Literature DB >> 34993555

The impact of body mass index on the accuracy of the physical examination of the knee.

Ron Gilat1, Ilan Y Mitchnik2, Assaf Moriah2, Almog Levi2, Ornit Cohen2, Dror Lindner2, Yiftah Beer2, Gabriel Agar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Obesity is a worldwide pandemic; however, no adaptations were made to the physical examination of obese patient's knees. The accuracy of the physical examination is critical for correct assessment and selection of treatment. We aimed to assess whether body mass index (BMI) affects the sensitivity and specificity of common provocative knee tests.
METHODS: We studied 210 patients who underwent knee arthroscopy to treat anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and meniscal pathologies. BMI and the knee's physical examination were documented pre-operatively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of ACL and meniscal provocative tests in relation to BMI were evaluated using arthroscopy as a gold standard.
RESULTS: The Anterior Drawer, Lachman, and Pivot-Shift tests for ACL tears were significantly less accurate and sensitive, yet more specific, in obese patients when compared to normal and overweight patients. The McMurray, Apley Grind, and Thessaly tests for medial meniscus tears showed greater sensitivity, but lower specificity, in patients with increased BMI. Above normal BMIs, independently of age and gender, were significantly associated with higher odds for positive ACL tests.
CONCLUSION: Tests for ACL tears are less sensitive in obese patients and alternatives to the classic tests should be considered. Medial meniscus tests tend to be more sensitive and less specific in patients with greater BMIs. Their results should be carefully interpreted due to possible false positives. The physician should take into consideration the impact of patient BMI on the accuracy of their physical examination of the knee to optimize treatment decision-making.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL tear; BMI; Knee; Meniscal tear; Obesity; Overweight; Physical examination

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34993555     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05277-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  6 in total

Review 1.  Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests.

Authors:  Gerard A Malanga; Steven Andrus; Scott F Nadler; James McLean
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Reexamining the physical examination for obese patients.

Authors:  Ann Willman Silk; Kathleen M McTigue
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Sex and body mass index correlate with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and quality of life scores in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Avi Elbaz; Eytan M Debbi; Ganit Segal; Amir Haim; Nahum Halperin; Gabriel Agar; Amit Mor; Ronen Debi
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  A Comparison of Stress Tests Used to Evaluate the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  D O Draper
Journal:  Phys Sportsmed       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Examiner proficiency in performing the anterior drawer and Lachman tests.

Authors:  D O Draper; S S Schulthies
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Idiopathic Genu Valgum and Its Association With Obesity in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Janet L Walker; Pooya Hosseinzadeh; Hank White; Kevin Murr; Todd A Milbrandt; Vishwas J Talwalkar; Henry Iwinski; Ryan Muchow
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.324

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.