Jiajun Li1,2, Lin Guo1, Jingzhe Liu2, Wei Fang1, Xiaoxin Sun1, Zuoxiang He1. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fuwai Hospital, National Centre for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Establishing appropriate reference value limits of left ventricular (LV) functional parameters is fundamental for the assessment of cardiac function. At present, there are no reports aimed at establishing reference limits using gated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in mainland China. METHODS: A total of 175 consecutive patients who were defined as low-risk coronary artery disease patients underwent stress Technetium-99m sestamibi (99mTc-MIBI)-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. The LV ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) were obtained by 3 quantitative algorithms: quantitative-gated SPECT, emory cardiac toolbox, and 4-dimensional model SPECT, respectively. The threshold values were obtained using Gaussian distribution or percentiles. The influence of gender, age, and weight on cardiac functional parameters was analyzed by multiple regressions for linear models. RESULTS: For males, the lower reference limits of EF were 52%, 63%, and 58%, respectively; and the upper limits of EDV/ESV were 106/45, 152/55, and 135/55 mL, respectively. For females, the lower reference limits of EF were 58%, 66%, and 65%, respectively; and the upper limits of EDV/ESV were 73/27, 105/31, and 88/29 mL, respectively. Compared to females, males had greater cardiac volume values and lower mean EF values. Bland-Altman plots revealed that the cardiac function parameters calculated by the three quantitative algorithms were in high agreement. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the reference limits of cardiac parameters calculated by the 3 methods based on single-center data in China were preliminarily established. The threshold values determined by three quantitative algorithms were not interchangeable but were highly correlated. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Establishing appropriate reference value limits of left ventricular (LV) functional parameters is fundamental for the assessment of cardiac function. At present, there are no reports aimed at establishing reference limits using gated myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in mainland China. METHODS: A total of 175 consecutive patients who were defined as low-risk coronary artery disease patients underwent stress Technetium-99m sestamibi (99mTc-MIBI)-gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging. The LV ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) were obtained by 3 quantitative algorithms: quantitative-gated SPECT, emory cardiac toolbox, and 4-dimensional model SPECT, respectively. The threshold values were obtained using Gaussian distribution or percentiles. The influence of gender, age, and weight on cardiac functional parameters was analyzed by multiple regressions for linear models. RESULTS: For males, the lower reference limits of EF were 52%, 63%, and 58%, respectively; and the upper limits of EDV/ESV were 106/45, 152/55, and 135/55 mL, respectively. For females, the lower reference limits of EF were 58%, 66%, and 65%, respectively; and the upper limits of EDV/ESV were 73/27, 105/31, and 88/29 mL, respectively. Compared to females, males had greater cardiac volume values and lower mean EF values. Bland-Altman plots revealed that the cardiac function parameters calculated by the three quantitative algorithms were in high agreement. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the reference limits of cardiac parameters calculated by the 3 methods based on single-center data in China were preliminarily established. The threshold values determined by three quantitative algorithms were not interchangeable but were highly correlated. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Raymond J Gibbons; Gary J Balady; J Timothy Bricker; Bernard R Chaitman; Gerald F Fletcher; Victor F Froelicher; Daniel B Mark; Ben D McCallister; Aryan N Mooss; Michael G O'Reilly; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-10-16 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alpesh Mehta; Mark I Travin; Jeffrey M Levsky; Vineet R Jain; William B Burton; Linda B Haramati Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Daniela Knollmann; Oliver H Winz; Philipp T Meyer; Mardjan Raptis; Thomas Krohn; Karl-Christian Koch; Wolfgang M Schaefer Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 10.057