Literature DB >> 34992787

Perspective of drug design with high-performance computing.

Zhe Li1, Hui Li2, Kunqian Yu2, Hai-Bin Luo1.   

Abstract

The representative applications, recent advances and possible future directions of computational drug design were summarized, aiming to accelerate the drug discovery with the assistance of the fast-developing high-performance computing.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34992787      PMCID: PMC8692934          DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Sci Rev        ISSN: 2053-714X            Impact factor:   17.275


In recent decades, the development of high-performance computing (HPC) continues to follow Moore's law, with many computational methods in drug design experiencing a renaissance. Binding prediction, virtual screening, molecular dynamics simulations and protein folding are crucial applications of computational drug design to accelerate drug discovery (Fig. 1). Reliable prediction of the receptor/ligand binding affinities that determine the pharmacological effects of drugs is the most important application of HPC in drug discovery, and is the main focus of this Perspective.
Figure 1.

Representative applications of HPC in drug design.

Representative applications of HPC in drug design. Accurate prediction of receptor/ligand binding affinity remains challenging because of the complexity of the system. There are several methods for predicting the binding affinity, from very fast and approximate empirical scoring functions, to more complicated methods with moderate accuracy such as linear interaction energy and molecular mechanics Poisson—Boltzmann/surface area, to rigorous and accurate but very computationally expensive methods such as free energy perturbation (FEP). Limitations in computational resources set back the theoretical development of the accurate but expensive methods, and also make it difficult to balance accuracy and efficiency for the selection of methods in drug design. Ultra-high-throughput virtual screening is one of the key demands of drug discovery by HPC. The number of pharmacologically active molecules is extremely large, estimated to be in the order of 1060 [1]. The number of purchasable compounds in ZINC database has already reached 230 million, while that of ‘make-on-demand synthesis’ compounds can be 10 billion. For the scoring functions usually implemented in docking methods, ultra-high-throughput virtual screening is now possible by HPC. Although the accuracy of the docking-based virtual screening can be limited, the results are still promising because of the large number of compounds. In 2019, virtual screening of 138 million compounds was performed against D4 receptor, and 30 hits showed sub-micromolar activity including a 180 pM subtype-selective agonist [2]. Recently, an open-source virtual screening platform VirtualFlow was successfully conducted to screen 1.4 billion compounds and identified a potent KEAP1 inhibitor with nanomolar affinity [3]. Accurate binding affinity prediction is another important issue in drug discovery. Docking-based virtual screening showed advantages in hit discovery; however, in further hit-to-lead optimizations where many new compounds could be synthesized, more accurate binding affinity prediction methods are urgently needed to accelerate the process and reduce the cost of synthesis and bioassay validation. For such prediction, extensive MD simulations are needed, because the properties in the macroscopic world, for example free energy, are related to the time average of the corresponding properties in the microscopic system. Although theoretically rigorous, the samples that are important to the accuracy of free energy calculations correspond to the rare events, the lack of sampling of which can be a major source of error. Different enhanced sampling methods have been proposed to overcome the rare events problem, including non-Boltzmann sampling, exchanging configurations, modeling probability distributions, etc. To increase the simulation time, special-purpose supercomputers, such as ANTON2, have been built to perform MD simulations at high speed with considerable stability. Of note, FEP, a representative free energy calculation method, has been successfully used in both absolute and relative binding free energy (ABFE and RBFE) calculations [4-6]. The FEP RBFE method FEP+  was tested by more than 200 ligands with ∼92.4% calculations showing absolute errors within 2 kcal/mol, which was proven to be effective in reducing the false positive rate by further experiments [4]. Relative to FEP RBFE methods, FEP ABFE have a much wider range of applications [5,6] such as scaffold hopping, ligand selectivity study, etc. Recently, a highly potent PDE10 inhibitor with subnanomolar affinity was discovered by FEP ABFE-based hit-to-lead optimizations [5]. However, these accurate binding prediction methods have not been widely applied in real drug discovery works because of high computational costs. With the continuous development of enhanced sampling methods and computational ability, these methods will have more impact on drug discovery in the near future. Computational drug discovery by HPC has showed greater potential than at any time before in the development of promising agents against COVID-19. Since the outbreak of COVID-19, billion-level ultra-high-throughput virtual screenings were performed to find potential therapeutic agents. The work from LeGrand et al. using AutoDock-GPU in the summit supercomputer was shortlisted for the 2020 Gordon Bell Prize. Recently, we also finished a billion-level virtual screening by AutoDock-GPU against RdRp of SARS-CoV-2 in less than 24 hours on a domestic supercomputer. In another work, FEP was used to evaluate the docking-based virtual screening results towards the FDA-approved drug database [6] to give a more accurate ranking in binding affinity.  As a result, 16 hits were identified from 25 selected drugs after bioassay. Among them, dipyridamole showed promising outcomes in the subsequent clinical trials [7]. Additionally, the roles of glycans in modulating the conformational dynamics of the SARS-COV-2 spike protein were also revealed by extensive MD simulations, which provided insight for further drug and vaccine design [8]. Millions or even billions of binding affinity predictions via accurate methods could be one of the ultimate goals for computational drug discovery. However, this would require 103 to 106 times the computational resources of the fastest supercomputer in the world. Currently, combining calculation methods with different speed and accuracy, for example docking-based high-throughput prescreening and FEP-based binding affinity prediction, is an applicable strategy (Fig. 2). Deep learning technologies can also accelerate calculations in drug discovery such as by sampling the Boltzmann distribution, and thus overcome the rare events problems [9]. The convolutional neural networks can be trained to predict the binding affinity from 3D structures [10]. In the foreseeable future, with the development of HPC and technologies such as enhanced sampling and deep learning, more innovative algorithms can be developed, which will further speed up the drug design and discovery.
Figure 2.

An applicable strategy for hit discovery. Docking-based high-throughput virtual screening can be used first to reduce the number of the molecule database, which can be evaluated by more accurate binding affinity calculations to optimize the docking results.

An applicable strategy for hit discovery. Docking-based high-throughput virtual screening can be used first to reduce the number of the molecule database, which can be evaluated by more accurate binding affinity calculations to optimize the docking results.
  10 in total

1.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Yujie Wu; Yuqing Deng; Byungchan Kim; Levi Pierce; Goran Krilov; Dmitry Lupyan; Shaughnessy Robinson; Markus K Dahlgren; Jeremy Greenwood; Donna L Romero; Craig Masse; Jennifer L Knight; Thomas Steinbrecher; Thijs Beuming; Wolfgang Damm; Ed Harder; Woody Sherman; Mark Brewer; Ron Wester; Mark Murcko; Leah Frye; Ramy Farid; Teng Lin; David L Mobley; William L Jorgensen; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Robert Abel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculation and Design of a Subnanomolar Inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase-10.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Yiyou Huang; Yinuo Wu; Jingyi Chen; Deyan Wu; Chang-Guo Zhan; Hai-Bin Luo
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  KDEEP: Protein-Ligand Absolute Binding Affinity Prediction via 3D-Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  José Jiménez; Miha Škalič; Gerard Martínez-Rosell; Gianni De Fabritiis
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  The drug-maker's guide to the galaxy.

Authors:  Asher Mullard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Boltzmann generators: Sampling equilibrium states of many-body systems with deep learning.

Authors:  Frank Noé; Simon Olsson; Jonas Köhler; Hao Wu
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Ultra-large library docking for discovering new chemotypes.

Authors:  Jiankun Lyu; Sheng Wang; Trent E Balius; Isha Singh; Anat Levit; Yurii S Moroz; Matthew J O'Meara; Tao Che; Enkhjargal Algaa; Kateryna Tolmachova; Andrey A Tolmachev; Brian K Shoichet; Bryan L Roth; John J Irwin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Potential therapeutic effects of dipyridamole in the severely ill patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Liu; Zhe Li; Shuai Liu; Jing Sun; Zhanghua Chen; Min Jiang; Qingling Zhang; Yinghua Wei; Xin Wang; Yi-You Huang; Yinyi Shi; Yanhui Xu; Huifang Xian; Fan Bai; Changxing Ou; Bei Xiong; Andrew M Lew; Jun Cui; Rongli Fang; Hui Huang; Jincun Zhao; Xuechuan Hong; Yuxia Zhang; Fuling Zhou; Hai-Bin Luo
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 11.413

8.  Identify potent SARS-CoV-2 main protease inhibitors via accelerated free energy perturbation-based virtual screening of existing drugs.

Authors:  Zhe Li; Xin Li; Yi-You Huang; Yaoxing Wu; Runduo Liu; Lingli Zhou; Yuxi Lin; Deyan Wu; Lei Zhang; Hao Liu; Ximing Xu; Kunqian Yu; Yuxia Zhang; Jun Cui; Chang-Guo Zhan; Xin Wang; Hai-Bin Luo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Beyond Shielding: The Roles of Glycans in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein.

Authors:  Lorenzo Casalino; Zied Gaieb; Jory A Goldsmith; Christy K Hjorth; Abigail C Dommer; Aoife M Harbison; Carl A Fogarty; Emilia P Barros; Bryn C Taylor; Jason S McLellan; Elisa Fadda; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 14.553

10.  An open-source drug discovery platform enables ultra-large virtual screens.

Authors:  Andras Boeszoermenyi; Zi-Fu Wang; Christoph Gorgulla; Patrick D Fischer; Paul W Coote; Krishna M Padmanabha Das; Yehor S Malets; Dmytro S Radchenko; Yurii S Moroz; David A Scott; Konstantin Fackeldey; Moritz Hoffmann; Iryna Iavniuk; Gerhard Wagner; Haribabu Arthanari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.