Literature DB >> 34989603

Draft Genome Sequence and De Novo Assembly of a Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Isolate Collected from the Andean Region in Colombia.

Pei-Ling Yu1, James C Fulton1, Sandra L Carmona2, Diana Burbano-David2, Luz Stella Barrero2, Jose C Huguet-Tapia1, Jeremy T Brawner1, Mauricio Soto-Suarez2.   

Abstract

We report a draft genome assembly of the causal agent of tomato vascular wilt, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici isolate 59, obtained from the Andean region in Colombia.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 34989603      PMCID: PMC8759360          DOI: 10.1128/mra.00980-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici is a soilborne fungus belonging to the F. oxysporum species complex (FOSC). F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici causes fusarium wilt in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), which often leads to significant yield losses (1, 2). F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici isolate 59 was isolated from root and stem tissue from a wilted tomato plant grown in the Andean region of Colombia (3). Isolate 59 was classified as F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici race 2, using PCR markers for phylogenetic analysis (3). For whole-genome sequencing, fungal hyphae from a 6-day-old culture (Czapek-Dox medium) were collected and lyophilized overnight. High-molecular-weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using a modified phenol-chloroform/isoamyl alcohol method (4). For Nanopore sequencing, a library was prepared using the ligation sequencing kit (SQK-LSK109) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) using 1 μg HMW DNA. The long-fragment buffer (LFB) supplied in the kit was used to enrich long DNA fragments of >3 kb. An R9.4.1 flow cell (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) was loaded and run for 24 h. Base calling was performed using Guppy version 4.0.21 within MinKNOW (Oxford Nanopore Technologies). Illumina sequencing was performed using a fungal sample collected as previously described. Total DNA was isolated using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (5). DNA (350 ng/μL) was used for library preparation with the Nextera DNA Flex library preparation kit in dual index format (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The library was sequenced in paired-end format on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencing system (Macrogen, South Korea). The quality of the Nanopore and Illumina reads was assessed via NanoPlot version 1.30.1 (6) and FastQC version 11.7 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/), respectively. A total of 1,742,231 raw reads were generated from the Nanopore sequencing. Approximately 16 million 151-bp paired-end reads were obtained from the Illumina sequencing. The resulting long reads were first processed using Porechop version 0.2.4 to divide chimeric sequences (https://github.com/rrwick/Porechop) (7); then, the reads were filtered by length and quality using Filtlong version 0.2.0 (https://github.com/rrwick/Filtlong). The N50 length of the Nanopore reads was 9.569 kbp. A total of 885,847 filtered reads were assembled using the de novo long-read assembler Shasta version 0.1.0 (8). The sequenced short reads were processed by first removing residual adapters and poor quality reads using Trim Galore version 0.6.5 (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/trim_galore/). Reads shorter than 100 bp were filtered using the FASTX-Toolkit version 0.0.14 (fastx_trimmer; http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit). The de novo assembly Nanopore and Illumina reads were polished using Racon version 1.4.13 (9) and Pilon (10), respectively. Whole-genome assembly was carried out using a hybrid de novo assembly approach, incorporating Nanopore long reads and Illumina short reads. A summary of assembly statistics was generated using BBMap version 38.90 (11), and the assembly completeness was evaluated using the Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) version 4.0.6 software (12) (Table 1). PYANI version 0.2.10 was used to calculate the average nucleotide identity (ANI) and relatedness measures of whole-genome comparisons among Fusarium species (13) (Fig. 1). The draft assembly (combining long reads and Illumina short reads) has a total size of 54.2 Mb and a coverage of approximately 75.5×. The completeness of the assembly was calculated using BUSCO with the Hypocreales_odb10 lineage gene data set; the analysis showed that 4,441 out of 4,494 BUSCO markers were found, and only a few duplicated or missing BUSCO orthologs were identified (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Comparison of assembly statistics of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici isolates

CharacteristicData for F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici strain:
5942874287
Accession no. (database)PRJNA756266 (BioProject)GCF_000149955.1 (GenBank assembly)GCA_003315725.1 (GenBank assembly)
Sequencing methodOxford Nanopore + IlluminaSangerPacBio + Illumina
Total length (Gbp)5.366.15.39
No. of contigs3611,362504
Coverage (×)75.56.576
Assembly size (Mb)54.259.953.9 
Longest contig (bp)6,457,1415,700,000
% GC47.6748.447.7
Contig N50 (bp)3,035,62095,4161,338,693
Contig L50718411
Complete BUSCOs (%)99.6097.7099.90
Total no. of BUSCOs4,4944,4942,294
No. of duplicate BUSCOs374034
No. of fragmented BUSCOs0241
No. of missing BUSCOs7787
ReferenceThis study 15 14
FIG 1

Heatmap table of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) values generated from a pairwise comparison of 15 Fusarium isolates. An ANI score greater than 95% between two genomes indicates that they are the same species. The genomes of the Fusarium isolates were downloaded from NCBI: F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4 (GenBank accession number GCA_000350365.1), F. circinatum strain FSP 34 (GCA_000497325.3), F. oxysporum f. sp. melonis 26406 (GCA_002318975.1), F. oxysporum Fo47 (GCA_013085055.1), F. circinatum isolate V (GCA_013168815.1), F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 1 isolate VCG01220 (GCA_016802225.1), F. proliferatum strain NRRL62905 (GCA_900029915.1), F. verticillioides 7600 (GCF_000149555.1), F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 4287 (GCA_003315725.1), F. graminearum PH-1 (GCF_000240135.3), F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 strain 54006 (GCF_000260195.1), F. oxysporum NRRL 32931 (GCF_000271745.1), F. proliferatum ET1 (GCF_900067095.1), F. fujikuroi IMI 58289 (GCF_900079805.1).

Heatmap table of the average nucleotide identity (ANI) values generated from a pairwise comparison of 15 Fusarium isolates. An ANI score greater than 95% between two genomes indicates that they are the same species. The genomes of the Fusarium isolates were downloaded from NCBI: F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 4 (GenBank accession number GCA_000350365.1), F. circinatum strain FSP 34 (GCA_000497325.3), F. oxysporum f. sp. melonis 26406 (GCA_002318975.1), F. oxysporum Fo47 (GCA_013085055.1), F. circinatum isolate V (GCA_013168815.1), F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 1 isolate VCG01220 (GCA_016802225.1), F. proliferatum strain NRRL62905 (GCA_900029915.1), F. verticillioides 7600 (GCF_000149555.1), F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici 4287 (GCA_003315725.1), F. graminearum PH-1 (GCF_000240135.3), F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4 strain 54006 (GCF_000260195.1), F. oxysporum NRRL 32931 (GCF_000271745.1), F. proliferatum ET1 (GCF_900067095.1), F. fujikuroi IMI 58289 (GCF_900079805.1). Comparison of assembly statistics of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici isolates The results of this study will contribute to building a more robust phylogenetic framework that will guide inquiries concerning the evolution of important traits in the FOSC group.

Data availability.

The described genome assembly is available in GenBank under BioProject accession number PRJNA756266. The Illumina and Oxford Nanopore reads are deposited at the Sequence Read Archive (SAR) under accession numbers SRX11976571 and SRX11976570, respectively. F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici strain 59 was registered in the National Collections Registry (RNC129) and was collected under AGROSAVIA permit framework number 1466 from 2014, updated by resolution 04039 on 19 July 2018.
  12 in total

1.  BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs.

Authors:  Felipe A Simão; Robert M Waterhouse; Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evgenia V Kriventseva; Evgeny M Zdobnov
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Nanopore sequencing and the Shasta toolkit enable efficient de novo assembly of eleven human genomes.

Authors:  Kishwar Shafin; Trevor Pesout; Ryan Lorig-Roach; Marina Haukness; Hugh E Olsen; Colleen Bosworth; Joel Armstrong; Kristof Tigyi; Nicholas Maurer; Sergey Koren; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Tobias Marschall; Simon Mayes; Vania Costa; Justin M Zook; Kelvin J Liu; Duncan Kilburn; Melanie Sorensen; Katy M Munson; Mitchell R Vollger; Jean Monlong; Erik Garrison; Evan E Eichler; Sofie Salama; David Haussler; Richard E Green; Mark Akeson; Adam Phillippy; Karen H Miga; Paolo Carnevali; Miten Jain; Benedict Paten
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Comparative genomics reveals the in planta-secreted Verticillium dahliae Av2 effector protein recognized in tomato plants that carry the V2 resistance locus.

Authors:  Edgar A Chavarro-Carrero; Jasper P Vermeulen; Michael F Seidl; Bart P H J Thomma; David E Torres; Toshiyuki Usami; Henk J Schouten; Yuling Bai
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement.

Authors:  Bruce J Walker; Thomas Abeel; Terrance Shea; Margaret Priest; Amr Abouelliel; Sharadha Sakthikumar; Christina A Cuomo; Qiandong Zeng; Jennifer Wortman; Sarah K Young; Ashlee M Earl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing.

Authors:  Ryan R Wick; Louise M Judd; Claire L Gorrie; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2017-09-14

6.  Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads.

Authors:  Robert Vaser; Ivan Sović; Niranjan Nagarajan; Mile Šikić
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Improved Assembly of Reference Genome Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici Strain Fol4287.

Authors:  Dilay Hazal Ayhan; Cristina López-Díaz; Antonio Di Pietro; Li-Jun Ma
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2018-09-13

Review 8.  Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici causal agent of vascular wilt disease of tomato: Biology to diversity- A review.

Authors:  C Srinivas; D Nirmala Devi; K Narasimha Murthy; Chakrabhavi Dhananjaya Mohan; T R Lakshmeesha; BhimPratap Singh; Naveen Kumar Kalagatur; S R Niranjana; Abeer Hashem; Abdulaziz A Alqarawi; Baby Tabassum; Elsayed Fathi Abd Allah; S Chandra Nayaka
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.219

9.  NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data.

Authors:  Wouter De Coster; Svenn D'Hert; Darrin T Schultz; Marc Cruts; Christine Van Broeckhoven
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Characterization of Pathogenic and Nonpathogenic Fusarium oxysporum Isolates Associated with Commercial Tomato Crops in the Andean Region of Colombia.

Authors:  Sandra L Carmona; Diana Burbano-David; Magda R Gómez; Walter Lopez; Nelson Ceballos; Jairo Castaño-Zapata; Jaime Simbaqueba; Mauricio Soto-Suárez
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.