Literature DB >> 34985418

Covalency between the uranyl ion and dithiophosphinate by sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy and density functional theory.

Yusheng Zhang1, Wuhua Duan1, Qiang Wang1, Lei Zheng2, Jianchen Wang1, Jing Chen1, Taoxiang Sun1.   

Abstract

The dithiophosphinic acids (HS2PR2) have been used for the selective separation of trivalent actinides (AnIII) from lanthanides (LnIII) over the past decades. The substituents on the dithiophosphinic acids dramatically impact the separation performance, but the mechanism is still open for debate. In this work, two dithiophosphinic acids with significantly different AnIII/LnIII separation performance, i.e. diphenyl dithiophosphinic acid (HS2PPh2) and bis(ortho-trifluoromethylphenyl) dithiophosphinic acid [HS2P(o-CF3C6H4)2], are employed to understand the substituent effect on the bonding covalency between the S2PR2- anions (R = Ph and o-CF3C6H4) and the uranyl ion by sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) in combination with density functional theory calculations. The two UO2(S2PR2)(EtOH) complexes display similar XAS spectra, in which the first pre-edge feature with an intensity of 0.16 is entirely attributed to the transitions from S 1s orbitals to the unoccupied molecular orbitals due to the mixing between U 5f and S 3p orbitals. The Mulliken population analysis indicates that the amount of \% S 3p character in these orbitals is essentially identical for the UO2(S2PPh2)2(EtOH) and UO2[S2P(o-CF3C6H4)2]2(EtOH) complexes, which is lower than that in the U 6d-based orbitals. The essentially identical covalency in U-S bonds for the two UO2(S2PR2)2(EtOH) complexes are contradictory to the significantly different AnIII/LnIII separation performance of the two dithiophosphinic acids, thus the covalency seems to be unable to account for substituent effects in the AnIII/LnIII separation by the dithiophosphinic acids. The results in this work provide valuable insight into the understanding of the mechanism in the AnIII/LnIII separation by the dithiophosphinic acids. open access.

Entities:  

Keywords:  X-ray absorption spectroscopy; covalency; density functional theory; dithiophosphinate; uranyl ion

Year:  2022        PMID: 34985418      PMCID: PMC8733989          DOI: 10.1107/S160057752101198X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat        ISSN: 0909-0495            Impact factor:   2.616


  43 in total

1.  Bonding Study on the Chemical Separation of Am(III) from Eu(III) by S-, N-, and O-Donor Ligands by Means of All-Electron ZORA-DFT Calculation.

Authors:  Masashi Kaneko; Sunao Miyashita; Satoru Nakashima
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 5.165

2.  Enhancing Actinide(III) over Lanthanide(III) Selectivity through Hard-by-Soft Donor Substitution: Exploitation and Implication of Near-Degeneracy-Driven Covalency.

Authors:  Biswajit Sadhu; Michael Dolg
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Bonding and charge transfer in nitrogen-donor uranyl complexes: insights from NEXAFS spectra.

Authors:  C D Pemmaraju; Roy Copping; Shuao Wang; Markus Janousch; Simon J Teat; Tolek Tyliszcak; Andrew Canning; David K Shuh; David Prendergast
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  EXAFS and time-resolved laser fluorescence spectroscopy (TRLFS) investigations of the structure of Cm(III)/Eu(III) complexed with di(chlorophenyl)dithiophosphinic acid and different synergistic agents.

Authors:  Michael Weigl; Melissa A Denecke; Petra J Panak; Andreas Geist; Klaus Gompper
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 4.390

5.  Energy-Degeneracy-Driven Covalency in Actinide Bonding.

Authors:  Jing Su; Enrique R Batista; Kevin S Boland; Sharon E Bone; Joseph A Bradley; Samantha K Cary; David L Clark; Steven D Conradson; Alex S Ditter; Nikolas Kaltsoyannis; Jason M Keith; Andrew Kerridge; Stosh A Kozimor; Matthias W Löble; Richard L Martin; Stefan G Minasian; Veronika Mocko; Henry S La Pierre; Gerald T Seidler; David K Shuh; Marianne P Wilkerson; Laura E Wolfsberg; Ping Yang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Comparing the 2,2'-Biphenylenedithiophosphinate Binding of Americium with Neodymium and Europium.

Authors:  Justin N Cross; Joseph A Macor; Jeffery A Bertke; Maryline G Ferrier; Gregory S Girolami; Stosh A Kozimor; Joel R Maassen; Brian L Scott; David K Shuh; Benjamin W Stein; S Chantal E Stieber
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Experimental and theoretical comparison of actinide and lanthanide bonding in M[N(EPR(2))(2)](3) complexes (M = U, Pu, La, Ce; E = S, Se, Te; R = Ph, iPr, H).

Authors:  Andrew J Gaunt; Sean D Reilly; Alejandro E Enriquez; Brian L Scott; James A Ibers; Perumal Sekar; Kieran I M Ingram; Nikolas Kaltsoyannis; Mary P Neu
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 5.165

8.  Description of the ground state wave functions of Ni dithiolenes using sulfur K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy.

Authors:  Robert K Szilagyi; Booyong S Lim; Thorsten Glaser; Richard H Holm; Britt Hedman; Keith O Hodgson; Edward I Solomon
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-07-30       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Covalency in the f element-chalcogen bond. computational studies of M[N(EPR2)2]3 (M = La, Ce, Pr, Pm, Eu, U, Np, Pu, Am, Cm; E = O, S, Se, Te; R = H, (i)Pr, Ph).

Authors:  Kieran I M Ingram; Matthew J Tassell; Andrew J Gaunt; Nikolas Kaltsoyannis
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 5.165

10.  Highly Selective Separation of Actinides from Lanthanides by Dithiophosphinic Acids: An in-Depth Investigation on Extraction, Complexation, and DFT Calculations.

Authors:  Zhipeng Wang; Ning Pu; Yin Tian; Chao Xu; Fang Wang; Ying Liu; Lirong Zhang; Jing Chen; Songdong Ding
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.165

View more
  1 in total

1.  Foreword to the special virtual issue on Actinide physics and chemistry with synchrotron radiation.

Authors:  Kristina O Kvashnina; Sergei M Butorin; Shuao Wang; Weiqun Shi
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.557

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.