| Literature DB >> 34991491 |
Ling Dong1,2, Xingbo Bian1,2, Yan Zhao2, He Yang1,2, Yonghua Xu3,4, Yongzhong Han5, Lianxue Zhang6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ginseng red skin root syndrome (GRS) is one of the most common ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) diseases. It leads to a severe decline in P. ginseng quality and seriously affects the P. ginseng industry in China. However, as a root disease, the characteristics of the GRS rhizosphere microbiome are still unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Ginseng red skin root syndrome; Microbial interaction network; Soil ecological environment; rhizosphere
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34991491 PMCID: PMC8734182 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02430-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Diversity of the 16 S rRNA gene-based bacterial and ITS rRNA gene-based fungi communities. Values are the means ± standard errors (n = 6). Different letters in the same row mean significant difference at P <0.05 among the five treatments. HG (healthy ginseng), GRS1 (rust root area greater than 0, less than or equal to 25%), GRS2 (red skin root area greater than 25%, less than or equal to 50%), GRS3 (rust root area greater than 50%, less than or equal to 75%) and GRS4 (rust root area greater than 75%)
| OTUs | Observed species | Shannon | Simpson | Chao1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HG | 2209 ± 163 b | 1952 ± 125 b | 8.518 ± 0.078 bc | 0.993 ± 0.001 b | 2171.36 ± 140.73 bc |
| GRS1 | 2226 ± 183 b | 2013 ± 111 ab | 8.604 ± 0.116 bc | 0.993 ± 0.001 b | 2400.47 ± 365.58 ab |
| GRS2 | 2510 ± 198 a | 2225 ± 156 a | 8.849 ± 0.073 a | 0.994 ± 0.000 a | 2475.05 ± 166.26 a |
| GRS3 | 2124 ± 191 b | 1874 ± 168 b | 8.369 ± 0.219 c | 0.991 ± 0.002 b | 2096.48 ± 182.25 c |
| GRS4 | 2297 ± 250 ab | 2035 ± 219 ab | 8.606 ± 0.254 b | 0.992 ± 0.002 b | 2278.28 ± 245.57 abc |
| HG | 593 ± 103 a | 533 ± 85 ab | 4.822 ± 0.111 a | 0.913 ± 0.005 a | 576.98 ± 102.37 ab |
| GRS1 | 602 ± 132 a | 537 ± 114 ab | 4.866 ± 0.243 a | 0.927 ± 0.009 ab | 595.66 ± 134.21 ab |
| GRS2 | 615 ± 84 a | 568 ± 84 a | 4.74 ± 0.209 a | 0.914 ± 0.015 ab | 717.49 ± 244.41 a |
| GRS3 | 489 ± 93 a | 436 ± 75 b | 4.348 ± 0.0.5 b | 0.905 ± 0.008 b | 486.28 ± 86.68 b |
| GRS4 | 546 ± 140 a | 489 ± 120 ab | 4.497 ± 0.263 b | 0.897 ± 0.016 b | 549.05 ± 139.95 ab |
Fig. 1Non-Metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (NMDS) analysis plot. A bacteria; B fungi. HG (healthy ginseng), GRS1 (rust root area greater than 0, less than or equal to 25%), GRS2 (red skin root area greater than 25%, less than or equal to 50%), GRS3 (rust root area greater than 50%, less than or equal to 75%) and GRS4 (rust root area greater than 75%)
Fig. 2Unweighted Pair-group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) clustering analysis with Weighted Unifrac distance matrix and the relative abundance of each sample and group at the phylum level. A bacteria; B fungi
Fig. 3The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis. A LDA scores of bacteria differential taxa (LDA score>4); B diagram of bacterial differential taxa; C LDA scores of fungi differential taxa (LDA score>4); D diagram of fungi differential taxa
Fig. 4Overview of bacterial networks. Different nodes represent different genera; the size of nodes represents the average relative abundance of the genus; the nodes of the same gate have the same color; the color of the lines between nodes corresponds to the positive and negative correlation (red is positively correlated; blue is negatively correlated)
Fig. 5Overview of fungi networks. Different nodes represent different genera; the size of nodes represents the average relative abundance of the genus; the nodes of the same gate have the same color; the color of the lines between nodes corresponds to the positive and negative correlation (red is positively correlated; blue is negatively correlated)
Fig. 6Distance-based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) at the phylum level. (A) bacteria; (B) fungi. The length of arrows represents the degree of correlation between environmental factors and community distribution and species distribution