Literature DB >> 20238192

Quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT studies in Chinese population with Western normal databases.

Dianfu Li1, Dong Li, Jianlin Feng, Donglan Yuan, Kejiang Cao, Ji Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess diagnostic performance of the current quantification packages using Western normal databases in detecting coronary artery disease in Chinese population.
METHODS: Seventy-five patients who underwent rest/stress myocardial perfusion SPECT and coronary angiography (CAG) were enrolled. Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb) and Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (QPS) with its standard (QPS-standard) and simplified (QPS-simplified) methods were used to quantify these studies. A preliminary Chinese normal database was created from 80 normal subjects (QPS-simplified-Chinese). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) was used to assess the accuracy of the four normal databases in detecting >or=50% or >or=70% stenosis given by CAG.
RESULTS: The enrolled cohorts had lower body mass index (BMI) and smaller heart size than Western population. The areas under ROC curve of ECTb, QPS-standard, and QPS-simplified were significantly lower than QPS-simplified-Chinese in detecting >or=50% stenosis, but not in detecting >or=70% stenosis. Diagnostic accuracy was much lower in the RCA and LCX territory.
CONCLUSION: Chinese normal database is needed for accurately applying these quantification methods to Chinese population, especially for detecting moderate defects in regions with relatively greater attenuation impact. An alternative approach could be modification of the existing Western normal databases for low-BMI and/or small-heart subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20238192      PMCID: PMC2992841          DOI: 10.1007/s12350-010-9217-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  15 in total

1.  Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts.

Authors:  E G DePuey; E V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Quantitation in gated perfusion SPECT imaging: the Cedars-Sinai approach.

Authors:  Guido Germano; Paul B Kavanagh; Piotr J Slomka; Serge D Van Kriekinge; Geoff Pollard; Daniel S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Normal SPECT thallium-201 bull's-eye display: gender differences.

Authors:  R L Eisner; M J Tamas; K Cloninger; D Shonkoff; J A Oates; A M Gober; D W Dunn; J A Malko; A L Churchwell; R E Patterson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Lower diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in women: an effect of smaller chamber size.

Authors:  C L Hansen; D Crabbe; S Rubin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Quantitative same-day rest-stress technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT: definition and validation of stress normal limits and criteria for abnormality.

Authors:  K F Van Train; J Areeda; E V Garcia; C D Cooke; J Maddahi; H Kiat; G Germano; G Silagan; R Folks; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. II: validation and diagnostic yield.

Authors:  T Sharir; G Germano; P B Waechter; P B Kavanagh; J S Areeda; J Gerlach; X Kang; H C Lewin; D S Berman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Quantitative myocardial-perfusion SPECT: comparison of three state-of-the-art software packages.

Authors:  Arik Wolak; Piotr J Slomka; Mathews B Fish; Santiago Lorenzo; Wanda Acampa; Daniel S Berman; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging.

Authors:  S Iskander; A E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  5 in total

1.  Factors affecting appearance of a normal myocardial perfusion scan.

Authors:  Piotr Slomka; Guido Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Normal Databases for the Relative Quantification of Myocardial Perfusion.

Authors:  Mathieu Rubeaux; Yuan Xu; Guido Germano; Daniel S Berman; Piotr J Slomka
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2016-06-30

3.  Sex-specific reference limits of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes estimated by gated myocardial perfusion imaging for low-risk patients in China: a comparison between three quantitative algorithms.

Authors:  Jiajun Li; Lin Guo; Jingzhe Liu; Wei Fang; Xiaoxin Sun; Zuoxiang He
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

4.  Small average differences in attenuation corrected images between men and women in myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: a novel normal stress database.

Authors:  Elin Trägårdh; Karl Sjöstrand; David Jakobsson; Lars Edenbrandt
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Diagnostic Performance of PET Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Smaller Left Ventricles: A Substudy of the 18F-Flurpiridaz Phase III Clinical Trial.

Authors:  René R Sevag Packard; Joel L Lazewatsky; Cesare Orlandi; Jamshid Maddahi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 10.057

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.