Literature DB >> 34992316

Objective Content Validation of the Hemodynamic and Technical Parameters of the OrpheusTM Cardiopulmonary Bypass Simulator.

Bruce E Searles1, Edward M Darling1, Jeffrey B Riley1, Jacob McNinch2, Erik Rufa3, Jason R Wiles4.   

Abstract

The utilization of simulators for training is increasing in the professions associated with cardiac surgery. Before applying these simulators to high-stakes assessment, the simulator's output data must be validated. The aim of this study is to validate a Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB) simulator by comparing the simulated hemodynamic and technical outputs to published clinical norms. Three Orpheus™ CPB simulators were studied and compared to a published reference of physiologic and technical metrics that are managed during clinical CPB procedures. The limits of the simulators user modifiable variables were interrogated across their full range and the results were plotted against the published clinical norms. The data generated with the simulator conforms to validated clinical parameters for patients between 50 and 110 kg. For the pre- and post-CPB periods, the independent variables of central venous pressure (CVP), heart rate (HR), contractility, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) must be operated between the limits of 7 and 12 mmHg, 65 and 110 beats/min, 28% and 65%, and 6 and 32 units respectively. During full CPB the arterial pump flows should be maintained between 3.5 and 5.5 LPM and SVR between 18 and 38 units. Validated technical parameters during cardioplegia delivery are expected at solution flow rates between 250 and 400 mL/min and 100 and 225 mL/min for antegrade and retrograde delivery routes, respectively. We have identified the limits for user-modifiable settings that produce data conforming to the physiologic and technical parameter limits reported in the peer reviewed literature. These results can inform the development of simulation scenarios used for high stakes assessments of personnel, equipment, and technical protocols. © Copyright 2021 AMSECT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiopulmonary bypass; education; simulation; validity.

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34992316      PMCID: PMC8717731          DOI: 10.1182/ject-53-263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  7 in total

1.  "Orpheus" cardiopulmonary bypass simulation system.

Authors:  Richard W Morris; David A Pybus
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2007-12

2.  Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures.

Authors:  P S Myles; J Cui
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 3.  Assessment of competence: developing trends and ethical considerations.

Authors:  Melissa Chin; Robert S Lagasse
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.706

4.  Flight or fright: training in a high-stakes zone.

Authors:  Benjamin Sieniewicz
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2016-10-03

5.  Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2003–2006.

Authors:  Margaret A McDowell; Cheryl D Fryar; Cynthia L Ogden; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2008-10-22

Review 6.  Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative.

Authors:  Amitai Ziv; Paul Root Wolpe; Stephen D Small; Shimon Glick
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Survey of the Routine Practice Limits for Physiologic and Technical Parameters Managed by Clinical Perfusionists during Adult Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Bruce Searles; Edward M Darling; Jeffrey B Riley; Jason R Wiles
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2020-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.