| Literature DB >> 34992587 |
Debbie Lee1, Gennaro Calendo1, Kristin Kopec1, Rebekah Henry2, Scott Coutts3, David McCarthy2, Heather M Murphy1,4.
Abstract
As many cities around the world face the prospect of replacing aging drinking water distribution systems (DWDS), water utilities must make careful decisions on new pipe material (e.g., cement-lined or PVC) for these systems. These decisions are informed by cost, physical integrity, and impact on microbiological and physicochemical water quality. Indeed, pipe material can impact the development of biofilm in DWDS that can harbor pathogens and impact drinking water quality. Annular reactors (ARs) with cast iron and cement coupons fed with chloraminated water from a municipal DWDS were used to investigate the impact of pipe material on biofilm development and composition over 16 months. The ARs were plumbed as closely as possible to the water main in the basement of an academic building to simulate distribution system conditions. Biofilm communities on coupons were characterized using 16S rRNA sequencing. In the cast iron reactors, β-proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and α-proteobacteria were similarly relatively abundant (24.1, 22.5, and 22.4%, respectively) while in the cement reactors, α-proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were more relatively abundant (36.3 and 35.2%, respectively) compared to β-proteobacteria (12.8%). Mean alpha diversity (estimated with Shannon H and Faith's Phylogenetic Difference indices) was greater in cast iron reactors (Shannon: 5.00 ± 0.41; Faith's PD: 15.40 ± 2.88) than in cement reactors (Shannon: 4.16 ± 0.78; Faith's PD: 13.00 ± 2.01). PCoA of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities indicated that communities in cast iron ARs, cement ARs, bulk distribution system water, and distribution system pipe biofilm were distinct. The mean relative abundance of Mycobacterium spp. was greater in the cement reactors (34.8 ± 18.6%) than in the cast iron reactors (21.7 ± 11.9%). In contrast, the mean relative abundance of Legionella spp. trended higher in biofilm from cast iron reactors (0.5 ± 0.7%) than biofilm in cement reactors (0.01 ± 0.01%). These results suggest that pipe material is associated with differences in the diversity, bacterial composition, and opportunistic pathogen prevalence in biofilm of DWDS.Entities:
Keywords: annular reactor; biofilm; drinking water; microbiome; pipe material
Year: 2021 PMID: 34992587 PMCID: PMC8724538 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.779016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Total chlorine, turbidity, temperature, conductivity (5-min data provided by the local water utility) and pH and temperature (analyzed weekly on-site) of the AR influent water from June 2017 to October 2018.
Summary of microbiological and physicochemical water quality in annular reactor (AR) influent (5-min data provided by local water utility over the study period) and effluent (analyzed weekly over the study period).
| AR Influent Mean ± Standard Deviation | Cast Iron AR Effluent Mean ± Standard Deviation | Cement AR Effluent Mean ± Standard Deviation | |
| HPC | 1.54 ± 6.29 × 107CFU/100 mL | 1.05 ± 1.16 × 108CFU/cm2 | 2.60 ± 7.47 × 107CFU/cm2 |
| Total chlorine | 1.94 ± 0.48 mg/L | 0.16 ± 1.35 mg/L | 0.40 ± 0.40 mg/L |
| Conductivity | 331.77 ± 51.33 μS/cm | 324.78 ± 40.82 μS/cm | 325.98 ± 55.17 μS/cm |
| Temperature | 20.59 ± 5.65°C | 24.50 ± 3.65°C | 24.64 ± 2.52°C |
| Turbidity | 0.85 ± 1.09 NTU | 1.24 ± 1.38 NTU | 0.89 ± 0.73 NTU |
| pH | 7.49 ± 0.86 | 7.41 ± 0.73 | 7.32 ± 0.77 |
CFU, colony forming unit; NTU, nephelometric turbidity unit. μS/cm, microsiemens per centimeter.
FIGURE 2Relative abundance of the most prevalent taxa in cast iron and cement annular reactor (AR) biofilm samples over the 16-month study period. At each time point, one coupon was collected from the set of cast iron ARs and the set of cement ARs. One coupon from each set was collected weekly for the first 34 weeks and then monthly for four additional months (cast iron ARs) and six additional months (cement ARs). A total of 38 coupons from the cast iron ARs and a total of 40 coupons from the cement ARs were collected. The relative abundance of the top AR taxa in bulk water and drinking water distribution system (DWDS) pipe biofilm collected during the main break in March 2018 can be found in the top right section.
FIGURE 3Relative abundance of differentially abundant taxa in cast iron and cement annular reactor (AR) biofilm samples over the 16-month study period as identified by Longitudinal Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes (ANCOM) analysis. At each time point, one coupon was collected from the set of cast iron ARs and the set of cement ARs. One coupon from each set was collected weekly for the first 34 weeks and the monthly for four additional months (cast iron ARs) and six additional months (cement ARs). A total of 38 coupons from the cast iron ARs and a total of 40 coupons from the cement ARs were collected.
FIGURE 4Observed ASVs, Faith PD, and Shannon H indices of biofilm samples from annular reactors (ARs) and physicochemical parameters [pH, temperature (Celsius), conductivity (pS/cm), and turbidity (NTU)] of water samples collected from ARs during coupon collection. For the first 34 weeks, one cast iron coupon and one cement coupon were collected. Then, one cast iron coupon was collected monthly for four more months and one cement coupon was collected monthly for six more months. Loess method used to fit the smooth curve. Gray bands represent the 95% confidence interval.
FIGURE 5Comparison of bacterial communities in annular reactors (cast iron and cement) and drinking water distribution systems (bulk water and pipe biofilm). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities according to their sample type (color) and months since start of study (size).
Identified opportunistic pathogens in annular reactor (AR; cast iron or cement substrata) biofilm, distribution system (DS) pipe biofilm, and bulk water (distribution system) samples.
| Genera | Sample Type | Identified Opportunistic Pathogens |
|
| Bulk water |
|
| AR [cast iron (1)] |
| |
|
| Bulk water |
|
|
| AR [cast iron (19), cement (5)]; DS pipe (1) |
|
|
| AR [cast iron (37), cement (34)]; DS pipe (2) |
|
| AR [cast iron (30), cement (29)]; bulk water; DS pipe (1) |
| |
| AR [cast iron (13), cement (7)] |
| |
| DS Pipe (3) |
| |
| AR [cast iron (13), cement (9)]; bulk water; DS pipe |
| |
| AR [cast iron (38), cement (39)]; bulk water; DS pipe (8) |
| |
| Bulk water; DS pipe (6) |
| |
| AR [cast iron (12), cement (5)] |
| |
| AR [cast iron (1), cement (4)] |
| |
| AR [cement (5)] |
| |
| AR [cast iron (6), cement (18)]; bulk water; DS pipe (9) |
| |
| AR [cast iron (13), cement (1)] |
| |
| Bulk water; DS pipe (2) |
| |
| AR [cast iron (2), cement (3)] |
| |
| AR [cast iron (13), cement (28)]; DS pipe (1) |
| |
| AR [cast iron (3)] |
| |
|
| AR [cast iron (1)] |
|
| AR [cast iron (3), cement (3)] |
|
Number of samples where the opportunistic pathogen was detected is provided in parentheses.