| Literature DB >> 34987377 |
Lingling Lv1, Hainan Zhang1, Xuling Tan2, Lixia Qin1, Xinke Peng1, Rongrong Bai1, Qile Xiao1, Changlian Tan3, Haiyan Liao3, Weiqian Yan1, Jieqiong Tan4,5,6, Beisha Tang4,7,8,9, Chunyu Wang1,2.
Abstract
Background: Recently, many studies have shown that low vitamin D (VD) levels may be related to an increased risk of Parkinson's disease (PD), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Objective: To explore the relationship between PD and VD levels, as well as to analyze the effects of VD on spontaneous brain activity and explore the possible mechanism of its involvement in PD risk.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; fraction amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation; resting-state functional MRI; risk; vitamin D
Year: 2021 PMID: 34987377 PMCID: PMC8721225 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.763947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
The demographic and clinical data of Parkinson’s disease patients and health controls (HC).
| Variable | PD ( | HC ( | |
| Gender: M/F | 180/150 | 127/82 | 0.155 |
| Age (years) | 59.09 ± 9.97 | 60.72 ± 13.00 | 0.102 |
| Onset age (years) | 55.86 ± 10.08 | NA | NA |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.83 ± 3.12 | 22.77 ± 3.00 | 0.843 |
| Educational level (years) | 8.08 ± 4.47 | NA | NA |
| Disease duration (months) | 24 (12, 48) | NA | NA |
| H&Y stage | 271/59 | NA | NA |
| UPDRS-III score | 19 (11, 28.25) | NA | NA |
| MMSE | 24.23 ± 3.84 | NA | NA |
| Sampling season (July–December; %) | 239 (72.4%) | 159 (76.1%) | 0.347 |
Serum 25(OH)D levels in different populations.
| 25(OH)D (ng/ml) | |
| PD | 23.60 ± 7.27 |
| HC | 25.60 ± 5.78 |
| H&Y stages: 1–2.5 | 24.16 ± 6.83 |
| H&Y stage: 3–5 | 21.03 ± 8.61 |
| PD: male | 24.60 ± 7.30 |
| PD: female | 22.40 ± 7.08 |
| HC: male | 25.73 ± 5.75 |
| HC: female | 25.41 ± 5.86 |
P-values are calculated using two-tailed Student’s t-test; *compared to HC (p < 0.05);
FIGURE 1Comparison of serum 25(OH)D levels in PD patients and healthy controls. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; P-values were calculated using Student‘s t-test.
Association between vitamin D (VD) and PD risk.
| OR | 95% CI | ||
| Vit D deficiency [25(OH)D < 20 ng/ml] | 2.319 | (1.501, 3.583) | 0.000 |
| Vit D insufficiency [25(OH)D < 30 ng/ml] | 0.964 | (0.624, 1.490) | 0.869 |
| 25(OH)D | 0.007 ( | ||
| Q1 (6.2–19.9 ng/ml) | 1.941 | (1.140, 3.305) | 0.015 |
| Q2 (19.9–24.8 ng/ml) | 0.800 | (0.490, 1.305) | 0.371 |
| Q3 (24.8–28.5 ng/ml) | 0.750 | (0.452, 1.243) | 0.264 |
| Q4 (>28.5 ng/ml) | Reference |
Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between serum VD levels and the risk of PD, adjusting for age at sampling, BMI, sex, and sampling season;
Demographic characteristics of the PD patients and health controls.
| HC ( | PD ( | ||||
| PD + VDD ( | PD + VDI ( | PD + NVD ( | |||
| Sex (male/female) | 12/9 | 10/9 | 6/7 | 12/2 | 0.146 |
| Age (year) | 56 (52, 61) | 54 (49, 63) | 61 (57, 66) | 56 (50, 66) | 0.367 |
| Education (year) | 10 (9, 12) | 6 (6, 9) | 6 (6, 9) | 9 (6, 9) | 0.030 |
| Disease duration (month) | NA | 24 (12, 60) | 12 (5, 36) | 24 (12, 48) | 0.445 |
| UPDRS-3 score | NA | 18 (11, 38) | 16 (11, 20) | 26 (14, 43) | 0.306 |
| H&Y score | NA | 1.5 (1, 2.5) | 2 (1.5, 2) | 2.25 (1.5, 3) | 0.405 |
| MMSE score | 29(29, 30) | 24 (18, 26) | 22 (19, 26) | 27 (25, 29) | 0.000 |
FIGURE 2Comparison amounts of the PD + VDD, PD + VDD, and PD + NVD patients and the health control group with Bonferroni correction; (A) comparison of education in PD patients and healthy controls; (B) comparison of MMSE scores in PD patients and healthy controls. #P = 0.029, *P < 0.001; PD + VDD, PD patients with VD deficiency; PD + VDI, D patients with VD insufficiency; PD + NVD, PD patients with normal VD levels; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.
FIGURE 3Fraction amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation differences between the sub-groups of PD patients and healthy controls (HC). (A) fALFF differences between PD + VDD and HC (corrected for multiple comparisons, at GRF, p < 0.01). (B) fALFF differences between PD + VDI and HC (corrected for multiple comparisons, at GRF, p < 0.01). (C) fALFF differences between PD + NVD and HC (corrected for multiple comparisons, at GRF, p < 0.01). (D) fALFF differences between PD + VDD and PD + NVD (corrected for multiple comparisons, at AlphaSim, p < 0.05). Red: increased fALFF. Blue: decreased fALFF.