort to enhance patient outcomes, but they experienced numerous strains when trying to balance what they believed was feasible for the patient with what they perceived as established standards of care.
PURPOSE: Little is known about how patients' socioeconomic status (SES) influences physicians' clinical management decisions, although this information may have important implications for understanding inequities in health care quality. We investigated physician perspectives on how patients' SES influences care. METHODS: The study consisted of in-depth semistructured interviews with primary care physicians in Connecticut. Investigators coded interviews line by line and refined the coding structure and interview guide based on successive interviews. Recurrent themes emerged through iterative analysis of codes and tagged quotations. RESULTS: We interviewed 18 physicians from varied practice settings, 6 female, 9 from minority racial backgrounds, and 3 of Hispanic ethnicity. Four themes emerged from our interviews: (1) physicians held conflicting views about the effect of patient SES on clinical management, (2) physicians believed that changes in clinical management based on the patient's SES were made in the patient's interest, (3) physicians varied in the degree to which they thought changes in clinical management influenced patient outcomes, and (4) physicians faced personal and financial strains when caring for patients of low SES. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians indicated that patient SES did affect their clinical management decisions. As a result, physicians commonly undertook changes to their management plan in an effort to enhance patient outcomes, but they experienced numerous strains when trying to balance what they believed was feasible for the patient with what they perceived as established standards of care.
Authors: John Spertus; Carole Decker; Catherine Woodman; John House; Phil Jones; James O'Keefe; A Michael Borkon Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-05-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Steven M Asch; Eve A Kerr; Joan Keesey; John L Adams; Claude M Setodji; Shaista Malik; Elizabeth A McGlynn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John Arko-Mensah; Joseph Darko; Ezekiel Nii Noye Nortey; Juergen May; Christian G Meyer; Julius N Fobil Journal: Environ Manage Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 3.266
Authors: Justin W Timbie; Ashley M Kranz; Maria DeYoreo; Blen Eshete-Roesler; Marc N Elliott; José J Escarce; Mark E Totten; Cheryl L Damberg Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Jonathan L Hills-Dunlap; Patrice Melvin; Dionne A Graham; Mark A Kashtan; Seema P Anandalwar; Shawn J Rangel Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 16.193