| Literature DB >> 34987843 |
Honglei Zhang1, Chao Liu2, Li Li3, Xu Feng1, Qing Wang4, Jihua Li5, Shaobin Xu6, Shuting Wang7, Qianlu Yang8, Zhenghai Shen8, Jinhua Su9, Xiaosan Su1, Ruifen Sun1, Xuhong Zhou1, Junliang Wang1, Yongchun Zhou8, Baowei Jiao10, Wanbao Ding11, Xianbao Cao12, Yue Wang13, Yunchao Huang8, Lianhua Ye8.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34987843 PMCID: PMC8692936 DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwab152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Natl Sci Rev ISSN: 2053-714X Impact factor: 17.275
Figure 1.Molecular characterization of XWFA and rat model recapitulation of lung cancer initiation. (a) Comparison of distributions of samples from different pathology stages (I, II, III and IV) across the XWFA, TLSF and TLNF cohorts. Chi-square test was used to calculate P value. (b) Violin plot showing the tumor mutation burden (TMB) across the XWFA, TCGA-LUAD and TCGA-LUSC cohorts. The box indicates the interquartile range (IQR), the middle line indicates median, whiskers indicate the highest and lowest values within 1.5× IQR away from the box, and dots plot values >1.5× IQR away from the box. (c) Co-mutation plot of tumor samples from the XWFA cohort. Significantly mutated genes were identified with MutSig2CV algorithm (FDR corrected P < 0.25) and oncodriveCLUST (FDR corrected P < 0.1) and were ranked in order of decreasing prevalence. Clinical features such as pathology stages, ages, recurrence status and clonality were indicated. (d) Top three mutation signatures derived from single nucleotide variants were identified with Cosmic Mutational Signatures (version 2.0). (e) Focal-level CNV across chromosomes 1–22 in XWFA cohort, with GISTIC FDR q values on the y axis. Amplifications were labeled red (top) and deletions were labeled blue (bottom). Selected genes in the Cancer Gene Census (CGC) were labeled in the significant peak regions. (f) Association analysis of subgroups identified in the XWFA and EAS cohorts with Submap. Significant correspondence between subgroups highlighted in red with Bonferroni adjusted P values. *: FDR < 0.1; **: FDR < 0.01. (g) Phenotypes of RNA-based subgroups in XWFA. The annotation rows showing the genomic and clinicopathologic features for each patient. The heat map showing the normalized mean expression of subgroup differentially expressed genes. Representative GO biological processes were labeled right. (h, i) Comparison of PDCD1 (h) and CTLA4 (i) expression among PI, TRU and TRU-W clusters in XWFA cohort. (j) Schematic showing the overall experimental design for the rat_coal model (top). Red dot: rats treated with smoke from local smoky coal; blue dots: rats treated with fresh air. The arrow below the timeline indicates the most enriched disturbed biological processes during smoke treatment. (k) Heatmap showing the relative infiltration of immune cells derived from RNA-based ssGSEA scores in lung tissue across six time points. Two-sided Mann-Whitney U test was used for P value calculation in (b, h and i).