Literature DB >> 34993100

Predictive value of thrombus susceptibility for cardioembolic stroke by quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Jie Chen1, Zhe Zhang2, Ximing Nie1, Yuyuan Xu2, Chunlei Liu3, Xingquan Zhao1, Yongjun Wang1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hypointense blooming signal of thrombi on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), known as the susceptibility vessel sign (SVS), is predictive of cardioembolic stroke. The SVS originates from the local magnetic susceptibility effect; thus, the susceptibility value of thrombi may provide useful information in discriminating stroke etiology. We aim to utilize quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to assess thrombus's susceptibility value in acute ischemic stroke patients and explore the relationship of thrombus susceptibility with cardioembolic stroke.
METHODS: From 2018 to 2020, 132 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with middle cerebral artery occlusion were recruited within 48 hours of onset. All patients underwent a three-dimensional multi-echo SWI scan using a 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanner. The SVS presence and the diameter of the SVS-related hypointense signal were assessed on SWI. QSM was applied to compute the susceptibility value of the thrombus. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology was used to define the optimal cutoff value of the susceptibility in QSM and the diameter on SWI for predicting cardioembolic stroke.
RESULTS: The SVS was identified in 93 (70.5%) patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery occlusion and was significantly associated with cardioembolism. The hyperintense signal on QSM in the corresponding middle cerebral artery occlusion was present in 116 (87.9%) patients. ROC analysis indicated that thrombus susceptibility had a greater area under the curve than that of the SVS diameter (0.88 vs. 0.70, P<0.001) and that the optimal cutoff value of thrombus susceptibility for cardioembolism was 0.35 ppm. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that thrombus susceptibility (≥0.35 ppm) was an independent predictor of cardioembolic stroke (odds ratio =20.75; 95% CI, 7.19-59.87; P<0.001), with sensitivity, specificity, a positive predictive value, and a negative predictive value of 85.2%, 80.8%, 75.4%, and 88.7%, respectively, while the SVS presence showed sensitivity, specificity, a positive predictive value, and a negative predictive value of 90.7%, 43.6%, 87.2%, and 52.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Thrombus susceptibility provides superior diagnostic performance over the SVS for discriminating between cardioembolism and other stroke subtypes. Quantitative susceptibility measurements of thrombi may help predict cardioembolic stroke in patients with acute middle cerebral artery occlusion. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Susceptibility vessel sign (SVS); acute ischemic stroke; cardioembolic stroke; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)

Year:  2022        PMID: 34993100      PMCID: PMC8666785          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  29 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  The different clinical value of susceptibility vessel sign in acute ischemic stroke patients under different interventional therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingsu Liu; Lin Li; Guangqin Li
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 3.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions.

Authors:  E Mark Haacke; Saifeng Liu; Sagar Buch; Weili Zheng; Dongmei Wu; Yongquan Ye
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Susceptibility-weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping in the brain.

Authors:  Chunlei Liu; Wei Li; Karen A Tong; Kristen W Yeom; Samuel Kuzminski
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Two-Layered Susceptibility Vessel Sign and High Overestimation Ratio on MRI Are Predictive of Cardioembolic Stroke.

Authors:  R Bourcier; I Derraz; S Bracard; C Oppenheim; O Naggara
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Red blood cells in thrombosis.

Authors:  James R Byrnes; Alisa S Wolberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Authors:  Wei Li; Nian Wang; Fang Yu; Hui Han; Wei Cao; Rebecca Romero; Bundhit Tantiwongkosi; Timothy Q Duong; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) as a means to monitor cerebral hematoma treatment.

Authors:  Yuyao Zhang; Hongjiang Wei; Yawen Sun; Matthew J Cronin; Naying He; Jianrong Xu; Yan Zhou; Chunlei Liu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Fast robust automated brain extraction.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Tian Liu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  1 in total

1.  Absence of Susceptibility Vessel Sign in Patients With Malignancy-Related Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated With Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Authors:  Morin Beyeler; Nebiyat F Belachew; Moritz Kielkopf; Enrique B Aleman; Alejandro Xavier León Betancourt; Kotryna Genceviciute; Christoph Kurmann; Lorenz Grunder; Barbara Birner; Thomas R Meinel; Adrian Scutelnic; Philipp Bücke; David J Seiffge; Tomas Dobrocky; Eike I Piechowiak; Sara Pilgram-Pastor; Heinrich P Mattle; Pasquale Mordasini; Marcel Arnold; Urs Fischer; Thomas Pabst; Jan Gralla; Martin D Berger; Simon Jung; Johannes Kaesmacher
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.